Advertisement

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

, Volume 47, Issue 11, pp 2308–2321 | Cite as

Effects of a Bioactive SPPEPS Peptide on Chondrogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells

  • Salma Mahzoon
  • Jakob M. Townsend
  • Thi N. Lam
  • Virginie Sjoelund
  • Michael S. DetamoreEmail author
Article
  • 136 Downloads

Abstract

A synthetic ‘chondroinductive’ biomaterial that could induce chondrogenesis without the need for growth factors, extracellular matrix, or pre-seeded cells could revolutionize orthopedic regenerative medicine. The objective of the current study was thus to introduce a synthetic SPPEPS peptide and evaluate its ability to induce chondrogenic differentiation. In the current study, dissolving a synthetic chondroinductive peptide candidate (100 ng/mL SPPEPS) in the culture medium of rat bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (rBMSCs) elevated collagen type II gene expression compared to the negative control (no growth factor or peptide in the cell culture medium) after 3 days. In addition, proteomic analyses indicated similarities in pathways and protein profiles between the positive control (10 ng/mL TGF-β3) and peptide group (100 ng/mL SPPEPS), affirming the potential of the peptide for chondroinductivity. Incorporating the SPPEPS peptide in combination with the RGD peptide in pentenoate-functionalized hyaluronic acid (PHA) hydrogels elevated the collagen type II gene expression of the rBMSCs cultured on top of the hydrogels compared to using either peptide alone. The evidence suggests that SPPEPS may be a chondroinductive peptide, which may be enhanced in combination with an adhesion peptide.

Keywords

Chondroinductive peptide Biomaterial Hydrogel Proteomics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Emi Kiyotake for assistance with preparing the manuscript. The authors acknowledge Dr. Susan Nimmo at the University of Oklahoma Magnetic Resonance Facility for help with conducting NMR. The authors acknowledge a potential conflict of interest as the authors (S.M. and M.D.) are actively pursuing intellectual property protection of the SPPEPS peptide.

Supplementary material

10439_2019_2306_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (206 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 206 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ables, J. L., J. J. Breunig, A. J. Eisch, and P. Rakic. Not(ch) just development: Notch signalling in the adult brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 12:269–283, 2011.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3024.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barry, F., R. E. Boynton, B. Liu, and J. M. Murphy. Chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow: differentiation-dependent gene expression of matrix components. Exp. Cell Res. 268:189–200, 2001.  https://doi.org/10.1006/excr.2001.5278.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burdick, J. A., R. L. Mauck, J. H. Gorman, and R. C. Gorman. Acellular biomaterials: an evolving alternative to cell-based therapies. Sci. Transl. Med. 5:176ps174, 2013.  https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3003997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Caprini, A., et al. A novel bioactive peptide: assessing its activity over murine neural stem cells and its potential for neural tissue engineering. N Biotechnol. 30:552–562, 2013.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2013.03.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ceylan, H., A. B. Tekinay, and M. O. Guler. Selective adhesion and growth of vascular endothelial cells on bioactive peptide nanofiber functionalized stainless steel surface. Biomaterials 32:8797–8805, 2011.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.018.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    French, M. M., S. Rose, J. Canseco, and K. A. Athanasiou. Chondrogenic differentiation of adult dermal fibroblasts. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 32:50–56, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gray, B. P., and K. C. Brown. Combinatorial peptide libraries: mining for cell-binding peptides. Chem. Rev. 114:1020–1081, 2014.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr400166n.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Itoh, S., et al. GSK-3alpha and GSK-3beta proteins are involved in early stages of chondrocyte differentiation with functional redundancy through RelA protein phosphorylation. j. Biol. Chem. 287:29227–29236, 2012.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.372086.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kiyotake, E. A., E. C. Beck, and M. S. Detamore. Cartilage extracellular matrix as a biomaterial for cartilage regeneration. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1383:139–159, 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13278.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kiyotake, E. A., A. W. Douglas, E. E. Thomas, S. L. Nimmo, and M. S. Detamore. Development and quantitative characterization of the precursor rheology of hyaluronic acid hydrogels for bioprinting. Acta Biomater. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.041.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li, A., Y. Wei, C. Hung, and G. Vunjak-Novakovic. Chondrogenic properties of collagen type XI, a component of cartilage extracellular matrix. Biomaterials 173:47–57, 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.05.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li, Y., et al. A fibrillar collagen gene, Col11a1, is essential for skeletal morphogenesis. Cell 80:423–430, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lin, X., et al. Augmentation of osseous phenotypes in vivo with a synthetic peptide. J Orthop. Res. 25:531–539, 2007.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lin, X. H., et al. B2A peptide induces chondrogenic differentiation in vitro and enhances cartilage repair in rats. J. Orthop. Res. 30:1221–1228, 2012.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22078.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu, S. Q., et al. Biomimetic hydrogels for chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells to neocartilage. Biomaterials 31:7298–7307, 2010.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ludbrook, S. B., S. T. Barry, C. J. Delves, and C. M. Horgan. The integrin alphavbeta3 is a receptor for the latency-associated peptides of transforming growth factors beta1 and beta3. Biochem. J. 369:311–318, 2003.  https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20020809.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mahzoon, S., and M. S. Detamore. Peptides: drawing inspiration from cell–matrix interactions. Tissue Eng. B Rev. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2018.0003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mahzoon, S., T. J. Siahaan, and M. S. Detamore. Bio-Instructive Scaffolds for Musculoskeletal Interfaces. In: Bio-instructive Scaffolds for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, edited by J. Brown, S. Kumbar, and B. Banik. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2016.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    McAllister, T. N., N. Dusserre, M. Maruszewski, and N. L’Heureux. Cell-based therapeutics from an economic perspective: primed for a commercial success or a research sinkhole? Regen. Med. 3:925–937, 2008.  https://doi.org/10.2217/17460751.3.6.925.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mu, D., et al. The integrin alpha(v)beta8 mediates epithelial homeostasis through MT1-MMP-dependent activation of TGF-beta1. J. Cell Biol. 157:493–507, 2002.  https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200109100.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mummery, C. L., R. P. Davis, and J. E. Krieger. Challenges in using stem cells for cardiac repair. Sci. Transl. Med. 2:27ps17, 2010.  https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3000558.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Munger, J. S., J. G. Harpel, F. G. Giancotti, and D. B. Rifkin. Interactions between growth factors and integrins: latent forms of transforming growth factor-beta are ligands for the integrin alphavbeta1. Mol. Biol. Cell 9:2627–2638, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Munger, J. S., et al. The integrin alpha v beta 6 binds and activates latent TGF beta 1: a mechanism for regulating pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis. Cell 96:319–328, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mwale, F., et al. A synthetic peptide of link protein stimulates the biosynthesis of collagens II, IX and proteoglycan by cells of the intervertebral disc. J. Cell. Biochem. 88:1202–1213, 2003.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.10479.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mwale, F., et al. The efficacy of Link N as a mediator of repair in a rabbit model of intervertebral disc degeneration. Arthritis Res. Ther. 13:R120, 2011.  https://doi.org/10.1186/ar3423.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Renner, J. N., Y. Kim, and J. C. Liu. Bone morphogenetic protein-derived peptide promotes chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng. Pt A 18:2581–2589, 2012.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Roberts, A. B., et al. Mesoderm induction in Xenopus laevis distinguishes between the various TGF-beta isoforms. Growth Factors 3:277–286, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shukla, A., et al. TGF-beta signalling is regulated by Schnurri-2-dependent nuclear translocation of CLIC4 and consequent stabilization of phospho-Smad2 and 3. Nat. Cell Biol. 11:777–784, 2009.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1885.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Svensen, N., J. G. Walton, and M. Bradley. Peptides for cell-selective drug delivery. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 33:186–192, 2012.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2012.02.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tamamura, Y., et al. Developmental regulation of Wnt/beta-catenin signals is required for growth plate assembly, cartilage integrity, and endochondral ossification. J. Biol. Chem. 280:19185–19195, 2005.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M414275200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Townsend, J. M., et al. Superior calvarial bone regeneration using pentenoate-functionalized hyaluronic acid hydrogels with devitalized tendon particles. Acta Biomater. 71:148–155, 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.02.013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Verrecchio, A., et al. Design of peptides with high affinities for heparin and endothelial cell proteoglycans. J. Biol. Chem. 275:7701–7707, 2000.  https://doi.org/10.1074/Jbc.275.11.7701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wei, Y., Y. Ji, L. Xiao, Q. Lin, and J. Ji. Different complex surfaces of polyethyleneglycol (PEG) and REDV ligand to enhance the endothelial cells selectivity over smooth muscle cells. Colloids surf. B 84:369–378, 2011.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.01.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wei, Y., et al. Surface engineering of cardiovascular stent with endothelial cell selectivity for in vivo re-endothelialisation. Biomaterials 34:2588–2599, 2013.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.12.036.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wojtowicz, A. M., et al. Coating of biomaterial scaffolds with the collagen-mimetic peptide GFOGER for bone defect repair. Biomaterials 31:2574–2582, 2010.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wu, D., and W. Pan. GSK3: a multifaceted kinase in Wnt signaling. Trends Biochem. Sci. 35:161–168, 2010.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2009.10.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Xiao, Y., E. A. Friis, S. H. Gehrke, and M. S. Detamore. Mechanical testing of hydrogels in cartilage tissue engineering: beyond the compressive modulus. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 19:403–412, 2013.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2012.0461.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Xu, H. G., and W. Chen. Expression and significance of ENPP1, TNAP and ANK proteins in the degeneration of endplate chondrocytes in rats. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 91:189–192, 2011.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Biomedical Engineering Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Aerospace and Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA
  2. 2.Stephenson School of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA
  3. 3.Department of Microbiology and Plant BiologyUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA
  4. 4.Department of Cell BiologyUniversity of Oklahoma Health Science CenterOklahoma CityUSA

Personalised recommendations