Influence of Rurality on HIV Testing Practices Across the United States, 2012–2017
In the US, HIV testing has been key in the identification of new HIV cases, allowing for the initiation of antiretroviral treatment and a reduction in disease transmission. We consider the influence of living in a rural area (rurality) on HIV testing between different US regions and states as existing work in this area is limited. Using the 2012–2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Systems surveys, we explored the independent role of rurality on having ever been tested for HIV and having a recent HIV test at the national, regional, and state levels by calculating average adjusted predictions (AAPs) and average marginal effects (AMEs). Suburban and urban areas had higher odds and AAPs of having ever been tested for HIV and having a recent HIV test compared to rural areas across the US. The Midwest had the lowest AAPs for both having ever been tested for HIV (17.57–20.32%) and having a recent HIV test (37.65–41.14%) compared to other regions. For both questions on HIV testing, regions with the highest AAPs had the greatest rural–urban differences in probabilities and regions with the lowest AAPs had the smallest rural–urban difference in probabilities. The highest rural–urban testing disparities were observed in states with high AAPs for HIV testing. HIV testing estimates were higher in urban compared to rural areas at the national, regional, and state level. This study examines the isolated influence of rurality on HIV testing and identifies specific US areas where future efforts to increase HIV testing should be directed to.
KeywordsHIV testing Rurality BRFSS Logistic regression Average adjusted predictions Average marginal effects
There was no funding for this study.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human or animals participants performed by any of the authors. All data that was used is publicly available and anonymized.
This is not applicable to the study.
- 1.CDC. Estimated HIV incidence and prevalence in the United States, 2010–2015. HIV Surveill Suppl Rep. 2018;23(1):1.Google Scholar
- 2.CDC. Estimates of new HIV infections in the United States: CDC HIV/AIDS Facts. 2016; http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/factsheets/pdf/incidence.pdf. Accessed 2 April 2018.
- 3.Kaiser Family Foundation. The HIV/AIDS epidemic in the United States: the basics. 2018; https://www.kff.org/hivaids/fact-sheet/the-hivaids-epidemic-in-the-united-states-the-basics/. Accessed 27 Aug 2018.
- 4.Secretary’s Minority AIDS Initiative Fund U.S. Statistics; 2018. https://www.hiv.gov/hiv-basics/overview/data-and-trends/statistics. Accessed 27 Aug 2018.
- 5.CDC. HIV in the United States: at a glance. 2018; https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/overview/ataglance.html. Accessed 27 Aug 2018.
- 6.Campsmith ML, Rhodes PH, Hall HI, Green TA. Undiagnosed HIV prevalence among adults and adolescents in the United States at the end of 2006. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;53(5):619–24.Google Scholar
- 7.CDC. Monitoring selected national HIV prevention and care objectives by using HIV surveillance data—United States and 6 dependent areas, 2016. HIV Surveill Suppl Rep. 2018;23(4).Google Scholar
- 8.CDC. HIV surveillance report, 2016. 2017; http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hiv-surveillance.html.
- 18.Selik RM, Mokotoff ED, Branson B, Owen SM, Whitmore S, Hall HI. Revised surveillance case definition for HIV infection & United States, 2014. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63(3):1–10.Google Scholar
- 20.Kaiser Family Foundation. Views and Experiences with HIV testing in the U.S.: survey brief. 2009; https://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/7926.pdf.
- 24.Government Accountability Office. Federal and State efforts to identify infected individuals and connect them to care. GAO-09-985 2009; GAO-09-985. https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-985.
- 26.CAA Test. HIV testing in the United States. 2016; https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/factsheets/hiv-testing-us-508.pdf.
- 27.Forrest KYZ, Lin Y. Comparison of health-related factors between rural and urban Pennsylvania residents using behavioral risk factor surveillance system (BRFSS) data. 2010; http://www.rural.palegislature.us/brfss_2010.pdf.
- 31.Henderson ER, Subramaniam DS, Chen J. Rural–urban differences in HIV testing among US adults: findings from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system. Sex Transm Dis. 2018; Publish Ahead of Print.Google Scholar
- 37.CDC. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey data. In: Services USDoHaH, ed. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2012.Google Scholar
- 38.CDC. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey data. In: Services USDoHaH, ed. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014.Google Scholar
- 39.CDC. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey data. In: Services USDoHaH, ed. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2016.Google Scholar
- 40.CDC. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system 2013 codebook report land-line and cell-phone data. 2014.Google Scholar
- 41.CDC. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system 2015 codebook report land-line and cell-phone data. 2016; https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2015/pdf/codebook15_llcp.pdf.
- 42.CDC. LLCP 2017 codebook report overall version data weighted with _LLCPWT behavioral risk factor surveillance system. 2018; https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2017/pdf/codebook17_llcp-v2-508.pdf.
- 44.CDC. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system comparability of data BRFSS 2017. 2018; https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2017/pdf/compare-2017-508.pdf.
- 45.CDC. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey questionnaire. In: Services USDoHaH, ed. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2012.Google Scholar
- 46.CDC. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey questionnaire. In: Services DoHaH, ed. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014.Google Scholar
- 47.CDC. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey questionnaire. In: Services USDoHaH, ed. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2016.Google Scholar
- 66.Shedlin MG, Decena CU, Oliver-Velez D. Initial acculturation and HIV risk among new Hispanic immigrants. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005;97(7 Suppl):32S–7S.Google Scholar
- 70.Kann L, Olsen EO, McManus T, et al. Sexual identity, sex of sexual contacts, and health-risk behaviors among students in grades 9–12-youth risk behavior surveillance, selected sites, United States, 2001–2009. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(7):1–133.Google Scholar
- 76.LaMorte WW. Residual confounding, confounding by indication, & reverse causality. 2016; http://sphweb.bumc.bu.edu/otlt/MPH-Modules/BS/BS704-EP713_Confounding-EM/BS704-EP713_Confounding-EM4.html.
- 78.Wang F, Shin H-C. SAS® model selection macros for complex survey data using PROC SURVEYLOGISTIC/SURVEYREG. Midwest SAS Users Group, Kansas City, KS; 2011. http://www.mwsug.org/proceedings/2011/stats/MWSUG-2011-SA02.pdf.
- 79.SAS 9.4 [computer program]. Cary, North Carolina 2017.Google Scholar
- 80.NIDA. Who is at risk for HIV infection and which populations are most affected? 2012; https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/research-reports/hivaids/who-risk-hiv-infection-which-populations-are-most-affected.
- 81.NICHD. Who is at risk of HIV/AIDS? 2016; https://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/hiv/conditioninfo/risk.
- 82.CDC. Populations at greatest risk. 2015; https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/policies/hip/risk.html.
- 84.WHO. Men who have sex with men. 2018; https://www.who.int/hiv/topics/msm/en/.
- 85.CDC. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system 2012 codebook report land-line and cell-phone data. 2013; https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2012/pdf/codebook12_llcp.pdf.
- 86.Jann B. Predictive margins and marginal effects in Stata. 2013.Google Scholar
- 88.Stata Statistical Software. Release 15 [computer program]. College Station: StataCorp LLC; 2017.Google Scholar
- 89.U.S. Census Bureau. Census Bureau Regions and Divisions with State FIPS Codes; 2015. https://www2.census.gov/geo/docs/maps-data/maps/reg_div.txt.
- 90.CDC. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2017. 2018; https://www.cdc.gov/std/stats17/2017-STD-Surveillance-Report_CDC-clearance-9.10.18.pdf.
- 91.Nusbaum MR, Wallace RR, Slatt LM, Kondrad EC. Sexually transmitted infections and increased risk of co-infection with human immunodeficiency virus. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2004;104(12):527–35.Google Scholar
- 94.Page P. Beyond statistical significance: clinical interpretation of rehabilitation research literature. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9(5):726–36.Google Scholar
- 95.US Census. Georgia: 2010 population and housing Unit counts. 2012; https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/2010/cph-2/cph-2-12.pdf.
- 96.CDC. HIV in the United States by region. 2018; https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/overview/geographicdistribution.html.
- 99.Scribani M, Shelton J, Chapel D, Krupa N, Wyckoff L, Jenkins P. Comparison of bias resulting from two methods of self-reporting height and weight: a validation study. RSM Open. 2014;5(6):1–7.Google Scholar
- 101.USDA. Rural–urban continuum codes. 2016; https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-continuum-codes/.