Advertisement

AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 23, Issue 11, pp 3175–3183 | Cite as

Using Social Media to Enhance Provider Network for HIV and Harm Reduction Service Integration in Vietnam

  • Li LiEmail author
  • Chunqing Lin
  • Nan Feng
  • Tuan Anh Le
  • Julie Hsieh
  • Diep Bich Nguyen
  • Tuan Anh Nguyen
Article

Abstract

Social media can potentially serve as a platform to coordinate medical care among fragmented health sectors. This paper describes procedures of using social media to enhance antiretroviral therapy (ART) and methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) providers’ virtual network for integrated service for HIV-positive people who inject drugs (PWID) in Vietnam. A total of 88 ART and MMT treatment providers participated in person group sessions followed by online virtual support to improve service integration. In-person reunions were held to reinforce Facebook participation and network activities. Content analysis was used to identify keywords and topic categories of the online information exchange. Both MMT and ART providers were actively engaged in online communications. Referral and treatment adherence were the two most frequently discussed topic areas by both the MMT and ART providers. Frequent cross-agency connections were observed. Online provider networks and communities could be built and useful to support treatment providers to improve service integration.

Keywords

Social media Treatment providers Service integration Network Vietnam 

Resumen

Los medios sociales pueden potencialmente servir una plataforma para coordinar atencion medica entre los sectores de salud fragmentados. Este documento describe los procedimentos de uso de las redes sociales para mejorar proveedores red virtual de proveedores de terapia antiretoriviral (TARV) y la tratamiento de mantenimiento con metadona (TMM) para el servicio integrado para personas VIH positivas que se inyectan drogas en Vietnam. Un total de 88 proveedores de tratamiento de TARV y TMM participación en sesiones grupales en persona siguiendo un ayuda virtual web para mejorar integracions de servicio. Se llevaron reuniones en persona para reforzar la participación en Facebook y en las actividades de la red. El método de análisis se utiliza para identificar palabras y categorías de intercambio de información en línea. Los proveedores de TMM y TARV participaron activamente en las comunicaciones en línea. La referencia y la adherencia al tratamiento fueron las dos áreas temáticas más discutidas por los proveedores de TMM y TARV. Observaron conexiones frecuentes entre agencias. Las redes y comunidades de proveedores en línea podrían ser construidas y útiles para apoyar a los proveedores de tratamiento para mejorar la integración del servicio.

Palabra claves

Medios sociales Proveedores de tratamiento Integración del servicio La red Vietnam 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Research reported in this manuscript was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health under award number [R01DA041008] and the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health under award number [P30MH058107]. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the views of the NIH. The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the project team members in Vietnam for their contributions to this study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All authors included on this manuscript declare that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Bernard S, Tailor A, Jones P, Alexander DE. Addressing the medical and support service needs of people living with HIV (PLWH) through program collaboration and service integration (PCSI). Calif J Health Promot. 2016;14(1):1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention. Program collaboration and service integration: enhancing the prevention and control of HIV/AIDS, viral hepatitis, sexually transmitted diseases, and tuberculosis in the United States 2009. https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/programintegration/docs/207181-c_nchhstp_pcsi-whitepaper-508c.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2018.
  3. 3.
    Fenton KA, Aquino GA, Dean HD. Program collaboration and service integration in the prevention and control of HIV infection, viral hepatitis, STDs, and tuberculosis in the U.S.: lessons learned from the field. Public Health Rep. 2014;129(Suppl 1):1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549141291s101.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Azar P, Wood E, Nguyen P, et al. Drug use patterns associated with risk of non-adherence to antiretroviral therapy among HIV-positive illicit drug users in a Canadian setting: a longitudinal analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:193.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0913-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kamarulzaman A, Altice FL. Challenges in managing HIV in people who use drugs. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2015;28(1):10–6.  https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000000125.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lesko CR, Edwards JK, Moore RD, Lau B. A longitudinal, HIV care continuum: 10-year restricted mean time in each care continuum stage after enrollment in care, by history of IDU. AIDS. 2016;30(14):2227–34.  https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000001183.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vermund SH, Mallalieu EC, Van Lith LM, Struthers HE. Health communication and the HIV continuum of care. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;74(Suppl 1):S1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000001211.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mugavero MJ, Norton WE, Saag MS. Health care system and policy factors influencing engagement in HIV medical care: piecing together the fragments of a fractured health care delivery system. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(Suppl 2):S238–46.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciq048.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lin C, Cao X, Li L. Integrating antiretroviral therapy in methadone maintenance therapy clinics: service provider perceptions. Int J Drug Policy. 2014;25(6):1066–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.04.021.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lin C, Li L, Cao X. Client acceptability for integrating antiretroviral therapy in methadone maintenance therapy clinics in Sichuan. China Subst Use Misuse. 2017;52(1):119–26.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2016.1222622.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kiriazova T, Lunze K, Raj A, Bushara N, et al. “It is easier for me to shoot up”: stigma, abandonment, and why HIV-positive drug users in Russia fail to link to HIV care. AIDS Care. 2017;29(5):559–63.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2016.1259451.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tomori C, Risher K, Limaye RJ, et al. A role for health communication in the continuum of HIV care, treatment, and prevention. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;66(Suppl 3):S306–10.  https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000239.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bich DN, Korthuis PT, Thu TN, Van Dinh H, Le Minh G. HIV patients’ preference for integrated models of addiction and HIV treatment in Vietnam. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016;1(69):57–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2016.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haskell R, Graham K, Bernards S, Flynn A, Wells S. Service user and family member perspectives on services for mental health, substance use/addiction, and violence: a qualitative study of their goals, experiences and recommendations. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2016;10:9.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-016-0040-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Poremski D, Harris DW, Kahan D, et al. Improving continuity of care for frequent users of emergency departments: service user and provider perspectives. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016;40:55–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2016.01.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Binder A, Braun GE. Reimbursing health-care service provider networks. Gesundheitswesen. 2015;77(3):206–12.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1395565.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Internet world stats. Internet growth statistics 2018. https://www.internetworldstats.com/emarketing.htm. Accessed 5 Dec 2018.
  18. 18.
    Panahi S, Watson J, Partridge H. Social media and physicians: exploring the benefits and challenges. Health Inform J. 2016;22(2):99–112.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458214540907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Seidel RL, Jalilvand A, Kunjummen J, Gilliland L, Duszak R Jr. Radiologists and social media: do not forget about Facebook. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(1):224–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.09.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guillory J, Wiant KF, Farrelly M, et al. Recruiting hard-to-reach populations for survey research: using Facebook and Instagram advertisements and in-person intercept in LGBT bars and nightclubs to recruit LGBT young adults. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(6):e197.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9461.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Whitaker C, Stevelink S, Fear N. The use of Facebook in recruiting participants for health research purposes: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(8):e290.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7071.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ventola CL. Social media and health care professionals: benefits, risks, and best practices. Pharm Ther. 2014;39(7):491–520.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lambert JD, Greaves CJ, Farrand P, Price L, Haase AM, Taylor AH. Web-based intervention using behavioral activation and physical activity for adults with depression (the eMotion study): pilot randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(7):e10112.  https://doi.org/10.2196/10112.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tanner AE, Mann L, Song E, et al. weCARE: a social media-based intervention designed to increase HIV care linkage, retention, and health outcomes for racially and ethnically diverse young MSM. AIDS Educ Prev. 2016;28(3):216–30.  https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.2016.28.3.216.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gonzalez RS, Amer SM, Yahia NB, et al. Facebook discussion groups provide a robust worldwide platform for free pathology education. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017;141(5):690–5.  https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2016-0369-OA.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jackson HT, Young MT, Rodriguez HA, Wright AS. SAGES foregut surgery masters program: a surgeon’s social media resource for collaboration, education, and professional development. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(6):2800–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pander T, Pinilla S, Dimitriadis K, Fischer MR. The use of Facebook in medical education–a literature review. GMSZ Med Ausbild. 2014;31(3):33.  https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chan WSY, Leung AYM. Use of social network sites for communication among health professionals: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(3):e117.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8382.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lofters AK, Slater MB, Angl EN, Leung FH. Facebook as a tool for communication, collaboration, and informal knowledge exchange among members of a multisite family health team. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016;9:29–34.  https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S94676.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). UNAIDS data 2017. http://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2017/2017_data_book. Accessed 5 Dec 2018.
  31. 31.
    Hoang TV, Ha TTT, Hoang TM, et al. Impact of a methadone maintenance therapy pilot in Vietnam and its role in a scaled-up response. Harm Reduct J. 2015;12:39.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-015-0075-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    UNAIDS. Optimizing Viet Nam’s HIV response: an investment case. 2014. https://www.aidsdatahub.org/sites/default/files/publication/Vietnam_investment_case_2014.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2018.
  33. 33.
    Pham LTT, Kitamura A, Do HM, et al. Retrospective analysis of antiretroviral therapy uptake and retention of male clients receiving methadone maintenance therapy in two provinces in Vietnam: potential synergy of the two therapies. Harm Reduct J. 2017;14(1):2.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-017-0133-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tran BX, Ohinmaa A, Duong AT, et al. Cost-effectiveness of integrating methadone maintenance and antiretroviral treatment for HIV-positive drug users in Vietnam’s injection-driven HIV epidemics. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;125(3):206–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.02.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tran BX, Nguyen LH, Phan HT, Nguyen LK, Latkin CA. Preference of methadone maintenance patients for the integrative and decentralized service delivery models in Vietnam. Harm Reduct J. 2015;12:29.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-015-0063-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Statista. Most popular social networks worldwide as of October 2018, ranked by number of active users (in millions). 2018. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/. Accessed 5 Dec 2018.
  37. 37.
    Statista. Leading countries based on number of Facebook users as of October 2018 (in millions). 2018. https://www.statista.com/statistics/268136/top-15-countries-based-on-number-of-facebook-users/. Accessed 5 Dec 2018.
  38. 38.
    Statista. Daily reach of leading social networks and mobile messenger apps in Vietnam as of July 2015. https://www.statista.com/statistics/496997/daily-active-users-of-leading-social-networks-vietnam/ Accessed 29 Apr 2019.
  39. 39.
    Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wesolowski A, Eagle N, Noor AM, Snow RW, Buckee CO. Heterogeneous mobile phone ownership and usage patterns in Kenya. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(4):e35319.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035319.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kim C, Kang BS, Choi HJ, et al. Nationwide online social networking for cardiovascular care in Korea using Facebook. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21(1):17–22.  https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001465.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dixon BE, Embi PJ, Haggstrom DA. Information technologies that facilitate care coordination: provider and patient perspectives. Transl Behav Med. 2018;8(3):522–5.  https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibx086.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Giudice EL, Lewin LO, Welsh C, et al. Online versus in-person screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment training in pediatrics residents. J Grad Med Educ. 2015;7(1):53–8.  https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-14-00367.1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wu XV, Chan YS, Tan KHS, Wang W. A systematic review of online learning programs for nurse preceptors. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;60:11–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.09.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Li L, Guan J, Liang LJ, Lin C, Wu Z. Popular opinion leader intervention for HIV stigma reduction in health care settings. AIDS Educ Prev. 2013;25(4):327–35.  https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.2013.25.4.327.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Arigo D, Pagoto S, Carter-Harris L, Lillie SE, Nebeker C. Using social media for health research: methodological and ethical considerations for recruitment and intervention delivery. Digit Health. 2018;4:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207618771757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Messina BAM. One billion people in the elevator: the ethical challenges of social media and health care. J Healthc Commun. 2017;2(3):29.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2472-1654.100069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Cybersecurity Awareness Training 2018. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/fy18-cybersecurityawarenesstraining.pdf Accessed 5 Dec 2018.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior – Center for Community HealthUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.National Institute of Hygiene and EpidemiologyHanoiVietnam

Personalised recommendations