Angiogenesis

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 183–202 | Cite as

miRNAs regulate the HIF switch during hypoxia: a novel therapeutic target

  • Marcin Serocki
  • Sylwia Bartoszewska
  • Anna Janaszak-Jasiecka
  • Renata J. Ochocka
  • James F. Collawn
  • Rafał Bartoszewski
Open Access
Review Paper

Abstract

The decline of oxygen tension in the tissues below the physiological demand leads to the hypoxic adaptive response. This physiological consequence enables cells to recover from this cellular insult. Understanding the cellular pathways that mediate recovery from hypoxia is therefore critical for developing novel therapeutic approaches for cardiovascular diseases and cancer. The master regulators of oxygen homeostasis that control angiogenesis during hypoxia are hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs). HIF-1 and HIF-2 function as transcriptional regulators and have both unique and overlapping target genes, whereas the role of HIF-3 is less clear. HIF-1 governs the acute adaptation to hypoxia, whereas HIF-2 and HIF-3 expressions begin during chronic hypoxia in human endothelium. When HIF-1 levels decline, HIF-2 and HIF-3 increase. This switch from HIF-1 to HIF-2 and HIF-3 signaling is required in order to adapt the endothelium to prolonged hypoxia. During prolonged hypoxia, the HIF-1 levels and activity are reduced, despite the lack of oxygen-dependent protein degradation. Although numerous protein factors have been proposed to modulate the HIF pathways, their application for HIF-targeted therapy is rather limited. Recently, the miRNAs that endogenously regulate gene expression via the RNA interference (RNAi) pathway have been shown to play critical roles in the hypoxia response pathways. Furthermore, these classes of RNAs provide therapeutic possibilities to selectively target HIFs and thus modulate the HIF switch. Here, we review the significance of the microRNAs on the relationship between the HIFs under both physiological and pathophysiological conditions.

Keywords

microRNAs HIFs Hypoxia Target protectors Morpholinos 

Abbreviations

ARNT

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator

CDKN1A

p21—cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1

CUL2

Cullin-2

DICER1

Endoribonuclease Dicer

EFNA3

Ephrin A3

EGLN1

Prolyl hydroxylase domain-containing protein 2 (PHD2)

ELK3

ETS domain-containing protein Elk-3

EPAS1

Endothelial PAS domain-containing protein 1 (also known as hypoxia-inducible factor-2alpha HIF-2alpha)

FBXW7

F-box/WD repeat-containing protein 7

GPD1L

Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 1-like

HIF1A

Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha

HIF1AN

Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha inhibitor

HIF3A

Hypoxia-inducible factor 3 alpha

HMOX1

Heme oxygenase (decycling) 1

KLF2

Kruppel-like factor 2

IDH2

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (NADP)

IRS-1

Insulin receptor substrate 1

NRAS

Neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog

PDCD4

Programmed cell death protein 4

PDK4

Pyruvate dehydrogenase lipoamide kinase isozyme 4

PTEN

Phosphatase and tensin homolog

RPS6KB1

p70S6 kinase

SIRT1

Sirtuin 1

STAT3

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3

VEGFA

Vascular endothelial growth factor

YWHAZ

14-3-3 Protein zeta/delta

The different roles of HIF-1, HIF-2 and HIF-3 during hypoxia

Many of the deadliest human diseases including coronary artery disease, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cancer are associated with various levels of hypoxia. Cell survival during hypoxia requires the activation of a number of molecular signaling pathways that stimulate angiogenesis, erythropoietin production and metabolism reprogramming to favor glycolysis, and this biological response is termed the hypoxic adaptive response [1]. Unsuccessful oxygen homeostasis, however, that results from chronic hypoxia, may lead to apoptosis, except in the case of various types of cancer [2]. The hypoxic adaptive response, therefore, is crucial for recovery from stroke or myocardial infarction, whereas re-activation of the hypoxia-related cell death pathway can lead to inhibition of tumor growth. Having the ability to manipulate this pathway, therefore, offers a number of important therapeutic opportunities.

The activation of the hypoxic adaptive response depends on the function of transcription factors called hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs). HIFs in response to the unmet oxygen demand of cells activate a number of signaling pathways that are required for cell survival [3]. There are three different HIFs, HIF-1, HIF-2 and HIF-3, that are present in human tissues and are tightly regulated through changes in oxygen tension [4]. HIFs are heterodimers of stable, constitutively expressed β subunits (also called aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator or HIF-1β (ARNT), HIF-2β (ARNT2) and HIF-3β (ARNTL) that associate with the hypoxia-induced α subunits, HIF-1α, HIF-2α and HIF-3α [5] (Fig. 1). The amino-terminal end of both α and β subunits consists of basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) and PAS (PER–ARNT–SIM) domains that mediate heterodimerization and DNA binding [6]. The carboxy-terminal domain of HIF-1α and HIF-2α consists of domains that regulate its stability (the oxygen-dependent degradation domain, ODD) and transcriptional activity (two transactivation domains (TADs), N-TAD and C-TAD [6]. Furthermore, both the C- and N-termini of α subunits have nuclear localization signals (N-NLS and C-NLS, respectively) that direct them to the nucleus [7]. HIF-1α and HIF-2α have 48% amino acid sequence identity and similar protein structures, and they differ mainly within the N-TAD domain [8]. HIF-3α is similar to HIF-1α and HIF-2α in the bHLH and PAS domains, but lacks the C-terminal transactivation domain [2]. Alternative splicing of HIF3A, however, as well as utilization of different promoters results in at least four different HIF3A mRNA variants that code for six or more isoforms [9]. To date, the most studied HIF-3 variant is the inhibitory PAS domain protein (IPAS), which is a truncated protein [10] that inhibits HIF-1 and HIF-2 activity in cell culture [10]. The other human HIF-3 isoforms, in contrast, were reported to induce gene expression, indicating that that HIF-3 can also be an important transcriptional regulator of hypoxic signaling [11, 12].
Fig. 1

Schematic representation of the HIF subunit domain structures. ODD oxygen-dependent degradation domain, bHLH basic helix–loop–helix, PAS PER–ARNT–SIM, TAD transactivation domain, aa number of amino acid residues

Regulation of HIF stability

All three HIF-α proteins show oxygen-regulated protein stability [5]. During normoxia, posttranslational hydroxylations of alpha subunits occur by hydroxylase enzymes, proline-hydroxylases (PHDs) and factor inhibiting hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (FIH-1; also known as HIF-1α subunit inhibitor, HIF1AN). During normoxia, these hydroxylase enzymes target the alpha subunits for polyubiquitination and degradation [13]. The PHD-dependent hydroxylation of specific proline residues in the ODD domains leads to recruitment of the product of the tumor suppressor gene von Hippel-Lindau E3 ligase (pVHL) and other protein cofactors and results in 26S proteasomal degradation of the alpha subunits. The crucial role of pVHL in regulation of HIF homeostasis is illustrated by the fact that mice embryos with inactivation of VHL die in utero due to defects in placental development, whereas heterozygous VHL mice appear phenotypically normal [14].

In order to hydroxylate HIF-α, PHDs require molecular oxygen, 2-oxoglutarate, iron ions (Fe2+) and ascorbic acid [15]. Furthermore, PHDs isoforms show different HIF specificity and PHD-2 activity is mainly HIF-1α-specific [16], whereas HIF-2α levels are controlled mainly by PHD-3 [17]. Although the complete ablation of Phd1 and Phd3 in mice had very limited effects on animal development and phenotype, the disruption of the Phd2 gene resulted in a global increase in HIF-α levels and severe placental and heart defects that resulted in embryonic death [18].

The second hydroxylase, FIH-1, regulates the transcriptional activity of the heterodimeric complex by hydroxylation of a single asparagine residue in transactivation domains of the α subunits of HIF-1 and HIF-2 [19]. This posttranslational modification prevents a late key step in the HIF activation process, the dependent recruitment of the co-activators CREB-binding protein (CBP, also known as CREBBP) and p300, which have histone acetyltransferase activity [20]. The FIH-1 activity also requires molecular oxygen. Importantly, FIH-1 preferentially hydroxylates HIF-1α and requires lower oxygen tension to maintain activity than PHD-2 [21]. Interestingly however, the complete impairment of FIH gene expression in mice had little to no effect on related HIF signaling, including angiogenesis, erythropoiesis, or development [22]. Hence, further examination of whether FIH-1 regulates HIFα activity in vivo is necessary.

During normoxia, both PHD-2 and FIH-1 are active and maintain low HIF protein levels and transcriptional activity [23]. However, low oxygen tension impairs PHD-2 and FIH-1 activities and leads to the HIF-alpha subunit stabilization. Subsequently, the alpha subunits translocate to the nucleus and after dimerization with the β subunits form transcriptionally active HIF complexes [24]. HIF-1 and HIF-2 mediate the endothelial hypoxic response by binding to the hypoxia response element (HRE) sequences in the promoters of their unique and common target genes and enhance their expression [2]. The HREs consist of an asymmetric E-box motif RCGTG (where R is A or G) [25]. Although HIF-mediated negative transcriptional regulation has been reported [26], it is almost entirely indirect [27]. Finally, the hypoxic recruitment of the CREBBP and p300 to HIF complexes allows an additional level of modulation of HIF transcriptional activity in response to various environmental stimuli [20], whereas the hypoxia-induced sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) selectively deacetylates HIF-1α during hypoxia and leads to increased HIF-1 activity [28].

HIF target genes

HIF-1 complexes are present in all tissues, whereas HIF-2 is limited to specific cell types that include endothelial cells (ECs), glial cells, type II pneumocytes, cardiomyocytes, kidney fibroblasts, interstitial cells and hepatocytes [29]. In vitro studies show that the efficiency of hydroxylation of HIF-2α, by both the PHDs and FIH-1, is much lower than for HIF-1α, which results in the accumulation and activation of HIF-2α at higher oxygen tensions than HIF-1α [30]. However, although the O2 tensions stabilizing the HIF-2α in vitro were often close to the physiological ones observed in tissues (normoxia in situ), HIF-2α was not detected under normoxic conditions in vivo in the organs examined [31, 32].

The genes activated by HIF-1 enhance oxygen delivery to the tissues and/or promote cellular metabolic adaption to the reduced oxygen levels [3]. Indeed, HIF-1, but not HIF-2, is responsible for the transcriptional regulation of the glycolytic pathway enzymes such as phosphofructokinase (PFK) and lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) [33]. Furthermore, HIF-1 induces genes that are involved in pH regulation (monocarboxylate transporter 4 (MCT4) and carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA-IX)); in apoptosis induction (BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19 kDa-interacting protein 3 (BNIP3) and BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19 kDa-interacting protein 3-like (BNIP3L/NIX)) [17]; and in maintaining endothelial homeostasis (endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS3)) [34]. Another target of HIF-1 during hypoxia is heme oxygenase-1 (HMOX1) that has pro-angiogenic activity [35], whereas HIF-2 stimulates the expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) 2 and 13 and the stem cell factor OCT-3/4 [17]. Furthermore, silencing HIF-2α in human microvascular endothelial cells (hMVECs) exposed to prolonged hypoxia indicated that the transcriptional activity of this HIF isoform specifically inhibited endothelial sprouting [36, 37]. This specific activation of HIF target gene expression was proposed to be independent of selective HRE-binding and relied on the non-equivalent C-terminal regions of these factors’ alpha subunits [38].

Common targets of HIF-1 and HIF-2 include the vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), the glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) and erythropoietin (EPO) [2]. However, the latter one is considered to be mainly a HIF-2 target gene [29]. Erythropoiesis relies on iron availability, and HIFs regulate the expression of several genes involved in iron homeostasis, including transferrin [39]. Importantly, a conserved iron response element (IRE) identified in the 5′UTR of HIF-2α mRNA was shown to mediate HIF-2α protein translation during increased iron availability, thereby providing a functional link between hypoxia-related erythropoiesis and iron homeostasis [40, 41].

It needs to be stressed that for many genes, the HIF selectivity is highly cell-type-specific [42]. The differences in tissue-specific effects of HIF-1 and HIF-2 on target genes have been proposed to be conferred by cooperation of the HIF-alpha TAD domains (particularly the N-TAD) with other transcription cofactors, possibly in a tissue-specific manner [43]. To date, members of Ets family transcription factors have been shown to support HIF-2α-related hypoxic gene induction [43, 44, 45]. Importantly, although endogenous HIF-2 alone was shown to be inefficient in compensating for HIF-1 function during hypoxia [46], it has been also reported that in the absence of HIF-1, the exogenous HIF-2 was able to activate HIF-1-specific genes and vice versa [46, 47]. Furthermore, in HIF-2α knockdown mice, HIF-1α regulates the expression of genes that are normally regulated by HIF-2α [48].

HIF knockout/knockdown animal models

The essential role of the HIF pathway in the cellular and developmental aspects of oxygen homeostasis has been also confirmed in animal knockout/knockdown models. Furthermore, the results of HIF-specific knockouts and knockdowns stress the different biological and transcriptional functions of these factors as well as their complex physiological functions [49]. The complete impairment of HIF-1α expression in mouse tissues results in developmental arrest and early embryonic lethality that manifested as defects in capillarization and a complete lack of cephalic vascularization and a greatly increased degree of hypoxia [50, 51]. Similarly, mice with complete deficiency of HIF-2α were embryonic or perinatal lethal, with embryos that develop severe vascular defects [52, 53]. However, by crossing mice in different genetic backgrounds, a small fraction of viable Hif-2α-null adult mice were obtained [54]. These mice exhibit multi-organ dysfunction associated with increased oxidative stress levels, suggesting that HIF-2α is a crucial factor for regulating the expression of antioxidant enzymes [54]. Importantly, HIF-2α knockout mice did not show impaired blood vessels formation by vasculogenesis, but later fusion and assembly, suggesting that HIF-2α activity is critical for the remodeling of the primary vascular network into a mature hierarchy pattern [52]. Hence, both HIF-1 and HIF-2 play essential roles, but cannot fully compensate for each other during embryonic development [2]. Taken together, the data imply the necessity of the transition from HIF-1- to HIF-2 signaling during embryonic vascular development in order to adapt it to the increase in oxygen tension as the vasculature develops. However, the mechanism for the developmental switch from HIF-1 to HIF-2 remains unknown.

In contrast to the lethal HIF-1α and HIF-2α mice models, the HIF-3α-depleted mice were viable, but displayed impaired heart and lung development during the embryonic and neonatal stages [55]. The loss of HIF-3α in mouse pulmonary endothelial cells results in impaired angiogenesis both in normoxic and in hypoxic conditions, supporting the direct transcriptional involvement of HIF-3 in hypoxic signaling [56].

Since the analysis of a biological function of HIF-1α and HIF-2α after birth is hampered by the null mice lethality, heterozygous mice and cell-type-specific HIF-1α and HIF-2α knockouts/knockdowns remain the main tools for studying the consequences of these HIF functional impairments [57]. Mice that are HIF-1α heterozygous develop normally and are indistinguishable from their wild-type littermates in normoxia [50, 58]. Upon exposure to chronic hypoxia, however, these mice develop ventilatory abnormalities [59]. The wild-type mice, however, were more prone to develop polycythemia, right ventricular hypertrophy, pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary vascular remodeling during chronic hypoxia [58]. Furthermore, numerous studies that examined the consequences of loss of HIF-1α in different tissues demonstrated that this transcription factor’s function is not limited to hypoxic adaptation, but also modulates other critical physiological functions [57] including immune responses [60], chondrogenesis [61] and osteoblast development [62]. Importantly, mouse endothelial cells (ECs) lacking HIF-1α display reduced proliferation and decreased tubular network formation during hypoxia, and loss of HIF-1α in these cells leads to impairment of a hypoxia-driven VEGF autocrine loop that is crucial for tumorigenesis [63].

HIF-2α heterozygous knockdown mice show normal development similar to HIF-1α heterozygous knockdown [64]. Importantly, upon exposure to hypoxia, the HIF-2α knockdown mice displayed impaired neovascularization in the retina [64]. Furthermore, the reduced HIF-2α expression in these animals results in higher susceptibility to renal injury, and elevation of endothelia-related oxidative stress response signaling [65]. In contrast, heterozygosity for HIF-2α appeared to be protective against pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular hypertrophy induced by chronic hypoxia [49], similar to HIF-1α heterozygosity. Although HIF-2α knockdown mice are anemic, the anemia did not affect their susceptibility to ischemia [65]. Importantly, the acute deletion of HIF-2α resulted in anemia associated with decreased levels of circulating Epo and thus confirmed that this gene is a physiological target of HIF-2α in adult mice [66]. Interestingly, the specific deletion of HIF-2α in murine endothelial cells did not affect mouse development, but resulted in increased vessel permeability, aberrant endothelial cell ultrastructure, cell adhesion and pulmonary hypertension [67]. HIF-2α-depleted ECs displayed defective hypoxic induction of target genes that likely contribute to these phenotypes [67]. Importantly, the VEGF expression was unaffected in HIF-2α-depleted ECs, suggesting that this gene is a HIF-1-specific target in these cells [4, 67].

HIF effects on angiogenesis

Taken together, the results of HIF-specific knockouts imply different physiological functions of HIF-alpha isoforms with HIF-1 promoting initial angiogenesis, and HIF-2 and HIF-3 instructing further development of the vascular network in a tissue-specific manner. Overall, the studies highlight the necessity of maintaining a proper HIF balance during development and during pathological conditions.

Consequently, in endothelium exposed to hypoxic stress, HIF-1 governs the initial/acute adaptation to hypoxia and promotes the formation of a primitive vascular network, whereas HIF-2 and HIF-3 expressions begin after more prolonged oxygen depletion and allow maturation and stabilization of this vasculature [2]. Furthermore, the formation of HIF-1-dependent vasculature leads to increased perfusion and thus increases in oxygen concentrations that may lead to HIF-2 accumulation, which is less prone to oxygen-dependent destabilization. Hence, in endothelial tissues, there is a switch in HIF signaling during prolonged hypoxia. The HIF-1 levels are reduced during this period, whereas HIF-2 and HIF-3 are induced and accumulate. As shown in the primary human endothelial cells (HUVECs) in Fig. 2, HIF-1 governs the HRE-dependent cellular responses during first 8 h of hypoxia, then HIF-2 becomes main regulator for the next 24 h. Importantly, both HIF-1 and HIF-2 are highly expressed at the 8-h time point, showing that in cell culture, the HIF switch occurs gradually within hours. Furthermore, the inability to reduce the HIF-1 levels during prolonged hypoxia leads to cell death, making this a potential therapeutic target in cancer. Therefore, the described HIF switch is crucial for endothelial adaptation to continuous oxygen depletion. Passing the signal from HIF-1 to HIF-2 and eventually to HIF-3 allows the cells the ability to promote angiogenesis and long-term survival.
Fig. 2

Hypoxia (0.8% O2) induces dynamic changes in the protein expression profile of the Hif-1α, Hif-2α and HIF-3α in primary HUVECs (pooled from 10 donors, passage 3). The protein levels of were detected with SDS-PAGE and Western blot and normalized to β Actin levels. Two individual samples (20 µg of total protein per lane) were tested for each time point, and the experiments were repeated twice. The primary antibodies used were: Hif-1α (Abcam ab16066, diluted at 1:2000); Hif-2α (Abcam ab199, diluted at 1:1000), Hif-3α [12] (Sigma AV39936, diluted at 1:1000), beta Actin (Abcam ab1801, diluted at 1:1000)

To date, only a few studies have evaluated the genome-wide effects of HIFs in vitro in human pulmonary artery ECs and HUVECs during 24 and 48 h of hypoxic exposure [68, 69]. Furthermore, there are no reports that focus on the transcriptional consequences of acute hypoxia (less than 12 h) and only one that followed the effects of prolonged hypoxia (14 days) in human microvascular endothelial cells (hMVECs) [36]. However, the genome-wide analysis of human colon carcinoma cells compared the transcriptome changes observed during acute hypoxia during chronic hypoxia and found dramatic differences in the hypoxia transcriptional response [70], with similar results also described in [71]. Acute hypoxia affected the expression of only 196 genes, whereas chronic hypoxia resulted in changes in 4149 transcripts [70]. Interestingly, 144 genes were common for these two types of hypoxia [70]. These large-scale changes in transcriptome are presumably required to adapt the cells to chronic hypoxia. Although this differential expression mainly results from the activation of downstream transcriptional effects during hypoxia, it is also a result of the different HIF isoforms.

To take advantage of regulating angiogenesis as a possible therapeutic intervention, it is important to understand the molecular pathways governing endothelial adaptation to hypoxia and especially the HIF switch from HIF-1 to HIF-2. It should also be emphasized that the distinction between acute and prolonged hypoxia is rather arbitrary and does not necessarily reflect the pathological conditions. For example, in vivo tissue oxygen tension can remain low for prolonged periods and often switches (in tumor tissues) or cycles between normoxic and hypoxic levels. Finally, most of the studies relate hypoxic conditions to normoxia defined as atmospheric oxygen pressure (above 20%), and this is many fold higher than physiological normoxia in situ.

Although HIF regulation during normoxic conditions is carefully controlled by the hydroxylases described above, how HIF activity and angiogenesis are controlled during hypoxia is less clear. The mechanisms underlying the HIF switch and related HIF-1 level reductions remain poorly understood. Importantly during prolonged hypoxia, the HIF-1 levels are reduced, despite the lack of oxygen-dependent degradation.

Other mechanisms that regulate the HIF switch

SART1, the human homolog of murine hypoxia-associated factor (HAF), is a transcription factor that has been proposed to be a crucial mediator of the HIF switch. The SART1/HAF protein selectively binds and degrades HIF-1α while promoting HIF-2α stability and transactivation [72]. The SART1 levels first decrease during acute hypoxia and gradually increase with prolonged hypoxia exposure that destabilizes HIF-1 and stabilizes HIF-2 [73]. Therefore, SART1 provides an elegant mechanism for the protein stability-based switch from HIF-1 to HIF-2 signaling [2]. Another mechanism that contributes to the HIF switch is based on the Hsp70/CHIP (carboxyl terminus of Hsp70-interacting protein) complex that during prolonged hypoxia selectively ubiquitylates HIF-1α but not HIF-2α and leads to proteasomal degradation [74]. A third mechanism potentially involved in the protein stability-based switch from HIF-1 to HIF-2 signaling relies on the interplay between the receptor for activated kinase C1 (RACK1) that promotes degradation of HIF-1α and the heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) that stabilizes the α subunit [75, 76]. RACK1 promotes PHD-/VHL-independent proteasomal degradation of HIF-1α and competes with Hsp90 for binding to the PAS-A domain of HIF-1α [75, 76]. RACK1 binds to Elongin-C and promotes ubiquitination of HIF-1α [75, 76]. Also, human double min 2 (hdm2) has been reported to induce HIF-1α proteasomal degradation in a p53-dependent manner [77].

Another example is the Kruppel-like Factor 2 (KLF2), which is strongly expressed in endothelial cells and necessary for normal vessel formation [78]. KLF2 has been shown to selectively promote Hif-1α degradation during hypoxia in a von Hippel-Lindau-independent, but proteasome-dependent manner through disruption of the interaction between Hif-1α and Hsp90. Interestingly, Klf2 has no effect on Hif-2α protein stability [79]. Furthermore, as suggested by studies in the conditional PHD2-deficient mice [80, 81], the HIF-1-dependent induction PHD3 that is able to govern HIF-2α degradation both in normoxia and in hypoxia [15] could be a limiting factor for HIF-2α levels during hypoxia. Hence, HIF-1 through induction of PHD3 could prevent premature HIF-2 accumulation during acute hypoxia and thus provide an addition mechanism for the HIF switch.

Clearly, further studies will be necessary to clarify whether these above mechanisms provide the selection between HIF-1 and HIF-2. The above-discussed mechanisms contributing the HIF switch strongly rely on stabilizing/destabilizing α subunits and have been described mainly in cancer cells and animal models. Determining whether similar regulatory mechanisms also take place in normal human endothelia from different vascular beds remains an open question.

The stability of the mRNA of HIF-α subunits also differs during hypoxia following the HIF switch. Indeed, the HIF1A mRNA after the initial induction is reduced to normoxic levels, whereas EPAS1 and HIF3A mRNAs stabilize and accumulate during prolonged hypoxia [12]. Hence, the selective reduction of the protein output from existing HIF-α subunits transcripts provides a novel mechanism for controlling HIF expression and their related signaling during hypoxia.

Role of miRs in regulating HIF signaling

microRNAs (miRNAs, miRs) are nonprotein coding RNA molecules that govern mRNA stability and translation by binding to the 3′UTR of the mRNA, resulting in reduced protein levels. microRNAs are encoded in both introns and intergenic clusters as short inverted repeats and have a double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) stem loop that is about 70 bp long [82]. These primary microRNAs (pri-miRNA) genes are transcribed by RNA polymerase II into long primary miRNA (pri-miRNA) transcripts [83]. The double-strand-specific ribonuclease Drosha-DGCR8 complex processes the pri-miRNA transcripts to the precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA) stem loop structures [83]. The pre-miRNAs are next transported to the cytoplasm where they are cleaved by the Dicer RNAase III endonuclease to produce the mature 21–23 nucleotide miRNAs [83, 84]. Mature miRNAs are incorporated into the Argonaute-containing silencing complexes called the miRNA ribonucleoprotein complex (miRNP) and down regulate specific target mRNAs via either decreasing the transcript levels or by translational repression [85, 86]. They act as adaptors for the miRNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) to initiate mRNA decay and thus reduce protein output. Mature miRNAs recognize their target mRNAs through base-pairing interactions between nucleotides numbers 2 and 8 of the miRNA (the seed region) and the complementary nucleotides in the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) of the mRNAs [87].

Given that miRNAs reduce the protein output from existing transcripts, they are the perfect candidates for controlling HIF expression during hypoxia. Hence, during early hypoxia, specific temporal changes of miRNA levels may contribute to HIF-1 accumulation and the maintenance of the steady-state levels of HIF-2 and HIF-3. Whereas during prolonged hypoxia, the miRNA expression is changed to help to maintain low HIF-1 function and maintain elevated HIF-2 and HIF-3 levels. Hence, miRNAs have the ability govern the hypoxic HIF switch in human endothelia.

Although hypoxia and ischemia change the expression profiles of many miRNAs [88], a functional role for a limited number of these so-called hypoxamiRs [89] has been demonstrated and number of these that affect HIF expression have been identified [90]. Furthermore, despite the growing number of known HIF-related miRs, a large number of studies have focused on cancer cell lines only and often ignore endothelial cells and the role of hypoxia-induced miRNAs. Importantly, different human tissues display a different spectrum of hypoxic responses, including changes in HIF expression that might result from tissue-specific miRNA expression. Indeed, many miRNAs are expressed in tissue- and age-specific patterns [91]. The results are also often conflicting regarding the changes in miRNA levels during a time course of hypoxia as well. Interestingly, reports in cancer cells have shown that hypoxia results in reduced expression of genes involved in miRNA biogenesis, including DICER [92] and DROSHA [93]. Simultaneously, however, they have increased expression of genes responsible for miRNA function like EIF2C4 that encodes a crucial component of the RISC complex Argonaute 4 (AGO4) [92]. In human primary endothelial cells (HUVECs), hypoxia reduces mRNA and protein expression of many miRNA-processing subunits including DICER [94]. Hypoxic reduction of DICER results from activity of the oxygen-dependent H3K27me3 demethylases lysine demethylase 6A and 6B (KDM6A/B), which suppress the DICER promoter and lead to reduced miRNA biogenesis during hypoxia [95]. Although one could expect a general dramatic reduction in mature miRNA levels during hypoxia along with an increase in mRNAs stability, analysis of pri-miRNAs and mature miRNAs levels during hypoxia has shown this not to be the case and suggests that additional mechanisms are involved in maintaining hypoxic miRNA expression [92]. Alternatively, it could suggest that although expression of proteins responsible for miRNA biogenesis is reduced during hypoxia, their levels are still maintained. Furthermore, Dicer activity is not required for maturation of all miRNAs [96].

The majority of the studies conducted so far have considered simplified models, where a single miRNA effects were analyzed in the context of one or more mRNA targets. Although these studies advance our understanding of miRNAs function as cellular regulators, they overlook the important fact that a single mRNA can be regulated by the simultaneous coordinated actions of a number of different miRNAs. For example, the HIF1A 3′UTR is 1174 base long, while the miRNA seed sequence is usually 6–8 bases. Hence, HIF1A mRNA can bind a combination of miRNAs simultaneously, and these pools of miRNA will further determine this mRNA’s translation and stability.

At present, and summarized in Supplemental Table 1, 40 miRNAs have been identified that modulate HIF expression. Conversely, HIF-1 promotes the expression of several hypoxamiRs including miR-210 [97], miR-146a [98], miR-145 [99], miR-382 [100], miR-191 [101], miR-363 [102], miR-421 [103] in tumor cells, miR-204 in neuronal cells [104], miR-30a and miR-21 in cardiomyocytes [105, 106], miR-687 in embryonic kidney cells [107], miR-155 in intestinal epithelial cells [108], and miR-429 [109] and miR-19a [110] in endothelial cells. It has to be stressed that among miRNA that were reported to directly target HIF mRNAs in cancer cells, few could be classified as hypoxamiRs and validated in normal endothelial cells (combined in Table 1). Below, we discuss hypoxamiRs and miRs and how they may contribute to the HIF switch.
Table 1

MicroRNAs involved in regulating HIFs and HIF regulatory gene levels in ECs

miRNA

Cell type

Impact of hypoxia on miRNA expression

miRNA target (s) (direct or indirect*)

Investigated processes

References

miR-18a

Choroidal endothelial cells

Upregulated

HIF1A

Proliferation migration

[116]

miR-107

Endothelial progenitor cells—EPCs

Upregulated

ARNT

Differentiation

[121]

miR-135b

HUVECs

Upregulated

HIF1AN

Angiogenesis

[124]

HIF1A*

miR-155

Mouse skin endothelial SENDs cells and HUVECs

Upregulated

HIF1A

Angiogenesis hypoxia

[108]

miR-199a

Endometrial stromal cells; endothelial EA.hy926 cells

Not shown

HIF1A

Angiogenesis

[123]

miR-200b

HMVECs

Downregulated upregulated

ETS1

Angiogenesis hypoxia

[135, 136]

HUVECs

KLF2

miR-210

HUVECs

Upregulated

EFNA3

Angiogenesis hypoxia

[131, 132, 150]

HIF3A

miR-424

HUVECs, hMVECs, hBOECs and hMBECs

Upregulated

CUL2

Angiogenesis

[137]

HIF1A*

miR-429

HUVECs

Upregulated

HIF1A

Hypoxia

[12, 109]

HIF3A

miR-433

HUVECs

Downregulated

HIF1A

Proliferation and migration

[138]

miRNAs proven to directly bind HIF mRNAs are in bold, and indirect effects are marked with “*”

ARNT aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, CUL2 cullin-2, EFNA3 ephrin A3, EGLN1 prolyl hydroxylase domain-containing protein 2 (PHD2), ETS1 ETS Proto-Oncogene 1, Transcription Factor, HIF1A hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha, HIF1AN hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha inhibitor, HIF3A hypoxia-inducible factor 3 alpha, KLF2 Kruppel-like factor 2

Role of miRs in regulating the HIF switch

The miR-17 family includes miR-17, miR-18a/b miR-20a/b, miR-93 and miR-106a/b. With the exception of miR-93, these miRNAs are produced from several miRNA gene clusters, which apparently arose from a series of ancient evolutionary genetic duplication events, and also include members of the miR-19 and miR-25 families [111]. In humans, the miRNA constituents of the clusters are overexpressed in multiple cancer types. Importantly, some of these family members have been proposed to be hypoxamiRs [112, 113, 114, 115]. miR-18a expression is markedly upregulated after 24 h hypoxia in human choroidal endothelial cells and can directly target HIF1A mRNA [116]. Hence, the hypoxic induction of miR-18a may allow HIF-1α level decreases and thus contribute to the HIF switch. Although the expression changes of other miR-17 family members (miR-17, miR-20a and miR-20b) were reported to be involved in the HIF-related response during hypoxia in cancer cells [114, 117] and in mouse pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells (PASMC) [118], the exact role of these miRNAs needs to be confirmed during hypoxia in human endothelia.

Deng and coworkers identified miR-103/107 as directly targeting HIF-1β subunits in rat PASMCs [119]. They showed that hypoxia reduces miR-103/107 levels in PASMCs and leads to upregulation of HIF-1β, but not HIF-1α [119]. This report confirms a previous study of Yamakuchi and coworkers who showed in human colon cancer cells that miR-107 decreases hypoxia signaling by suppressing the expression of ARNT1 [120]. Furthermore, in human colon cancer specimens, expression of miR-107 was controlled via p53 and inversely associated with the expression of HIF-1β [120]. In contrast, another study showed that miR-107 was upregulated in hypoxia in rat endothelial progenitor cells and prevents their differentiation via its target HIF-1β [121]. miRNA-mediated beta subunits suppression has been shown to limit HIF-1 activity and angiogenesis and provides a novel, alpha subunit-independent mechanism for HIF signaling regulation. However, the physiological role of this regulation as well as the miRNA specificity against other HIF beta isoforms requires further study.

The polymorphism in the miR-199a target site in HIF1A sequence is associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma risk [122], whereas forced overexpression of miR-199a in endometrial stromal cells (ESCs) attenuated HIF1A’s angiogenic potential during hypoxia via targeting both VEGFA and HIF1-α in these cells [123]. Unfortunately, however, the changes in physiological levels of miR-199a under normoxia and hypoxia in these cells were not determined [123]. Therefore, the possible physiological effects of miR-199a on HIF-1α in ECs will require further studies.

Exosomal hypoxamiRs

An exosomal miR-135b formed during hypoxia in multiple myeloma cells directly suppresses HIF1AN in HUVECs and leads to increased HIF-1 activity and angiogenesis [124]. This exosomal miR-135 provides an interesting example of potentiation of HIF-1 activity in cell-to-cell transfer. Furthermore, by suppressing HIF1AN, miR-135b may allow for a sustained hypoxic response, in spite of the fact that the oxygen levels were partially restored. Exosomal miRNAs that stimulate HIF signaling may be involved in controlling hypoxic response on a larger scale than previously recognized. Furthermore, a recent study found that exosomes derived from human hypoxic oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cells increased the migration and invasion of OSCC cells in HIF-1α- and HIF-2α-dependent manner and contained high levels of miR-21 [125]. A positive feedback loop between miR-21 and HIF-1 activity has also been recently reported in human cardiomyocytes, where hypoxia induces miR-21 expression [106]. HIF-1 transcriptionally enhances miR-21 promoter activity, and miR-21 stimulates HIF-1α expression and modulates the PTEN/Akt pathway [106]. The miR-21 presence in exosomes suggests that this miR-21 can participate in activation of the hypoxic response between cells, including endothelia, through potentiating HIF-1 signaling. However, further studies will be necessary to validate this possibility.

Other hypoxamiRs

miR-155 is upregulated by hypoxia in human epithelial colorectal adenocarcinoma cells (Caco2), human endothelia and in the mouse intestine [108, 126]. It contributes directly through binding to HIF1A mRNA to a decrease in the levels of HIF-1α mRNA and protein, and to a decrease in transcriptional activity [108]. A role for HIF-1α in the induction of miR-155 during hypoxia has been confirmed [108]. Thus, miR-155 induction commits to an isoform-specific negative feedback loop for HIF-1α activity during prolonged hypoxia [108], establishing miR-155 as an important part of the HIF switch.

miR-210 is the most consistently and significantly induced miRNA during hypoxia. It is also unique in that it is induced in almost all cell lines [127]. The expression of this miRNA is regulated by both HIF-1α [128] and HIF-2α [129]. Overexpression of miR-210 in HUVECs enhances VEGFA and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR2) expression and thereby promotes angiogenesis [130]. Furthermore, recent studies in human chondrocytes [131] and hepatocellular carcinoma cells [132] confirmed that miR-210 directly targets the mRNA of HIF3A and suppresses this HIF protein expression. Hence, miR-210 could contribute to the HIF switch between HIF-1/HIF-2 and HIF-3. During acute hypoxia, miR-210 levels are induced by HIF-1/HIF-2 to prevent HIF-3 accumulation, while during chronic hypoxia HIF-1/HIF-2 levels decline and lead to the reduction of miR-210 and subsequent HIF-3 signaling. However, this hypothesis requires further validation.

Recently, another very interesting example of a positive feedback loop indirectly controlling HIF-1 was proposed for miR-147a in human cervical cancer (HeLa) cells, where miR-147 reduced the levels of a dominant-negative isoform of HIF-3 [133]. Moreover, miR-147a is hypoxia-induced and targets HIF-3, a dominant-negative regulator of HIF-1, and thus miR-147a in turn stabilizes and accumulates HIF-1 [133]. Although these studies provide very novel mechanism contributing to HIF switch, these studies will require confirmation in human endothelial cells.

In mice, the levels of the miR-200 family members miR-200b, miR-200c, and miR-429 increase during ischemic preconditioning and target PHD-2, leading to accumulation of HIF-1α [134]. However, Chan and coworkers demonstrated in hMVECs (human microvascular endothelial cells) that miR-200b is downregulated by prolonged hypoxia (24 h), and thus, the levels of its targets, the pro-angiogenic genes, are induced [135]. In contrast, our studies in HUVECs indicate that the physiological induction of miR-200b during acute hypoxia (4 h) leads to direct Klf2 downregulation and subsequent stabilization of HIF-1 signaling [136]. Furthermore, we demonstrated that miR-429 (clustered along with miR-200a and miR-200b on chromosome 1p36) has the opposite function. Although miR-429 is upregulated during acute hypoxia in primary HUVECs by HIF-1, the HIF-1α levels are negatively regulated by miR-429, establishing a negative regulatory feedback loop [109]. Furthermore, the temporal changes in expression of miR-429 facilitate the HIF switch through the specific reduction of HIF-1 levels and subsequent stabilization of HIF-3 during prolonged hypoxia in human endothelium [12]. This suggests that miR-429 may regulate the transitional switch between HIF-1, HIF-2 and HIF-3 responses in HUVECs under chronic hypoxia by attenuating HIF-1 responses and by delaying the onset of HIF3A message stability. However, this hypothesis requires validation in other types of human ECs.

Another elegant miRNA-dependent mechanism of miRNA-related positive HIF-1α stability regulation in human ECs (including HUVECs and hMVECs) during hypoxia is provided by miR-424. microRNA-424 is differentially increased in ECs exposed to hypoxia and targets cullin 2 (CUL2), which is critical to the assembly of the ubiquitin ligase system and leads to the stabilization of HIF1-α [137]. Importantly, the rodent homolog of human miR-424, mu-miR-322, has a similar impact on HIF-1α in experimental models of ischemia [137]. Another miRNA, miR-433, is downregulated in hypoxia-exposed HUVECs and normally directly targets HIF1-α. Hence, the hypoxic reduction of this miRNA could promote HIF-1 signaling [138]. However, since miR-433 was reduced up to 48 h of hypoxia [138], further studies are required to access physiological consequences of this miRNA modulation for the HIF switch.

Although no miRNA has been proposed to directly target HIF-2 levels in human endothelium to date, recent work indicates that miR-588 in neuroblastoma stimulates HIF-2α expression through interaction with 5′ UTR of EPAS1 mRNA [139]. miR-558 directly binds with its complementary site within this 5′-UTR and facilitates the binding of AGO2 to the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) binding protein 1 and results in increased eIF4E enrichment and HIF-2α translation [139]. Furthermore, miR-17, and miR-18b have been postulated to directly reduce EPAS1 in human macrophages [140]. Interestingly, a functional binding site of miR-145 in the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) of EPAS1 mRNA was also confirmed in neuroblastoma cells [141]. Overexpression or knockdown of miR-145 altered both the mRNA and protein levels of HIF-2α and its downstream genes in normoxic conditions, supporting the view that all three HIFs are regulated either directly or indirectly by miRNAs.

Long noncoding RNAs and HIF regulation

Another group of noncoding RNAs that can be modulated by hypoxia and control HIF signaling is the long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). lncRNAs are defined as nonprotein coding transcripts longer than 200 nucleotides [142]. lncRNAs can carry biological functions through chromatin modification, genomic imprinting, and transcriptional interference and activation [142]. To date, a large number of HIF-related lncRNAs have been identified in cancer cells (reviewed in [143]), and here we focus on those that may also contribute to the HIF switch. For example, 5′aHIF1α and 3′aHIF1α lncRNAs are two antisense transcripts that are transcribed from the 3′-untranslated region and 5′-promoter region of the sense HIF1A mRNA [144]. These aHIF1α lncRNAs are induced under hypoxia in cancer cells to suppress HIF1A mRNA expression [145], thus providing for a HIF switch negative feedback loop. However, although aHIF1α is expressed in many cancers [144], it is unclear how important this is in non-cancerous cells. Other studies in cancer cells have shown that HIF-1α-induced lincRNA-p21 bind HIF-1α and VHL and thus disrupt the VHL–HIF-1α interaction and promote HIF-1α accumulation [146]. Furthermore, the long intergenic noncoding RNA, the regulator of reprogramming (linc-RoR), was increased in hypoxic regions within tumor cell xenografts in vivo and shown to target miR-145 [147]. Thus, linc-RoR could affect either HIF-1 or HIF-2 signaling. Very recently, a study of Lo Dico and coworkers reported that miR-675-5p embedded in hypoxia-induced long noncoding RNA H19 plays a mandatory role in establishing the hypoxic response and in promoting hypoxia-mediated angiogenesis in human glioma cells [148]. In these studies, the direct interaction of miR675-5p, HIF1A mRNA and the RNA Binding Protein HuR was also proven [148]. A recent study by Cai and coworkers identified LINC00152 to specifically reduce miR-138 levels and thus stabilize HIF-1α in gastric and hepatocellular cancer cells [149]. The studies discussed above suggest that lncRNAs can affect HIF signaling not only directly but also through miRNA modulation. However, further clarification is needed to establish if these miRNAs-lncRNAs regulations take place in normal human endothelia.

Unanswered questions

The discussed studies highlight the biological importance of the HIF signaling transition both during development and in pathological conditions. Our understanding, however, regarding the posttranscriptional and posttranslational mechanisms governing this transition in normal human endothelia is rather limited. Although numerous posttranslational interactions have been proposed to explain hypoxic HIF-1α destabilization, very few of these studies were validated in ECs, and their impact on HIF-1α levels and the related consequences mostly remain unknown.

Similarly, while cancer research studies have resulted in the identification of a large number of miRNAs involved either directly or indirectly in controlling HIF expression [151], the functional effects of a small percentage of these miRNAs have been validated in human endothelial cells. Several miRNAs including miR-155 and miR-429 are believed to be involved directly in the HIF switch (Fig. 3). These two miRNAs are induced through HIF-1 and reduce HIF-1α levels, and in doing so, provide a mechanism for establishing the transition to HIF-2 and HIF-3 signaling. The hypoxic changes in both miR-210 and miR-429 also provide a mechanistic explanation for HIF-3α accumulation during chronic hypoxia. The miR-147a-based positive feedback mechanism controlling the downregulation of the dominant-negative isoform of HIF-3 could also be an important part of this regulation. Furthermore, miR-558 provides the very interesting possibility for direct upregulation of HIF-2α levels, but this needs to be verified.
Fig. 3

Schematic representation of the miRNA role in the HIF switch regulation

The majority of studies have focused on HIF-1′s role and do not consider the consequences of hypoxia-related miRNA-initiated alterations of HIF-2 and HIF-3 activity. Furthermore to date, only a few miRNAs have been shown to control HIF-2α and Hif-3α expressions. On the other hand, since the HIF switch is a dynamic process, more attention should be paid to follow the temporal miRNA and HIF level alternations during hypoxia. Most of the previous studies have limited their focus to assessment of miRNA/mRNA and protein changes in chronic hypoxia. Although these reports increase our understanding of the miRNA-related aspects of the hypoxic response, the lack of data relating to the temporal miRNA changes with the respective HIF levels limits their utility in evaluating the ncRNAs effects on the HIF transition. Furthermore, since most of current miRNA studies followed their effects on HIF levels in a single type of ECs, it is difficult to distinguish between miRNA’s universal endothelial effects and the tissue-specific ones. Finally, although due to experimental limitations, usually the impact of only one miRNA on one particular HIF level is considered. The most plausible scenario would assume that in vivo the HIF mRNA stability is simultaneously and cooperatively governed by unique sets of miRNAs. How we will be able to untangle this complex mechanism of regulation remains an open question. Finally, although animal models are very critical for determining both the physiological and pathological roles of HIF signaling, the discrepancy in miRNA target selection between human and other species often hampers their translational usefulness. A plethora of different miRNA species are predicted to have different target sites in human and rodents’ 3′UTR of HIF mRNAs, and miRNA site conservancy is a rather poor predictor of their functionality since even a one base change within the target site can impair miRNA function [152]. Furthermore, the most commonly implemented models to study the hypoxic response in human ECs in vitro do not reflect the physiological (normoxia in situ) and pathological conditions in vivo (e.g., acute hypoxia, persistent hypoxemia and intermittent hypoxia). Thus, the miRNA organism specificity limitations highlight the need for validation of miRNA–HIF interactions in experimental models to normal human ECs and in human pathophysiology.

To date, many efforts have been made to identify small molecule inhibitors that target the HIF pathway (reviewed in [153]). However, the majority of HIF inhibitors identified so far are based on the evaluation of HIF-1 activity in cultured cancer cell lines. HIF-1 inhibitor activity includes affecting HIF-1α protein levels, HIF-1 dimerization, HIF-1 DNA binding and HIF-1α transcriptional activity. However, none of the presently available inhibitors appears to disrupt the HIF-1 pathway as their exclusive target [154]. Furthermore, their selectivity against other HIF-α subunits (HIF-2 and HIF-3 isoforms) is mostly unknown, as well as their ability to control the HIF switch. However, in recent years an effort has been made to develop selective HIF-2 inhibitors that are now in clinical studies [155]. Chronic hypoxia is a major clinical concern in the cancer field, and the potential of HIF-2-directed therapies is now possible, especially given the recent studies that indicate that tubulin beta-3 chain (TUBB3), which is involved in cancer progression and chemotherapy, is a HIF-2 target gene [156]. In contrast, the stimulation of the protective HIF response could be applied during the pathologies of ischemic/hypoxic and during inflammatory conditions. The many compounds proposed to induce HIF signaling target mainly VHL, PHD2 and PHD3. The most advanced, based on clinical development are the PHD3 inhibitors [157, 158, 159]. However, recent studies indicate that both FIH1 and PHDs, besides being involved in HIF response, regulate a wide range of other cellular metabolic activities [160], and this needs to be considered in order to minimize their possible side effects.

Although in the cancer field, HIF-specific inhibitors (mainly HIF-2) may open novel therapeutic approaches, their use in cardiovascular therapies is limited, given that the goal is to increase or sustain HIF activity (both HIF-1 and HIF-2) to help minimize hypoxic/ischemic tissue damage and to contribute to tissue recovery. Therefore, the design of more specific HIF switch targeting agents, including miRNA-based approaches, should be the focus of future research efforts.

Prospects and predictions

The development of novel miRNA-based therapies for human pathologies is now of great interest. Although we can modulate the cellular miRNA levels (either with their analogs/agomiRs (miRNA overexpression) or inhibitors/antagomiRs (miRNA reduction), the number of other miRNA target genes remains a major limitation for such a strategy (Fig. 3). Another approach relies on binding of all mature miRNAs by stably overexpressing a mRNA with multiple miRNA binding sites. Consequently, the miRNAs bind this ectopic transcript rather than its endogenous target. Given that the ectopic mRNAs are used to soak up the mature miRNAs, these mRNAs have been referred to as miRNA sponges [161]. To date, several antagomiR and agomiR (mimic)-based miRNA therapeutics are currently in development [162]. However, since a single miRNA can regulate hundreds of different mRNAs, alterations in this miRNA levels will have wide-ranging and unanticipated consequences on cell metabolism. The unanticipated consequences may be caused by secondary targets that are often difficult to predict [163]. Hence, the possibilities of therapy based just on inhibition or overexpression of a specific miRNA poses a number of challenges and concerns.

An alternate and more specific approach relies on the inhibition of the miRNA binding to a defined and unique seed sequence of a specific mRNA using a target protector. Target protectors are single-stranded, modified RNAs that inhibit the interaction of the miRNA with a specific target without blocking the effects of the particular miRNA on other targets (Fig. 4). Hence, with target protectors, we can provide specificity to the individual miRNA–mRNA interaction. Importantly, target protectors increase mRNA target expression by a modest amount and only in cells where the mRNA is already expressed [163]. Finally, if a mutation creates a new miRNA binding site that results in lower expression of an important gene, as in the case of the HIF-1α/miR-199a [122] polymorphism, treatment could occur by protecting this new mutant target site [164]. Therefore, a critical feature for this strategy is to define the specific and direct miRNA–mRNA interactions, as proposed here for HIF factors in the human endothelium.
Fig. 4

Potential miRNA therapeutic strategies. a agomiRs—exogenous miRNA overexpression impairs translation and leads to decreased stability of the majority of the target mRNAs. b antagomiRs—reduction of endogenous miRNA levels leads to increased stability and translation of the majority of the target mRNAs c. Target protector prevents miRNA binding to a defined specific target mRNA, leading to increased stability and translation of this mRNA (without any impact on other potential mRNA targets)

The target protectors technology is based on morpholinos, an oligomer molecule with a molecular structure that is a modification of natural nucleic acid in which the 5-membered sugar ring is replaced by the 6-membered morpholine ring [165] (Fig. 5). Furthermore, the negatively charged phosphate intersubunit linkages of DNA and RNA have been replaced by nonionic phosphorodiamidate intersubunit linkages [165]. With these modifications, the morpholinos are very stable in biological systems [166], show excellent solubility in aqueous solutions (typically in excess of 100 mg/ml), and have very high affinity for their complementary RNA sequences [167]. Morpholinos block access of other molecules to small (~ 25 base) specific sequences of the base-pairing surfaces of RNA (Fig. 3) [165]. In order to bind to target sequences, morpholinos require at least 14–15 contiguous bases, which makes them target-sequence-specific [165]. Furthermore, the morpholinos are free of off-target effects since they cannot interact electrostatically with proteins because of their unnatural backbone structure [165]. More importantly, the lack of a backbone charge also allows for simple and efficient delivery of morpholinos into cells by non-toxic endocytosis-assisted delivery reagents, both in vitro and in vivo [168]. The modified backbone of these oligos also prevents them from being loaded into the RISC and triggering an RNAi response [163]. This approach provides a mechanism for blocking the miRNA-mediated suppression of a specific target mRNA. Despite all these encouraging features of target protectors, the morpholinos have several potential limitations: (1) if the target sequence is not unique in the genome, potential off-target effects can occur; (2) morpholinos are generally only active for the first 5 days after delivery; and (3) they can cause nonspecific toxic effects [163].
Fig. 5

Schematic representation of the morpholino structures complementarily to the mRNA. Morpholinos have a modification of the natural RNA in which the 5-membered sugar ring is replaced by the 6-membered morpholine ring and the negatively charged phosphate intersubunit linkages are replaced by nonionic phosphorodiamidate intersubunit linkages

It is clear that understanding the cellular pathways that regulate the HIF switch during hypoxia is a “Holy Grail” of vascular disorder therapies. Although the role of miRNAs in regulating the HIF-1 pathway and angiogenesis has been extensively studied, especially in cancer cells, there is limited information regarding the miRNA’s role in regulating the HIF switch in normal human endothelia. Importantly, our knowledge regarding the function of the specific HIF-α isoforms is very limited, especially regarding HIF-3 [169]. Nevertheless, the HIF switch remains a critical therapeutic target for both vascular and cancer therapies. Therapy to inhibit tumor growth is critically dependent upon the inhibition of HIF-related angiogenesis and survival (especially HIF-2), whereas therapy during stroke or myocardial infarction strongly relies on the enhancement of HIF-1 activity. The development of precise therapeutic regulation of the HIF switch is clearly important for both of these opposing actions. Hence, although many important questions regarding miRNAs biological function still remain to be answered, the possibility that miRNAs or their specific target protectors can be used in future therapeutic approaches to regulate HIF function emphasizes the importance of the studies discussed here.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Science Center Sonata Bis Program under contract UMO-2015/18/E/NZ3/00687 (to R.B.) and NIH P30 DK072482 (to J.F.C.).

Authors Contributions

All authors wrote and revised the paper.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10456_2018_9600_MOESM1_ESM.docx (138 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 137 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Semenza GL (1999) Perspectives on oxygen sensing. Cell 98(3):281–284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Koh MY, Powis G (2012) Passing the baton: the HIF switch. Trends Biochem Sci 37(9):364–372.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2012.06.004 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Semenza GL (1999) Regulation of mammalian O2 homeostasis by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 15:551–578.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.15.1.551 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Majmundar AJ, Wong WJ, Simon MC (2010) Hypoxia-inducible factors and the response to hypoxic stress. Mol Cell 40(2):294–309.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.022 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kaelin WG Jr, Ratcliffe PJ (2008) Oxygen sensing by metazoans: the central role of the HIF hydroxylase pathway. Mol Cell 30(4):393–402.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang GL, Jiang BH, Rue EA, Semenza GL (1995) Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 is a basic-helix–loop–helix-PAS heterodimer regulated by cellular O2 tension. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92(12):5510–5514CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kallio PJ, Okamoto K, O’Brien S, Carrero P, Makino Y, Tanaka H, Poellinger L (1998) Signal transduction in hypoxic cells: inducible nuclear translocation and recruitment of the CBP/p300 coactivator by the hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha. EMBO J 17(22):6573–6586.  https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/17.22.6573 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Loboda A, Jozkowicz A, Dulak J (2012) HIF-1 versus HIF-2—is one more important than the other? Vascul Pharmacol 56(5–6):245–251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vph.2012.02.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pasanen A, Heikkila M, Rautavuoma K, Hirsila M, Kivirikko KI, Myllyharju J (2010) Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-3alpha is subject to extensive alternative splicing in human tissues and cancer cells and is regulated by HIF-1 but not HIF-2. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 42(7):1189–1200.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2010.04.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maynard MA, Evans AJ, Hosomi T, Hara S, Jewett MA, Ohh M (2005) Human HIF-3alpha4 is a dominant-negative regulator of HIF-1 and is down-regulated in renal cell carcinoma. FASEB J 19(11):1396–1406.  https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.05-3788com CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang P, Yao Q, Lu L, Li Y, Chen PJ, Duan C (2014) Hypoxia-inducible factor 3 is an oxygen-dependent transcription activator and regulates a distinct transcriptional response to hypoxia. Cell Rep 6(6):1110–1121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2014.02.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Janaszak-Jasiecka A, Bartoszewska S, Kochan K, Piotrowski A, Kalinowski L, Kamysz W, Ochocka RJ, Bartoszewski R, Collawn JF (2016) miR-429 regulates the transition between hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)1A and HIF3A expression in human endothelial cells. Sci Rep 6:22775.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22775 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maxwell PH, Wiesener MS, Chang GW, Clifford SC, Vaux EC, Cockman ME, Wykoff CC, Pugh CW, Maher ER, Ratcliffe PJ (1999) The tumour suppressor protein VHL targets hypoxia-inducible factors for oxygen-dependent proteolysis. Nature 399(6733):271–275.  https://doi.org/10.1038/20459 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gnarra JR, Ward JM, Porter FD, Wagner JR, Devor DE, Grinberg A, Emmert-Buck MR, Westphal H, Klausner RD, Linehan WM (1997) Defective placental vasculogenesis causes embryonic lethality in VHL-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94(17):9102–9107CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Appelhoff RJ, Tian YM, Raval RR, Turley H, Harris AL, Pugh CW, Ratcliffe PJ, Gleadle JM (2004) Differential function of the prolyl hydroxylases PHD1, PHD2, and PHD3 in the regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor. J Biol Chem 279(37):38458–38465.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M406026200 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Berra E, Benizri E, Ginouves A, Volmat V, Roux D, Pouyssegur J (2003) HIF prolyl-hydroxylase 2 is the key oxygen sensor setting low steady-state levels of HIF-1alpha in normoxia. EMBO J 22(16):4082–4090.  https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg392 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Keith B, Johnson RS, Simon MC (2011) HIF1alpha and HIF2alpha: sibling rivalry in hypoxic tumour growth and progression. Nat Rev Cancer 12(1):9–22.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3183 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Takeda K, Ho VC, Takeda H, Duan LJ, Nagy A, Fong GH (2006) Placental but not heart defects are associated with elevated hypoxia-inducible factor α levels in mice lacking prolyl hydroxylase domain protein 2. Mol Cell Biol 26(22):8336–8346.  https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.00425-06 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lando D, Peet DJ, Whelan DA, Gorman JJ, Whitelaw ML (2002) Asparagine hydroxylation of the HIF transactivation domain a hypoxic switch. Science 295(5556):858–861.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1068592 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ruas JL, Poellinger L, Pereira T (2005) Role of CBP in regulating HIF-1-mediated activation of transcription. J Cell Sci 118(Pt 2):301–311.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01617 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mahon PC, Hirota K, Semenza GL (2001) FIH-1: a novel protein that interacts with HIF-1alpha and VHL to mediate repression of HIF-1 transcriptional activity. Genes Dev 15(20):2675–2686.  https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.924501 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang N, Fu Z, Linke S, Chicher J, Gorman JJ, Visk D, Haddad GG, Poellinger L, Peet DJ, Powell F, Johnson RS (2010) The asparaginyl hydroxylase FIH (Factor Inhibiting HIF) is an essential regulator of metabolism. Cell Metab 11(5):364–378.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2010.03.001 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ziello JE, Jovin IS, Huang Y (2007) Hypoxia-Inducible Factor (HIF)-1 regulatory pathway and its potential for therapeutic intervention in malignancy and ischemia. Yale J Biol Med 80(2):51–60PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang GL, Semenza GL (1993) General involvement of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 in transcriptional response to hypoxia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90(9):4304–4308CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wenger RH, Stiehl DP, Camenisch G (2005) Integration of oxygen signaling at the consensus HRE. Sci STKE: Signal Transduct Knowl Environ 2005(306):re12.  https://doi.org/10.1126/stke.3062005re12 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen KF, Lai YY, Sun HS, Tsai SJ (2005) Transcriptional repression of human cad gene by hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha. Nucleic Acids Res 33(16):5190–5198.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki839 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mole DR, Blancher C, Copley RR, Pollard PJ, Gleadle JM, Ragoussis J, Ratcliffe PJ (2009) Genome-wide association of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1alpha and HIF-2alpha DNA binding with expression profiling of hypoxia-inducible transcripts. J Biol Chem 284(25):16767–16775.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M901790200 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lim JH, Lee YM, Chun YS, Chen J, Kim JE, Park JW (2010) Sirtuin 1 modulates cellular responses to hypoxia by deacetylating hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha. Mol Cell 38(6):864–878.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.023 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhao J, Du F, Shen G, Zheng F, Xu B (2015) The role of hypoxia-inducible factor-2 in digestive system cancers. Cell Death Dis 6:e1600.  https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2014.565 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Koivunen P, Hirsila M, Gunzler V, Kivirikko KI, Myllyharju J (2004) Catalytic properties of the asparaginyl hydroxylase (FIH) in the oxygen sensing pathway are distinct from those of its prolyl 4-hydroxylases. J Biol Chem 279(11):9899–9904.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M312254200 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wiesener MS, Jurgensen JS, Rosenberger C, Scholze CK, Horstrup JH, Warnecke C, Mandriota S, Bechmann I, Frei UA, Pugh CW, Ratcliffe PJ, Bachmann S, Maxwell PH, Eckardt KU (2003) Widespread hypoxia-inducible expression of HIF-2alpha in distinct cell populations of different organs. FASEB J 17(2):271–273.  https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.02-0445fje CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wiesener MS, Turley H, Allen WE, Willam C, Eckardt KU, Talks KL, Wood SM, Gatter KC, Harris AL, Pugh CW, Ratcliffe PJ, Maxwell PH (1998) Induction of endothelial PAS domain protein-1 by hypoxia: characterization and comparison with hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha. Blood 92(7):2260–2268PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hu CJ, Wang LY, Chodosh LA, Keith B, Simon MC (2003) Differential roles of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha (HIF-1alpha) and HIF-2alpha in hypoxic gene regulation. Mol Cell Biol 23(24):9361–9374CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kalinowski L, Janaszak-Jasiecka A, Siekierzycka A, Bartoszewska S, Woźniak M, Lejnowski D, Collawn JF, Bartoszewski R (2016) Posttranscriptional and transcriptional regulation of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase during hypoxia: the role of microRNAs. Cell Mol Biol Lett 21(1):16.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s11658-016-0017-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Loboda A, Stachurska A, Dorosz J, Zurawski M, Wegrzyn J, Kozakowska M, Jozkowicz A, Dulak J (2009) HIF-1 attenuates Ref-1 expression in endothelial cells: reversal by siRNA and inhibition of geranylgeranylation. Vascul Pharmacol 51(2–3):133–139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vph.2009.05.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nauta TD, van den Broek M, Gibbs S, van der Pouw-Kraan TC, Oudejans CB, van Hinsbergh VW, Koolwijk P (2017) Identification of HIF-2alpha-regulated genes that play a role in human microvascular endothelial sprouting during prolonged hypoxia in vitro. Angiogenesis 20(1):39–54.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-016-9527-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nauta TD, Duyndam MC, Weijers EM, van Hinsbergh VW, Koolwijk P (2016) Correction: HIF-2alpha expression regulates sprout formation into 3D fibrin matrices in prolonged hypoxia in human microvascular endothelial cells. PLoS ONE 11(9):e0163840.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163840 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lau KW, Tian YM, Raval RR, Ratcliffe PJ, Pugh CW (2007) Target gene selectivity of hypoxia-inducible factor-alpha in renal cancer cells is conveyed by post-DNA-binding mechanisms. Br J Cancer 96(8):1284–1292.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603675 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rolfs A, Kvietikova I, Gassmann M, Wenger RH (1997) Oxygen-regulated transferrin expression is mediated by hypoxia-inducible factor-1. J Biol Chem 272(32):20055–20062CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hentze MW, Muckenthaler MU, Andrews NC (2004) Balancing acts: molecular control of mammalian iron metabolism. Cell 117(3):285–297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sanchez M, Galy B, Muckenthaler MU, Hentze MW (2007) Iron-regulatory proteins limit hypoxia-inducible factor-2alpha expression in iron deficiency. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14(5):420–426.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1222 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dengler VL, Galbraith M, Espinosa JM (2014) Transcriptional regulation by hypoxia inducible factors. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 49(1):1–15.  https://doi.org/10.3109/10409238.2013.838205 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hu CJ, Sataur A, Wang L, Chen H, Simon MC (2007) The N-terminal transactivation domain confers target gene specificity of hypoxia-inducible factors HIF-1alpha and HIF-2alpha. Mol Biol Cell 18(11):4528–4542.  https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E06-05-0419 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Elvert G, Kappel A, Heidenreich R, Englmeier U, Lanz S, Acker T, Rauter M, Plate K, Sieweke M, Breier G, Flamme I (2003) Cooperative interaction of hypoxia-inducible factor-2alpha (HIF-2alpha) and Ets-1 in the transcriptional activation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (Flk-1). J Biol Chem 278(9):7520–7530.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M211298200 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Aprelikova O, Wood M, Tackett S, Chandramouli GV, Barrett JC (2006) Role of ETS transcription factors in the hypoxia-inducible factor-2 target gene selection. Can Res 66(11):5641–5647.  https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3345 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Park SK, Dadak AM, Haase VH, Fontana L, Giaccia AJ, Johnson RS (2003) Hypoxia-induced gene expression occurs solely through the action of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha (HIF-1alpha): role of cytoplasmic trapping of HIF-2alpha. Mol Cell Biol 23(14):4959–4971CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Warnecke C, Zaborowska Z, Kurreck J, Erdmann VA, Frei U, Wiesener M, Eckardt KU (2004) Differentiating the functional role of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1alpha and HIF-2alpha (EPAS-1) by the use of RNA interference: erythropoietin is a HIF-2alpha target gene in Hep3B and Kelly cells. FASEB J 18(12):1462–1464.  https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.04-1640fje CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tsuboi I, Yamashita T, Nagano M, Kimura K, To’a Salazar G, Ohneda O (2015) Impaired expression of HIF-2alpha induces compensatory expression of HIF-1alpha for the recovery from anemia. J Cell Physiol 230(7):1534–1548.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.24899 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Patel SA, Simon MC (2008) Biology of hypoxia-inducible factor-2α in development and disease. Cell Death Differ 15(4):628–634.  https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2008.17 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Iyer NV, Kotch LE, Agani F, Leung SW, Laughner E, Wenger RH, Gassmann M, Gearhart JD, Lawler AM, Yu AY, Semenza GL (1998) Cellular and developmental control of O2 homeostasis by hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha. Genes Dev 12(2):149–162CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ryan HE, Lo J, Johnson RS (1998) HIF-1 alpha is required for solid tumor formation and embryonic vascularization. EMBO J 17(11):3005–3015.  https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/17.11.3005 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Peng J, Zhang L, Drysdale L, Fong GH (2000) The transcription factor EPAS-1/hypoxia-inducible factor 2alpha plays an important role in vascular remodeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(15):8386–8391.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.140087397 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Tian H, Hammer RE, Matsumoto AM, Russell DW, McKnight SL (1998) The hypoxia-responsive transcription factor EPAS1 is essential for catecholamine homeostasis and protection against heart failure during embryonic development. Genes Dev 12(21):3320–3324.  https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.12.21.3320 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Scortegagna M, Ding K, Oktay Y, Gaur A, Thurmond F, Yan LJ, Marck BT, Matsumoto AM, Shelton JM, Richardson JA, Bennett MJ, Garcia JA (2003) Multiple organ pathology, metabolic abnormalities and impaired homeostasis of reactive oxygen species in Epas1−/− mice. Nat Genet 35(4):331–340.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1266 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Yamashita T, Ohneda O, Nagano M, Iemitsu M, Makino Y, Tanaka H, Miyauchi T, Goto K, Ohneda K, Fujii-Kuriyama Y, Poellinger L, Yamamoto M (2008) Abnormal heart development and lung remodeling in mice lacking the hypoxia-inducible factor-related basic helix–loop–helix PAS protein NEPAS. Mol Cell Biol 28(4):1285–1297.  https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.01332-07 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kobayashi S, Yamashita T, Ohneda K, Nagano M, Kimura K, Nakai H, Poellinger L, Ohneda O (2015) Hypoxia-inducible factor-3alpha promotes angiogenic activity of pulmonary endothelial cells by repressing the expression of the VE-cadherin gene. Genes Cells Devot Mol Cell Mech 20(3):224–241.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gtc.12215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Weidemann A, Johnson RS (2008) Biology of HIF-1alpha. Cell Death Differ 15(4):621–627.  https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2008.12 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Yu AY, Shimoda LA, Iyer NV, Huso DL, Sun X, McWilliams R, Beaty T, Sham JS, Wiener CM, Sylvester JT, Semenza GL (1999) Impaired physiological responses to chronic hypoxia in mice partially deficient for hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha. J Clin Investig 103(5):691–696.  https://doi.org/10.1172/jci5912 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Peng Y-J, Yuan G, Ramakrishnan D, Sharma SD, Bosch-Marce M, Kumar GK, Semenza GL, Prabhakar NR (2006) Heterozygous HIF-1α deficiency impairs carotid body-mediated systemic responses and reactive oxygen species generation in mice exposed to intermittent hypoxia. J Physiol 577(Pt 2):705–716.  https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2006.114033 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Cramer T, Yamanishi Y, Clausen BE, Forster I, Pawlinski R, Mackman N, Haase VH, Jaenisch R, Corr M, Nizet V, Firestein GS, Gerber HP, Ferrara N, Johnson RS (2003) HIF-1alpha is essential for myeloid cell-mediated inflammation. Cell 112(5):645–657CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Provot S, Zinyk D, Gunes Y, Kathri R, Le Q, Kronenberg HM, Johnson RS, Longaker MT, Giaccia AJ, Schipani E (2007) Hif-1alpha regulates differentiation of limb bud mesenchyme and joint development. J Cell Biol 177(3):451–464.  https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200612023 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Wang Y, Wan C, Deng L, Liu X, Cao X, Gilbert SR, Bouxsein ML, Faugere MC, Guldberg RE, Gerstenfeld LC, Haase VH, Johnson RS, Schipani E, Clemens TL (2007) The hypoxia-inducible factor alpha pathway couples angiogenesis to osteogenesis during skeletal development. J Clin Investig 117(6):1616–1626.  https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI31581 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Tang N, Wang L, Esko J, Giordano FJ, Huang Y, Gerber H-P, Ferrara N, Johnson RS (2004) Loss of HIF-1α in endothelial cells disrupts a hypoxia-driven VEGF autocrine loop necessary for tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell 6(5):485–495.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2004.09.026 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Morita M, Ohneda O, Yamashita T, Takahashi S, Suzuki N, Nakajima O, Kawauchi S, Ema M, Shibahara S, Udono T, Tomita K, Tamai M, Sogawa K, Yamamoto M, Fujii-Kuriyama Y (2003) HLF/HIF-2alpha is a key factor in retinopathy of prematurity in association with erythropoietin. EMBO J 22(5):1134–1146.  https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg117 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kojima I, Tanaka T, Inagi R, Kato H, Yamashita T, Sakiyama A, Ohneda O, Takeda N, Sata M, Miyata T, Fujita T, Nangaku M (2007) Protective role of hypoxia-inducible factor-2alpha against ischemic damage and oxidative stress in the kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol: JASN 18(4):1218–1226.  https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2006060639 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Gruber M, Hu CJ, Johnson RS, Brown EJ, Keith B, Simon MC (2007) Acute postnatal ablation of Hif-2alpha results in anemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(7):2301–2306.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0608382104 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Skuli N, Liu L, Runge A, Wang T, Yuan L, Patel S, Iruela-Arispe L, Simon MC, Keith B (2009) Endothelial deletion of hypoxia-inducible factor—2α (HIF-2α) alters vascular function and tumor angiogenesis. Blood 114(2):469–477.  https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-12-193581 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Manalo DJ, Rowan A, Lavoie T, Natarajan L, Kelly BD, Ye SQ, Garcia JG, Semenza GL (2005) Transcriptional regulation of vascular endothelial cell responses to hypoxia by HIF-1. Blood 105(2):659–669.  https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2004-07-2958 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Weigand JE, Boeckel JN, Gellert P, Dimmeler S (2012) Hypoxia-induced alternative splicing in endothelial cells. PLoS ONE 7(8):e42697.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042697 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lendahl U, Lee KL, Yang H, Poellinger L (2009) Generating specificity and diversity in the transcriptional response to hypoxia. Nat Rev Genet 10(12):821–832.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2665 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Bayer C, Vaupel P (2012) Acute versus chronic hypoxia in tumors: controversial data concerning time frames and biological consequences. Strahlenther Onkol: Organ Deutsch Rontgenges 188(7):616–627.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-012-0085-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Koh MY, Powis G (2006) SART1/HAF, a protein widely over expressed in human cancer, decreases HIF-1α levels and inhibits tumor growth. Can Res 66(8 Supplement):409Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Koh MY, Lemos R Jr, Liu X, Powis G (2011) The hypoxia-associated factor switches cells from HIF-1alpha- to HIF-2alpha-dependent signaling promoting stem cell characteristics, aggressive tumor growth and invasion. Can Res 71(11):4015–4027.  https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-4142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Luo WB, Zhong J, Chang R, Hu HX, Pandey A, Semenza GL (2010) Hsp70 and CHIP selectively mediate ubiquitination and degradation of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1 alpha but Not HIF-2 alpha. J Biol Chem 285(6):3651–3663.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.068577 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Liu YV, Semenza GL (2007) RACK1 vs. HSP90—competition for HIF-1 alpha degradation vs. stabilization. Cell Cycle 6(6):656–659.  https://doi.org/10.4161/Cc.6.6.3981 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Liu YV, Baek JH, Zhang H, Diez R, Cole RN, Semenza GL (2007) RACK1 competes with HSP90 for binding to HIF-1 alpha and is required for O-2-independent and HSP90 inhibitor-induced degradation of HIF-1 alpha. Mol Cell 25(2):207–217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.01.001 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Ravi R, Mookerjee B, Bhujwalla ZM, Sutter CH, Artemov D, Zeng QW, Dillehay LE, Madan A, Semenza GL, Bedi A (2000) Regulation of tumor angiogenesis by p53-induced degradation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha. Genes Dev 14(1):34–44PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Bhattacharya R, SenBanerjee S, Lin Z, Mir S, Hamik A, Wang P, Mukherjee P, Mukhopadhyay D, Jain MK (2005) Inhibition of vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated angiogenesis by the kruppel-like factor KLF2. J Biol Chem 280(32):28848–28851.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.C500200200 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Kawanami D, Mahabeleshwar GH, Lin Z, Atkins GB, Hamik A, Haldar SM, Maemura K, Lamanna JC, Jain MK (2009) Kruppel-like factor 2 inhibits hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha expression and function in the endothelium. J Biol Chem 284(31):20522–20530.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.025346 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Franke K, Kalucka J, Mamlouk S, Singh RP, Muschter A, Weidemann A, Iyengar V, Jahn S, Wieczorek K, Geiger K, Muders M, Sykes AM, Poitz DM, Ripich T, Otto T, Bergmann S, Breier G, Baretton G, Fong GH, Greaves DR, Bornstein S, Chavakis T, Fandrey J, Gassmann M, Wielockx B (2013) HIF-1alpha is a protective factor in conditional PHD2-deficient mice suffering from severe HIF-2alpha-induced excessive erythropoiesis. Blood 121(8):1436–1445.  https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-08-449181 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Dai Z, Li M, Wharton J, Zhu MM, Zhao YY (2016) Prolyl-4 hydroxylase 2 (PHD2) deficiency in endothelial cells and hematopoietic cells induces obliterative vascular remodeling and severe pulmonary arterial hypertension in mice and humans through hypoxia-inducible factor-2alpha. Circulation 133(24):2447–2458.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021494 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Hastings ML, Krainer AR (2001) Pre-mRNA splicing in the new millennium. Curr Opin Cell Biol 13(3):302–309.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00212-X CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Han JJ, Lee Y, Yeom KH, Nam JW, Heo I, Rhee JK, Sohn SY, Cho YJ, Zhang BT, Kim VN (2006) Molecular basis for the recognition of primary microRNAs by the Drosha-DGCR8 complex. Cell 125(5):887–901.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.043 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Wang X, Xu X, Ma Z, Huo Y, Xiao Z, Li Y, Wang Y (2011) Dynamic mechanisms for pre-miRNA binding and export by Exportin-5. RNA 17(8):1511–1528.  https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.2732611 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Winter J, Jung S, Keller S, Gregory RI, Diederichs S (2009) Many roads to maturity: microRNA biogenesis pathways and their regulation. Nat Cell Biol 11(3):228–234.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb0309-228 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Shin C, Nam JW, Farh KKH, Chiang HR, Shkumatava A, Bartel DP (2010) Expanding the MicroRNA targeting code: functional sites with centered pairing. Mol Cell 38(6):789–802.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.06.005 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Bartel DP (2009) MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell 136(2):215–233.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.002 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Kulshreshtha R, Ferracin M, Wojcik SE, Garzon R, Alder H, Agosto-Perez FJ, Davuluri R, Liu CG, Croce CM, Negrini M, Calin GA, Ivan M (2007) A microRNA signature of hypoxia. Mol Cell Biol 27(5):1859–1867.  https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01395-06 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Madanecki P, Kapoor N, Bebok Z, Ochocka R, Collawn JF, Bartoszewski R (2013) Regulation of angiogenesis by hypoxia: the role of microRNA. Cell Mol Biol Lett 18(1):47–57.  https://doi.org/10.2478/s11658-012-0037-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Greco S, Gaetano C, Martelli F (2014) HypoxamiR regulation and function in ischemic cardiovascular diseases. Antioxid Redox Signal 21(8):1202–1219.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2013.5403 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Noren Hooten N, Abdelmohsen K, Gorospe M, Ejiogu N, Zonderman AB, Evans MK (2010) microRNA expression patterns reveal differential expression of target genes with age. PLoS ONE 5(5):e10724.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010724 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Camps C, Saini HK, Mole DR, Choudhry H, Reczko M, Guerra-Assuncao JA, Tian YM, Buffa FM, Harris AL, Hatzigeorgiou AG, Enright AJ, Ragoussis J (2014) Integrated analysis of microRNA and mRNA expression and association with HIF binding reveals the complexity of microRNA expression regulation under hypoxia. Mol Cancer 13:28.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-13-28 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Rupaimoole R, Wu SY, Pradeep S, Ivan C, Pecot CV, Gharpure KM, Nagaraja AS, Armaiz-Pena GN, McGuire M, Zand B, Dalton HJ, Filant J, Miller JB, Lu CH, Sadaoui NC, Mangala LS, Taylor M, van den Beucken T, Koch E, Rodriguez-Aguayo C, Huang L, Bar-Eli M, Wouters BG, Radovich M, Ivan M, Calin GA, Zhang W, Lopez-Berestein G, Sood AK (2014) Hypoxia-mediated downregulation of miRNA biogenesis promotes tumour progression. Nat Commun.  https://doi.org/10.1038/Ncomms6202 (Artn 52) Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Ho JJ, Metcalf JL, Yan MS, Turgeon PJ, Wang JJ, Chalsev M, Petruzziello-Pellegrini TN, Tsui AK, He JZ, Dhamko H, Man HS, Robb GB, Teh BT, Ohh M, Marsden PA (2012) Functional importance of Dicer protein in the adaptive cellular response to hypoxia. J Biol Chem 287(34):29003–29020.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.373365 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    van den Beucken T, Koch E, Chu K, Rupaimoole R, Prickaerts P, Adriaens M, Voncken JW, Harris AL, Buffa FM, Haider S, Starmans MHW, Yao CQ, Ivan M, Ivan C, Pecot CV, Boutros PC, Sood AK, Koritzinsky M, Wouters BG (2014) Hypoxia promotes stem cell phenotypes and poor prognosis through epigenetic regulation of DICER. Nat Commun.  https://doi.org/10.1038/Ncomms6203 (Artn 5203) Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Cifuentes D, Xue H, Taylor DW, Patnode H, Mishima Y, Cheloufi S, Ma E, Mane S, Hannon GJ, Lawson ND, Wolfe SA, Giraldez AJ (2010) A novel miRNA processing pathway independent of Dicer requires Argonaute2 catalytic activity. Science 328(5986):1694–1698.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1190809 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Huang X, Ding L, Bennewith KL, Tong RT, Welford SM, Ang KK, Story M, Le QT, Giaccia AJ (2009) Hypoxia-inducible mir-210 regulates normoxic gene expression involved in tumor initiation. Mol Cell 35(6):856–867.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.006 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Spinello I, Quaranta MT, Paolillo R, Pelosi E, Cerio AM, Saulle E, Lo Coco F, Testa U, Labbaye C (2015) Differential hypoxic regulation of the microRNA-146a/CXCR4 pathway in normal and leukemic monocytic cells: impact on response to chemotherapy. Haematologica 100(9):1160–1171.  https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2014.120295 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Blick C, Ramachandran A, McCormick R, Wigfield S, Cranston D, Catto J, Harris AL (2015) Identification of a hypoxia-regulated miRNA signature in bladder cancer and a role for miR-145 in hypoxia-dependent apoptosis. Br J Cancer 113(4):634–644.  https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.203 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Seok JK, Lee SH, Kim MJ, Lee YM (2014) MicroRNA-382 induced by HIF-1alpha is an angiogenic miR targeting the tumor suppressor phosphatase and tensin homolog. Nucleic Acids Res 42(12):8062–8072.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku515 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Nagpal N, Ahmad HM, Chameettachal S, Sundar D, Ghosh S, Kulshreshtha R (2015) HIF-inducible miR-191 promotes migration in breast cancer through complex regulation of TGFbeta-signaling in hypoxic microenvironment. Sci Rep 5:9650.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09650 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Xie Y, Li W, Feng J, Wu T, Li J (2016) MicroRNA-363 and GATA-1 are regulated by HIF-1alpha in K562 cells under hypoxia. Mol Med Rep 14(3):2503–2510.  https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.5578 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Ge X, Liu X, Lin F, Li P, Liu K, Geng R, Dai C, Lin Y, Tang W, Wu Z, Chang J, Lu J, Li J (2016) MicroRNA-421 regulated by HIF-1alpha promotes metastasis, inhibits apoptosis, and induces cisplatin resistance by targeting E-cadherin and caspase-3 in gastric cancer. Oncotarget 7(17):24466–24482.  https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8228 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Wang X, Li J, Wu D, Bu X, Qiao Y (2016) Hypoxia promotes apoptosis of neuronal cells through hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha-microRNA-204-B-cell lymphoma-2 pathway. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 241(2):177–183.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1535370215600548 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Yang Y, Li Y, Chen X, Cheng X, Liao Y, Yu X (2016) Exosomal transfer of miR-30a between cardiomyocytes regulates autophagy after hypoxia. J Mol Med (Berl) 94(6):711–724.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-016-1387-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Liu Y, Nie HG, Zhang KK, Ma D, Yang G, Zheng ZL, Liu K, Yu B, Zhai CL, Yang S (2014) A feedback regulatory loop between HIF-1 alpha and miR-21 in response to hypoxia in cardiomyocytes. FEBS Lett 588(17):3137–3146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2014.05.067 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Bhatt K, Wei Q, Pabla N, Dong G, Mi QS, Liang M, Mei C, Dong Z (2015) MicroRNA-687 Induced by Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1 Targets Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog in Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. J Am Soc Nephrol: JASN 26(7):1588–1596.  https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2014050463 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Bruning U, Cerone L, Neufeld Z, Fitzpatrick SF, Cheong A, Scholz CC, Simpson DA, Leonard MO, Tambuwala MM, Cummins EP, Taylor CT (2011) MicroRNA-155 promotes resolution of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha activity during prolonged hypoxia. Mol Cell Biol 31(19):4087–4096.  https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01276-10 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Bartoszewska S, Kochan K, Piotrowski A, Kamysz W, Ochocka RJ, Collawn JF, Bartoszewski R (2015) The hypoxia-inducible miR-429 regulates hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha expression in human endothelial cells through a negative feedback loop. Faseb Journal 29(4):1467–1479.  https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.14-267054 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Akhtar S, Hartmann P, Karshovska E, Rinderknecht FA, Subramanian P, Gremse F, Grommes J, Jacobs M, Kiessling F, Weber C, Steffens S, Schober A (2015) Endothelial hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha promotes atherosclerosis and monocyte recruitment by upregulating MicroRNA-19a. Hypertension 66(6):1220–1226.  https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.05886 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Landgraf P, Rusu M, Sheridan R, Sewer A, Iovino N, Aravin A, Pfeffer S, Rice A, Kamphorst AO, Landthaler M, Lin C, Socci ND, Hermida L, Fulci V, Chiaretti S, Foa R, Schliwka J, Fuchs U, Novosel A, Muller RU, Schermer B, Bissels U, Inman J, Phan Q, Chien M, Weir DB, Choksi R, De Vita G, Frezzetti D, Trompeter HI, Hornung V, Teng G, Hartmann G, Palkovits M, Di Lauro R, Wernet P, Macino G, Rogler CE, Nagle JW, Ju J, Papavasiliou FN, Benzing T, Lichter P, Tam W, Brownstein MJ, Bosio A, Borkhardt A, Russo JJ, Sander C, Zavolan M, Tuschl T (2007) A mammalian microRNA expression atlas based on small RNA library sequencing. Cell 129(7):1401–1414.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.040 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Wu F, Huang W, Wang X (2015) microRNA-18a regulates gastric carcinoma cell apoptosis and invasion by suppressing hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha expression. Exp Ther Med 10(2):717–722.  https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2546 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Hua Z, Lv Q, Ye W, Wong CK, Cai G, Gu D, Ji Y, Zhao C, Wang J, Yang BB, Zhang Y (2006) MiRNA-directed regulation of VEGF and other angiogenic factors under hypoxia. PLoS ONE 1:e116.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000116 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Lin SC, Wang CC, Wu MH, Yang SH, Li YH, Tsai SJ (2012) Hypoxia-Induced MicroRNA-20a Expression Increases ERK Phosphorylation and Angiogenic Gene Expression in Endometriotic Stromal Cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.  https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-1450 Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Lei Z, Li B, Yang Z, Fang H, Zhang GM, Feng ZH, Huang B (2009) Regulation of HIF-1alpha and VEGF by miR-20b tunes tumor cells to adapt to the alteration of oxygen concentration. PLoS ONE 4(10):e7629.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007629 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Han F, Wu Y, Jiang W (2015) MicroRNA-18a decreases choroidal endothelial cell proliferation and migration by inhibiting HIF1A expression. Med Sci Monit 21:1642–1647.  https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.893068 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    He M, Wang QY, Yin QQ, Tang J, Lu Y, Zhou CX, Duan CW, Hong DL, Tanaka T, Chen GQ, Zhao Q (2013) HIF-1alpha downregulates miR-17/20a directly targeting p21 and STAT3: a role in myeloid leukemic cell differentiation. Cell Death Differ 20(3):408–418.  https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2012.130 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Chen T, Zhou Q, Tang H, Bozkanat M, Yuan JX, Raj JU, Zhou G (2016) miR-17/20 controls prolyl hydroxylase 2 (PHD2)/hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF1) to regulate pulmonary artery smooth muscle cell proliferation. J Am Heart Assoc.  https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.004510 Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Deng B, Du J, Hu R, Wang AP, Wu WH, Hu CP, Li YJ, Li XH (2016) MicroRNA-103/107 is involved in hypoxia-induced proliferation of pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells by targeting HIF-1 beta. Life Sci 147:117–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2016.01.043 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Yamakuchi M, Lotterman CD, Bao C, Hruban R, Karim B, Mendell JT, Huso D, Lowenstein CJ (2010) P53-induced microRNA-107 inhibits HIF-1 and tumor angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(14):6334–6339.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911082107 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Meng S, Cao J, Wang L, Zhou Q, Li Y, Shen C, Zhang X, Wang C (2012) MicroRNA 107 partly inhibits endothelial progenitor cells differentiation via HIF-1β. PLoS ONE 7(7):e40323.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040323 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Wang X, Ren H, Zhao T, Ma W, Dong J, Zhang S, Xin W, Yang S, Jia L, Hao J (2016) Single nucleotide polymorphism in the microRNA-199a binding site of HIF1A gene is associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma risk and worse clinical outcomes. Oncotarget 7(12):13717–13729.  https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.7263 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Dai L, Lou W, Zhu J, Zhou X, Di W (2015) MiR-199a inhibits the angiogenic potential of endometrial stromal cells under hypoxia by targeting HIF-1alpha/VEGF pathway. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 8(5):4735–4744PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Umezu T, Tadokoro H, Azuma K, Yoshizawa S, Ohyashiki K, Ohyashiki JH (2014) Exosomal miR-135b shed from hypoxic multiple myeloma cells enhances angiogenesis by targeting factor-inhibiting HIF-1. Blood 124(25):3748–3757.  https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-05-576116 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Xue D, Yang Y, Liu Y, Wang P, Dai Y, Liu Q, Chen L, Shen J, Ju H, Li Y, Tan Z (2016) MicroRNA-206 attenuates the growth and angiogenesis in non-small cell lung cancer cells by blocking the 14–3–3zeta/STAT3/HIF-1alpha/VEGF signaling. Oncotarget 7(48):79805–79813.  https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12972 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Yang DG, Wang JH, Xiao M, Zhou T, Shi X (2016) Role of Mir-155 in controlling HIF-1 alpha level and promoting endothelial cell maturation. Sci Rep.  https://doi.org/10.1038/Srep35316 (Artn 35316) Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Chan SY, Loscalzo J (2010) MicroRNA-210: a unique and pleiotropic hypoxamir. Cell Cycle 9(6):1072–1083CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Camps C, Buffa FM, Colella S, Moore J, Sotiriou C, Sheldon H, Harris AL, Gleadle JM, Ragoussis J (2008) hsa-miR-210 Is induced by hypoxia and is an independent prognostic factor in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14(5):1340–1348.  https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1755 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Zhang Z, Sun H, Dai H, Walsh RM, Imakura M, Schelter J, Burchard J, Dai X, Chang AN, Diaz RL, Marszalek JR, Bartz SR, Carleton M, Cleary MA, Linsley PS, Grandori C (2009) MicroRNA miR-210 modulates cellular response to hypoxia through the MYC antagonist MNT. Cell Cycle 8(17):2756–2768CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Liu F, Lou YL, Wu J, Ruan QF, Xie A, Guo F, Cui SP, Deng ZF, Wang Y (2012) Upregulation of MicroRNA-210 regulates renal angiogenesis mediated by activation of VEGF signaling pathway under ischemia/perfusion injury in vivo and in vitro. Kidney Blood Press Res 35(3):182–191.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000331054 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Li Z, Meng D, Li G, Xu J, Tian K, Li Y (2016) Overexpression of microRNA-210 promotes chondrocyte proliferation and extracellular matrix deposition by targeting HIF-3alpha in osteoarthritis. Mol Med Rep 13(3):2769–2776.  https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.4878 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Kai AK, Chan LK, Lo RC, Lee JM, Wong CC, Wong JC, Ng IO (2016) Down-regulation of TIMP2 by HIF-1alpha/miR-210/HIF-3alpha regulatory feedback circuit enhances cancer metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 64(2):473–487.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.28577 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Wang F, Zhang HX, Xu NH, Huang NN, Tian CM, Ye AL, Hu GN, He J, Zhang YO (2016) A novel hypoxia-induced miR-147a regulates cell proliferation through a positive feedback loop of stabilizing HIF-1. Cancer Biol Ther 17(8):790–798.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15384047.2016.1195040 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Lee S-T, Chu K, Jung K-H, Yoon H-J, Jeon D, Kang K-M, Park K-H, Bae E-K, Kim M, Lee SK, Roh J-K (2010) MicroRNAs induced during ischemic preconditioning. Stroke 41(8):1646–1651.  https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.110.579649 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Chan YC, Khanna S, Roy S, Sen CK (2011) miR-200b targets Ets-1 and is down-regulated by hypoxia to induce angiogenic response of endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 286(3):2047–2056.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.158790 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Bartoszewski R, Serocki M, Janaszak-Jasiecka A, Bartoszewska S, Kochan-Jamrozy K, Piotrowski A, Króliczewski J, Collawn JF (2017) miR-200b downregulates Kruppel Like Factor 2 (KLF2) during acute hypoxia in human endothelial cells. Eur J Cell Biol 96(8):758–766.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcb.2017.10.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Ghosh G, Subramanian IV, Adhikari N, Zhang X, Joshi HP, Basi D, Chandrashekhar YS, Hall JL, Roy S, Zeng Y, Ramakrishnan S (2010) Hypoxia-induced microRNA-424 expression in human endothelial cells regulates HIF-alpha isoforms and promotes angiogenesis. J Clin Investig 120(11):4141–4154.  https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI42980 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Zhang L, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Jiang Y, Xiao X, Tan J, Yuan W, Liu Y (2017) MicroRNA-433 inhibits the proliferation and migration of HUVECs and neurons by targeting hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha. J Mol Neurosci 61(2):135–143.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-016-0853-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Qu HX, Zheng LD, Song HJ, Jiao WJ, Li D, Fang EH, Wang XJ, Mei H, Pu JR, Huang K, Tong QS (2016) microRNA-558 facilitates the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 2 alpha through binding to 5’-untranslated region in neuroblastoma. Oncotarget 7(26):40657–40673.  https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.9813 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Poitz DM, Augstein A, Gradehand C, Ende G, Schmeisser A, Strasser RH (2013) Regulation of the Hif-system by micro-RNA 17 and 20a—role during monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation. Mol Immunol 56(4):442–451.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2013.06.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Zhang H, Pu J, Qi T, Qi M, Yang C, Li S, Huang K, Zheng L, Tong Q (2014) MicroRNA-145 inhibits the growth, invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis of neuroblastoma cells through targeting hypoxia-inducible factor 2 alpha. Oncogene 33(3):387–397.  https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2012.574 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Geisler S, Coller J (2013) RNA in unexpected places: long non-coding RNA functions in diverse cellular contexts. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14(11):699–712.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3679 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Lorenzen JM, Thum T (2016) Long noncoding RNAs in kidney and cardiovascular diseases. Nat Rev Nephrol 12(6):360–373.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2016.51 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Bertozzi D, Iurlaro R, Sordet O, Marinello J, Zaffaroni N, Capranico G (2011) Characterization of novel antisense HIF-1alpha transcripts in human cancers. Cell Cycle 10(18):3189–3197.  https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.10.18.17183 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Uchida T, Rossignol F, Matthay MA, Mounier R, Couette S, Clottes E, Clerici C (2004) Prolonged hypoxia differentially regulates hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1alpha and HIF-2alpha expression in lung epithelial cells: implication of natural antisense HIF-1alpha. J Biol Chem 279(15):14871–14878.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M400461200 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Yang F, Zhang H, Mei Y, Wu M (2014) Reciprocal regulation of HIF-1alpha and lincRNA-p21 modulates the Warburg effect. Mol Cell 53(1):88–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.11.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Takahashi K, Yan IK, Haga H, Patel T (2014) Modulation of hypoxia-signaling pathways by extracellular linc-RoR. J Cell Sci 127(Pt 7):1585–1594.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.141069 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Lo Dico A, Costa V, Martelli C, Diceglie C, Rajata F, Rizzo A, Mancone C, Tripodi M, Ottobrini L, Alessandro R, Conigliaro A (2016) MiR675-5p acts on HIF-1alpha to sustain hypoxic responses: a new therapeutic strategy for glioma. Theranostics 6(8):1105–1118.  https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.14700 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Cai Q, Wang Z, Wang S, Weng M, Zhou D, Li C, Wang J, Chen E, Quan Z (2017) Long non-coding RNA LINC00152 promotes gallbladder cancer metastasis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition by regulating HIF-1alpha via miR-138. Open Biol.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.160247 Google Scholar
  150. 150.
    Fasanaro P, D’Alessandra Y, Di Stefano V, Melchionna R, Romani S, Pompilio G, Capogrossi MC, Martelli F (2008) MicroRNA-210 modulates endothelial cell response to hypoxia and inhibits the receptor tyrosine kinase ligand Ephrin-A3. J Biol Chem 283(23):15878–15883.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M800731200 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    van Beijnum JR, Giovannetti E, Poel D, Nowak-Sliwinska P, Griffioen AW (2017) miRNAs: micro-managers of anticancer combination therapies. Angiogenesis 20(2):269–285.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-017-9545-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Moszynska A, Gebert M, Collawn JF, Bartoszewski R (2017) SNPs in microRNA target sites and their potential role in human disease. Open Biol.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.170019 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Xia Y, Choi H-K, Lee K (2012) Recent advances in hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1 inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem 49:24–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2012.01.033 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Maxwell PH, Eckardt K-U (2016) HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors for the treatment of renal anaemia and beyond. Nat Rev Nephrol 12(3):157–168.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2015.193. http://www.nature.com/nrneph/journal/v12/n3/abs/nrneph.2015.193.html#supplementary-information
  155. 155.
    Wallace EM, Rizzi JP, Han G, Wehn PM, Cao Z, Du X, Cheng T, Czerwinski RM, Dixon DD, Goggin BS, Grina JA, Halfmann MM, Maddie MA, Olive SR, Schlachter ST, Tan H, Wang B, Wang K, Xie S, Xu R, Yang H, Josey JA (2016) A Small-Molecule Antagonist of HIF2α Is Efficacious in Preclinical Models of Renal Cell Carcinoma. Can Res 76(18):5491–5500.  https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-0473 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Raspaglio G, Petrillo M, Martinelli E, Li Puma DD, Mariani M, De Donato M, Filippetti F, Mozzetti S, Prislei S, Zannoni GF, Scambia G, Ferlini C (2014) Sox9 and Hif-2alpha regulate TUBB3 gene expression and affect ovarian cancer aggressiveness. Gene 542(2):173–181.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2014.03.037 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Warnecke C, Griethe W, Weidemann A, Jurgensen JS, Willam C, Bachmann S, Ivashchenko Y, Wagner I, Frei U, Wiesener M, Eckardt KU (2003) Activation of the hypoxia-inducible factor-pathway and stimulation of angiogenesis by application of prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors. FASEB J 17(9):1186–1188.  https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.02-1062fje CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Ivan M, Kaelin WG Jr (2017) The EGLN-HIF O2-Sensing System: multiple Inputs and Feedbacks. Mol Cell 66(6):772–779.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2017.06.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Kim WY, Safran M, Buckley MR, Ebert BL, Glickman J, Bosenberg M, Regan M, Kaelin WG Jr (2006) Failure to prolyl hydroxylate hypoxia-inducible factor alpha phenocopies VHL inactivation in vivo. EMBO J 25(19):4650–4662.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601300 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Rodriguez J, Pilkington R, Garcia Munoz A, Nguyen LK, Rauch N, Kennedy S, Monsefi N, Herrero A, Taylor CT, von Kriegsheim A (2016) Substrate-trapped interactors of PHD3 and FIH cluster in distinct signaling pathways. Cell Rep 14(11):2745–2760.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.02.043 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    Ebert MS, Sharp PA (2010) MicroRNA sponges: progress and possibilities. RNA Publ RNA Soc 16(11):2043–2050.  https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.2414110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    Christopher AF, Kaur RP, Kaur G, Kaur A, Gupta V, Bansal P (2016) MicroRNA therapeutics: discovering novel targets and developing specific therapy. Perspect Clin Res 7(2):68–74.  https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.179431 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  163. 163.
    Staton AA, Giraldez AJ (2011) Use of target protector morpholinos to analyze the physiological roles of specific miRNA-mRNA pairs in vivo. Nat Protoc 6(12):2035–2049.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2011.423 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    Choi WY, Giraldez AJ, Schier AF (2007) Target protectors reveal dampening and balancing of Nodal agonist and antagonist by miR-430. Science 318(5848):271–274.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1147535 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    Summerton JE (2007) Morpholino, siRNA, and S-DNA compared: impact of structure and mechanism of action on off-target effects and sequence specificity. Curr Top Med Chem 7(7):651–660CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  166. 166.
    Hudziak RM, Barofsky E, Barofsky DF, Weller DL, Huang SB, Weller DD (1996) Resistance of morpholino phosphorodiamidate oligomers to enzymatic degradation. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev 6(4):267–272.  https://doi.org/10.1089/oli.1.1996.6.267 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  167. 167.
    Summerton J (1999) Morpholino antisense oligomers: the case for an RNase H-independent structural type. Biochem Biophys Acta 1489(1):141–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  168. 168.
    Arora V, Devi GR, Iversen PL (2004) Neutrally charged phosphorodiamidate morpholino antisense oligomers: uptake, efficacy and pharmacokinetics. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 5(5):431–439CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  169. 169.
    Ravenna L, Salvatori L, Russo MA (2016) HIF3 alpha: the little we know. FEBS J 283(6):993–1003.  https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.13572 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biology and Pharmaceutical BotanyMedical University of GdanskGdańskPoland
  2. 2.Department of Inorganic ChemistryMedical University of GdanskGdańskPoland
  3. 3.Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative BiologyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA

Personalised recommendations