Advertisement

Low-Intensity Outreach to Increase Uptake of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Among Patients with Sexually Transmitted Infections

  • Ryan R. Guinness
  • Jonathan E. Volk
  • Leo B. Hurley
  • Tadd T. Tobias
  • Julia L. Marcus
Original Paper

Abstract

We piloted a low-intensity outreach intervention to increase linkage to PrEP care among HIV-uninfected individuals with rectal sexually transmitted infections or syphilis. We sent a secure email message or letter with information about accessing PrEP. Of those sent an email, 12.4% were linked to PrEP care; linkage differed by race/ethnicity, ranging from 0% of Black individuals to 32% of Hispanic individuals (P = 0.019). No individuals sent letters were linked to PrEP care. A one-time secure email to high-risk patients is feasible to increase linkage to PrEP care. Studies are needed to evaluate scalable interventions to increase PrEP uptake in at-risk populations.

Keywords

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) Uptake Outreach Implementation research 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by a Kaiser Permanente Northern California Community Benefit research grant, and by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (K01 122853).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of interest

RRG declares that he has no conflict of interest. JEV declares that he has no conflict of interest. LBH declares that he has no conflict of interest. TTT declares that he has no conflict of interest. JLM reports past research support from Merck.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in our study were in accordance with the ethical standards of Kaiser Permanente Northern California and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and later its amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

An informed consent waiver was obtained for this project from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Institutional Review Board.

References

  1. 1.
    Mayer KH, Grasso C, Levine K, et al. Increasing PrEP uptake, persistent disparities in at-risk patients in a Boston center. Conference on retroviruses and opportunistic infections. Boston, 2018 [Abstract 1014].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    King HL, Keller SB, Giancola MA, et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis accessibility research and evaluation (PrEPARE study). AIDS Behav. 2014;18(9):1722–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Merchant RC, Corner D, Garza E, et al. Preferences for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) information among men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) at community outreach settings. J Gay Lesbian Ment Health. 2016;20(1):21–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hardy H, Kumar V, Doros G, et al. Randomized controlled trial of a personalized cellular phone reminder system to enhance adherence to antiretroviral therapy. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2011;25(3):153–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Catalani C, Philbrick W, Fraser H, Mechael P, Israelski DM. mHealth for HIV treatment and prevention: a systematic review of the literature. Open AIDS J. 2013;7:17–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schickedanz A, Huang D, Lopez A, et al. Access, interest, and attitudes toward electronic communication for health care among patients in the medical safety net. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(7):914–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Silvestre A-L, Sue VM, Allen JY. If you build it, will they come? The Kaiser permanente model of online health care. Health Affairs (Millwood). 2009;28(2):334–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rao S, Seth P, Walker T, et al. HIV testing and outcomes among hispanics/latinos—United States, Puerto Rico, and U.S. Virgin Islands, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(40):1099–103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holloway IW, Tan D, Gildner JL, et al. Facilitators and barriers to pre-exposure prophylaxis willingness among young men who have sex with men who use geosocial networking applications in California. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2017;31(12):517–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eaton LA, Driffin DD, Kegler C, et al. The role of stigma and medical mistrust in the routine health care engagement of black men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(2):e75–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lelutiu-Weinberger C, Golub SA. Enhancing PrEP access for black and latino men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;73(5):547–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Singh S, Song R, Johnson AS, McCray E, Hall HI. HIV incidence, HIV prevalence, and undiagnosed HIV infections in men who have sex with men, United States. Ann Intern Med. 2018;168(10):685–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryan R. Guinness
    • 1
  • Jonathan E. Volk
    • 1
  • Leo B. Hurley
    • 2
  • Tadd T. Tobias
    • 3
  • Julia L. Marcus
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Adult and Family MedicineKaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical CenterSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Kaiser Permanente Division of ResearchOaklandUSA
  3. 3.Department of Infectious DiseasesKaiser Permanente Oakland Medical CenterOaklandUSA
  4. 4.Department of Population MedicineHarvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care InstituteBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations