Advertisement

Numerical and Experimental Investigation of a Laminated Aluminum Composite Structure

  • Jifeng WangEmail author
  • Reza Bihamta
  • Tyler P. Morris
  • Ye-Chen Pan
Article
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

This study presents an integrated numerical and experimental investigation of a laminated aluminum composite structure. The laminated aluminum composite structure was created by attaching structural tape adhesive in between aluminum layers and curing it in an oven. Three point bending tests were conducted on samples with different span lengths and thicknesses and their effect on the flexural response was observed and discussed. Using realistic material fracture models, simulations were performed to capture the different failure modes that were observed experimentally (large plastic deformation, wrinkling, and delamination). Good agreement was observed between the simulations and experiments. The delamination mechanism in the simulations was also discussed in detail. The developed simulation methodology can be used as a robust tool to predict the performance of laminated aluminum composite structures with more complex geometries.

Keywords

Laminated aluminum Composite structure Three point bending Flexural response Delamination 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Bieniaś, J., Dadej, K., Surowska, B.: Interlaminar fracture toughness of glass and carbon reinforced multidirectional fiber metal laminates. Eng. Fract. Mech. 175, 127–145 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stoll, M.M., Weidenmann, K.A.: Fatigue of fiber-metal-laminates with aluminum core, CFRP face sheets and elastomer interlayers (FMEL). Int. J. Fatigue. 107, 110–118 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kotik, H.G., Perez Ipiña, J.E.: Short-beam shear fatigue behavior of fiber metal laminate (glare). Int. J. Fatigue. 95, 236–242 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G.-C. Yu, L.-Z. Wu, L. Ma and J. Xiong, "Low Velocity Impact of Carbon Fiber Aluminum Laminates", 2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nestler, D., Trautmann, M., Zopp, C., Tröltzsch, J., Osiecki, T., Nendel, S., Wagner, G., Kroll, L.: Continuous film stacking and thermoforming process for hybrid CFRP/aluminum laminates. Procedia CIRP. 66, 107–112 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Janssen, H., Peters, T., Brecher, C.: Efficient production of tailored structural thermoplastic composite parts by combining tape placement and 3d printing. Procedia CIRP. 66, 91–95 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kießling, R., Ihlemann, J., Riemer, M., Drossel, W.-G., Scharf, I., Lampke, T., Sharafiev, S., Pouya, M., Wagner, M.-X.: The Interface of an intrinsic hybrid composite – development, production and characterisation. Procedia CIRP. 66, 289–293 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Akpinar, S.: The effect of composite patches on the failure of adhesively-bonded joints under bending moment. Appl. Compos. Mater. 20, 1289–1304 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    "ls-Dyna ® keyword user's manual volume II Material Models Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC)," 2012Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dhaliwal, G.S., Newaz, G.M.: Modeling low velocity impact response of carbon Fiber reinforced aluminum laminates (CARALL). Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials. (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mostafa, A., Shankar, K., Morozov, E.V.: Experimental, theoretical and numerical investigation of the flexural behaviour of the composite Sandwich panels with PVC foam Core. Appl. Compos. Mater. 21, 661–675 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dogan, F., Hadavinia, H., Donchev, T., Bhonge, P.S.: Delamination of impacted composite structures by cohesive zone interface elements and tiebreak contact. Central European Journal of Engineering. (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davies, G.A., Guiamatsia, I.: Problem of the cohesive zone in numerically simulating delamination/ debonding failure modes. Appl. Compos. Mater. 19, 831–838 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jing, L., Wang, Z., Ning, J., Zhao, L.: The dynamic response of sandwich beams with open-cell metal foam cores. Compos. Part B. 42, 1–10 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Umer, R., Waggy, E.M., Haq, M., Loos, A.C.: Experimental and numerical characterizations of flexural behavior of VARTM-infused composite sandwich structures. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 31, 67–76 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang, N.Z., Chen, X., Li, A., Li, Y.X., Zhang, H.W., Liu, Y.: Three-point bending performance of a new aluminum foam composite structure. Trans. Nonferrous Metals Soc. China (English Edition. (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Utz, J.C., Nelson, S., O'Toole, B.J., van Breukelen, F.: Bone strength is maintained after 8 months of inactivity in hibernating golden-mantled ground squirrels, Spermophilus lateralis. J. Exp. Biol. 212, 2746–2752 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dariushi, S., Sadighi, M.: A study on flexural properties of sandwich structures with fiber/metal laminate face sheets. Appl. Compos. Mater. 20, 839–855 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jifeng Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Reza Bihamta
    • 1
  • Tyler P. Morris
    • 1
  • Ye-Chen Pan
    • 1
  1. 1.General Motors Global Technical CenterWarrenUSA

Personalised recommendations