A spatially explicit tree search application for agroforestry in the United States

  • Michael BoruckeEmail author
  • Derek Howard
  • Shibu Jose


A spatially explicit application has been developed for the conterminous United States to assist farmers and extension agents with selecting appropriate tree species for agroforestry applications. The application combines several spatially explicit databases of tree species, high-resolution soil data, and climate. On the front-end of the application, a simple graphical user interface (GUI) allows the user to indicate their location, the size of the area to be searched, and the functional use category for the trees. These parameters are used to query a PostGRESQL relational database management system on the back-end via a Python script. All tree species within the user-specified area and matching the user-specified objectives, are returned to the web page along with tree characteristics, and soil and climate data for the specified location. Expert feedback on the application was solicited and used to make improvements to the service. The accuracy of the application was tested at several locations in Missouri, USA, and found satisfactory.


Agroforestry Tree species selection Database Webservice Spatially explicit Plant hardiness zones 



The authors would like to thank all the agroforestry professionals and land managers who gave feedback on the application.


  1. Butler PR, Iverson L, Thompson FR, Brandt L, Handler S, Janowiak M et al (2015) Central Appalachians forest ecosystem vulnerability assessment and synthesis: a report from the Central Appalachians Climate Change Response Framework project. General Technical Report, NRS-146. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, vol 146, pp 1–310Google Scholar
  2. Daly C, Widrlechner MP, Halbleib MD, Smith JI, Gibson WP (2012) Development of a new USDA plant hardiness zone map for the United States. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 51(2):242–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Digitized Plant Hardiness Zone Map (2015) Open Plant Hardiness Zone. Accessed 2 Feb 2016
  4. Ellis EA, Nair PKR, Linehan PE, Beck HW, Blanche CA (2000) A GIS-based database management application for agroforestry planning and tree selection. Comput Electron Agric 27(1):41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellis EA, Bentrup G, Schoeneberger MM (2004) Computer-based tools for decision support in agroforestry: current state and future needs. Agroforestry Systems 61:401–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellis EA, Nair PKR, Jeswani SD (2005) Development of a web-based application for agroforestry planning and tree selection. Comput Electron Agric 49(1):129–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (4th April 2016) GBIF Occurrence Download.
  8. U.S. Geological Survey (1999) Digital representation of “Atlas of United States Trees” by Elbert L. Little, Jr.Google Scholar
  9. Graymore ML, Wallis AM, Richards AJ (2009) An Index of regional sustainability: a GIS-based multiple criteria analysis decision support system for progressing sustainability. Ecol Complex 6(4):453–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gunderson CA, Edwards NT, Walker AV, O’Hara KH, Campion CM, Hanson PJ (2012) Forest phenology and a warmer climate–growing season extension in relation to climatic provenance. Glob Change Biol 18(6):2008–2025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jacke D, Toensmeier E (2005) Edible forest gardens, volume II: ecological design and practice for temperate-climate permaculture. Chelsea Green Publishing, White River Junction, VermontGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones KS, Costello LR (2007) Selecting fruit, nut, and berry crops for home gardens in San Mateo and San Francisco Counties Publication 8261 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. Jose S (2011) Managing native and non-native plants in agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 83(2):101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Luedeling E, Zhang M, Girvetz EH (2009) Climatic changes lead to declining winter chill for fruit and nut trees in California during 1950––2099. PLoS ONE 4(7):e6166. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. McKENNEY DW, Pedlar JH, Lawrence K, Campbell K, Hutchinson MF (2007) Beyond traditional hardiness zones: using climate envelopes to map plant range limits. Bioscience 57(11):929–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Orwa C (2010) Agroforestree Database 4.0: a tree reference and selection guide. World Agroforestry CentreGoogle Scholar
  17. Park IW, Schwartz MD (2015) Long-term herbarium records reveal temperature-dependent changes in flowering phenology in the southeastern USA. Int J Biometeorol 59(3):347–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Plants for a Future (PFAF) (2011), Plant Database Search. (n.d.). Retrieved 11 June 2011
  19. Soil Survey Staff (2014). Gridded Soil Survey Geographic (gSSURGO) Database for the United States of America and the Territories, Commonwealths, and Island Nations served by the USDA-NRCS. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 20 Feb 2016 (FY2014 official release)
  20. University of Missouri-Columbia. Center for Agroforestry (2015) Training manual for applied agroforestry practices. University of Missouri Center for AgroforestryGoogle Scholar
  21. Vegetation Impact Program (VIP), Midwestern Regional Climate Center (2016) Illinois State Water Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Accessed 25 Apr 2016Google Scholar
  22. Vogel KP, Schmer MR, Mitchell RB (2005) Plant adaptation regions: ecological and climatic classification of plant materials. Rangel Ecol Manag 58(3):315–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wallace DC, Young FJ (2008). Black walnut suitability index: a natural resources conservation service national soil information system based interpretive model. In: Proceedings, 16th Central Hardwood forest conference, West Lafayette, IN, pp 589–595Google Scholar
  24. Widrlechner MP, Daly C, Keller M, Kaplan K (2012) Horticultural applications of a newly revised USDA plant hardiness zone map. HortTechnology 22(1):6–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilson BT, Lister AJ, Riemann RI (2012) A nearest-neighbor imputation approach to mapping tree species over large areas using forest inventory plots and moderate resolution raster data. For Ecol Manag 271:182–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wilson BT, Lister AJ, Riemann RI, Griffith DM (2013) Live tree species basal area of the contiguous United States (2000–2009). USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Newtown Square. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Woodall CW, Oswalt CM, Westfall JA, Perry CH, Nelson MD, Finley AO (2009) An indicator of tree migration in forests of the eastern United States. For Ecol Manag 257(5):1434–1444CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Natural ResourcesUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations