Advertisement

Acta Biotheoretica

, Volume 66, Issue 3, pp 159–176 | Cite as

Natural Selection and Drift as Individual-Level Causes of Evolution

  • Pierrick Bourrat
Regular Article

Abstract

In this paper I critically evaluate Reisman and Forber’s (Philos Sci 72(5):1113–1123, 2005) arguments that drift and natural selection are population-level causes of evolution based on what they call the manipulation condition. Although I agree that this condition is an important step for identifying causes for evolutionary change, it is insufficient. Following Woodward, I argue that the invariance of a relationship is another crucial parameter to take into consideration for causal explanations. Starting from Reisman and Forber’s example on drift and after having briefly presented the criterion of invariance, I show that once both the manipulation condition and the criterion of invariance are taken into account, drift, in this example, should better be understood as an individual-level rather than a population-level cause. Later, I concede that it is legitimate to interpret natural selection and drift as population-level causes when they rely on genuinely indeterministic events and some cases of frequency-dependent selection.

Keywords

Natural selection Drift Evolution Causality Probabilities Manipulation Invariance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am thankful to Paul Griffiths, Frans Jacobs, Charles Pence, Arnaud Pocheville, Joeri Witteveen and three anonymous reviewers for their comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. This research was supported under Australian Research Council’s Discovery Projects funding scheme (project number DP150102875) and a Macquarie University Research Fellowship.

References

  1. Ariew A, Rice C, Rohwer Y (2015) Autonomous-statistical explanations and natural selection. Br J Philos Sci 66(3):635–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beatty J (1984) Chance and natural selection. Philos Sci 51(2):183–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouchard F, Rosenberg A (2004) Fitness, probability and the principles of natural selection. Br J Philos Sci 55(4):693–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourrat P (2015) Distinguishing natural selection from other evolutionary processes in the evolution of altruism. Biol Theory 10(4):311–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourrat P (2017) Explaining drift from a deterministic setting. Biol Theory 12(1):27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brandon RN (1990) Adaptation and environment. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  7. Dobzhansky T (1970) Genetics of the evolutionary process. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Dobzhansky T, Pavlovsky O (1957) An experimental study of interaction between genetic drift and natural selection. Evolution 11:311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dobzhansky T, Spassky NP (1962) Genetic drift and natural selection in experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Proc Natl Acad Sci 48(2):148–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Forber P, Reisman K (2007) Can there be stochastic evolutionary causes? Philos Sci 74(5):616–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Futuyma DJ (2005) Evolution. Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunerland, MAGoogle Scholar
  13. Glymour B (2001) Selection, indeterminism, and evolutionary theory. Philos Sci 68(4):518–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Godfrey-Smith P (2009) Darwinian populations and natural selection. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haig D (2012) The strategic gene. Biol Philos 27(4):461–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamilton M (2009) Population genetics. Wiley, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Hitchcock C, Velasco J (2014) Evolutionary and Newtonian forces. Ergo Open Access J Philos 1Google Scholar
  18. Huneman P (2014) Inscrutability and the opacity of natural selection and random genetic drift: distinguishing the epistemic and metaphysical aspects. Erkenntnis 80(3):491–518Google Scholar
  19. Kerr B, Riley MA, Feldman MW, Bohannan BJ (2002) Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real-life game of rock–paper–scissors. Nature 418(6894):171–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lu Q, Bourrat P (2017) The evolutionary gene and the extended evolutionary synthesis. Br J Philos Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axw035 Google Scholar
  21. Matthen M, Ariew A (2002) Two ways of thinking about fitness and natural selection. J Philos 99(2):55–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Matthen M, Ariew A (2009) Selection and causation. Philos Sci 76(2):201–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Millstein RL (2006) Natural selection as a population-level causal process. Br J Philos Sci 57(4):627–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Millstein RL (2016) Genetic drift. In: Zalta EN (ed) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2016)Google Scholar
  25. Northcott R (2010) Walsh on causes and evolution. Philos Sci 77(3):457–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Okasha S (2006) Evolution and the levels of selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Okasha S (2008) Fisher’s fundamental theorem of natural selection—a philosophical analysis. Br J Philos Sci 59(3):319–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Otsuka J (2016) A critical review of the statisticalist debate. Biol Philos 31(4):459–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Otsuka J, Turner T, Allen C, Lloyd EA (2011) Why the causal view of fitness survives. Philos Sci 78(2):209–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pearl J (2009) Causality: models, reasoning, and inference, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Plutynski A (2007) Drift: a historical and conceptual overview. Biol Theory 2:156–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pocheville A, Griffiths PE, Stotz K (2017) Comparing causes—an information-theoretic approach to specificity, proportionality and stability. In: Leitgeb H, Niiniluoto I, Sober E, Seppälä P (eds) Proceedings of the 15th congress of logic, methodology and philosophy of science. College Publications, London, pp 250–275Google Scholar
  33. Reisman K, Forber P (2005) Manipulation and the causes of evolution. Philos Sci 72(5):1113–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosenberg A (2001) Discussion note: indeterminism, probability, and randomness in evolutionary theory. Philos Sci 68(4):536–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosenberg A, Bouchard F (2005) Matthen and Ariew’s obituary for fitness: reports of its death have been greatly exaggerated. Biol Philos 20(2):343–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sarkar S (2008) A note on frequency dependence and the levels/units of selection. Biol Philos 23(2):217–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shapiro L, Sober E (2007) Epiphenomenalism—the do’s and the don’ts. In: Wolters G, Machamer P (eds) Thinking about causes: From Greek philosophy to modern physics. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp 235–264Google Scholar
  38. Sober E (2010) Evolutionary theory and the reality of macro-probabilities. In: Eells E, Fetzer JH (eds) The place of probability in science. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 133–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stephens C (2004) Selection, drift, and the “Forces” of evolution. Philos Sci 71(4):550–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sterelny K, Kitcher P (1988) The return of the gene. J Philos 85(7):339–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Walsh DM (2000) Chasing shadows: natural selection and adaptation. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part C Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 31(1):135–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Walsh DM (2007) The pomp of superfluous causes: the interpretation of evolutionary theory. Philos Sci 74(3):281–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Walsh DM (2010) Not a sure thing: fitness, probability, and causation. Philos Sci 77(2):147–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Walsh DM, Lewens T, Ariew A (2002) The trials of life: natural selection and random drift. Philos Sci 69(3):429–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Walsh DM, Ariew A, Matthen M (2017) Four pillars of statisticalism. Philos Theory Biol 9(20170609)Google Scholar
  46. Weber M (2001) Determinism, realism, and probability in evolutionary theory. Philos Sci 68(3):S213–S224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Woodward J (2000) Explanation and invariance in the special sciences. Br J Philos Sci 51(2):197–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Woodward J (2003) Making things happen: a theory of causal explanation. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Woodward J (2010) Causation in biology: stability, specificity, and the choice of levels of explanation. Biol Philos 25(3):287–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Woodward J (2013) Causation and manipulability. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/causation-mani/

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyMacquarie UniversityNorth RydeAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Philosophy, School of History and Philosophy of Science and Charles Perkins CentreThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations