Advertisement

Correlates of Transactional Sex Among a Rural Population of People Who Inject Drugs

  • Sean T. AllenEmail author
  • Rebecca Hamilton White
  • Allison O’Rourke
  • N. Jia Ahmad
  • Tim Hazelett
  • Michael E. Kilkenny
  • Susan G. Sherman
Original Paper

Abstract

In the United States, high rates of HIV infection among persons who engage in transactional sex are partially driven by substance use. Little is known about transactional sex among rural populations of people who inject drugs (PWID). Using data from a 2018 survey of 420 rural PWID in West Virginia, we used logistic regression to identify correlates of recent transactional sex (past 6 months). Most study participants were male (61.2%), white (83.6%), and reported having injected heroin (81.0%) in the past 6 months. Nearly one-fifth (18.3%) reported engaging in recent transactional sex. Independent correlates of transactional sex were: being female [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.90; 95% CI 2.12–7.16]; being a sexual minority (aOR 3.07; 95% CI 1.60–5.87); being single (aOR 3.22; 95% CI 1.73–6.01); receptive syringe sharing (aOR 3.13; 95% CI 1.73–5.66); and number of injections per day (aOR 1.08; 95% CI 1.01–1.15). Rural PWID who engage in transactional sex are characterized by multiple vulnerabilities that increase their HIV risk.

Keywords

HIV Transactional sex Rural health People who inject drugs 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a Grant from the Bloomberg American Health Initiative at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health to Dr. Sean T. Allen. This research has been facilitated by the infrastructure and resources provided by the Johns Hopkins University Center for AIDS Research, an NIH funded program (P30AI094189), which is supported by the following NIH Co-Funding and Participating Institutes and Centers: NIAID, NCI, NICHD, NHLBI, NIDA, NIMH, NIA, FIC, NIGMS, NIDDK, and OAR. STA is also supported by the National Institutes of Health (K01DA046234). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, or in analysis and interpretation of the results, and this paper does not necessarily reflect views or opinions of the funders. We are grateful to the collaboration of the Cabell Huntington Health Department, without whom, this project would not have been possible. We are especially grateful to Thommy Hill, Tyler Deering, Kathleen Napier, Jeff Keatley, Michelle Perdue, Chad Helig, and Charles “CK” Babcock for all their support throughout the study implementation. We are also grateful for the hard work of the West Virginia COUNTS! research team: Megan Keith, Anne Maynard, Aspen McCorkle, Terrance Purnell, Ronaldo Ramirez, Kayla Rodriguez, Lauren Shappell, Kristin Schneider, Brad Silberzahn, Dominic Thomas, Kevin Williams, and Hayat Yusuf. We gratefully acknowledge the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources. We also wish to acknowledge Josh Sharfstein, Michelle Spencer, Dori Henry, and Akola Francis for their support throughout each phase of the study. Most importantly, we are grateful to our study participants.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

None of authors have any conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Baral S, Beyrer C, Muessig K, et al. Burden of HIV among female sex workers in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12(7):538–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Patterson TL, Semple SJ, Staines H, et al. Prevalence and correlates of HIV infection among female sex workers in 2 Mexico-US border cities. J Infect Dis. 2008;197(5):728–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Platt L, Rhodes T, Judd A, et al. Effects of sex work on the prevalence of syphilis among injection drug users in 3 Russian cities. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(3):478–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kerrigan D, Wirtz A, Semini I, et al. The global HIV epidemics among sex workers. Washington DC: The World Bank; 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ulibarri MD, Roesch S, Rangel MG, Staines H, Amaro H, Strathdee SA. “Amar te Duele” (“love hurts”): sexual relationship power, intimate partner violence, depression symptoms and HIV risk among female sex workers who use drugs and their non-commercial, steady partners in Mexico. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(1):9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    El-Bassel N, Witte SS, Wada T, Gilbert L, Wallace J. Correlates of partner violence among female street-based sex workers: substance abuse, history of childhood abuse, and HIV risks. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2001;15(1):41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wojcicki JM, Malala J. Condom use, power and HIV/AIDS risk: sex-workers bargain for survival in Hillbrow/Joubert Park/Berea, Johannesburg. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(1):99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McMillan K, Worth H, Rawstorne P. Usage of the terms prostitution, sex work, transactional sex, and survival sex: their utility in HIV prevention research. Arch Sex Beh. 2018;47(5):1517–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chatterji M, Murray N, London D, Anglewicz P. The factors influencing transactional sex among young men and women in 12 sub-Saharan African countries. Soc Biol. 2005;52(1–2):56–72.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maganja RK, Maman S, Groves A, Mbwambo JK. Skinning the goat and pulling the load: transactional sex among youth in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. AIDS Care. 2007;19(8):974–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Greene JM, Ennett ST, Ringwalt CL. Prevalence and correlates of survival sex among runaway and homeless youth. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1406–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reuben J, Serio-Chapman C, Welsh C, Matens R, Sherman SG. Correlates of current transactional sex among a sample of female exotic dancers in Baltimore, MD. J Urban Health. 2011;88(2):342–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paz-Bailey G, Noble M, Salo K, Tregear SJ. Prevalence of HIV among U.S. female sex workers: systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(10):2318–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimated HIV incidence and prevalence in the United States, 2010–2015. HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/reports/surveillance/cdc-hiv-surveillance-supplemental-report-vol-23-1.pdf. Accessed Mar 2018.
  15. 15.
    Morris MD, Lemus H, Wagner KD, et al. Factors associated with pathways toward concurrent sex work and injection drug use among female sex workers who inject drugs in northern Mexico. Addiction. 2013;108(1):161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shannon K, Kerr T, Bright V, Gibson K, Tyndall MW. Drug sharing with clients as a risk marker for increased violence and sexual and drug-related harms among survival sex workers. AIDS Care. 2008;20(2):228–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Strathdee SA, Philbin MM, Semple SJ, Pu M, Orozovich P, Martinez G, et al. Correlates of injection drug use among female sex workers in two Mexico-U.S. border cities. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;92(1–3):132–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tran TN, Detels R, Long HT, Lan HP. Drug use among female sex workers in Hanoi, Vietnam. Addiction. 2005;100(5):619–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    El-Bassel N, Wechsberg WM, Shaw SA. Dual HIV risk and vulnerabilities among women who use or inject drugs: no single prevention strategy is the answer. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2012;7(4):326–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roy E, Richer I, Morissette C, et al. Temporal changes in risk factors associated with HIV seroconversion among injection drug users in eastern central Canada. AIDS. 2011;25(15):1897–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    UNAIDS. UNAIDS guidance note on HIV and sex work. Geneva, Switzerland: UNAIDS. 2012. http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/sub_landing/files/JC2306_UNAIDS-guidance-note-HIV-sex-work_en.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2019.
  22. 22.
    Decker MR, Wirtz AL, Moguilnyi V, et al. Female sex workers in three cities in Russia: HIV prevalence, risk factors and experience with targeted HIV prevention. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(3):562–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Van Handel MM, Rose CE, Hallisey EJ, et al. County-level vulnerability assessment for rapid dissemination of HIV or HCV infections among persons who inject drugs, United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;73(3):323–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zibbell JE, Iqbal K, Patel RC, et al. Increases in hepatitis C virus infection related to injection drug use among persons aged ≤ 30 years - Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, 2006-2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(17):453–8.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hedegaard H, Minino AM, Warner M. Drug overdose deaths in the United States, 1999-2017. NCHS Data Brief. 2018;329:1–8.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Allen ST, O’Rourke A, White RH, Schneider KE, Kilkenny M, Sherman SG. Estimating the number of people who inject drugs in a rural county in Appalachia. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(3):445–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    US Census Bureau. 2010 Census Urban and Rural Classification and Urban Area Criteria. US Census Bureau. 2012.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    West Virginia Drug Overdose Deaths Historical Overview 2001-2015. Bureau for Public Health, West Virginia Department of Health & Human Resources; 2017. http://dhhr.wv.gov/oeps/disease/ob/documents/opioid/wv-drug-overdoses-2001_2015.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2019.
  29. 29.
    Kersey L. 26 overdoses over 5 hours in one town, but nobody got referred to treatment. Charleston Gazette-Mail. 2017 July 29, 2017.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nash B. Cabell OD totals down 40% through nine months. The Herald Dispatch. 2018 10/02/2018.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Footer KHA, Park JN, Allen ST, et al. Police-related correlates of client-perpetrated violence among female sex workers in Baltimore city, Maryland. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(2):289–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Health, Behavior and Society at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.DC Center for AIDS ResearchDepartment of Psychology at the George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.Cabell-Huntington Health DepartmentHuntingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations