Advertisement

HIV Point of Care Testing (PoCT) at Late-Night Sex on Premises Venues (SOPV) for Gay and Bisexual Men and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men (GBMSM): A Mixed Methods Analysis

  • Amy B. MullensEmail author
  • Kirstie Daken
  • Jime Lemoire
  • Charlotte Brownlow
  • Glen Driver
  • Jeff Gow
Original Paper
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this study was to establish ‘proof of concept’ for a novel approach to HIV and STI testing at a sex on premises venue (SOPV) for gay and bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) during late night group sex theme parties. A mixed-methods approach was used, and the study aimed to: (1) Build upon existing SOPV funded service delivery and establish ‘proof of concept’ for this unique setting within an SOPV; (2) evaluate the uptake and feasibility/acceptability of routine HIV/STI testing for GBMSM during theme parties in SOPV; and (3) identify beliefs/perceptions regarding this health promotion activity and venue suitability. The characteristics of patrons utilising PoCT (Point of Care Testing) were established to help further reach potentially stigmatised, highly sexually adventurous GBMSM. The findings support further PoCT endeavours within MSM communities to target harder to reach communities to reduce the rate of new transmissions of HIV. Findings can inform future health promotion, screening and interventions, as well as to identify a successful method to engage harder to reach GBMSM that need further focused targeting for HIV and STI testing to reduce transmission.

Keywords

Sex-on-premises venues SOPV GBMSM Gay Bisexual PoCT Testing HIV STI 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the QPP RAPID peer-testers, patrons, sauna owners and management and venue staff. They would also like to thank the HIV Foundation Queensland who supported this research and made it possible via a Grant (Reference 2017—6). The authors also thank Associate Professor Sonja March, Dr Belinda Goodwin and Dr Rachel King for guidance with data analysis, and Rowena McGregor for assistance with the literature review.

Funding

This study was funded by HIV Foundation Queensland.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of University of Southern Queensland (Approval H16REA175) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Adam PC, de Wit JB, Bourne CP, Knox D, Purchas J. Promoting regular testing: an examination of HIV and STI testing routines and associated socio-demographic, behavioural and social-cognitive factors among men who have sex with men in New South Wales, Australia. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(5):921–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McGarrity LA, Huebner DM. Is being out about sexual orientation uniformly healthy? The moderating role of socioeconomic status in a prospective study of gay and bisexual men. Ann Behav Med. 2014;47:28–38.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9575-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rosenberg ES, Grey JA, Sanchez TH, Sullivan PS. Rates of prevalent HIV infection, prevalent diagnoses, and New diagnoses among men who have sex with men in US States, metropolitan statistical areas, and countries, 2012–2013. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2016.  https://doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.5684.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kirby T, Thornber-Dunwell M. High-risk drug practices tighten grip on London gay scene. Lancet. 2013;381(9861):101–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fazeli PL, Turan JM, Budhwani H, Smith W, Raper JL, Mugavero MJ, Turan B. Moment-to-moment within-person associations between acts of discrimination and internalized stigma in people living with HIV: an experience sampling study. Stigma Health. 2017;2(3):216–28.  https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mullens AB, Staunton S, Debattista J, Hamernik E, Gill D. Sex on premises venue (SOPV) health promotion project in response to sustained increases in HIV notifications. Sex Health. 2009;6:41–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bennett C, Knight V, Knox D, Gray J, Hartmann G, McNulty A. An alternative model of sexually transmissible infection testing in men attending a sex-on-premises venue in Sydney: a cross-sectional descriptive study. Sex Health. 2016;13(4):353–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    World Health Organisation. Guidance on provider-initiated HIV testing and counselling in health facilities. 2007. http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/guidelines/9789241595568_en.pdf.
  9. 9.
    Hall I, Holtgrave D, Maulsby C. HIV transmission rates from persons living with HIV who are aware and unaware of their infection. AIDS. 2012;26:893–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fischgrund BN, Halkitis PN, Carroll RA. Conceptions of hypermasculinity and mental health states in gay and bisexual men. Psychol Men Masc. 2012;13(2):123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goedel WC, Safren SA, Mayer KH, Duncan DT. Community-level norms and condomless anal intercourse among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men who use geosocial-networking smartphone applications in the Deep South. J HIV/AIDS Soc Serv. 2017;16:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15381501.2017.1344599.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grov C, Rendina HJ, Parsons JT. Comparing three cohorts of MSM sampled via sex parties, bars/clubs, and Craigslist.org: implications for researchers and providers. AIDS Edus Preview. 2015;26(4):362–82.  https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.2014.26.4.362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Golub SA, Starks TJ, Payton G, Parsons JT. The critical role of intimacy in the sexual risk behaviors of Gay and Bisexual Men. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(3):626–32.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-011-9972-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li D, Li C, Wang Z, Lau JTF. Prevalence and associated factors of unprotected anal intercourse with regular male sex partners among hiv negative men who have Sex with Men in China: a cross-sectional survey. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0119977.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bourne A, Reid D, Hickson F, Torres-Rueda S, Steinberg P, Weatherburn P. “Chemsex” and harm reduction need among gay men in South London. Int J Drug Policy. 2015;26(12):1171–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.07.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mullens, A.B., Ray, M. & Fein, E. ‘Queensland Chemsex Study’: results from a cross sectional survey of gay and other homosexually active men in Queensland–substance use and sexual activity—Industry Report. Retrieved from University of Southern Queensland database, 2017.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Australian Federation of AIDS Organisations. HIV in Australia: 2017. https://www.afao.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/HIV-in-Australia-2017.pdf.
  18. 18.
    Stevens W, Gous N, Ford N, Scott LE. Feasibility of HIV point-of-care tests for resource-limited settings: challenges and solutions. BMC Med. 2014;12:173.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0173-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smith DE, Woolley IJ, Russell DB, Bisshop F, Furner V. HIV in practice: current approaches and challenges in the diagnosis, treatment and management of HIV infection in Australia. HIV Med. 2018;19:5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Newcomb ME, Moran K, Feinstein BA, Forscher E, Mustanski B. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use and condomless anal sex: evidence of risk compensation in a cohort of young men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018;77(4):358–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Traeger MW, Schroeder SE, Wright EJ, Hellard ME, Cornelisse VJ, Doyle JS, Stoové MA. Effects of Pre-exposure prophylaxis for the prevention of human immunodeficiency virus infection on sexual risk behavior in men who have sex with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67:676–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lampejo T, Turner R, Roberts C, Allen K, Watson L, Caverley-Frost L, Scott P, Ostridge E, Cooney G, Hardy J, Nulty K. Novel outreach settings to enhance sexually transmitted infection/HIV awareness, diagnosis and treatment in hard-to-reach populations. Int J STD AIDS. 2018;29(3):266–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cunningham P. Point of care (PoCT) testing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in Australia: in context. Pathology. 2013;45:49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Castel AD, Magnus M, Peterson J, Anand K, Wu C, Matrin M, Sansone M, Rocha N, Jolaosho T, West T, Hader S, Greenberg AE. Implementing a novel citywide rapid HIV testing campaign in Washington, DC: findings and lessons learned. Public Health Rep. 2012;127(4):422–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Debattista J. Health promotion within a sex on premises venue: notes from the field. Int J STD AIDS. 2015;26(14):1017–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mullens AB, Duyker J, Brownlow C, Lemoire J, Daken K, Gow, J. Point-of-care testing (POCT) for HIV/STI among MSM in regional Australia at community ‘beat’ locations. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Horwood J, Ingle SM, Burton D, Woodman-Bailey A, Horner P, Jeal N. Sexual health risks, service use, and views of rapid point-of-care testing among men who have sex with men attending saunas: a cross-sectional survey. Int J STD AIDS. 2016;27(4):273–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mullens AB, Strodl E, Fein E, Stewart L, Daken K. Depression mediates HIV stigma and medication adherence in men who have sex with men (living with HIV). Presentation at the 14th International Congress of Behavioral Medicine: Behavioral Medicine: Making an Impact in the Modern World (ICBM 2016), Melbourne, Australia, 2016.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ooi C, Lewis D. P4. 22 Crossing the bridge: exploring sexual risk profiles of men who have sex with men attending a sex on premises venue and a public sexual health clinic for sti screening in Sydney, Australia. 2017.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mutch AJ, Lui CW, Dean J, Mao L, Lemoire J, Debattista J, Howard C, Whittaker A, Fitzgerald L. Increasing HIV testing among hard-to-reach groups: examination of RAPID, a community-based testing service in Queensland, Australia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Causer LM, Guy RJ, Tabrizi SN, Whiley DM, Speers DJ, Ward J, Tangey A, Badman SG, Gengel B, Natoli LJ, Anderson DA, Wand H, Wilson D, Regan DG, Shephard M, Donovan B, Fairley CK, Anderson DA. Molecular test for chlamydia and gonorrhoea used at point of care in remote primary healthcare settings: a diagnostic test evaluation. Sex Transm Infect. 2018;94:340–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brown S, Debattista J, Durkin I, Hooper J. Mailed specimen collection for HIV testing in regional Queensland, Australia: a second attempt. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2016;40(4):397–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Grov C, Rendina HJ, Breslow AS, Ventuneac A, Adelson S, Parsons JT. Characteristics of men who have sex with men (MSM) who attend sex parties: results from a national online sample in the USA. Sex Trans Infect. 2013;90(1):26–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lee E, Mao L, Lea T, Williams G, Scott M, Heywood J, O’Connor S, Prestage G, Zablotska I, de Wit J, Holt M. Gay community periodic survey: Queensland 2017. Sydney: Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney. 2018. http://doi.org/10.4225/53/5ad3e2469a4c.
  36. 36.
    Fonner VA, Dalglish SL, Kennedy CE, Baggaley R, O’Reilly KR, Koechlin FM, Rodolph M, Hodges-Mameletzis I, Grant RM. Effectiveness and safety of oral HIV preexposure prophylaxis for all populations. AIDS London England. 2016;30(12):1973–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mullens AB, Young RM, Dunne MP, Norton G. The amyl nitrite expectancy Questionnaire for men who have sex with men (AEQ-MSM): a measure of substance-related beliefs. Subst Use Misuse. 2011;46(13):1642–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mullens AB, Fein E, Young RM, Dunne MP, Norton G, Daken K. Substance-related expectancies among men who have sex with men: development of psychometric tools to predict unprotected sexual activity (SEP-MSM). 2019, under review.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Psychology & Counselling, Institute for Resilient RegionsUniversity of Southern QueenslandIpswichAustralia
  2. 2.School of Psychology & CounsellingQueensland University of TechnologyKelvin GroveAustralia
  3. 3.Queensland Positive PeopleEast BrisbaneAustralia
  4. 4.School of Psychology & Counselling, Institute for Resilient RegionsUniversity of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia
  5. 5.School of Commerce, Institute for Resilient RegionsUniversity of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia
  6. 6.School of Accounting, Economics and FinanceUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalDurbanSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations