Advertisement

AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 23, Issue 7, pp 1871–1876 | Cite as

Associations Among Perceived HIV Risk, Behavioral Risk and Interest in PrEP Among Black Women in the Southern US

  • Jessica M. SalesEmail author
  • Anandi N. Sheth
Original Paper

Abstract

Utilizing data from Southern women, we created an HIV risk index with expanded partner-level factors to better capture women who may benefit from HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We examined the relationships between potential HIV risk as estimated by laboratory-confirmed bacterial STIs, HIV risk index, perceived HIV risk, and interest in PrEP. Women had multiple PrEP indications; partner characteristics better differentiated STI status than other indicators. Perceived HIV risk differentiated STI status, significantly correlated with the HIV risk index, as well as predicted greater interest in PrEP. Findings can inform how best to evaluate HIV risk and PrEP acceptability among women.

Keywords

PrEP Women Black or African American United States 

Notes

Funding

Support for the data used in this study was provided by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01 AA018096) to Ralph J. DiClemente. A. Sheth receives funding from the National Institutes of Health (K23AI114407).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of interest

J. Sales and A. Sheth are currently receiving grants from Gilead Sciences, Inc. (CO-US-276-4060).

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. 1.
    Hess K, Hu X, Lansky A, Mermin J, Hall HI. Estimating the lifetime risk of a diagnosis of HIV infection in the United States. In: Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Boston, MA, February 22–25; Abstract #52, and CDC Press Release. 2016. https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/2016/croi-2016.html#Graphics2.
  2. 2.
    Delaney KP, Sanchez T, Bowles K, Oraka E, DiNenno E, Sullivan P. Awareness and use of PrEP appear to be increasing among internet samples of US MSM. In: Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Boston, MA, February 22–25; Abstract #889. 2016.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Auerbach JD, Kinsky S, Brown G, Charles V. Knowledge, attitudes, and likelihood of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among US women at risk of acquiring HIV. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2015;29(2):102–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith DK, Van Handel M, Grey J. Estimates of adults with indications for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis by jurisdiction, transmission risk group, and race/ethnicity, United States, 2015. Ann Epidemiol. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.05.003.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bush S, Magnuson D, Rawlings M, Hawkins T, McCallister S, Mera Giler R. Racial characteristics of FTC/TDF for pre-exposure prophylaxis users in the US. In: American Society for Microbiology (ASM Microbe) 2016, Boston, MA, June 16–20; Abstract 2651. 2016.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    US Public Health Service. Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in the United States—2014: a clinical practice guideline. 2014. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/guidelines/PrEPguidelines2014.pdf.
  7. 7.
    Adimora A, et al. New approaches for HIV prevention trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65:324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beymer MR, Weiss RE, Sugar CA, Bourque LB, Gee GC, Morisky DE, Shu SB, Javanbakht M, Bolan RK. Are centers for disease control and prevention guidelines for preexposure prophylaxis specific enough? Formulation of a personalized HIV risk score for pre-exposure prophylaxis initiation. Sex Transm Dis. 2017;44(1):49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aaron E, Blum C, Seidman D, Hoyt MJ, Simone J, Sullivan M, Smith DK. Optimizing delivery of HIV preexposure prophylaxis for women in the United States. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2018;32(1):16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Willie TC, Stockman JK, Overstreet NM, Kershaw TS. Examining the impact of intimate partner violence type and timing on pre-exposure prophylaxis awareness, interest, and coercion. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(4):1190–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dolcini MM, Catania JA, Choi KH, Fullilove MT, Coates TJ. Cognitive and emotional assessments of perceived risk for HIV among unmarried heterosexuals. AIDS Educ Prev. 1996;8(4):294–307.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Curran TM, Monahan JL, Samp JA, Coles VB, DiClemente RJ, Sales J. Sexual risk among african american women: psychological factors and the mediating role of social skills. Commun Q. 2016;64(5):536–52.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2015.1132241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public HealthEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of MedicineEmory University School of MedicineAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations