Cash Transfers, Young Women’s Economic Well-Being, and HIV Risk: Evidence from HPTN 068
- 263 Downloads
Despite the large interest in economic interventions to reduce HIV risk, little research has been done to show whether there are economic gains of these interventions for younger women and what intermediary role economic resources play in changing participants’ sexual behavior. This paper contributes to this gap by examining the impacts of a conditional cash transfer (CCT) for young women in South Africa on young women’s economic resources and the extent to which they play a role in young women’s health and behavior. We used data from HIV Prevention Trials Network 068 study, which provided transfers to young women (in addition to their parents) conditional on the young woman attending at least 80% of school days in the previous month. We found that the CCT increased young women’s economic wellbeing in terms of having savings, spending money, being unindebted, and food secure. We also investigated heterogeneous effects of the program by household economic status at baseline because the program was not specifically poverty targeted and found that the results were driven by young women from the poorest families. From these results, we examined heterogeneity by baseline poverty for other outcomes related to HIV risk including sexual behavior and psychosocial well-being. We found psychosocial well-being benefits in young women from the poorest families and that economic wellbeing gains explained much these impacts.
KeywordsAdolescent girls and young women South Africa Economic empowerment Cash transfers Psychosocial well-being
Funding support for the HPTN was provided by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH; Award Numbers UM1AI068619 [HPTN Leadership and Operations Center], UM1AI068617 [HPTN Statistical and Data Management Center], and UM1AI068613 [HPTN Laboratory Center]. The study was also funded under R01MH110186, R01MH087118, and R24 HD050924 to the Carolina Population Center. Research reported in this publication was also supported by the NIAID of the NIH [Award Number T32AI007001]. Additional funding was provided by the Division of Intramural Research, NIAID, and NIH. The Agincourt Health and Socio-Demographic Surveillance System is supported by the University of the Witwatersrand, the Medical Research Council, South Africa and the Wellcome Trust, UK (Grants 058893/Z/99/A; 069683/Z/02/Z; 085477/Z/08/Z; and 085477/B/08/Z).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Levine R, Lloyd B, Greene ME, Grown C. Girls count: a global investment & action agenda. https://www.icrw.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Girls-Count-A-global-Investment-and-Action-Agenda.pdf (2009).
- 2.Jones N, Harper C, Watson C, Espey J, Wadugodapitiya D, Page E et al. Stemming girls’ chronic poverty: catalysing development change by building just social institutions (SSRN scholarly paper no. ID 1719613). Rochester: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1719613 (2010).
- 3.UNICEF. The state of the World’s children 2011: adolescence—an age of opportunity. New York: UNICEF; 2011.Google Scholar
- 5.Kim J, Pronyk P, Barnett T, Watts C. Exploring the role of economic empowerment in HIV prevention. AIDS. 2008;22:S57. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aids.0000341777.78876.40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Gillespie S, Kadiyala S, Greener R. Is poverty or wealth driving HIV transmission? AIDS. 2007;21:S5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aids.0000300531.74730.72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Shisana O, Rehle T, Simbayi LC, Zuma K, Jooste S, Zungu N, Labadarios D, Onoya D, et al. South African national HIV prevalence, incidence and behaviour survey, 2012. Cape Town: HSRC Press; 2014.Google Scholar
- 9.UNAIDS. 2016-prevention-gap-report_en.pdf. http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/2016-prevention-gap-report_en.pdf (n.d.).
- 14.Jennings L, Mathai M, Linnemayr S, Trujillo A, Mak’anyengo M, Montgomery BEE, Kerrigan DL. Economic context and HIV vulnerability in adolescents and young adults living in urban slums in kenya: a qualitative analysis based on scarcity theory. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(9):2784–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1676-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Leclerc-Madlala S. Age-disparate and intergenerational sex in southern Africa: the dynamics of hypervulnerability. AIDS. 2008;22:S17. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aids.0000341774.86500.53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Ashburn K, Warner A. Can economic empowerment reduce vulnerability of girls and young women to HIV? https://www.icrw.org/publications/can-economic-empowerment-reduce-vulnerability-of-girls-and-young-women-to-hiv/ (2010).
- 25.Reed E, West BS, Salazar M, Monroy RV. Economic empowerment to improve sexual and reproductive health among women and girls. In: Global perspectives on women’s sexual and reproductive health across the lifecourse. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60417-6_17.
- 28.Loevinsohn M, Gillespie SR. HIV/AIDS, food security and rural livelihoods: understanding and responding. Washington, DC: IFPRI. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6289494.pdf (2003).
- 32.Pronyk PM, Hargreaves JR, Kim JC, Morison LA, Phetla G, Watts C, et al. Effect of a structural intervention for the prevention of intimate-partner violence and HIV in rural South Africa: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet. 2006;368(9551):1973–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69744-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Ssewamala FM, Ismayilova L, McKay M, Sperber E, Bannon W, Alicea S. Gender and the effects of an economic empowerment program on attitudes toward sexual risk-taking among AIDS-orphaned adolescent youth in Uganda. J Adolesc Health. 2010;46(4):372–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.08.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Dunbar MS, Dufour M-SK, Lambdin B, Mudekunye-Mahaka I, Nhamo D, Padian NS. The SHAZ! project: results from a pilot randomized trial of a structural intervention to prevent HIV among adolescent women in Zimbabwe. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(11):e113621. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 49.Abler L, Hill L, Maman S, DeVellis R, Twine R, Kahn K, et al. Hope matters: developing and validating a measure of future expectations among young women in a high HIV prevalence setting in rural South Africa (HPTN 068). AIDS Behav. 2017;21(7):2156–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1523-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 50.Bedoya, G., Bittarello, L., Davis, J., & Mittag, N. (2017). Distributional impact analysis. World Bank policy research working paper 8139.Google Scholar
- 52.Inson MA, White MJ, Ginsburg C, Gómez-Olivé FX, Kahn K, Tollman S. Youth migration, livelihood prospects and demographic dividend: a comparison of the Census 2011 and Agincourt Health and Demographic Surveillance System in the rural northeast of South Africa. Afr Popul Stud. 2016;30(2 Suppl):2629–39.Google Scholar
- 53.Stats SA. Poverty trends in South Africa: an examination of absolute poverty between 2006 and 2011. Pretoria: Stat South Africa; 2014.Google Scholar
- 54.Dunbar MS, Maternowska C, Kang M-SJ, Laver SM, Mudekunye I, Padian NS. Findings from SHAZ!: a feasibility study of a microcredit and life-skills HIV prevention intervention to reduce risk among adolescent female orphans in Zimbabwe. J Prev Interv Commun. 2010;38(2):147–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10852351003640849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 56.Bastagli F, Hagen-Zanker J, Harman L, Barca V, Sturge G, Schmidt T, Pellerano L. Cash transfers: what does the evidence say. A rigorous review of programme impact and the role of design and implementation features. London: ODI; 2016.Google Scholar