Advertisement

PrEP Use and Sexually Transmitted Infections Are Not Associated Longitudinally in a Cohort Study of Young Men Who Have Sex with Men and Transgender Women in Chicago

  • Ethan MorganEmail author
  • Christina Dyar
  • Michael E. Newcomb
  • Richard T. D’Aquila
  • Brian Mustanski
Original Paper

Abstract

Our goal was to understand whether PrEP users are at increased risk for STIs, a key target in prevention efforts aimed at disrupting the spread of STIs and likely downstream HIV infection risk. Data were collected as part of RADAR, a cohort study of young men who have sex with men and transgender women (YMSM/TW) (aged 16–29) in Chicago. Longitudinal lagged regression models were utilized to assess the relationship between PrEP use and odds of rectal STI acquisition. Mediation models were also utilized to consider the potential pathway between PrEP use, condomless anal sex (CAS), and rectal STI. One hundred eighty-seven (16.2%) participants had a rectal STI at baseline. In both cross-sectional and longitudinal models, no significant association was observed between PrEP use and STI. In mediation models, PrEP use was significantly associated with increased CAS, however, CAS was not associated with STI status. We demonstrated that, overall, PrEP use was not associated with STIs among YMSM/TW but did observe that PrEP users were more likely to report increased participation in CAS at the subsequent study visit.

Keywords

HIV PrEP STI Longitudinal 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse at the National Institutes of Health (U01DA036939, PI: Mustanski; F32DA046313, PI: Morgan; R01MD013609, PI: Mustanski & Newcomb). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute on Drug Abuse or the National Institutes of Health. The sponsor had no involvement in the conduct of the research or the preparation of the article. The authors would like to thank the entire RADAR research team, particularly Dr. Thomas Remble and Antonia Clifford for overseeing the project and Daniel T. Ryan for data management. We also thank the RADAR participants for sharing their experiences with us.

References

  1. 1.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance, 2015. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2016.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Gonorrhea. 10/18/2016 2016. https://www.cdc.gov/std/stats15/gonorrhea.htm. Accessed 26 July, 2016.
  3. 3.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Chlamydia. 10/18/2016 2016. https://www.cdc.gov/std/stats15/chlamydia.htm. Accessed 26 July, 2016.
  4. 4.
    Schillinger J. The intersection of PrEP and sexually transmitted infections. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunisitic Infections (CROI); 2018; Boston, MA; 2018.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Eng J Med. 2010;363(27):2587–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kojima N, Davey DJ, Klausner JD. Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV infection and new sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men. AIDS. 2016;30(14):2251–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harawa NT, Holloway IW, Leibowitz A, et al. Serious concerns regarding a meta-analysis of preexposure prophylaxis use and STI acquisition. AIDS. 2017;31(5):739–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Montanto M, Dombrowksi JC, Barbee LA, Golden M, Khosropour C. Changes in sexual behavior and STI diagnoses among MSM using PrEP in Seattle, WA. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunisitic Infections (CROI); 2017; Seattle, WA; 2017.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Reported STDs in the United States 2014 national data for chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis. Atlanta: CDC; 2015.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paz-Bailey G, Mendoza M, Finlayson T, et al. Trends in condom use among men who have sex with men in the United States: the role of antiretroviral therapy and seroadaptive strategies. AIDS. 2016;30:1985–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Golub SA, Kowalczyk W, Weinberger CL, Parsons JT. Preexposure prophylaxis and predicted condom use among high-risk men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;54(5):548–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Newcomb ME, Moran K, Feinstein BA, Forscher E, Mustanski B. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use and condomless anal sex: evidence of risk compensation in a cohort of young men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018;77(4):358–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nguyen VK, Greenwald ZR, Trottier H, et al. Incidence of sexually transmitted infections before and after preexposure prophylaxis for HIV. AIDS. 2018;32(4):523–30.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Traeger M, Asselin J, Price B, et al. Changes, patterns and predictors of sexually transmitted infections in gay and bisexual men using PrEP—interim analysis from the PrEPX study. International AIDS Society (IAS); 2018; Amsterdam, Netherlands; 2018.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hendershot CS, Magnan RE, Bryan AD. Associations of marijuana use and sex-related marijuana expectancies with HIV/STD risk behavior in high-risk adolescents. Psychol Addict Behav. 2010;24(3):404–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kirkcaldy RD, Zaidi A, Hook EW 3rd, et al. Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial resistance among men who have sex with men and men who have sex exclusively with women: the Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project, 2005–2010. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(5 Pt 1):321–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brewer TH, Schillinger J, Lewis FM, et al. Infectious syphilis among adolescent and young adult men: implications for human immunodeficiency virus transmission and public health interventions. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38(5):367–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hyman MS, Bernstein KT, Raymond H, Kohn R, Klausner JD. Racial/ethnic and sexual behavior disparities in rates of sexually transmitted infections, San Francisco, 1999–2008. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mustanski B, Feinstein BA, Madkins K, Sullivan P, Swann G. Prevalence and risk factors for rectal and urethral sexually transmitted infections from self-collected samples among young men who have sex with men participating in the Keep It Up! 2.0 randomized controlled trial. Sex Transm Dis. 2017;44(8):483–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Millett GA, Flores SA, Peterson JL, Bakeman R. Explaining disparities in HIV infection among black and white men who have sex with men: a meta-analysis of HIV risk behaviors. AIDS. 2007;21(15):2083–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Newcomb ME, Mustanski B. Racial differences in same-race partnering and the effects of sexual partnership characteristics on HIV Risk in MSM: a prospective sexual diary study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;62(3):329–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. STDs and HIV: CDC Fact Sheet. 07/10/2017 2014. https://www.cdc.gov/std/hiv/stdfact-std-hiv.htm. Accessed 26 July, 2017.
  23. 23.
    Hall H, Song R, Rhodes P, et al. Estimation of HIV incidence in the United States. JAMA. 2008;300(5):520–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Boyadzhyan B, Yashina T, Yatabe JH, Patnaik M, Hill CS. Comparison of the APTIMA CT and GC assays with the APTIMA combo 2 assay, the Abbott LCx assay, and direct fluorescent-antibody and culture assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(7):3089–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Swann G, Newcomb M, Mustanski BS. Validation of the HIV risk assessment of sexual partnerships (H-RASP): comparison to a 2-month prospective diary study. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;47(1):121–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mustanski BS, Starks T, Newcomb M. Methods for the design and analysis of relationship and partner effects on sexual health. Arch Sex Behav. 2014;43(1):21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Adamson SJ, Kay-Lambkin FJ, Baker AL, et al. AnImproved brief measure of cannabis misuse: the cannabis use disorders identification test-revised (CUDIT-R). Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;110:137–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Babor T, Higgins-Biddle J, Saunders J, Monteiro M. AUDIT, the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification test: guidelines for use in primary health care. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO); 2001.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Traeger MW, Schroeder SE, Wright EJ, et al. Effects of pre-exposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection on sexual risk behavior in men who have sex with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67(5):676–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jenness SM, Weiss KM, Goodreau SM, et al. Incidence of gonorrhea and chlamydia following HIV preexposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men: a modeling study. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(5):712–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pathela P, Braunstein SL, Schillinger JA, Shepard C, Sweeney M, Blank S. Men who have sex with men have a 140-fold higher risk for newly diagnosed HIV and syphilis compared with heterosexual men in New York City. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;58(4):408–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern UniversityChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Medical Social SciencesNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Division of Infectious Diseases and HIV Translational Research Center, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of MedicineNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations