pp 1–11 | Cite as

Application of elevated temperature pressure swing adsorption in hydrogen production from syngas

  • Xuancan Zhu
  • Peixuan Hao
  • Yixiang Shi
  • Shuang LiEmail author
  • Ningsheng Cai


A clean and energy-efficient power system can be developed by the combination of hydrogen (as an energy carrier) and fuel cells (as power generation units); such system has the potential to compete with the current energy consumption pattern of direct combustion of fossil fuels. A novel CO/CO2 purification process, called the elevated-temperature pressure swing adsorption (ET-PSA), is coupled into an integrated gasification fuel cell (IGFC) power plant system in this work. A quantitative evaluation standard for the purification energy consumption is developed by considering both the net power efficiency loss of the IGFC after introducing the purification unit, and the total CO/CO2 removal rate. The sensible heat loss of syngas and the thermal regeneration of the saturated adsorbents are avoided; consequently, the calculated energy consumption of the ET-PSA (1.11 MJ/kg) process using the ideal purification unit as the base case is 36.2% lower than of the conventional solvent absorption method. Alternatively, high-temperature steam is consumed in the ET-PSA process during the rinse and purge steps, which leads to a decrease in the output power of the steam turbine. The purification energy consumption of the ET-PSA process can be further reduced either by increasing the hydrogen recovery ratio or by reducing the total steam consumption.


Elevated-temperature pressure swing adsorption Hydrogen production Energy consumption Process optimization Integrated gasification fuel cell 



Specific CO/CO2 removal rate (kg/kWhe)


Heat rate (kJ/kWhe)


Mass flow rate (kg/s)


Pressure (MPa)


Temperature (°C)


Net power efficiency (%)


Carbon capture and storage


Department of energy


Elevated temperature pressure swing adsorption


Hydrogen purity


Hydrogen recovery ratio


Heat recovery steam generator


Integrated gasification combined cycle


Integrated gasification fuel cell


Normal temperature pressure swing adsorption


Proton exchange membrane fuel cell

P/F ratio

Purge-to-feed ratio


Reference case

R/F ratio

Rinse-to-feed ratio


Solid oxide fuel cell


Specific primary energy consumption for carbon avoided


Water gas shift



This research was financed by the National Key Research Development Program of China (2018YFC0810001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51806120), the National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talent (BX20190198), the National Science Foundation for Post-doctoral Scientists of China (2017M610890), and the Seed Fund of Shanxi Research Institute for Clean Energy, Tsinghua University.


  1. Agency, I.E.: Redrawing the energy-climate map: world energy outlook special report. OECD/IEA (2013)Google Scholar
  2. Alptekin, G.: A Low Cost, High Capacity Regenerable Sorbent for Pre-combustion CO2 Capture. TDA Research, Incorporated, Wheat Ridge (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ameri, M., Mohammadi, R.: Simulation of an atmospheric SOFC and gas turbine hybrid system using Aspen Plus software. Int. J. Energy Res. 37(5), 412–425 (2013). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black, J.: Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity. National Energy Technology Laboratory, Washington, DC (2010)Google Scholar
  5. Boon, J., Coenen, K., van Dijk, E., Cobden, P., Gallucci, F., van Sint Annaland, M.: Chapter one-sorption-enhanced water–gas shift. In: Lemonidou, A.A. (ed.) Advances in Chemical Engineering, vol. 51, pp. 1–96. Academic Press, Washington, DC (2017)Google Scholar
  6. Bui, M., Adjiman, C.S., Bardow, A., Anthony, E.J., Boston, A., Brown, S., Fennell, P.S., Fuss, S., Galindo, A., Hackett, L.A., Hallett, J.P., Herzog, H.J., Jackson, G., Kemper, J., Krevor, S., Maitland, G.C., Matuszewski, M., Metcalfe, I.S., Petit, C., Puxty, G., Reimer, J., Reiner, D.M., Rubin, E.S., Scott, S.A., Shah, N., Smit, B., Trusler, J.P.M., Webley, P., Wilcox, J., Mac Dowell, N.: Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward. Energy Environ. Sci. 11(5), 1062–1176 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coenen, K., Gallucci, F., Hensen, E., van Sint Annaland, M.: Adsorption behavior and kinetics of H2S on a potassium-promoted hydrotalcite. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 43(45), 20758–20771 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Couling, D.J., Prakash, K., Green, W.H.: Analysis of membrane and adsorbent processes for warm syngas cleanup in integrated gasification combined-cycle power with CO2 capture and sequestration. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50(19), 11313–11336 (2011). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Denton, D.L.: An update on RTI’s warm syngas cleanup demonstration project. In: Gasification Technologies Conference, Washington, DC (2014)Google Scholar
  10. Field, R.P., Brasington, R.: Baseline flowsheet model for IGCC with carbon capture. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50(19), 11306–11312 (2011). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gazzani, M., Macchi, E., Manzolini, G.: CAESAR: SEWGS integration into an IGCC plant. Energy Procedia 4, 1096–1103 (2011). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gazzani, M., Macchi, E., Manzolini, G.: CO2 capture in integrated gasification combined cycle with SEWGS-part A: thermodynamic performances. Fuel 105, 206–219 (2013). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harrison, D.P.: Sorption-enhanced hydrogen production: a review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47(17), 6486–6501 (2008). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bhatta, K.G.L., Subramanyam, S., Chengala, M.D., Olivera, S., Venkatesh, K.: Progress in hydrotalcite like compounds and metal-based oxides for CO2 capture: a review. J. Clean. Prod. 103, 171–196 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Luberti, M., Friedrich, D., Brandani, S., Ahn, H.: Design of a H2 PSA for cogeneration of ultrapure hydrogen and power at an advanced integrated gasification combined cycle with pre-combustion capture. Adsorption 20(2–3), 511–524 (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mantripragada, H.C., Zhai, H., Rubin, E.S.: Boundary Dam or Petra Nova—Which is a better model for CCS energy supply? Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 82, 59–68 (2019). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Newell, R., Anderson, S.: Prospects for carbon capture and storage technologies. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 29, 109–142 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ribeiro, A.M., Santos, J.C., Rodrigues, A.E., Rifflart, S.: Pressure swing adsorption process in coal to Fischer–Tropsch fuels with CO2 capture. Energy Fuel 26(2), 1246–1253 (2012a). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ribeiro, A.M., Santos, J.C., Rodrigues, A.E., Rifflart, S.: Syngas stoichiometric adjustment for methanol production and co-capture of carbon dioxide by pressure swing adsorption. Sep. Sci. Technol. 47(6), 850–866 (2012b). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Riboldi, L., Bolland, O.: Overview on pressure swing adsorption (PSA) as CO2 capture technology: state-of-the-art, limits and potentials. Energy Procedia 114, 2390–2400 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shelton, W.: Analysis of integrated gasification fuel cell plant configurations. In: DOE/NETL-2011-1482 (2011)Google Scholar
  22. Valenti, G., Bonalumi, D., Macchi, E.: A parametric investigation of the Chilled Ammonia Process from energy and economic perspectives. Fuel 101, 74–83 (2012). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. van Dijk, H.A.J., Cobden, P.D., Lundqvist, M., Cormos, C.C., Watson, M.J., Manzolini, G., van der Veer, S., Mancuso, L., Johns, J., Sundelin, B.: Cost effective CO2 reduction in the iron & steel industry by means of the SEWGS technology: sTEPWISE project. Energy Procedia 114, 6256–6265 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. van Vuuren, D., Kriegler, E., Riahi, K., Tavoni, M., Koelbl, B., van Sluisveld, M.: The use of carbon capture and storage in mitigation scenarios: an integrated assessment modelling perspective. Our Common Future Under Climate Change. In: International Scientific Conference, Paris (2015)Google Scholar
  25. Veras, T.D., Mozer, T.S., dos Santos, D., Cesar, A.D.: Hydrogen: trends, production and characterization of the main process worldwide. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 42(4), 2018–2033 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Voldsund, M., Jordal, K., Anantharaman, R.: Hydrogen production with CO2 capture. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 41(9), 4969–4992 (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang, J., Huang, L., Yang, R., Zhang, Z., Wu, J., Gao, Y., Wang, Q., O’Hare, D., Zhong, Z.: Recent advances in solid sorbents for CO2 capture and new development trends. Energy Environ. Sci. 7(11), 3478–3518 (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang, Q., Luo, J., Zhong, Z., Borgna, A.: CO2 capture by solid adsorbents and their applications: current status and new trends. Energy Environ. Sci. 4(1), 42–55 (2011a). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang, S., Yan, S., Ma, X., Gong, J.: Recent advances in capture of carbon dioxide using alkali-metal-based oxides. Energy Environ. Sci. 4(10), 3805–3819 (2011b). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Welaya, Y.M.A., Mosleh, M., Ammar, N.R.: Thermodynamic analysis of a combined solid oxide fuel cell with a steam turbine power plant for marine applications. Brodogradnja 65(1), 97–116 (2014)Google Scholar
  31. Woods, M.C., Capicotto, P., Haslbeck, J.L., Kuehn, N.J., Matuszewski, M., Pinkerton, L.L., Rutkowski, M.D., Schoff, R.L., Vaysman, V.: Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants. Volume 1: bituminous coal and natural gas to electricity final report. In: National Energy Technology Laboratory (2007)Google Scholar
  32. Wu, Y.-J., Li, P., Yu, J.-G., Cunha, A.F., Rodrigues, A.E.: Progress on sorption-enhanced reaction process for hydrogen production. Rev. Chem. Eng. 32(3), 271–303 (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yang, Z.-Z., Wei, J.-J., Zeng, G.-M., Zhang, H.-Q., Tan, X.-F., Ma, C., Li, X.-C., Li, Z.-H., Zhang, C.: A review on strategies to LDH-based materials to improve adsorption capacity and photoreduction efficiency for CO2. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 386, 154–182 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yong, Z., Mata, V., Rodrigues, A.E.: Adsorption of carbon dioxide at high temperature: a review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 26(2–3), 195–205 (2002). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhu, X., Li, S., Shi, Y., Cai, N.: Recent advances in elevated-temperature pressure swing adsorption for carbon capture and hydrogen production. Prog. Energy Combust. 75, 100784 (2019). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhu, X., Shi, Y., Cai, N.: Integrated gasification combined cycle with carbon dioxide capture by elevated temperature pressure swing adsorption. Appl. Energy 176, 196–208 (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhu, X., Shi, Y., Cai, N.: CO2 residual concentration of potassium-promoted hydrotalcite for deep CO/CO2 purification in H2-rich gas. J. Energy Chem. 26(5), 956–964 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhu, X., Shi, Y., Cai, N., Li, S., Yang, Y.: Techno-economic evaluation of an elevated temperature pressure swing adsorption process in a 540 MW IGCC power plant with CO2 capture. Energy Procedia 63, 2016–2022 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhu, X., Shi, Y., Li, S., Cai, N.: Elevated temperature pressure swing adsorption process for reactive separation of CO/CO2 in H2-rich gas. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 43(29), 13305–13317 (2018a). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhu, X., Shi, Y., Li, S., Cai, N.: Two-train elevated-temperature pressure swing adsorption for high-purity hydrogen production. Appl. Energy 229, 1061–1071 (2018b). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhu, X., Shi, Y., Li, S., Cai, N., Anthony, E.J.: System and processes of pre-combustion carbon dioxide capture and separation. In: Pre-combustion Carbon Dioxide Capture Materials. pp. 281–334. The Royal Society of Chemistry, London (2018c)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineer of Ministry of Education, Department of Energy and Power EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Power Mechanical EngineeringInstitute of Refrigeration and Cryogenics, MOE China, Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations