Advertisement

AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 23, Issue 7, pp 1951–1963 | Cite as

“A Gay Man and a Doctor are Just like, a Recipe for Destruction”: How Racism and Homonegativity in Healthcare Settings Influence PrEP Uptake Among Young Black MSM

  • Katherine QuinnEmail author
  • Julia Dickson-Gomez
  • Meagan Zarwell
  • Broderick Pearson
  • Matthew Lewis
Original Paper

Abstract

Young, Black, gay bisexual or other MSM are significantly less likely to use PrEP than their White counterparts. These disparities may be due, in part, to medical mistrust and mistreatment within the healthcare system. This study aimed to uncover how young Black MSM’s perceptions of, and experiences with, health care contribute to low engagement in the healthcare system and low PrEP utilization. In late 2017 and early 2018, we conducted six focus groups with 44 Black MSM ages 16–25 in Milwaukee. Focus group topics included participants’ knowledge and perceptions of PrEP, perceptions and stereotypes about PrEP users, and general healthcare utilization patterns and behaviors. Focus group transcripts were transcribed verbatim and coded using MAXQDA qualitative analysis software. We used a team-based approach to thematic content analysis to understand how racism and homonegativity affected healthcare access and experiences. Results from this study help to characterize what contributes to mistrust of the healthcare system and healthcare providers to negatively affect PrEP use among young Black MSM. Focus group discussions revealed how previous and anticipated negative interactions with physicians and skepticism about the healthcare system have alienated young Black MSM from the health care system and created significant barriers to PrEP. Efforts to increase PrEP uptake and must address negative and discriminatory interactions with providers and the healthcare system.

Keywords

Medical mistrust Racial disparities PrEP disparities Young adults Qualitative Racism Homonegativity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are incredibly grateful to the young people who participated in this study and we were willing to share intimate details about their lives and healthcare experiences. This research would not have been possible without the community organizations and leaders who partner with us.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (K01 MH112412; PI: Quinn) and supported by the National Institute of Mental Health Center Grant (P30-MH52776; PI: J. Kelly).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

All study procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board at the Medical College of Wisconsin and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Informed Consent

Informed consent as obtained from all individuals who participated in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson PL, Glidden DV, Liu A, et al. Emtricitabine-tenofovir concentrations and pre-exposure prophylaxis efficacy in men who have sex with men. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(151):151ra125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Donnell D, Baeten JM, Bumpus NN, et al. HIV protective efficacy and correlates of tenofovir blood concentrations in a clinical trial of PrEP for HIV prevention. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;66(3):340–8.  https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Krakower DS, Mimiaga MJ, Rosenberger JG, et al. Limited awareness and low immediate uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men using an internet social networking site. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(3):e33119.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zablotska IB, Prestage G, de Wit J, Grulich AE, Mao L, Holt M. The informal use of antiretrovirals for preexposure prophylaxis of HIV infection among gay men in Australia. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;62(3):334–8.  https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0b013e31827e854a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kirby T, Thornber-Dunwell M. Uptake of PrEP for HIV slow among MSM. Lancet (London, England). 2014;383(9915):399–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Siegler AJ, Mouhanna F, Mera Giler R, et al. The prevalence of PrEP use and the PrEP-to-need ratio in the fourth quarter of 2017, United States. Ann Epidemiol. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.06.005.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arnold EA, Hazelton P, Lane T, et al. A qualitative study of provider thoughts on implementing pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in clinical settings to prevent HIV infection. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(7):e40603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rawlings KMR, Pechonkina A. Status of Truvada for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in the United States: An early drug utilization analysis. Paper presented at: 53rd ICAAC. Denver, Co.; 2015.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith DK. By race/ethnicity, Blacks have the highest number needing PrEP in the United States, 2018. In: CROI. Boston, MA; 2018. http://www.croiwebcasts.org/console/player/37188?mediaType=slideVideo&&crd_fl=0&ssmsrq=1529425735624&ctms=5000&csmsrq=5290.
  10. 10.
    Jenness SM, Maloney KM, Smith DK, et al. The PrEP care continuum and racial disparities in HIV incidence among men who have sex with men. BioRxiv. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1101/249540.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hosek S, Rudy B, Landovitz R, et al. ATN 110: an HIV PrEP demonstration project and safety study for young men who have sex with men in the United States. In: 8th IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment, and Prevention. Vancouver, Canada; 2015. http://www.natap.org/2015/IAS/IAS_76.htm.
  12. 12.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV and Youth. Atlanta, GA; 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/group/age/youth/cdc-hiv-youth.pdf.
  13. 13.
    Wingood GM, Dunkle K, Camp C, et al. Racial differences and correlates of potential adoption of preexposure prophylaxis: results of a national survey. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;63(Suppl 1):S95–101.  https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182920126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cahill S, Taylor SW, Elsesser SA, Mena L, Hickson DM, Mayer KH. Stigma, medical mistrust, and perceived racism may affect PrEP awareness and uptake in black compared to white gay and bisexual men in Jackson, Mississippi and Boston, Massachusetts. AIDS Care. 2017;29(11):1351–8.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2017.1300633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lelutiu-Weinberger C, Golub SA. Enhancing PrEP access for black and Latino men who have sex with men. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;73(5):547–55.  https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000001140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Holloway IW, Tan D, Gildner JL, et al. Facilitators and barriers to pre-exposure prophylaxis willingness among young men who have sex with men who use geosocial networking applications in California. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2017;31(12):517–27.  https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2017.0082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Clark A, Mayben JK, Hartman C, Kallen MA, Giordano TP. Conspiracy beliefs about HIV infection are common but not associated with delayed diagnosis or adherence to care. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2008;22(9):753–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bogart LM, Thorburn S. Are HIV/AIDS conspiracy beliefs a barrier to HIV prevention among African Americans? JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;38(2):213–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Altice FL, Mostashari F, Friedland GH. Trust and the acceptance of and adherence to antiretroviral therapy. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2001;28(1):47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Whetten K, Leserman J, Whetten R, et al. Exploring lack of trust in care providers and the government as a barrier to health service use. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(4):716–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Malebranche DJ, Peterson JL, Fullilove RE, Stackhouse RW. Race and sexual identity: perceptions about medical culture and healthcare among Black men who have sex with men. J Natl Med Assoc. 2004;96(1):97–107.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Logie CH, James LI, Tharao W, Loutfy MR. HIV, gender, race, sexual orientation, and sex work: a qualitative study of intersectional stigma experienced by HIV-positive women in Ontario, Canada. PLoS Med. 2011;8(11):e1001124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Macapagal K, Bhatia R, Greene GJ. Differences in healthcare access, use, and experiences within a community sample of racially diverse lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning emerging adults. LGBT Heal. 2016;3(6):434–42.  https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2015.0124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eaton LA, Driffin DD, Kegler C, et al. The role of stigma and medical mistrust in the routine health care engagement of black men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(2):e75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li C-C, Matthews AK, Aranda F, Patel C, Patel M. Predictors and consequences of negative patient-provider interactions among a sample of African American sexual minority women. LGBT Heal. 2015;2(2):140–6.  https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2014.0127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Irvin R, Wilton L, Scott H, et al. A study of perceived racial discrimination in Black men who have sex with men (MSM) and its association with healthcare utilization and HIV testing. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(7):1272–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bernstein KT, Liu K-L, Begier EM, et al. Same-sex attraction disclosure to health care providers among New York City men who have sex with men. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(13):1458–64.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.168.13.1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Qiao S, Zhou G, Li X. Disclosure of same-sex behaviors to health-care providers and uptake of HIV testing for men who have sex with men: a systematic review. Am J Mens Health. 2018;12(5):1197–214.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988318784149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Saldana J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers—Johnny Saldana—Google Books. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://books.google.ca/books?id=ZhxiCgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false. Published 2016.
  30. 30.
    Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2015.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.  https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wisconsin Department of Health Services. Wisconsin HIV Surveillance Annual Review Addendum: City of Milwaukee. New Diagnoses, Prevalent Cases, Syphilis Diagnoses, and HIV Testing Through December 31, 2016. Wisconsin Department of Health Services; 2017. https://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/publications/p0/p00484a.pdf.
  33. 33.
    Doshi RK, Malebranche D, Bowleg L, Sangaramoorthy T. Health care and HIV testing experiences among Black men in the South: implications for “seek, test, treat, and retain” HIV prevention strategies. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2013;27(2):123–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bogart LM, Wagner GJ, Green HD, et al. Medical mistrust among social network members may contribute to antiretroviral treatment nonadherence in African Americans living with HIV. Soc Sci Med. 2016;164:133–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sullivan PS, Peterson J, Rosenberg ES, et al. Understanding racial HIV/STI disparities in black and white men who have sex with men: a multilevel approach. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(3):e90514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Raymond HF, Chen Y-H, Syme SL, Catalano R, Hutson MA, McFarland W. The role of individual and neighborhood factors: HIV acquisition risk among high-risk populations in San Francisco. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(2):346–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dale SK, Bogart LM, Galvan FH, Wagner GJ, Pantalone DW, Klein DJ. Discrimination and hate crimes in the context of neighborhood poverty and stressors among HIV-positive African-American men who have sex with men. J Community Health. 2016;41(3):574–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bach PB, Pham HH, Schrag D, Tate RC, Hargraves JL. Primary care physicians who treat blacks and whites. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:575–84.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa040609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cooper LA, Roter DL, Carson KA, et al. The associations of clinicians’ implicit attitudes about race with medical visit communication and patient ratings of interpersonal care. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(5):979–87.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    White K, Haas JS, Williams DR. Elucidating the role of place in health care disparities: the example of racial/ethnic residential segregation. Health Serv Res. 2012;47:1278–99.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01410.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Eaton LA, Earnshaw VA, Maksut JL, Thorson KR, Watson RJ, Bauermeister JA. Experiences of stigma and health care engagement among Black MSM newly diagnosed with HIV/STI. J Behav Med. 2018;41(4):458–66.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-018-9922-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Whitehead J, Shaver J, Stephenson R. Outness, stigma, and primary health care utilization among rural LGBT populations. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1):e0146139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Patel RR, Chan PA, Harrison LC, et al. Missed opportunities to prescribe HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis by primary care providers in Saint Louis. Missouri. LGBT Heal. 2018;5(4):250–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Maksut JL, Eaton LA, Siembida EJ, Fabius CD, Bradley AM. Health care discrimination, sex behavior disclosure, and awareness of pre-exposure prophylaxis among black men who have sex with men. Stigma Heal. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000102.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Calabrese SK, Earnshaw VA, Underhill K, Hansen NB, Dovidio JF. The impact of patient race on clinical decisions related to prescribing HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): assumptions about sexual risk compensation and implications for access. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(2):226–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Calabrese SK, Krakower DS, Mayer KH. Integrating HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) into routine preventive health care to avoid exacerbating disparities. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(12):1883–9.  https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2017.304061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gay and Lesbian Medical Association. Guidelines for care of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender patients. 2006. http://www.glma.org/_data/n_0001/resources/live/Welcoming Environment.pdf.
  48. 48.
    Calabrese SK, Underhill K, Earnshaw VA, et al. Framing HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for the general public: how inclusive messaging may prevent prejudice from diminishing public support. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(7):1499–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in the United States-2017 Update: a clinical practice guideline. 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/risk/prep/cdc-hiv-prep-guidelines-2017.pdf.
  50. 50.
    Golub SA. PrEP stigma: implicit and explicit drivers of disparity. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2018;15:190–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-018-0385-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lim FA, Brown DV, Justin Kim SM. Addressing health care disparities in the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender population: a review of best practices. Am J Nurs. 2014;114(6):24–34.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.naj.0000450423.89759.36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Earl TR, Saha S, Lombe M, et al. Race, relationships, and trust in providers among black patients with HIV/AIDS. Soc Work Res. 2013;37(3):219–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Saha S, Sanders DS, Korthuis PT, et al. The role of cultural distance between patient and provider in explaining racial/ethnic disparities in HIV care. Patient Educ Couns. 2011.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.012.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral MedicineCenter for AIDS Intervention Research Medical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeUSA
  2. 2.Institute for Health and EquityMedical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeUSA
  3. 3.Diverse and ResilientMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations