Designing multifunctional woody polycultures according to landowner preferences in Central Illinois
Multifunctional woody polycultures (MWPs) are an alternative agricultural practice gaining interest in the U.S. Corn Belt as an option for combining agricultural production and conservation goals. MWPs integrate fruit, nut, timber, and/or bioenergy crops adjacent to annual crops. Previous studies revealed that landowners lack adequate information to make informed decisions regarding the adoption of MWPs. Following up on that work, this study engaged with 15 rural landowners in the Upper Sangamon River Watershed of Central Illinois to identify their design preferences, their information needs, and the adoption potential for MWPs. Landowner-specific designs were constructed based on three predefined alternative scenarios distinguished by their focus on: (1) production, (2) conservation, or (3) cultural functions. Two semi-structured interviews were conducted with landowners before and after the design process. Results from quantitative analysis and qualitative interpretation showed landowners preferred designs that integrated high levels of edible nuts and berries in an efficient, machine-harvestable arrangement. Nut-producing species, notably northern-adapted varieties of pecan (Carya illinoinensis), were the most preferred. The most influential motivators for the design and adoption of MWPs were utilizing high-value edible crops, improving pollinator and wildlife habitat, and increasing productivity of marginal land. While important, landowners felt these motivators still did not overcome limitations in the practical application of MWPs due to a lack of harvest machinery, of post-harvest processing facilities, and of accessible markets. The study findings demonstrate that a lack of reliable economic, marketing, and management information severely constrains the adoption potential of MWPs despite landowner interest in using MWPs on marginal lands.
KeywordsMultifunctional woody polycultures Landowner Preferences Design Scenarios Visualizations Participatory
This material is based on work supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under Award No. 2014-68006-22041. The Illinois Nutrient Research and Education Council provided additional funding and support. We owe so much to the cooperation and interest of all our participants in this study. Our work absolutely depended on our participants’ willingness to share their thoughts, insight, and life goals.
- Gold MA, Godsey LD, Josiah SJ (2004) Markets and marketing strategies for agroforestry specialty products in North America. Agrofor Syst 61–62:371–384. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000029011.42829.83 Google Scholar
- Keefer L, Bauer E (2011) Upper Sangamon River watershed monitoring data for the USEPA targeted watershed study: 2005–2008. ISWS Contract Report 2011-03Google Scholar
- MacDonald JM, Korb P, Hoppe RA (2013) Farm size and the organization of U.S. crop farming. USDA ERS ERR-152Google Scholar
- Mori GO, Gold M, Jose S (2017) Specialty crops in temperate agroforestry systems: sustainable management, marketing and promotion for the Midwest region of the U.S.A. In: Montagnini F (ed) Integrating landscapes: agroforestry for biodiversity conservation and food sovereignty. Springer, Cham, pp 331–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nassauer JI, Corry RC (2004) Using normative scenarios in landscape ecology. Landsc Ecol 19:343–356. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAND.0000030666.55372.ae CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rogers E (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Schulte LA, Asbjornsen H, Liebman M, Crow TR (2006) Agroecosystem restoration through strategic integration of perennials. J Soil Water Conserv 61:164A–169AGoogle Scholar
- Steinitz C, Anderson R, Arias H et al (2005) Alternative futures for landscapes in the Upper San Pedro River Basin of Arizona and Sonora. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international partners in flight conference, 20–24 March 2002, Asilomar, California, vol 1. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research StationGoogle Scholar
- USDA NASS (2012) Census of agriculture: quick stats. https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov. Accessed 2 Apr 2018
- USDA NASS (2017) Cropscape cropland data layer. https://nassgeodata.gmu.edu/CropScape/. Accessed 5 Feb 2017
- Wells GR, Fribourg HA, Schlarbaum SE et al (2003) Alternate land uses for marginal soils. J Soil Water Conserv 58:73–81Google Scholar
- White EM (2010) Woody biomass for bioenergy and biofuels in the United States: a briefing paper. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, PortlandGoogle Scholar