Multicultural Discussion as a Moderator of Counseling Supervision-Related Constructs

  • Mehmet Nurullah Akkurt
  • Kok-Mun Ng
  • Jered Kolbert
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

International students’ needs and experiences in counseling training and supervision has been an area of interest for several decades; however, there is a lack of research regarding effective approaches for supervising international students. Previous studies concerning the international counseling student population have mainly utilized bivariate analysis, and inconsistent results have been observed among studies examining the same relations, which makes applied implications questionable. More complex analysis to determine the relationships among constructs, which will assist in applied implications, are long needed. Thus, this study was a response to the need to determine if a moderation effect could be observed among key counseling supervision-related variables. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether international counseling supervisees’ perceptions regarding the degree to which the construct of multicultural discussion occurring in their university supervision moderated the relationship among key supervision-related variables, including acculturation, counselor self-efficacy, supervisory working alliance, and role ambiguity in supervision.

Keywords

International students Multicultural discussion Acculturation Role ambiguity Supervision 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bahrick, A. S. (1989). Role induction for counselor trainees: Effects on the supervisory working alliance (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University).Google Scholar
  2. Baker, D. E. (1990). The relationship of the supervisory working alliance to supervisor and supervisee narcissism, gender, and theoretical orientation. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(7-B), 3602–3603.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, G. P. (2013). Supervisory styles, supervision outcome and counselor self-efficacy of addiction treatment professionals (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Dissertation abstracts international: Section B: The sciences and engineering, 73(12). (2013–99120-142).Google Scholar
  4. Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2004). Fundamentals of clinical supervision. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  5. Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46(1), 5–34.Google Scholar
  6. Berry, J. W. (2005). Acculturation: Living successfully in two cultures. International journal of intercultural relations, 29(6), 697–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, J. M. (2006). Essentials of clinical supervision. New Jersey: Wiley & Son, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Cheon, H., Blumer, M. L. C., Shih, A., Murphy, M. J., & Sato, M. (2009). The influence of supervisor and supervisee matching, role conflict, and supervisory relationship on supervisee satisfaction. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 31(1), 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chopra, T. (2013). All supervision is multicultural: A review of literature on the need for multicultural supervision in counseling. Psychological Studies, 58(3), 335–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chung, M. (2009). International supervisors' social influence, self-efficacy, and acculturation in cross-cultural dyads of clinical supervision. Retrieved from Dissertation abstracts international: Section A, 71, 95.Google Scholar
  11. Fernando, D. M., & Hulse-Killacky, D. (2005). The relationship of supervisory styles to satisfaction with supervision and the perceived self-efficacy of master's-level counseling students. Counselor Education and Supervision, 44(4), 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1), 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gnilka, P. B., Chang, C. Y., & Dew, B. J. (2012). The relationship between supervisee stress, coping resources, the working alliance, and the supervisory working alliance. Journal of Counseling & Development, 90(1), 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hird, J. S., Cavalieri, C. E., Dulko, J. P., Felice, A. A. D., & Ho, T. A. (2001). Vision of realities: Supervisee perspectives of multicultural supervision. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 29(2), 114–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1989). Development and validation of the working alliance inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Inman, A. G. (2006). Supervisor multicultural competence and its relation to supervisory process and outcome. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 32(1), 73–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Institute of International Education. (2013). Open doors: Report on international educational exchange. New York: Author.Google Scholar
  18. Larson, L. M., Suzuki, L. A., Gillespie, K. N., Potenza, M. T., Bechtel, M. A., & Toulouse, A. L. (1992). Development and validation of the counseling self-estimate inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39(1), 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee, K. C. (2013). Training and educating international students in professional psychology: What graduate programs should know. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 7(1), 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mittal, M., & Wieling, E. (2006). Training experiences of international doctoral students in marriage and family therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 32(3), 369–383.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Moores, L., & Popadiuk, N. (2011). Positive aspects of international student transitions: A qualitative inquiry. Journal of College Student Development, 52(3), 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mori, Y., Inman, A. G., & Caskie, G. I. L. (2009). Supervising international students: Relationship between acculturation, supervisor multicultural competence, cultural discussions, and supervision satisfaction. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3(1), 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mullen, P. R., Lambie, G. W., & Conley, A. H. (2014). Development of the ethical and legal issues in counseling self-efficacy scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(1), 62–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nelson, M. L., & Friedlander, M. L. (2001). A close look at conflictual supervisory relationships: The trainee's perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(4), 384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ng, K., & Smith, S. D. (2012). Training level, acculturation, role ambiguity, and multicultural discussions in training and supervising international counseling students in the United States. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 34(1), 72–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nilsson, J. E. (2007). International students in supervision: Course self-efficacy, stress, and cultural discussions in supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 26(1–2), 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nilsson, J. E., & Anderson, M. Z. (2004). Supervising international students: The role of acculturation, role ambiguity, and multicultural discussions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35(3), 306–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nilsson, J. E., & Dodds, A. K. (2006). A pilot phase in the development of the international student supervision scale. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 34(1), 50–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nilsson, J. E., & Wang, C. (2008). Supervising international students in counseling and psychology training. In A. K. Hess, K. D. Hess, & T. H. Hess (Eds.), Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.) (pp. 70–81). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  30. Olk, M. E., & Friedlander, M. L. (1992). Trainees' experiences of role conflict and role ambiguity in supervisory relationships. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39(3), 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reid, L. M., & Dixon, A. L. (2012). The counseling supervision needs of international students in U.S. institutions of higher education: A culturally-sensitive supervision model for counselor educators. Journal for International Counselor Education, 4, 29–41.Google Scholar
  32. Rice, K. G., Choi, C., Zhang, Y., Villegas, J., Ye, H. J., Anderson, D., … Bigler, M. (2009). International student perspectives on graduate advising relationships. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56(3), 376–391.Google Scholar
  33. Seo, Y. S. (2010). Individualism, collectivism, client expression, and counselor effectiveness among south Korean international students. The Counseling Psychologist, 38(6), 824–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith, S. D., & Ng, K. (2009). International counseling trainees’ experiences and perceptions of their multicultural counseling training in the United States: A mixed method inquiry. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 31(4), 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sodowsky, G. R., & Plake, B. S. (1991). Psychometric properties of the American-international relations scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Spencer-Rodgers, J. (2001). Consensual and individual stereotypic beliefs about international students among American host nationals. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 25(6), 639–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Trice, A. G. (2004). Mixing it up: International graduate students' social interactions with American students. Journal of College Student Development, 45(6), 671–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wedding, D., McCartney, J. L., & Currey, D. E. (2009). Lessons relevant to psychologists who serve as mentors for international students. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(2), 189–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mehmet Nurullah Akkurt
    • 1
  • Kok-Mun Ng
    • 2
  • Jered Kolbert
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationEge UniversityİzmirTurkey
  2. 2.College of EducationOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  3. 3.School of EducationDuquesne UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations