We tested the hypothesis that an updated “Break the Cycle” (BtC) intervention, based in social cognitive theory and motivational interviewing, would reduce the likelihood that current persons who inject drugs (PWID) would assist persons who do not inject drugs (non-PWID) with first injections in Tallinn, Estonia and Staten Island, New York City. 402 PWID were recruited, a baseline interview covering demographics, drug use, and assisting non-PWID with first drug injections was administered, followed by BtC intervention. 296 follow-up interviews were conducted 6 months post-intervention. Percentages assisting with first injections declined from 4.7 to 1.3% (73% reduction) in Tallinn (p < 0.02), and from 15 to 6% (60% reduction) in Staten Island (p < 0.05). Persons assisted with first injections declined from 11 to 3 in Tallinn (p = 0.02) and from 32 to 13 in Staten Island. (p = 0.024). Further implementation research on BtC interventions is urgently needed where injecting drug use is driving HIV/HCV epidemics and areas experiencing opioid epidemics.
Injecting drug use Initiation First injection Break the cycle HIV Opioid epidemic
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This work was supported through Grant 5-DP1-DA039542 from the US National Institute on Drug Abuse and Grant # IUT34-17 from the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research. The funding agency had no role in the design, conduct, data analysis or report preparation for the study.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
All authors have declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Gossop M, Griffiths P, Powis B, Strang J. Severity of dependence and route of administration of heroin, cocaine and amphetamines. Br J Addict. 1992;87(11):1527–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mateu-Gelabert P, Guarino H, Jessell L, Teper A. Injection and sexual HIV/HCV risk behaviors associated with nonmedical use of prescription opioids among young adults in New York City. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015;48(1):13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones CM, Christensen A, Gladden RM. Increases in prescription opioid injection abuse among treatment admissions in the United States, 2004–2013. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;176:89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack KA, Jones CM, Ballesteros MF. Illicit drug use, illicit drug use disorders, and drug overdose deaths in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas—United States. Am J Transplant. 2017;17(12):3241–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Des Jarlais DC, Casriel C, Friedman SR, Rosenblum A. AIDS and the transition to illicit drug injection: results of a randomized trial prevention program. Br J Addiction. 1992;87:493–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlahov D, Fuller CM, Ompad DC, Galea S, Des Jarlais DC. Updating the infection risk reduction hierarchy: preventing transition into injection. J Urban Health. 2004;81(1):14–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werb D, Bluthenthal RN, Kolla G, et al. Preventing injection drug use initiation: state of the evidence and opportunities for the future. J Urban Health. 2018;95(1):91–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kermode M, Longleng V, Singh BC, Hocking J, Langkham B, Crofts N. My first time: initiation into injecting drug use in Manipur and Nagaland, north-east India. Harm Reduct J. 2007;4:19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotondi NK, Strike C, Kolla G, et al. Transition to injection drug use: the role of initiators. AIDS Beh. 2014;18(3):486–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt N, Stillwell G, Taylor C, Griffiths P. Evaluation of a brief intervention to prevent initiation into injecting drugs. Drugs. 1998;5(2):185–94.Google Scholar
Strike C, Rotondi M, Kolla G, et al. Interrupting the social processes linked with initiation of injection drug use: results from a pilot study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;137:48–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uuskula A, Kalikova A, Zilmer K, Tammai L, DeHovitz J. The role of injection drug use in the emergence of human immunodeficiency virus infection in Estonia. Int J Infect Dis. 2002;6(1):23–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uuskula A, Kals M, Rajaleid K, et al. High-prevalence and high-estimated incidence of HIV infection among new injecting drug users in Estonia: need for large scale prevention programs. J Public Health (Oxf). 2008;30(2):119–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EMCDDA. European drug report: trends and developments. Luxembourg: European Union: The European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). 2017.Google Scholar
Uusküla A, Des Jarlais DC, Raag M, Pinkerton SD, Feelemyer J. Combined prevention for persons who inject drugs in the HIV epidemic in a transitional country: the case of Tallinn, Estonia. AIDS Care. 2015;27(1):105–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uuskula A, Rajaleid K, Talu A, Abel-Ollo K, Des Jarlais DC. A decline in the prevalence of injecting drug users in Estonia, 2005–2009. Int J Drug Policy. 2013;24:312–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uusküla A, Barnes DM, Raag M, Talu A, Tross S, Des Jarlais DC. Frequency and factors associated with providing injection initiation assistance in Tallinn, Estonia. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;188:64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NYC Department of Planning. Current population estimates. New York, NY: NYC Department of Planning; 2017.Google Scholar
United States Census Bureau. 2010 Census Summary File 1: Population density by county. 2010.Google Scholar
NYC Department of Planning. DP03: Selected Economic Characteristics; 2015 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, New York City and Boroughs 2016.Google Scholar
NYC Department of Planning. DP05: ACS Demographic and Housing Estimates; 2015 American 812 Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, New York City and Boroughs 2016.Google Scholar
Luszczynska A, Schwarzer R. Social cognitive theory. In: Conner M, Norman P, editors. Predicting health behaviour. California: University of California; 2005. p. 127–69.Google Scholar
Bandura A. Social cognitive theory and exercise of control over HIV infection. In: Peterson J, DiClemente R, editors. Preventing AIDS: theory and practice of behavioral interventions. New York: Plenum Press; 1993.Google Scholar
Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: helping people change. New York: Guilford Press; 2012.Google Scholar
Heckathorn D. Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Soc Problems. 1997;44(2):174–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckathorn D, Semaan S, Broadhead RS, Hughes J. Extensions of respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of injection drug users aged 18–25. AIDS Behav. 2002;6(1):55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uuskula A, Heimer R, Dehovitz J, Fischer K, McNutt LA. Surveillance of HIV, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus in an estonian injection drug-using population: sensitivity and specificity of testing syringes for public health surveillance. J Infect Dis. 2006;193(3):455–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uuskula A, McNutt LA, Dehovitz J, Fischer K, Heimer R. High prevalence of blood-borne virus infections and high-risk behaviour among injecting drug users in Tallinn, Estonia. Int J STD AIDS. 2007;18(1):41–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Des Jarlais DC, Perlis TE, Stimson GV, Poznyak V, Group WPIDICS. Using standardization methods for research on HIV and injecting drug use in developing/transitional countries: case study from the WHO drug injection study phase II. BMC Public Health. 2006;654:6–12.Google Scholar
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2015.Google Scholar
Harrison L, Hughes A. The validity of self-reported drug use: Improving the accuracy of survey estimates (NIH Publication No. 97-4147, NIDA Research Monograph 167). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse. 1997.Google Scholar
Napper LE, Fisher DG, Johnson ME, Wood MM. The reliability and validity of drug users’ self reports of amphetamine use among primarily heroin and cocaine users. Addict Behav. 2010;35(4):350–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolla G, Strike C, Roy É, et al. Initiation stories: an examination of the narratives of people who assist with a first injection. Subst Use Misuse. 2015;50(13):1619–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger LD, Lopez AM, Kral AH, Bluthenthal RN. Moral ambivalence and the decision to initiate others into injection drug use: a qualitative study in two California cities. Int J Drug Policy. 2016;37:42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Des Jarlais DC, Marmor M, Paone D, et al. HIV incidence among injecting drug users in New York City syringe-exchange programmes. Lancet. 1996;348(9033):987–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uuskula A, Des Jarlais DC, Kals M, et al. Expanded syringe exchange programs and reduced HIV infection among new injection drug users in Tallinn, Estonia. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casriel C, Des Jarlais DC, Rodriguez R, Friedman SR, Stepherson B, Khuri E. Working with heroin sniffers: clinical issues in preventing drug injection. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1990;7:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar