AIDS and Behavior

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 1265–1272 | Cite as

Swipe Right: Dating Website and App Use Among Men Who Have Sex With Men

  • Hannah J. Badal
  • Jo Ellen Stryker
  • Nickolas DeLuca
  • David W. Purcell
Original Paper

Abstract

This study explored the frequency of dating website and app usage among MSM to understand sub-group differences in use. Web-based survey data (N = 3105) were analyzed to assess the use of dating websites and apps. More than half (55.7%) of MSM in this sample were frequent users of dating websites and apps. Two-thirds (66.7%) of frequent users had casual partners only in the past 12 months and reported a high average number of casual sexual partners in the past 12 months (Mdn = 5.0) compared to never users (Mdn = 0.0; χ 2(2) = 734.94, adj. p < .001). The most frequently used dating website or app was Grindr, with 60.2% of the sample reporting some or frequent use. Adam4Adam (23.5%), Jack’d (18.9%) and Scruff (18.7%) were also frequently used. Dating websites and apps may be effective channels to reach a diverse group of MSM with HIV prevention messages.

Keywords

Dating apps Online HIV prevention Gay MSM 

Resumen

Este estudio exploró la frecuencia de uso de sitios web y aplicaciones para buscar pareja entre hombres que tienen sexo con hombres (HSH), con el fin de comprender las diferencias en el uso entre sub-grupos. Se analizaron datos de una encuesta realizada por internet (N = 3105) para evaluar el uso de dichos sitios y aplicaciones. Más de la mitad (55.7%) de HSH en esta muestra eran usuarios frecuentes de sitios web y aplicaciones para buscar pareja. Dos tercios (66.7%) de los usuarios frecuentes tuvieron únicamente parejas casuales en los 12 meses previos y reportaron un alto número de parejas sexuales casuales en los 12 meses anteriores (Mdn = 5.0), en comparación con quienes nunca habían sido usuarios (Mdn = 0.0; χ 2(2) = 734.94, adj. p < .001). El sitio web o aplicación utilizado con mayor frecuencia fue Grindr, con el 60.2% de la muestra reportando uso ocasional o frecuente. Adam4Adam (23.5%), Jack’d (18.9%) y Scruff (18.7%) también se usaron con frecuencia. Los sitios web y aplicaciones para buscar pareja podrían ser canales efectivos para alcanzar un grupo diverso de HSH con mensajes para la prevención del VIH.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The findings and conclusions in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We would like to acknowledge and thank Donata Green, Nancy Habarta, Jennifer Uhrig, and Vanessa Boudewyns for their contributions to the survey development and implementation.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This research was approved by OMB#0920-0920 and the Institutional Review Board (RTI International). This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Purcell DW, Johnson CH, Lansky A, Prejean J, Stein R, Denning P, et al. Estimating the population size of men who have sex with men in the United States to obtain HIV and syphilis rates. Open AIDS J. 2012;6:98–107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    CDC. Diagnoses of HIV infection in the United States and dependent areas. Atlanta. GA: CDC; 2014. p. 2015.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hess K, Hu X, Lansky A, Mermin J, Hall HI. Estimating the lifetime risk of a diagnosis of HIV infection in the United States. In: Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI). Boston, 2016 [abstract 52].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Perrin A, Duggan M. Americans’ internet access: 2000-2015. Pew Research Center; June 2015.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grov C, Breslow AS, Newcomb ME, Rosenberger JG, Bauermeister JA. Gay and bisexual men’s use of the internet: research from the 1990s through 2013. J Sex Res. 2014;51(4):390–409.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parsons JT, Koken JA, Bimbi DS. The use of the internet by gay and bisexual male escorts: sex workers as sex educators. AIDS Care. 2004;16(8):1021–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bull S, McFarlane M. Soliciting sex on the internet: what are the risks for sexually transmitted diseases and HIV? Sex Transm Dis. 2000;27(9):545–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tikkanen R, Ross MW. Looking for sexual compatibility: experiences among swedish men in visiting internet gay chat rooms. CyberPsychol Behav. 2000;3(4):605–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Horvath K. Virtual and physical venues as contexts for HIV risk among rural men who have sex with men. Health Psychol. 2006;25(2):237–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Young SD, Cumberland WG, Lee S-J, Jaganath D, Szekeres G, Coates T. Social networking technologies as an emerging tool for HIV preventiona cluster randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(5):318–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stampler L. More men use dating apps than women. Time Magazine. 2015:February 17, 2016.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gordon ME. Flurry analytics blog [Internet]. Analytics F, editor: Flurry Analytics. 2013. http://flurrymobile.tumblr.com/post/113381180250/valentines-day-2013-looking-for-love-with-apps.
  13. 13.
    Rice E, Holloway IW, Winetrobe H, Rhoades H, Barman-Adhikari A, Gibbs J, et al. Sex risk among young men who have sex with men who use Grindr, a smartphone geosocial networking application. J AIDS Clin Res. 2012;S4(005).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Holloway IW, Rice E, Gibbs J, Winetrobe H, Dunlap S, Rhoades H. Acceptability of smartphone application-based HIV prevention among young men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(2):285–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wohlfeiler D, Hecht J, Volk J, Raymond HF, Kennedy T, McFarland W. How can we improve online HIV and STD prevention for men who have sex with men? Perspectives of hook-up website owners, website users, and HIV/STD. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(9). doi: 10.1007/s10461-012-0375-y.
  16. 16.
    Badal H, Habarta N. Reaching men who have sex with men (MSM): findings and lessons learned from the act against AIDS campaign and other HIV communication efforts. In: National Conference on Health Communication, Marketing, and Media, Atlanta, 2013.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Holloway IW, Dunlap S, del Pino HE, Hermanstyne K, Pulsipher C, Landovitz RJ. Online social networking, sexual risk and protective behaviors: considerations for clinicians and researchers. Curr Addict Rep. 2014;1(3):220–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lehmiller JJ, Ioerger M. Social networking smartphone applications and sexual health outcomes among men who have sex with men. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e86603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Landovitz RJ, Tseng C-H, Weissman M, Haymer M, Mendenhall B, Rogers K, et al. Epidemiology, sexual risk behavior, and HIV prevention practices of men who have sex with men using grindr in Los Angeles, California. J Urban Health. 2013;90(4):729–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Winetrobe H, Rice E, Bauermeister J, Petering R, Holloway IW. Associations of unprotected anal intercourse with Grindr-met partners among Grindr-using young men who have sex with men in Los Angeles. AIDS Care. 2014;26(10):1303–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hirshfield S, Grov C, Parsons JT, Anderson I, Chiasson MA. Social media use and HIV transmission risk behavior among ethnically diverse HIV-positive gay men: results of an online study in three U.S. States. Arch Sex Behav. 2015;44(7):1969–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Beymer MR, Weiss RE, Bolan RK, Rudy ET, Bourque LB, Rodriguez JP, et al. Sex on demand: geosocial networking phone apps and risk of sexually transmitted infections among a cross-sectional sample of men who have sex with men in Los Angeles County. Sex Transm Infect. 2014;90(7):567–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Grosskopf NA, LeVasseur MT, Glaser DB. Use of the internet and mobile-based “apps” for sex-seeking among men who have sex with men in New York City. Am J Mens Health. 2014;8(6):510–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mustanski B, Lyons T, Garcia SC. Internet use and sexual health of young men who have sex with men: a mixed-methods study. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40(2):289–300.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Grov C, Hirshfield S, Remien RH, Humberstone M, Chiasson MA. Exploring the venue’s role in risky sexual behavior among gay and bisexual men: an event-level analysis from a national online survey in the U.S. Arch Sex Behav. 2013;42(2):291–302.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Badal H, Habarta N, Boudewyns V, Bhalakia A, Stryker JE, DeLuca N. Reach and perceived effectiveness of act against AIDS testing campaigns targeting men who have sex with men. In: National HIV Prevention Conference, Atlanta, 2015.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Finlayson TJ, Le B, Smith A, Bowles K, Cribbin M, Miles I, et al. HIV risk, prevention, and testing behaviors among men who have sex with men–national HIV behavioral surveillance system, 21 U.S. Cities, United States, 2008. MMWR Surveill Summ (Washington, DC: 2002). 2011;60(14):1.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Montoya-Weiss M, Voss G, Grewal D. Determinants of online channel use and overall satisfaction with a relational, multichannel service provider. J Acad of Mark Sci. 2003;31(4):448–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kirby T, Thornber-Dunwell M. Phone apps could help promote sexual health in MSM. Lancet. 2014;384(9952):1415.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vaughan AS, Kramer MR, Cooper HLF, Rosenberg ES, Sullivan PS. Activity spaces of men who have sex with men: an initial exploration of geographic variation in locations of routine, potential sexual risk, and prevention behaviors. Soc Sci Med. 2017;175:1–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Xu F, Sternberg MR, Markowitz LE. Men who have sex with men in the United States: demographic and behavioral characteristics and prevalence of HIV and HSV-2 infection: results from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001-2006. Sex Transm Dis. 2010;37(6):399.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC (outside the USA) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hannah J. Badal
    • 1
    • 3
  • Jo Ellen Stryker
    • 1
  • Nickolas DeLuca
    • 2
  • David W. Purcell
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB PreventionCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Center for Global HealthCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Communication Studies, School of CommunicationNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations