Advertisement

AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 23, Supplement 1, pp 94–104 | Cite as

Lessons Learned from Applying a Modified Learning Collaborative Model to Promote Change in Regional and Statewide HIV Care Systems

  • Lori A. DeLorenzoEmail author
  • Jane Fox
  • Evelyn Byrd Quinlivan
  • Kate M. Gilmore
  • Mari Ruetten
  • Michelle Broaddus
  • Wayne Steward
  • Janet Meyers
Article
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

The Health Resources and Services Administration Special Projects of National Significance launched the Systems Linkage and Access to Care for Populations at High Risk of HIV Infection Initiative in 2011. Six state departments of health were funded to utilize a modified Learning Collaborative model to develop and/or adapt HIV testing, linkage to care and retention in care system-level interventions. More than 60 Learning Sessions were held over the course of the Learning Collaborative. A total of 22 unique interventions were tested with 18 interventions selected and scaled up. All interventions were created to impact services at a systems level, with standardized protocols developed to ensure fidelity. Our findings provide key lessons and present considerations for replication for use of a modified Learning Collaborative to achieve state-level systems change.

Keywords

Learning Collaborative Systems Linkage to HIV care Retention Department of Health 

Notes

Funding

This project is/was supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under Grant Number U90HA22702 for the Systems Linkages and Access to Care for Populations at High Risk for HIV Infection Initiative Evaluation and Technical Assistance Center. This information or content and conclusions are those of the authors and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Antonini VP, Oeser BT, Urad D. The California integration learning collaborative: a forum to address challenges of SUD-primary care service integration. J Psychoact Drugs. 2012;44(4):285–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chin MH, Cook S, Drum ML, Jin M, et al. Improving diabetes care in midwest community health centers with the health disparities collaborative. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(1):2–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Landis SE, Schwarz M, Curran DR. North Carolina family medicine residency programs’ diabetes learning collaborative. Fam Med. 2006;38(3):190–5.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    McMullen CK, Schneider J, Firemark A, et al. Cultivating engaged leadership through a learning collaborative: lessons from primary care renewal in Oregon safety net clinics. Ann Fam Med. 2013;11(1):534–40.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Palmer C, Bycroft J, Healey K, et al. Can formal collaborative methodologies improve quality in primary health care in New Zealand? J Prim Health Care. 2012;4(4):328–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schouten LM, Hulscher ME, van Everdingen JJ, et al. Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: systematic review. BMJ. 2008;336:1491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Strating MH, Neiboer AP, Zuiderent-Jerak T, Bal R. Creating effective quality-improvement collaboratives: a multiple case study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:344–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Young PC, Glade GB, Stoddard GJ, Norlin C. Evaluation of a learning collaborative to improve the delivery of preventive services by pediatric practices. Pediatrics. 2006;117(5):1469–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nembhard I. Learning and improving in quality improvement collaboratives: which collaborative features do participants value most? Health Serv Res. 2009;44(2):359–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ovretveit J, Bate P, Cleary S, et al. Quality collaboratives: lessons from research. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:345–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Becker DE, Drake RE, Bond GR, et al. A national mental health learning collaborative on supported employment. Psychiatr Serv. 2011;62(7):704–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    The Breakthrough Series: IHI’s Collaborative Model for Achieving Breakthrough Improvement. IHI Innovation Series white paper. Boston: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2003.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    SPNS Initiative: Systems Linkages and Access to Care, 2011–2016; 2016. https://hab.hrsa.gov/about-ryan-white-hivaids-program/spns-systems-linkages-and-access. Accessed 10 Mar 2018.
  14. 14.
    Hague CJ, Betsey J, Goldman L, et al. Using HIV surveillance laboratory data to identify out-of-care patients. AIDS Behav. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1742-5.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bailey S, Gilmore K, Yerkes L, Rhodes A. Connecting corrections and HIV care: building a care coordination program for recently incarcerated persons living with HIV in Virginia. AIDS Behav. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-2003-3.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Koester KA, Fuller SM, Maiorana A, et al. Implementing multi-level interventions to improve HIV testing, linkage-to- and retention-in-care interventions. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2016;27:1234–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schumann C, Westergaard R, Meier A, et al. Developing a patient navigation program to improve engagement in HIV medical care and viral suppression: a demonstration project protocol. AIDS Behav. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1727-4.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sena A, Donova J, Swygard H, et al. The North Carolina HIV bridge counselor program: outcomes from a statewide level intervention to link and reengage HIV-infected persons in care in the south. JAIDS. 2017;76(1):e7–14.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fuller S, Koester K, Maiorana A, et al. “I don’t have to do this all by myself”: systems navigation to ensure continuity of HIV care for persons leaving prison. AIDS Behav. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-2050-4.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Parnell H, Berger M, Gichance M, et al. Lost to care and back again: patient and navigator perspectives on HIV care re-engagement. AIDS Behav. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1919-y.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Addison D, Baim-Lance A, Suchman L, et al. Factors influencing the successful implementation of HIV linkage and retention interventions in healthcare agencies across New York State. AIDS Behav. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-2060-2.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    New York Links. http://www.newyorklinks.org. Accessed 15 Mar 2018.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Organizational IdeasBlacksburgUSA
  2. 2.Division of Health and EnvironmentAbt AssociatesCambridgeUSA
  3. 3.Institute for Global Health and Infectious DiseasesUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  4. 4.Virginia Department of HealthRichmondUSA
  5. 5.Wisconsin Department of Health ServicesMadisonUSA
  6. 6.Center for AIDS Intervention ResearchMedical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeUSA
  7. 7.UCSF Prevention Research CenterUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations