Advertisement

The Impact of Clinic Policy Attendance and the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Medical Case Management Program on HIV Clinical Outcomes: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study

  • Julia D. LópezEmail author
  • Enbal Shacham
  • Tawnya Brown
Original Paper
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Clinic appointment attendance is a significant determinant of improved HIV health outcomes. A retrospective longitudinal analysis from 2009 to 2015 examined the relationship of clinic policy attendance with and without medical case management (MCM) on HIV clinical outcomes. Clinical parameters were abstracted across the study years and latent growth models measured HIV clinical outcomes as a function of time. A total of 2773 patients were included in this study. More than the majority of individuals had 75% clinic policy attendance during each of the study years and the median number of MCM contact visits with the case manager was 4.0 visits per year (p < 0.01). While the overall trend identified improved HIV clinical outcomes across the clinic population over the study period, it also revealed individuals receiving MCM and with 75% clinic policy attendance had significantly faster improvement in HIV clinical outcomes compared to the individuals who did not receive MCM nor had 75% clinic policy attendance. This study identified how MCM, in combination with clinic policy attendance efforts, are useful in quickly improving HIV viral load and CD4 T-cell count. These findings support the continued need for funding of the Ryan White Care Act as it assists with the support of MCM and appointment attendance through the guidance of wrap-around services.

Keywords

HIV/AIDS Medical case management Clinic policy attendance HIV management Retrospective longitudinal study Latent growth modeling 

Resumen

La asistencia a citas en la clínica es un determinante significativo de la mejora de los resultados de salud del VIH. Un análisis longitudinal retrospectivo de 2009 a 2015 examinó la relación de la asistencia a las políticas clínicas con y sin gestión de casos médicos (MCM) sobre los resultados clínicos del VIH. Los parámetros clínicos se abstrajeron a lo largo de los años de estudio y los modelos de crecimiento latentes midieron los resultados clínicos del VIH en función del tiempo. Un total de 2773 pacientes fueron incluidos en este estudio. Más de la mayoría de las personas tuvieron un 75% de asistencia a políticas clínicas durante cada uno de los años de estudio y la mediana del número de visitas de contacto de MCM con el administrador del caso fue de 4.0 visitas por año (p < 0.01). Si bien la tendencia general identificó mejores resultados clínicos del VIH en toda la población clínica durante el período de estudio, también reveló que las personas que recibieron MCM y con una asistencia a políticas clínicas del 75% tuvieron una mejora significativamente más rápida en los resultados clínicos del VIH en comparación con las personas que no recibieron MCM ni tuvieron 75% de asistencia a la política clínica. Este estudio identificó cómo MCM, en combinación con los esfuerzos de asistencia a políticas clínicas, son útiles para mejorar rápidamente la carga viral del VIH y el recuento de células T CD4. Estos hallazgos apoyan la necesidad continua de financiación de la Ryan White VIH/SIDA programa, ya que ayuda con el apoyo de MCM y la asistencia a citas a través de la guía de los administradores de casos de VIH.

Palabras clave

VIH/SIDA Administración de casos médicos Asistencia a políticas clínicas Estudio longitudinal retrospectivo Modelos de crecimiento latente 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Marks G, Gardner LI, Craw J, Crepaz N. Entry and retention in medical care among HIV-diagnosed persons: a meta-analysis. AIDS. 2010;24(17):2665–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schadé A, van Grootheest G, Smit JH. HIV-infected mental health patients: characteristics and comparison with HIV-infected patients from the general population and non-infected mental health patients. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13(1):1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pecoraro A, Royer-Malvestuto C, Rosenwasser B, Moore K, Howell A, Ma M, et al. Factors contributing to dropping out from and returning to HIV treatment in an inner city primary care HIV clinic in the United States. AIDS Care. 2013;25(11):1399–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davis EM, Galvan FH. Alcohol use among HIV-positive Latinas and African American women. Affilia. 2012;27(4):435–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cook JA, Grey DD, Burke-Miller JK, Cohen MH, Vlahov D, Kapadia F, et al. Illicit drug use, depression and their association with highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-positive women. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;89(1):74–81.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Peterson JL. The challenges of seeking and receiving support for women living with HIV. Health Commun. 2010;25(5):470–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peterson K, Menten J, Peterson I, Togun T, Okomo U, Oko F, et al. Use of self-reported adherence and keeping clinic appointments as predictors of viremia in routine HIV care in the Gambia. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2015;14(4):343–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dietz E, Clum GA, Chung SE, Leonard L, Murphy DA, Perez LV, et al. Adherence to scheduled appointments among HIV-infected female youth in five US cities. J Adolesc Health. 2010;46(3):278–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yehia BR, Stewart L, Momplaisir F, Mody A, Holtzman CW, Jacobs LM, et al. Barriers and facilitators to patient retention in HIV care. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:246.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kidder DP, Wolitski RJ, Campsmith ML, Nakamura GV. Health status, health care use, medication use, and medication adherence among homeless and housed people living with HIV/AIDS. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(12):2238–45.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Edwards LV. Perceived social support and HIV/AIDS medication adherence among African American women. Qual Health Res. 2006;16(5):679–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2015 HIV Surveill Rep. 2016;27. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hiv-surveillance.html.
  13. 13.
    Kaaya S, Eustache E, Lapidos-Salaiz I, Musisi S, Psaros C, Wissow L. Grand challenges: improving HIV treatment outcomes by integrating interventions for co-morbid mental illness. PLoS Med. 2013;10(5):e1001447.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meade CS, Sikkema KJ. HIV risk behavior among adults with severe mental illness: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2005;25(4):433–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bradford JB, Coleman S, Cunningham W. HIV system navigation: an emerging model to improve HIV care access. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2007;21(S1):S49–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cabral HJ, Tobias C, Rajabiun S, Sohler N, Cunningham C, Wong M, et al. Outreach program contacts: do they increase the likelihood of engagement and retention in HIV primary care for hard-to-reach patients? AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2007;21(S1):S59–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brennan-Ing M, Seidel L, Rodgers L, Ernst J, Wirth D, Tietz D, et al. The impact of comprehensive case management on HIV client outcomes. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(2):e0148865.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mugavero MJ, Davila JA, Nevin CR, Giordano TP. From access to engagement: measuring retention in outpatient HIV clinical care. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2010;24(10):607–13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mugavero MJ, Lin HY, Allison JJ, Willig JH, Chang PW, Marler M, et al. Failure to establish HIV care: characterizing the “no show” phenomenon. Clin infect Dis. 2007;45(1):127–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    DHSS. Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment Modernization Act: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2006. http://hab.hrsa.gov/abouthab/modernact2006.html.
  21. 21.
    Arredondo M, Garrido C, Parkin N, Zahonero N, Bertagnolio S, Soriano V, et al. Comparison of HIV-1 RNA measurements obtained by using plasma and dried blood spots in the automated abbott real-time viral load assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(3):569–72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Horstmann E, Brown J, Islam F, Buck J, Agins BD. Retaining HIV-infected patients in care: where are we? Where do we go from here? Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(5):752–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jones D, Cook R, Rodriguez A, Waldrop-Valverde D. Personal HIV knowledge, appointment adherence and HIV outcomes. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(1):242–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lopez JD, Shacham E, Brown T. The impact of the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Medical Case Management Program on HIV clinical outcomes: a longitudinal study. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(9):3091–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kimeu M, Burmen B, Audi B, Adega A, Owuor K, Arodi S, et al. The relationship between adherence to clinic appointments and year-one mortality for newly enrolled HIV infected patients at a regional referral hospital in Western Kenya, January 2011–December 2012. AIDS Care. 2016;28(4):409–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Park WB, Choe PG, Kim SH, Jo JH, Bang JH, Kim HB, et al. One-year adherence to clinic visits after highly active antiretroviral therapy: a predictor of clinical progress in HIV patients. J Intern Med. 2007;261(3):268–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Berg MB, Safren SA, Mimiaga MJ, Grasso C, Boswell S, Mayer KH. Nonadherence to medical appointments is associated with increased plasma HIV RNA and decreased CD4 cell counts in a community-based HIV primary care clinic. AIDS Care. 2005;17(7):902–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gardner EM, Burman WJ, Maravi ME, Davidson AJ. Selective drug taking during combination antiretroviral therapy in an unselected clinic population. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;40(3):294–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gardner EM, Burman WJ, Steiner JF, Anderson PL, Bangsberg DR. Antiretroviral medication adherence and the development of class-specific antiretroviral resistance. AIDS. 2009;23(9):1035–46.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gardner EM, Sharma S, Peng G, Hullsiek KH, Burman WJ, Macarthur RD, et al. Differential adherence to combination antiretroviral therapy is associated with virological failure with resistance. AIDS. 2008;22(1):75–82.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rebeiro PF, Gange SJ, Horberg MA, Abraham AG, Napravnik S, Samji H, et al. Geographic variations in retention in care among hiv-infected adults in the United States. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1):e0146119.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyWashington University School of MedicineSaint LouisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, College for Public Health and Social JusticeSaint Louis UniversitySaint LouisUSA
  3. 3.Infectious Diseases ClinicWashington University School of MedicineSaint LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations