The Relationship Between Economic Deprivation, Housing Instability and Transactional Sex Among Women in North Carolina (HPTN 064)
Transactional sex is associated with socioeconomic disadvantage and HIV risk but few studies in the United States (US) have examined both individual and area-level predictors of transactional sex or distinguished transactional sex from sex work. We combined data from HIV Prevention Trials Network 064 study and the US Census to estimate prevalence ratios (PR) for the relationship between census-level and individual measures of economic deprivation and housing instability on transactional sex in 417 women in North Carolina. Increased transactional sex was associated with food insecurity (PR 1.86; 95%; CI 1.57, 2.19), housing instability (PR 1.33; 95% CI 1.11, 1.59), substance abuse (PR 1.90; 95% CI 1.64, 2.19) and partner incarceration (PR 1.32; 95% CI 1.09, 1.61). Census-level indicators were not associated with transactional sex, adjusted for individual-level covariates. Interventions should support housing stability and financial opportunities among southern African American women to reduce HIV risk, particularly among women with incarcerated partners.
KeywordsTransactional sex Economic deprivation Housing instability Multilevel
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UM1AI068619. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Prejean J, Tang T, Irene Hall H. HIV diagnoses and prevalence in the southern region of the United States, 2007–2010. J Commun Health. 2013;38:414–26.Google Scholar
- 2.CDC. HIV among women. Center for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA, USA. 2016. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/gender/women/index.html. Accessed Feb 2019.
- 12.Wamoyi J, Stoebenau K,Kyegombe N, Heise L, Ranganathan M. STRIVE technical brief: transactional sex and HIV risk. National Institute of Medical Research, Mwanza, Tanzania; International Center for Research on Women, Washington D.C., USA; London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 2018.Google Scholar
- 16.Jewkes R, Dunkle K, Nduna M, Shai NJ. Transactional sex and HIV incidence in a cohort of young women in the stepping stones trial. J AIDS Clin Res. 2012;3:7.Google Scholar
- 19.Browning CR, Olinger-Wilbon M. Neighborhood structure, social organization, and number of short-term sexual partnerships. J Marriage Fam. 2003;65:730–45.Google Scholar
- 20.Castel R. The roads to disaffiliation: insecure work and vulnerable relationships. Int J Urban Reg Res. 2000;24:519–35.Google Scholar
- 21.Reilly T, Woo G. Access to services and maintenance of safer sex practices among people living with HIV/AIDS. Soc Work Health Care. 2002;36:81–95.Google Scholar
- 25.Saegert S, Evans GW. Poverty, housing niches, and health in the United States. J Soc Issues. 2003;59:569–89.Google Scholar
- 26.Surratt HL, Inciardi JA, Kurtz SP, Kiley MC. Sex work and drug use in a subculture of violence. Crime Delinq. 2004;50:43–59.Google Scholar
- 27.North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. 2013 North Carolina STD/HIV Epidemiological Profile. 2013.Google Scholar
- 30.SAS. Principal component analysis, Chap. 1. SAS Corporation, Cary, NC. 1989. Retrieved from: https://support.sas.com/publishing/pubcat/chaps/55129.pdf.
- 32.Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385–401.Google Scholar
- 33.Prins A, Ouimette P, Kimerling R, Camerond RP, Hugelshofer DS, Shaw-Hegwer J, et al. The primary care PTSD screen (PC–PTSD): development and operating characteristics. Prim Care Psychiatry. 2004;9:9–14.Google Scholar
- 34.CDC. Social vulnerability index (SVI). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA. 2015. Retrieved from: https://svi.cdc.gov/factsheet.html.
- 35.Ene M, Leighton EA, Blue GL, Bell BA. Multilevel models for categorical data using SAS ® PROC GLIMMIX. SAS Corporation, Cary, NC. 2015. Retrieved from: https://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings15/3430-2015.pdf.
- 36.Orelien J. Model fitting in PROC GENMOD. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual SAS Users Group International Conference. 2001.Google Scholar
- 41.Mulia N. Questioning sex: drug-using women and heterosexual relations. J Drug Issues. 2000;30:741–65.Google Scholar
- 43.United States Census Bureau. Income, poverty and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2010. Suitland: United States Census Bureau; 2011.Google Scholar
- 47.Tester G. An intersectional analysis of sexual harassment in housing. Gend Soc. 2008;22:349–66.Google Scholar
- 49.Gray P, Fraser P. Housing and heroin use: the role of floating support. Drugs Educ Prev Policy. 2005;12:269–78.Google Scholar
- 50.Howden-Chapmam P. Housing standards: a glossary of housing and health. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2004;58:162–8.Google Scholar
- 52.Dauria EF, Oakley L, Arriola KJ, Elifson K, Wingood G, Cooper HLF. Collateral consequences: implications of male incarceration rates, imbalanced sex ratios and partner availability for heterosexual Black women. Cult Heal Sex. 2015;17:1190–206.Google Scholar
- 59.Kim A, Page-Shafer K, Ruiz J, Reyes L, Delgado V, Klausner J, et al. Vulnerability to HIV among women formerly incarcerated and women with incarcerated sexual partners. AIDS Behav. 2002;6:331–8.Google Scholar