Advertisement

Sitting time and associated factors among Portuguese older adults: results from Nutrition UP 65

  • Ana Sofia Sousa
  • Joana MendesEmail author
  • Rita S. Guerra
  • Patrícia Padrão
  • Pedro Moreira
  • Alejandro Santos
  • Nuno Borges
  • Cláudia Afonso
  • Cátia Martins
  • Graça Ferro
  • Teresa F. Amaral
Original Investigation
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

Older adults are particularly susceptible to sedentary behaviours. Sitting time has been increasingly referred to as a potentially modifiable risk factor in the prevention of chronic diseases. Identifying factors associated with sitting time, particularly those that are modifiable, will allow for more effective public health strategies. This study aimed to describe sitting time among Portuguese older adults and to evaluate associated factors. A cross-sectional study including 1423 older adults ≥ 65 years old was conducted. Sitting time was assessed with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Socio-demographic, health, anthropometric and functional variables were collected. Bivariate and multivariate linear regression models were conducted to study the association between these variables and sitting time. The median of sitting time was 300 min/day (interquartile range = 240 min/day), which is equal to 5 h/day. The following factors were directly associated with longer sitting time: being male, age ≥ 80 years, living in Central or Southern Portugal, being retired from work, as well as presenting low physical activity, obesity or longer time to walk 4.6 metres. On the other hand, being married, having higher education and higher household income were inversely associated with longer sitting time. It can be concluded that Portuguese older adults spend a considerable amount of time sitting per day. Potentially modifiable risk factors associated with longer sitting time in this population were related to nutritional status and functional ability.

Keywords

Healthy lifestyle Older adults Sedentary behaviour Time to walk 

Notes

Funding

Nutrition UP 65 is 85% funded by Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway through European Economic Area (EEA) Grants (Grant No. PT06) and 15% by Faculdade de Ciências da Nutrição e Alimentação, Universidade do Porto. Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway sponsor initiatives and projects in various program areas, primarily focusing on reducing economic and social disparities. The European Economic Area Grants are managed by Administração Central do Sistema de Saúde through the Programa Iniciativas em Saúde Pública.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Abel T, Graf N, Niemann S (2001) Gender bias in the assessment of physical activity in population studies. Soz Praventivmed 46(4):268–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amagasa S, Fukushima N, Kikuchi H et al (2017) Light and sporadic physical activity overlooked by current guidelines makes older women more active than older men. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 14(1):59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amaral TF, Santos A, Guerra RS et al (2016) Nutritional strategies facing an older demographic: the nutrition UP 65 study protocol. JMIR Res Protoc 5(3):e184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson TM, Sachdev PS, Brodaty H et al (2007) Effects of sociodemographic and health variables on Mini-Mental State Exam scores in older Australians. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 15:467–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ansah JP, Malhotra R, Lew N et al (2015) Projection of young-old and old-old with functional disability: does accounting for the changing educational composition of the elderly population make a difference? PLoS One 10(5):e0126471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balboa-Castillo T, León-Muñoz LM, Graciani A et al (2011) Longitudinal association of physical activity and sedentary behavior during leisure time with health-related quality of life in community-dwelling older adults. Health Qual Life Outcomes 9:47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barreira TV, Hamilton MT, Craft LL et al (2016) Intra-individual and inter-individual variability in daily sitting time and MVPA. J Sci Med Sport 19(6):476–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beaudart C, Rolland Y, Cruz-Jentoft AJ et al (2019) Assessment of muscle function and physical performance in daily clinical practice: a position paper endorsed by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO). Calcif Tissue Int 105(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bullock VE, Griffiths P, Sherar LB et al (2017) Sitting time and obesity in a sample of adults from Europe and the USA. Ann Hum Biol 44(3):230–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chang SH, Hsueh MC, Liao Y (2018) personal and behavioral correlates of total and domain-specific sedentary behaviors in older Taiwanese adults. BMC Geriatr 18(1):294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chastin SF, Buck C, Freiberger E et al (2015) Systematic literature review of determinants of sedentary behavior in older adults: a DEDIPAC study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 12:127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chumlea WC, Guo S, Roche AF et al (1988) Prediction of body weight for the nonambulatory elderly from anthropometry. J Am Diet Assoc 88(5):564–568Google Scholar
  13. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M et al (2003) International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35(8):1381–1395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Rezende LF, Rey-López JP, Matsudo VK et al (2014) Sedentary behavior and health outcomes among older adults: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 14:333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. do Carmo Correia de Lima M, Loffredo Bilton T, Jefferson de Sousa Soares W et al (2019) Maximum walking speed can improve the diagnostic value of frailty among community-dwelling older adults a cross-sectional study. J Frailty Aging 8(1):39–41Google Scholar
  16. Ekelund U, Steene-Johannessen J, Brown WJ et al (2016) Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women. Lancet 388(10051):1302–1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farrell L, Hollingsworth B, Propper C et al (2014) The socioeconomic gradient in physical inactivity: evidence from one million adults in England. Soc Sci Med 123:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12(3):189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J et al (2001) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56(3):M146–M156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grøntved A, Hu FB (2011) Television viewing and risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. JAMA 305(23):2448–2455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guerra RS, Fonseca I, Pichel F et al (2014) Hand length as an alternative measurement of height. Eur J Clin Nutr 68(2):229–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guerreiro M (2010) Testes de rastreio de defeito cognitivo e demência: uma perspectiva prática. Rev Port Clin Geral 26:46–53Google Scholar
  23. Harvey JA, Chastin SF, Skelton DA (2013) Prevalence of sedentary behavior in older adults: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 10(12):6645–6661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harvey JA, Chastin SF, Skelton DA (2015) How sedentary are older people? A systematic review of the amount of sedentary behavior. J Aging Phys Act 23(3):471–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hawks SR, Madanat HN, Merrill RM et al (2003) A cross-cultural analysis of ‘motivation for eating’ as a potential factor in the emergence of global obesity: Japan and the United States. Health Promot Int 18(2):153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huffman S, Szafron M (2017) Social correlates of leisure-time sedentary behaviours in Canadian adults. Prev Med Rep 5:268–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson Stoklossa CA, Ghosh SS, Forhan M et al (2017) Poor physical function as a marker of sarcopenia in adults with class II/III obesity. Curr Dev Nutr 2(3):nzx008Google Scholar
  28. Kahlmeier S, Wijnhoven TM, Alpiger P et al (2015) National physical activity recommendations: systematic overview and analysis of the situation in European countries. BMC Public Health 15:133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kikuchi H, Inoue S, Sugiyama T et al (2013) Correlates of prolonged television viewing time in older Japanese men and women. BMC Public Health 13:213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Matallana D, Santacruz C, Cano C et al (2011) The relationship between educational level and mini-mental state examination domains among older Mexican Americans. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 24:9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matthews CE, Chen KY, Freedson PS et al (2008) Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003–2004. Am J Epidemiol 167(7):875–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Matthews CE, George SM, Moore SC et al (2012) Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors and causes specific mortality in US adults. Am J Clin Nutr 95(2):437–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Milanović Z, Pantelić S, Trajković N et al (2013) Age-related decrease in physical activity and functional fitness among elderly men and women. Clin Interv Aging 8:549–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moraes C, Pinto JA, Lopes MA et al (2010) Impact of sociodemographic and health variables on mini-mental state examination in a community-based sample of older people. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 260:535–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. O’ Connor DW, Pollitt PA, Hyde JB et al (1989) The reliability and validity of the mini-mental state in a British community survey. J Psychiatr Res 23:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Owen N, Sparling PB, Healy GN et al (2010) Sedentary behavior: emerging evidence for a new health risk. Mayo Clin Proc 85(12):1138–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Owen N, Salmon J, Koohsari MJ et al (2014) Sedentary behaviour and health: mapping environmental and social contexts to underpin chronic disease prevention. Br J Sports Med 48(3):174–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Palmer VJ, Gray CM, Fitzsimons CF et al (2018) What do older people do when sitting and why? Implications for decreasing sedentary behavior. Gerontologist.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny020 Google Scholar
  39. Reid N, Healy GN, Gianoudis J et al (2018) Association of sitting time and breaks in sitting with muscle mass, strength, function, and inflammation in community-dwelling older adults. Osteoporos Int 29(6):1341–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rezende LFM, Sá TH, Mielke GI et al (2016) All-cause mortality attributable to sitting time: analysis of 54 countries worldwide. Am J Prev Med 51(2):253–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rubio Castañeda FJ, Tomás Aznar C, Muro Baquero C (2017) Validity, reliability and associated factors of the international physical activity questionnaire adapted to elderly (IPAQ-E). Rev Esp Salud Publica 18:91Google Scholar
  42. Sohn M, Cho KH, Han KD et al (2017) Sitting time and obesity or abdominal obesity in older South Koreans: Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013. Behav Med 43(4):251–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Statistics Portugal – Pordata (2019) https://www.pordata.pt/en/Portugal
  44. Stewart A, Marfell-Jones M, Olds T et al (2011) International standards for anthropometric assessment. International Standards for Anthropometric Assessment, PotchefstroomGoogle Scholar
  45. Studenski S, Perera S, Patel K et al (2011) Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA 305(1):50–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Suliga E, Cieśla E, Rębak D et al (2018) Relationship between sitting time, physical activity, and metabolic syndrome among adults depending on Body Mass Index (BMI). Med Sci Monit 24:7633–7645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tremblay MS (2012) Letter to the Editor: standardized use of the terms” sedentary” and” sedentary behaviours”. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 37(3):540–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Cauwenberg J, De Donder L, Clarys P et al (2014) Relationships of individual, social, and physical environmental factors with older adults’ televion viewing time. J Aging Phys Act 22(4):508–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Van Holle V, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Deforche B et al (2015) Assessment of physical activity in older Belgian adults: validity and reliability of an adapted interview version of the long International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-L). BMC Public Health 28(15):433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang CY, Chen TR, Lin YH et al (2012) Gait speed measure: the effect of different measuring distances and the inclusion and exclusion of acceleration and deceleration. Percept Mot Skills 114(2):469–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Bayliss MS et al (1995) Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the medical outcomes study. Med Care 33(4):264–279Google Scholar
  52. WHO. World Health Organization. BMI classification (2019a). http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/nutrition/a-healthy-lifestyle/body-mass-index-bmi. Accessed 22 Jan 2019
  53. WHO. Physical Inactivity: A Global Public Health Problem (2019b). https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_inactivity/en/. Accessed 22 Jan 2019
  54. WHO. World Health Organization. Proposed working definition of an older person in Africa for the MDS Project (2019c). https://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/ageingdefnolder/en/. Accessed 22 Jan 2019
  55. Wijndaele K, Healy GN, Dunstan DW et al (2010) Increased cardiometabolic risk is associated with increased TV viewing time. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42(8):1511–1518CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Sofia Sousa
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Joana Mendes
    • 1
    • 4
    • 5
    Email author
  • Rita S. Guerra
    • 1
    • 2
    • 6
  • Patrícia Padrão
    • 1
    • 7
  • Pedro Moreira
    • 1
    • 7
    • 8
  • Alejandro Santos
    • 1
    • 5
  • Nuno Borges
    • 1
    • 9
  • Cláudia Afonso
    • 1
    • 7
  • Cátia Martins
    • 10
  • Graça Ferro
    • 11
  • Teresa F. Amaral
    • 1
    • 6
  1. 1.Faculty of Nutrition and Food ScienceUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Faculty of Health Sciences (Nutrition Sciences)Fernando Pessoa UniversityPortoPortugal
  3. 3.ciTechCare - Center for Innovative Care and Health TechnologyIP LeiriaLeiriaPortugal
  4. 4.Department of Biomedicine, Biochemistry Unit, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  5. 5.I3S - Institute for Research and Innovation in HealthUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  6. 6.UISPA-IDMEC, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  7. 7.EPIUnit, Institute of Public HealthUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  8. 8.The Research Centre in Physical Activity, Health and LeisureUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  9. 9.CINTESIS - Centre for Health Technology and Services ResearchPortoPortugal
  10. 10.Obesity Research Group, Department of Cancer Research and Molecular MedicineNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)TrondheimNorway
  11. 11.Alto Minho Local Health UnitEPEViana do CasteloPortugal

Personalised recommendations