Home-Based Care and Perceived Quality of Life Among People Living with HIV in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam

  • Quyen Thi Tu Bui
  • Deborah Bain Brickley
  • Van Thi Thu Tieu
  • Nancy K. Hills
Article

Abstract

We conducted a cross-sectional study to examine the perceptions of quality of life among people living with HIV who received home-based care services administered through outpatient clinics in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam. Data were collected from a sample of 180 consecutively selected participants (86 cases, 94 controls) at four outpatient clinics, all of whom were on antiretroviral therapy. Quality of life was evaluated using the WHOQOL-BREF instrument. In adjusted analysis, those who received home-based care services had a quality of life score 4.08 points higher (on a scale of 100) than those who did not receive home-based care services (CI 95%, 2.32–5.85; p < 0.001). The findings suggest that home-based care is associated with higher self-perceptions of quality of life among people living with HIV.

Keywords

Home-based care HIV Viet Nam ART 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the interviewers and the HCMC PAC staff for their contribution to the collection of data. We would like to thank FHI in Viet Nam for providing HBC activities in the outpatient clinics, and CDC in Viet Nam for supporting HBC services and reviewing the study protocol and manuscript. This study was funded by the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under the terms of PS001468. We wish to acknowledge support from the UCSF’s International Traineeships in AIDS Prevention Studies (ITAPS), U.S. NIMH, R25MH064712. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of The Ethical Review Board for Biomedical Research Hanoi University of Public Health and ADS of CDC and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Ministry of Health/VAAC. National guidelines: community-and home-based care for people living with HIV. 2010.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bastardo YM, Kimberlin CL. Relationship between quality of life, social support and disease-related factors in HIV-infected persons in Venezuela. AIDS Care. 2000;12(5):673–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu C, Johnson L, Ostrow D, Silvestre A, Visscher B, Jacobson LP. Predictors for lower quality of life in the HAART era among HIV-infected men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;42(4):470–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bajunirwe F, Tisch DJ, King CH, Arts EJ, Debanne SM, Sethi AK. Quality of life and social support among patients receiving antiretroviral therapy in Western Uganda. AIDS Care. 2009;21(3):271–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bekele T, Rourke SB, Tucker R, et al. Direct and indirect effects of perceived social support on health-related quality of life in persons living with HIV/AIDS. AIDS Care. 2013;25(3):337–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khumsaen N, Aoup-Por W, Thammachak P. Factors influencing quality of life among people living with HIV (PLWH) in Suphanburi Province, Thailand. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. Jan-Feb. 2012;23(1):63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Allavena C, Prazuck T, Reliquet V, et al. Impact of education and support on the tolerability and quality of life in a cohort of HIV-1 infected patients treated with enfuvirtide (SURCOUF Study). J Int Assoc Phys AIDS Care. 2008;7(4):187–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kabore I, Bloem J, Etheredge G, et al. The effect of community-based support services on clinical efficacy and health-related quality of life in HIV/AIDS patients in resource-limited settings in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2010;24(9):581–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    The Goverment of Socialist Republic of Viet Nam. Decision of the Prime Minister: Approving the National Strategy on HIV/AIDS prevention and control in Viet Nam till 2010 with a vision to 2020. In: Minister TP, editor. Vol 36/2004/QD-TTg. Ha Noi: The Goverment; 2004. p. 75.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A Joint MoH/VAAC, FHI and PEPFAR Collaboration. Community and Home-based Care in Viet Nam- Findings and recommendations from a rapid assessment. 2009.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1993 revised classification system for HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adolescents and adults. 1992. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00018871.htm.
  12. 12.
    Division of metal health and prevention of substance abuse, World Health Organizaton. WHOQOL-BREF. Geneva. 1998.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    World Health Organisation. WHOQOL-BREF. Introduction, admistration, scoring, and generic version of the assessment. Geneva: WHO; 1996.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tran BX. Quality of life outcomes of antiretroviral treatment for HIV/AIDS patients in Vietnam. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(7):e41062.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Centers for Disease C, Prevention. Revised surveillance case definition for HIV infection–United States, 2014. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2014;63(RR-03):1–10.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harding R, Karus D, Easterbrook P, Raveis VH, Higginson IJ, Marconi K. Does palliative care improve outcomes for patients with HIV/AIDS? A systematic review of the evidence. Sex Transm Infect. 2005;81(1):5–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Young T, Busgeeth K. Home-based care for reducing morbidity and mortality in people infected with HIV/AIDS. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;2010(1):CD005417.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Den Oudsten BL, Zijlstra WP, De Vries J. The minimal clinical important difference in the World Health Organization quality of life instrument–100. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(5):1295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Layzell S, McCarthy M. Community-based health services for people with HIV/AIDS: a review from a health service perspective. AIDS Care. 1992;4(2):203–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tanzania Commission for AIDS. Home based care in Tanzania. TACAIDS. 2008. http://www.ncbi.n/m.nih.gov/pubamed/16499.
  21. 21.
    Waran. M. Home-based care in HIV/AIDS, the Indian experience. In: International Conference on AIDS, 2002;vol 142002.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    World Health Organisation. Community home-based care. Geneva: WHO; 2001.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Samson-Akpan PE, Ella RE, Ojong IN. Influence of Home-Based care on the Quality of Life of people living with HIV/AIDS in Cross River State, Nigeria 2014.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nojomi M, Anbary K, Ranjbar M. Health-related quality of life in patients with HIV/AIDS. Arch Iran Med. 2008;11(6):608–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Da Silva J, Bunn K, Bertoni RF, Neves OA, Traebert J. Quality of life of people living with HIV. AIDS care. 2013;25(1):71–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsHanoi University of Public HealthHanoiViet Nam
  2. 2.Global Strategic Information, Global Health SciencesUniversity of California San Francisco (UCSF)San FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.Ho Chi Minh City Provincial AIDS CommitteeHo Chi MinhViet Nam
  4. 4.Departments of Neurology, Epidemiology and BiostatisticsUniversity of California San Francisco (UCSF)San FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations