Advertisement

MSM Behavior Disclosure Networks and HIV Testing: An Egocentric Network Analysis Among MSM in China

  • Bolin Cao
  • Adam J. Saffer
  • Cui Yang
  • Hexin Chen
  • Kun Peng
  • Stephen W. Pan
  • Maya Durvasula
  • Chuncheng Liu
  • Hongyun Fu
  • Jason J. Ong
  • Weiming Tang
  • Joseph D. TuckerEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Men who have sex with men (MSM) disclose same-sex behaviors with others, creating disclosure networks. This study examined the characteristics of disclosure networks that are associated with HIV testing among MSM in China through an online nationwide survey. Name-generator questions were used to ask each participant (“ego”) to nominate up to five social network members (“alters”) with whom he had disclosed same-sex behaviors. Among the 806 men, the average disclosure network size was 4.05. MSM who reported larger disclosure networks were more likely to have been tested for HIV (aOR 1.21, 95% CI 1.08–1.34). The most common disclosure network alters were friends (45.1%), followed by sex partners (18.7%) and healthcare professionals (2.5%). Men who disclosed to healthcare professionals were more likely to test for HIV compared to men who disclosed to family members (aOR 5.43, 95% CI 2.11–14.04). Our findings can inform disclosure network-based interventions to promote MSM HIV testing.

Keywords

HIV MSM China Ego Network 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like the thank the SESH (Social Entrepreneurship to Spur Health) Global team for assistance.

Funding

This study was funded by National Institutes of Health [National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases 1R01AI114310]; UNC-South China STI Research Training Centre [Fogarty International Centre 1D43TW009532]; UNC Center for AIDS Research [National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases 5P30AI050410]; National Social Science Foundation of China [18CXW017]; Youth Talent Grant of Guangdong Province, China [2017WQNCX129]; Shenzhen University Grant [18QNFC46] and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to the MeSH Consortium (BMGF-OPP1120138). This publication was also supported by Grant Number UL1TR001111 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) at the National Institutes of Health.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Tucker and Weiming Tang, co-investigators on this study, participate in unpaid activities and as advisors for SESH Global, the coordinating center for this study. No other authors have conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Mitchell S, Cockcroft A, Lamothe G, Andersson N. Equity in HIV testing: evidence from a cross-sectional study in ten Southern African countries. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2010;10:23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hong Y, Zhang C, Li X, Fang X, Lin X, Zhou Y, et al. HIV testing behaviors among female sex workers in southwest China. AIDS Behav. 2012;16:44–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    UNAIDS. 90-90-90: An ambitious treatment target to help end the AIDS epidemic. 2014. http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/90-90-90_en.pdf.
  4. 4.
    Young SD, Cumberland WG, Nianogo R, Menacho LA, Galea JT, Coates T. The HOPE social media intervention for global HIV prevention in Peru: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet HIV. 2015;2:e27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tso LS, Tang W, Li H, Yan HY, Tucker JD. Social media interventions to prevent HIV: a review of interventions and methodological considerations. Curr Opin Psychol. 2015;9:6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tucker JD, Cao B, Li H, Tang S, Tang W, Wong NS, et al. Social media interventions to promote HIV testing. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:282–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rhodes SD, McCoy TP, Tanner AE, Stowers J, Bachmann LH, Nguyen AL, et al. Using social media to increase HIV testing among gay and bisexual men, other men who have sex with men, and transgender persons: outcomes from a randomized community trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62:1450–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D’Augelli AR, Hershberger SL, Pilkington NW. Lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth and their families: disclosure of sexual orientation and its consequences. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1998;68:361–71 discussion 372–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Durso LE, Meyer IH. Patterns and predictors of disclosure of sexual orientation to healthcare providers among lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals. Sex Res Soc Policy. 2013;10:35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garofalo R, Mustanski B, Donenberg G. Parents know and parents matter; is it time to develop family-based HIV prevention programs for young men who have sex with men? J Adolesc. 2008;43:201–4.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shilo G, Savaya R. Effects of family and friend support on LGB youths’ mental health and sexual orientation milestones. Fam Relat. 2011;60:318–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Willoughby BLB, Doty ND, Malik NM. Parental reactions to their child’s sexual orientation disclosure: a family stress perspective. Parenting. 2008;8:70–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lin X, Chi P, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Fang X, Qiao S, et al. Disclosure of HIV serostatus and sexual orientation among hiv-positive men who have sex with men in China. Community Ment Health J. 2016;52:457–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Metheny N, Stephenson R. Disclosure of sexual orientation and uptake of HIV testing and hepatitis vaccination for rural men who have sex with men. Ann Fam Med. 2016;14:155–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tang W, Mao J, Tang S, Liu C, Mollan K, Cao B, et al. Disclosure of sexual orientation to health professionals in China: results from an online cross-sectional study. J Int AIDS Soc. 2017;20:21416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Feng Y, Wu Z, Detels R. Evolution of men who have sex with men community and experienced stigma among men who have sex with men in Chengdu, China. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;53(Suppl 1):S98–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Meyer IH. Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychol Bull. 2003;129:674–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Henrickson M. “You Have to Be Strong to Be Gay”: bullying and educational attainment in LGB New Zealanders. J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv. 2007;19:67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Daley A, Solomon S, Newman PA, Mishna F. Traversing the margins: intersectionalities in the bullying of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth. J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv. 2007;19:9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Witzel T, Guise A, Nutland W, Bourne A. It starts with me: privacy concerns and stigma in the evaluation of a Facebook health promotion intervention. Sex Health. 2016;13(3):228–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schope RD. The decision to tell: Factors influencing the disclosure of sexual orientation by gay men. J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv. 2002;14:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Granovetter MS. The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol. 1973;78:1360–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Scott HM, Pollack L, Rebchook GM, Huebner DM, Peterson J, Kegeles SM. Peer social support is associated with recent HIV testing among young black men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2014;18:913–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cao B, Liu C, Durvasula M, Tang W, Pan S, Saffer AJ, et al. Social media engagement and HIV testing among men who have sex with men in China: a nationwide cross-sectional survey. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19:e251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Amirkhanian YA, Kelly JA, Kabakchieva E, McAuliffe TL, Vassileva S. Evaluation of a social network HIV prevention intervention program for young men who have sex with men in Russia and Bulgaria. AIDS Educ Prev. 2003;15:205–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Feng Y, Wu Z, Detels R. Evolution of men who have sex with men community and experienced stigma among men who have sex with men in Chengdu, China. J AIDS. 2010;53:S98–103.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Neilands TB, Steward WT, Choi K-H. Assessment of stigma towards homosexuality in China: a study of men who have sex with men. Arch Sex Behav. 2008;37:838–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of web surveys: the checklist for reporting results of internet E-surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res. 2004;6:e34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marsden PV. Network data and measurement. Annu Rev Sociol. 1990;16:435–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Marin A, Hampton KN. Simplifying the personal network name generator. Field Methods. 2007;19:163–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lindgren KO. Dyadic regression in the presence of heteroscedasticity-An assessment of alternative approaches. Soc Netw. 2010;32:279–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Greenland S, Pearl J, Robins JM. Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology. 1999;10:37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liu H, Feng T, Liu H, Feng H, Cai Y, Rhodes AG, et al. Egocentric networks of Chinese men who have sex with men: network components, condom use norms, and safer sex. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2009;23:885–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Flom PL, Friedman SR, Kottiri BJ, Neaigus A, Curtis R, Des Jarlais DC, et al. Stigmatized drug use, sexual partner concurrency, and other sex risk network and behavior characteristics of 10–24 year old youth in a high-risk neighborhood. Sex Transm Dis. 2001;28:598–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhao Y, Ma Y, Chen R, Li F, Qin X, Hu Z. Non-disclosure of sexual orientation to parents associated with sexual risk behaviors among gay and bisexual MSM in China. AIDS Behav. 2016;20:193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Guo Y, Li X, Liu Y, Jiang S, Tu X. Disclosure of same-sex behavior by young Chinese migrant men: context and correlates. Psychol Health Med. 2014;19:190–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Small ML, Sukhu C. Because they were there: access, deliberation, and the mobilization of networks for support. Soc Netw. 2016;47:73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Liu JX, Choi K. Experiences of social discrimination among men who have sex with men in Shanghai, China. AIDS Behav. 2006;10:25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Choi K-H, Steward WT, Miège P, Hudes E, Gregorich SE. Sexual stigma, coping styles, and psychological distress: a longitudinal study of men who have sex with men in Beijing, China. Arch Sex Behav. 2016;45:1483–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wah-Shan C. Homosexuality and the cultural politics of Tongzhi in Chinese Societies. J Homosex. 2001;40:27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Huang ZJ, He N, Nehl EJ, Zheng T, Smith BD, Zhang J, et al. Social network and other correlates of HIV testing: findings from male sex workers and other MSM in Shanghai, China. AIDS Behav. 2012;16:858–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Amirkhanian YA, Kelly JA, Takacs J, Mcauliffe TL, Kuznetsova AV, Toth TP, et al. Effects of a social network HIV/STD prevention intervention for MSM in Russia and Hungary. AIDS. 2015;29:583–93.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Centola D. An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior. Science. 2011;334:1269–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Shrum W, Cheek NH, Hunter SM, Hunter SM. Friendship in school: gender and racial homophily. Sociol Educ. 1988;61:227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Orne-Gliemann J, Balestre E, Tchendjou P, Miric M, Darak S, Butsashvili M, et al. Increasing HIV testing among male partners. AIDS. 2013;27:1167–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Boeras DI, Luisi N, Karita E, McKinney S, Sharkey T, Keeling M, et al. Indeterminate and discrepant rapid HIV test results in couples’ HIV testing and counselling centres in Africa. J Int AIDS Soc. 2011;14(1):18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kimbrough LW, Fisher HE, Jones KT, Johnson W, Thadiparthi S, Dooley S. Accessing social networks with high rates of undiagnosed HIV infection: the social networks demonstration project. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:1093–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Valente TW. Network interventions. Science. 2018;337:49–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Valente TW, Fosados R. Diffusion of innovations and network segmentation: the part played by people in promoting health. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33:S23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Stupiansky NW, Liau A, Rosenberger J, Rosenthal SL, Tu W, Xiao S, et al. Young men’s disclosure of same sex behaviors to healthcare providers and the impact on health: results from a US national sample of young men who have sex with men. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2017;31:342–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Coleman TA, Bauer GR, Pugh D, Aykroyd G, Powell L, Newman R. Sexual orientation disclosure in primary care settings by gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in a Canadian City. LGBT Health. 2017;4:42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Qiao S, Zhou G, Li X. Disclosure of same-sex behaviors to health-care providers and uptake of HIV testing for men who have sex with men: a systematic review. Am J Mens Health. 2018;15:1197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Calabrò RS, Quattrini F. Disclosing sexual orientation to healthcare providers: still a taboo or time for a change? J Natl Med Assoc. 2018;110:596–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Fisher CB, Fried AL, Macapagal K, Mustanski B. Patient–provider communication barriers and facilitators to HIV and STI preventive services for adolescent MSM. AIDS Behav. 2018;22:3417–28.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-2081-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Stojisavljevic S, Djikanovic B, Matejic B. ‘The Devil has entered you’: a qualitative study of Men Who Have Sex With Men (MSM) and the stigma and discrimination they experience from healthcare professionals and the general community in Bosnia and Herzegovina. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0179101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Bernstein KT, Liu K-L, Begier EM, Koblin B, Karpati A, Murrill C. Same-sex attraction disclosure to health care providers among New York City Men Who Have Sex With Men: implications for HIV testing approaches. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:1458–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Li KT, Tang W, Wu D, Huang W, Wu F, Lee A, et al. Pay-it-forward strategy to enhance uptake of dual gonorrhea and chlamydia testing among men who have sex with men in China: a pragmatic, quasiexperimental study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19:76–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Chu S-C, Choi SM. Social capital and self-presentation on social networking sites: a comparative study of Chinese and American young generations. Chinese J Commun. 2010;3:402–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Mazur E, Li Y. Identity and self-presentation on social networking web sites: a comparison of online profiles of Chinese and American emerging adults. Psychol Pop Media Cult. 2018;5:101–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Reilly KH, Neaigus A, Shepard CW, Cutler BH, Sweeney MM, Rucinski KB, et al. It’s Never Just HIV : Exposure to an HIV prevention media campaign and behavior change among men who have sex with men participating in the national HIV behavioral surveillance system in New York City. LGBT Health. 2016;3:314–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bolin Cao
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Adam J. Saffer
    • 4
  • Cui Yang
    • 5
  • Hexin Chen
    • 6
  • Kun Peng
    • 7
  • Stephen W. Pan
    • 2
    • 3
    • 8
  • Maya Durvasula
    • 9
  • Chuncheng Liu
    • 2
    • 3
    • 10
  • Hongyun Fu
    • 11
  • Jason J. Ong
    • 3
    • 12
  • Weiming Tang
    • 2
    • 3
    • 13
  • Joseph D. Tucker
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 12
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Media and CommunicationShenzhen UniversityShenzhenChina
  2. 2.University of North Carolina Project-ChinaGuangzhouChina
  3. 3.Social Entrepreneurship to Spur Health (SESH)GuangzhouChina
  4. 4.University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  5. 5.Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA
  6. 6.Department of Media and CommunicationCity University of Hong KongHong KongHong Kong
  7. 7.Faculty of Humanities and ArtsMacau University of Science and TechnologyTaipaChina
  8. 8.Department of Public HealthXi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool UniversitySuzhouChina
  9. 9.Sanford School of Public PolicyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  10. 10.Department of SociologyUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  11. 11.Eastern Virginia Medical UniversityNorfolkUSA
  12. 12.London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLondonUK
  13. 13.Guangdong Provincial Centre for Skin Diseases and STI ControlGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations