Do translocal networks matter for agricultural innovation? A case study on advice sharing in small-scale farming communities in Northeast Thailand
Recent research on agricultural innovation has outlined social networks’ role in diffusing agricultural knowledge; however, so far, it has broadly neglected the socio-spatial dimensions of innovation processes. Against this backdrop, we apply a spatially explicit translocal network perspective in order to investigate the role of migration-related translocal networks for adaptive change in a small-scale farming community in Northeast Thailand. By means of formal social network analysis we map the socio-spatial patterns of advice sharing regarding changes in sugarcane and rice farming over a period of five years. We find that, in translocally connected and mobile rural communities, a substantial share of advice originates from translocal levels. Translocal advice is dominantly provided through weak and formal ties with extension agencies and shared by few highly central larger-scale farmers within sparse local networks. This draws the picture of top-down translocal innovation flows driven by extension agencies and brokered through elite farmers. A closer look on institutional context and key actors of particular changes, however, suggests the potential of migration-related translocal networks and migration experience in fostering bottom-up innovations. Migration-related innovations transfers can promote adaptive capacity also among less favorably connected actors, especially if changes are geared towards limited household resources and are compatible with social practices of small-scale farming. We conclude that a translocal network perspective is instructive for research and extension interested in leveraging more inclusive agricultural innovation.
KeywordsAgricultural innovation Farmer advice sharing Migration Northeast Thailand Social network analysis (SNA) Translocal knowledge transfers
Bank of agriculture and agricultural cooperatives
Department of agricultural extension
Social network analysis
This article is based on research funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Grant Number 01LN1309A. The responsibility for the contents of this publication lies with the authors. We thank the numerous interviewees for providing insights in their agricultural activities and their sources of advice. In particular we thank our excellent research assistants, Pichapon Robru and Nootchanok Jitpakdee, for facilitating and translating interviews, and Raks Thai Foundation for organizational support.
- Berdegué, J.A., T. Rosada, and A.J. Bebbington. 2014. The rural transformation. In International development: Ideas, experience, and prospects, ed. B. Currie-Alder, R. Kanbur, D.M. Malone, and R. Medhora, 463–478. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671656.001.0001.Google Scholar
- Bodin, Ö., B. Crona, and H. Ernstson. 2006. Social networks in natural resource management: What is there to learn from a structural perspective? Ecology and Society 11 (2): r2.Google Scholar
- Brickell, K., and A. Datta. 2011. Translocal geographies. Spaces, places, connections. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Darr, D., and J. Pretzsch. 2008. Mechanisms of innovation diffusion under information abundance and information scarcity—On the contribution of social networks in group vs. individual extension approaches in semi-arid Kenya. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 14 (3): 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/13892240802207676.Google Scholar
- Ellis, F. 2003. A livelihoods approach to migration and poverty reduction. Paper commissioned by the Department for International Development (DFID). CiteSeerX. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.553.5678&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2019.
- Granovetter, M.S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78 (6): 1360–1380.Google Scholar
- Hennig, M., U. Brandes, J. Pfeffer, and I. Mergel. 2012. Studying social networks: A guide to empirical research. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
- Hollstein, B., and F. Straus. 2006. Qualitative Netzwerkanalyse. Konzepte, Methoden, Anwendungen. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
- Marsden, P.V. 2005. Recent developments in network measurement. In Models and methods in social network analysis, ed. P.J. Carrington, J. Scott, and S. Wasserman, 8–30. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Mikhail, M., A. Fencl, S. Naruchaikusol, and E. Kemp-Benedict. 2010. Innovation and diffusion of sustainable agricultural water resource management in a changing climate: A case study in Northeast Thailand. Stockholm Environment Institute, Project report—2010. CAKE. https://www.cakex.org/sites/default/files/documents/sei-2010-innovation-diffusion-agriculture-thailand.pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2019.
- Naruchaikusol, S. 2016. Climate change in Thailand. TransRe Factsheet, Issue 2. transre. http://transre.org/files/9014/6859/1818/Climate_Change_in_Thailand_TransRe_Fact_Sheet_No._2.pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2019.
- Newman, L., and A. Dale. 2005. Network structure, diversity, and proactive resilience building: A response to Tompkins and Adger. Ecology and Society 10 (1): r2.Google Scholar
- Promburom, P., and P. Sakdapolrak. 2012. Where the rain falls project. Case study: Thailand. Results from Thung Hua Chang District, Northern Thailand. UNU EHS. https://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:1845/pdf10818.pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2019.
- Salpeteur, M., H.H.R. Patel, J.L. Molina, A.L. Balbo, X. Rubio-Campillo, V. Reyes-García, and M. Madella. 2016. Comigrants and friends: Informal networks and the transmission of traditional ecological knowledge among seminomadic pastoralists of Gujarat, India. Ecology and Society 21 (2): 20. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08332-210220.Google Scholar
- Schut, M., L. Klerkx, J. Rodenburg, J. Kayeke, L.C. Hinnou, C.M. Raboanarielina, P.Y. Adegbola, A. van Ast, and L. Bastiaans. 2015. RAAIS: Rapid appraisal of agricultural innovation systems (Part I). A diagnostic tool for integrated analysis of complex problems and innovation capacity. Agricultural Systems 132: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.08.009.Google Scholar
- Scott, J. 2013. Social network analysis, 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Steinbrink, M. 2009. Leben zwischen Land und Stadt. Migration, Translokalität und Verwundbarkeit in Südafrika. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
- Thuo, M., A.A. Bell, B.E. Bravo-Ureta, M.A. Lachaud, D.K. Okello, E. Nasambu Okoko, N.L. Kidula, C.M. Deom, and N. Puppala. 2014. Effects of social network factors on information acquisition and adoption of improved groundnut varieties: The case of Uganda and Kenya. Agriculture and Human Values 31 (3): 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-014-9486-6.Google Scholar
- Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social network analysis. Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Wossen, T., T. Berger, T. Mequaninte, and B. Alamirew. 2013. Social network effects on the adoption of sustainable natural resource management practices in Ethiopia. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 20 (6): 477–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2013.856048.Google Scholar