Advertisement

In Silico Investigation of Angiogenesis with Growth and Stress Generation Coupled to Local Extracellular Matrix Density

Abstract

Mechanical interactions during angiogenesis, i.e., traction applied by neovessels to the extracellular matrix and the corresponding deformation, are important regulators of growth and neovascularization. We have previously designed, implemented, and validated a coupled model of angiogenesis in which a discrete microvessel growth model interacts with a continuous finite element mesh through the application of local remodeling sprout stresses (Edgar et al. in Biomech Model Mechanobiol, 2014). However, the initial implementation of this framework does not take matrix density into account when determined these remodeling stresses and is therefore insufficient for the study of angiogenesis within heterogeneous matrix environments such as those found in vivo. The objective of this study was to implement sensitivity to matrix density in the active stress generation within AngioFE in order to allow the study of angiogenic growth within a heterogeneous density environment. We accomplished this by scaling active sprout stresses relative to local matrix density using a scaling factor previously determined from experimental data. We then exercised the new functionality of the model by simulating angiogenesis within four different scenarios: homogeneous density, a narrow gap model, and matrix density gradient, and a construct subjected to repeated loading/unloading and preconditioning. These numerical experiments predicted heterogeneous matrix density in the initially homogeneous case, the closure and alignment of microvessels along a low-density gap, the formation of a unique cap-like structure during angiogenesis within a density gradient, and the alignment of microvessels in the absence of applied load due to preconditioning. The result of these in silico investigations demonstrate how matrix heterogeneity affects neovascularization and matrix deformation and provides a platform for studying angiogenesis in complicated and multi-faceted mechanical environments that microvessels experience in vivo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

References

  1. 1.

    Annex, B. H. Therapeutic angiogenesis for critical limb ischaemia. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 10:387–396, 2013.

  2. 2.

    Aritan S, Oyadiji SO, and Bartlett RM. The in vivo mechanical properties of muscular bulk tissue. In: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference, pp. 5259–5262, 2009.

  3. 3.

    Ateshian, G. A., S. Maas, and J. A. Weiss. Multiphasic finite element framework for modeling hydrated mixtures with multiple neutral and charged solutes. J. Biomech. Eng. 135:111001, 2013.

  4. 4.

    Bouhadir, K. H., and D. J. Mooney. Promoting angiogenesis in engineered tissues. J. Drug Target. 9:397–406, 2001.

  5. 5.

    Califano, J., and C. Reinhart-King. A balance of substrate mechanics and matrix chemistry regulates endothelial cell network assembly. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 1:122–132, 2008.

  6. 6.

    Califano, J. P., and C. A. Reinhart-King. Substrate stiffness and cell area predict cellular traction stresses in single cells and cells in contact. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 3:68–75, 2010.

  7. 7.

    Chang, C. C., L. Krishnan, S. S. Nunes, K. H. Church, L. T. Edgar, et al. Determinants of microvascular network topologies in implanted neovasculatures. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 32:5–14, 2012.

  8. 8.

    Conway, E. M., D. Collen, and P. Carmeliet. Molecular mechanisms of blood vessel growth. Cardiovasc. Res. 49:507–521, 2001.

  9. 9.

    Cummings, C. L., D. Gawlitta, R. M. Nerem, and J. P. Stegemann. Properties of engineered vascular constructs made from collagen, fibrin, and collagen–fibrin mixtures. Biomaterials 25:3699–3706, 2004.

  10. 10.

    Edgar, L. T., S. C. Sibole, C. J. Underwood, J. E. Guilkey, and J. A. Weiss. A computational model of in vitro angiogenesis based on extracellular matrix fibre orientation. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 16:790–801, 2013.

  11. 11.

    Edgar, L. T., J. B. Hoying, U. Utzinger, C. J. Underwood, L. Krishnan, et al. Mechanical interaction of angiogenic microvessels with the extracellular matrix. J. Biomech. Eng. 136:021001, 2014.

  12. 12.

    Edgar, L. T., S. A. Maas, J. E. Guilkey, and J. A. Weiss. A coupled model of neovessel growth and matrix mechanics describes and predicts angiogenesis in vitro. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2014. doi:10.1007/s10237-014-0635-z.

  13. 13.

    Edgar, L. T., C. J. Underwood, J. E. Guilkey, J. B. Hoying, and J. A. Weiss. Extracellular matrix density regulates the rate of neovessel growth and branching in sprouting angiogenesis. PLoS One 9:e85178, 2014.

  14. 14.

    Folkman, J. Angiogenesis and angiogenesis inhibition: an overview. EXS. 79:1–8, 1997.

  15. 15.

    Ghajar, C. M., X. Chen, J. W. Harris, V. Suresh, C. C. Hughes, et al. The effect of matrix density on the regulation of 3-D capillary morphogenesis. Biophys. J . 94:1930–1941, 2008.

  16. 16.

    Ho, S. P., S. J. Marshall, M. I. Ryder, and G. W. Marshall. The tooth attachment mechanism defined by structure, chemical composition and mechanical properties of collagen fibers in the periodontium. Biomaterials 28:5238–5245, 2007.

  17. 17.

    Holzapfel, G. A., G. Sommer, C. T. Gasser, and P. Regitnig. Determination of layer-specific mechanical properties of human coronary arteries with nonatherosclerotic intimal thickening and related constitutive modeling. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 289:H2048–H2058, 2005.

  18. 18.

    Hoying, J. B., C. A. Boswell, and S. K. Williams. Angiogenic potential of microvessel fragments established in three-dimensional collagen gels. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 32:409–419, 1996.

  19. 19.

    Khurana, R., M. Simons, J. F. Martin, and I. C. Zachary. Role of angiogenesis in cardiovascular disease: a critical appraisal. Circulation 112:1813–1824, 2005.

  20. 20.

    Kim, B. S., E. J. Kim, J. S. Choi, J. H. Jeong, C. H. Jo, and Y. W. Cho. Human collagen-based multilayer scaffolds for tendon-to-bone interface tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 102:4044–4054, 2014.

  21. 21.

    Kirilova, M., S. Stoytchev, D. Pashkouleva, and V. Kavardzhikov. Experimental study of the mechanical properties of human abdominal fascia. Med. Eng. Phys. 33:1–6, 2011.

  22. 22.

    Kniazeva, E., and A. J. Putnam. Endothelial cell traction and ECM density influence both capillary morphogenesis and maintenance in 3-D. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 297:C179–C187, 2009.

  23. 23.

    Kniazeva, E., S. Kachgal, and A. J. Putnam. Effects of extracellular matrix density and mesenchymal stem cells on neovascularization in vivo. Tissue Eng. A 17:905–914, 2011.

  24. 24.

    Kraning-Rush, C. M., J. P. Califano, and C. A. Reinhart-King. Cellular traction stresses increase with increasing metastatic potential. PLoS ONE 7:e32572, 2012.

  25. 25.

    Krishnan, L., J. A. Weiss, M. D. Wessman, and J. B. Hoying. Design and application of a test system for viscoelastic characterization of collagen gels. Tissue Eng. 10:241–252, 2004.

  26. 26.

    Krishnan, L., J. B. Hoying, H. Nguyen, H. Song, and J. A. Weiss. Interaction of angiogenic microvessels with the extracellular matrix. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 293:H3650–H3658, 2007.

  27. 27.

    Krishnan, L., C. J. Underwood, S. Maas, B. J. Ellis, T. C. Kode, et al. Effect of mechanical boundary conditions on orientation of angiogenic microvessels. Cardiovasc. Res. 78:324–332, 2008.

  28. 28.

    Lin, S., N. Sangaj, T. Razafiarison, C. Zhang, and S. Varghese. Influence of physical properties of biomaterials on cellular behavior. Pharm. Res. 28:1422–1430, 2011.

  29. 29.

    Lo, C. M., H. B. Wang, M. Dembo, and Y. L. Wang. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys. J . 79:144–152, 2000.

  30. 30.

    Lu, H. H., and S. Thomopoulos. Functional attachment of soft tissues to bone: development, healing, and tissue engineering. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 15:201–226, 2013.

  31. 31.

    Maas SA. WinFiber3D. Musculoskeletal Research Laboratories, University of Utah. http://mrl.sci.utah.edu/software/winfiber3d. 2007–2011.

  32. 32.

    Maas, S. A., B. J. Ellis, G. A. Ateshian, and J. A. Weiss. FEBio: finite elements for biomechanics. J. Biomech. Eng. 134:011005, 2012.

  33. 33.

    Moffat, K. L., W. H. Sun, P. E. Pena, N. O. Chahine, S. B. Doty, et al. Characterization of the structure-function relationship at the ligament-to-bone interface. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:7947–7952, 2008.

  34. 34.

    Nirmalanandhan, V. S., N. Juncosa-Melvin, J. T. Shearn, G. P. Boivin, M. T. Galloway, et al. Combined effects of scaffold stiffening and mechanical preconditioning cycles on construct biomechanics, gene expression, and tendon repair biomechanics. Tissue Eng. A 15:2103–2111, 2009.

  35. 35.

    Nishida, N., H. Yano, T. Nishida, T. Kamura, and M. Kojiro. Angiogenesis in cancer. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2:213–219, 2006.

  36. 36.

    Novosel, E. C., C. Kleinhans, and P. J. Kluger. Vascularization is the key challenge in tissue engineering. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 63:300–311, 2011.

  37. 37.

    Phelps, E. A., and A. J. Garcia. Engineering more than a cell: vascularization strategies in tissue engineering. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 21:704–709, 2010.

  38. 38.

    Pittman, R. N. Oxygen transport and exchange in the microcirculation. Microcirculation. 12:59–70, 2005.

  39. 39.

    Roeder, B. A., K. Kokini, J. E. Sturgis, J. P. Robinson, and S. L. Voytik-Harbin. Tensile mechanical properties of three-dimensional type I collagen extracellular matrices with varied microstructure. J. Biomech. Eng. 124:214–222, 2002.

  40. 40.

    Shiu, Y. T., J. A. Weiss, J. B. Hoying, M. N. Iwamoto, I. S. Joung, and C. T. Quam. The role of mechanical stresses in angiogenesis. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 33:431–510, 2005.

  41. 41.

    Sieminski, A. L., R. P. Hebbel, and K. J. Gooch. The relative magnitudes of endothelial force generation and matrix stiffness modulate capillary morphogenesis in vitro. Exp. Cell Res. 297:574–584, 2004.

  42. 42.

    Tonnesen MG, Feng X, and Clark RA. Angiogenesis in wound healing. In: The Journal of Investigative Dermatology. Symposium Proceedings/the Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc. [and] European Society for Dermatological Research, vol. 5, 2000, pp. 40–46.

  43. 43.

    Underwood, C. J., L. T. Edgar, J. B. Hoying, and J. A. Weiss. Cell-generated traction forces and the resulting matrix deformation modulate microvascular alignment and growth during angiogenesis. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 307:H152–H164, 2014.

  44. 44.

    Vernon, R. B., and E. H. Sage. A novel, quantitative model for study of endothelial cell migration and sprout formation within three-dimensional collagen matrices. Microvasc. Res. 57:118–133, 1999.

  45. 45.

    Wood, G. C., and M. K. Keech. The formation of fibrils from collagen solutions. 1. The effect of experimental conditions: kinetic and electron-microscope studies. Biochem. J. 75:588–598, 1960.

  46. 46.

    Wu, J., Z. Mao, H. Tan, L. Han, T. Ren, and C. Gao. Gradient biomaterials and their influences on cell migration. Interface Focus. 2:337–355, 2012.

  47. 47.

    Yamamura, N., R. Sudo, M. Ikeda, and K. Tanishita. Effects of the mechanical properties of collagen gel on the in vitro formation of microvessel networks by endothelial cells. Tissue Eng. 13:1443–1453, 2007.

  48. 48.

    Yeung, T., P. C. Georges, L. A. Flanagan, B. Marg, M. Ortiz, et al. Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 60:24–34, 2005.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support from National Institutes of Health #R01HL077683, R01GM083925 and R01EB015133 is gratefully acknowledged.

Conflict of interest

The authors state no conflicting interests.

Author information

Correspondence to Jeffrey A. Weiss.

Additional information

Associate Editor Estefanía Peña oversaw the review of this article.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (AVI 30066 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (AVI 28269 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (AVI 28526 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (AVI 39882 kb)

Supplementary material 1 (AVI 30066 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (AVI 28269 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (AVI 28526 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (AVI 39882 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Edgar, L.T., Hoying, J.B. & Weiss, J.A. In Silico Investigation of Angiogenesis with Growth and Stress Generation Coupled to Local Extracellular Matrix Density. Ann Biomed Eng 43, 1531–1542 (2015) doi:10.1007/s10439-015-1334-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Angiogenesis
  • Extracellular matrix
  • Cellular mechanics
  • Cell–matrix interactions
  • Finite element modeling
  • Growth modeling