Advertisement

Applied Composite Materials

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 205–217 | Cite as

Investigation into Composites Property Effect on the Forming Limits of Multi-Layer Hybrid Sheets Using Hydroforming Technology

  • Shichen LiuEmail author
  • Lihui Lang
  • Shiwei Guan
  • Seigei Alexandrov
  • Yipan Zeng
Article
  • 248 Downloads

Abstract

Fiber-metal laminates (FMLs) such as Kevlar reinforced aluminum laminate (ARALL), Carbon reinforced aluminum laminate (CARALL), and Glass reinforced aluminum laminate (GLARE) offer great potential for weight reduction applications in automobile and aerospace construction. In order to investigate the feasibility for utilizing such materials in the form of laminates, sheet hydroforming technology are studied under the condition of uniform blank holder force for three-layered aluminum and aluminum-composite laminates using orthogonal carbon and Kevlar as well as glass fiber in the middle. The experimental results validate the finite element results and they exhibited that the forming limit of glass fiber in the middle is the highest among the studied materials, while carbon fiber material performs the worst. Furthermore, the crack modes are different for the three kinds of fiber materials investigated in the research. This study provides fundamental guidance for the selection of multi-layer sheet materials in the future manufacturing field.

Keywords

Multi-layer hybrid sheet Hydroforming technology Forming limits Numerical simulation Crack modes 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors greatly acknowledge the financial support from National Science Foundation of China with Grant No.51675029.

References

  1. 1.
    Botelho, E.C.: A review on the development and properties of continuous fiber/epoxy/aluminum hybrid composites for aircraft structures. Mater. Res. 9, 247–256 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vogelesang, L.B., Vlot, A.: Development of fibre metal laminates for advanced aerospace structures. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 103(1), 1–5 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vermeeren, A.J.R.: A historical overview of the development of Fiber-metal laminate. J Composite Material. 10, 189–205 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asundi, A., Choi, A.Y.N.: Fiber metal laminates: an advanced material for future aircraft. J Mater Process Tech. 63, 384–394 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reyes, G., Kang, H.: Mechanical behavior of lightweight thermoplastic fiber–metal laminates. J Mater Process Tech. 186, 284–290 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Olga, S., Adele, C., Heinz, P.: Metal–polymer–metal sandwiches with local metal reinforcements: a study on formability by deep drawing and bending. Compos. Struct. 94, 1–7 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vogelesang, L.B., Gunnink, J.W.: ARALL: a materials challenge for the next generation of aircraft. J. Mater. Design. 7, 287–300 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wu, G., Yang, J.-M.: The Mechanical Behavior of GLARE Laminates for Aircraft Structures. J Fail Struct Mater. 7, 72–79 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Park, S.Y., Choi, W.J., Choi, H.S.: A comparative study on the properties of GLARE laminates cured by autoclave and autoclave consolidation followed by oven postcuring. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 49, 605–613 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yanagimoto, J., Ikeuchi, K.: Sheet forming process of carbon fiber reinforced plastics for lightweight parts. J CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol. 61(1), 247–250 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dı́az, J., Rubio, L.: Developments to manufacture structural aeronautical parts in carbon fibre reinforced thermoplastic materials. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 144(0), 342–346 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hou, M., Ye, L., Mai, Y.W.: Manufacturing process and mechanical properties of thermoplastic composite components. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 63(1–3), 334–338 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rajkumar, G.R., Krishna, M.: Investigation of tensile and bending behavior of aluminum based hybrid fiber metal laminates. Procedia Mater Sci. 5, 60–68 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aukush, P., Sanan, H.: Experimental and numerical investigation on the uniaxial tensile response and failure of fiber metal laminates. Compos Part B. 125(15), 259–274 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Correia, J.P., Ahzi, S.: Electromagnetic sheet bulging: analysis of process parameters by FE simulations. Key Eng. Mater. 554, 741–748 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang, Z.J., Li, Y.: Evaluation of forming limit in viscous pressure forming of automobile aluminum alloy 6k21-T4 sheet. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China. 17, 1169–1174 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    He, Z.B., Yuan, S.J.: Analytical model for tube hydro-bulging tests, part II:linear model for pole thickness and its application. Int J Mech Sci. 87, 307–315 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang, Y., Lang, L., Zafar, R.: Investigation into the overlapping sheet hydraulic bulge and its formability. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 38(6), 1635–1645 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical Engineering and AutomationBeijing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsBeijingChina
  2. 2.Institute for problems in Mechanics of the Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Chengdu Aircraft Manufacturing Company LTDChengduChina

Personalised recommendations