Advertisement

Age integration in older Europeans’ non-kin core networks: Does formal social participation play a role?

  • Haosen Sun
  • Markus H. SchaferEmail author
Original Investigation
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

Age segregation—the widespread separation of people by age—is deemed by many gerontologists a major problem in contemporary societies. Contributing to this dialog, the current exploratory article examines the presence of non-kin members in European seniors’ close personal networks. Specifically, we document network connections to people outside of their 10-year birth cohort, both younger (“downward” age integration) and older (“upward” age integration). We consider whether different aspects of social participation—breadth and intensity of activity, and specific types of participation—are associated with age integration and we pay particular attention to variation across four regions of the continent. Analyses use Wave 6 of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (N = 34,282) which contains an updated social networks module. Results of descriptive analyses and logistic regression models demonstrate three key findings. First, both forms of age integration are rare—fewer than 10% of older Europeans have non-kin networks that extend beyond their own cohorts. Nevertheless, both forms of age integration tend to be higher in northern and central Europe than in the south and east. Second, two dimensions of formal social activity involvement were associated with age integration, namely activity breadth and intensity. Third, though there was some evidence that particular formal activities were linked to age integration, this pattern was not consistent across the whole of Europe. Overall, findings point to the significance of cultural and organizational variation across Europe as well as to important and increasingly relevant social cleavages in the later segments of adulthood.

Keywords

Age integration Social networks Social participation 

Notes

References

  1. Butler RN (1969) Age-ism: another form of bigotry. Gerontologist 9(4):243–246.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/9.4_Part_1.243 Google Scholar
  2. Campbell KE, Marsden PV, Hurlbert JS (1986) Social resources and socioeconomic status. Soc Netw 8(1):97–117Google Scholar
  3. Cornwell B (2009) Good health and the bridging of structural holes. Soc Netw 31(1):92–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2008.10.005 Google Scholar
  4. Cornwell B, Laumann EO, Schumm LP (2008) The social connectedness of older adults: a national profile. Am Sociol Rev 73(2):185–203.  https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240807300201 Google Scholar
  5. Dykstra PA, Fleischmann M (2016) Cross-age friendship in 25 European countries. Studi Sociologia 54(2):107–125Google Scholar
  6. Dykstra PA, Fleischmann M (2018) Are societies with a high value on the active ageing index more age integrated? In: Zaidi A, Harper S, Howse K, Lamura G, Perek-Białas J (eds) Building evidence for active ageing policies. Palgrave Macmillan, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  7. Erlinghagen M, Hank K (2006) The participation of older Europeans in volunteer work. Ageing Soc 26(4):567–584.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X06004818 Google Scholar
  8. Feld SL (1981) The focused organization of social ties. Am J Sociol 86(5):1015–1035Google Scholar
  9. Fiori KL, Antonucci TC, Cortina KS (2006) Social network typologies and mental health among older adults. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 61(1):P25–P32Google Scholar
  10. Gilleard C, Higgs P (2011) Ageing abjection and embodiment in the fourth age. J Aging Stud 25(2):135–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2010.08.018 Google Scholar
  11. Glanville JL (2016) Why does involvement in voluntary associations promote trust? Examining the role of network diversity. Sociol Inquiry 86(1):29–50.  https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12096 Google Scholar
  12. Hagestad GO, Uhlenberg P (2005) The social separation of old and young: a root of ageism. J Soc Issues 61(2):343–360.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00409.x Google Scholar
  13. Hagestad G, Uhlenberg P (2006) Should we be concerned about age-segregation? Some theoretical and empirical explorations. Res Aging 28(6):638–653.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027506291872 Google Scholar
  14. Hank K (2010) Societal determinants of productive aging: a multilevel analysis across 11 European countries. Eur Sociol Rev 27(4):526–541.  https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcq023 Google Scholar
  15. Haynes P, Banks L, Hill M (2014) The relationship between employment and social networks in the older population: a comparative European study. Int J Soc Econ 41(4):321–335.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-10-2012-0201 Google Scholar
  16. Kohli M (1988) Ageing as a challenge for sociological theory. Ageing Soc 8(4):367–394.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X00007169 Google Scholar
  17. Kohli M, Hank K, Künemund H (2009) The social connectedness of older Europeans: patterns, dynamics and contexts. J Eur Soc Policy 19(4):327–340Google Scholar
  18. Kuti É (2004) Civic service in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: from mandatory public work toward civic service. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 33(4):79S–97SGoogle Scholar
  19. Lifshitz-Vahav H, Shrira A, Bodner E (2017) The reciprocal relationship between participation in leisure activities and cognitive functioning: the moderating effect of self-rated literacy level. Aging Mental Health 21(5):524–531.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2015.1124838 Google Scholar
  20. Lin N (2000) Inequality in social capital. Contemp Sociol 29(6):785–795Google Scholar
  21. Litwin H, Shiovitz-Ezra S (2011) Social network type and subjective well-being in a national sample of older Americans. Gerontologist 51(3):379–388Google Scholar
  22. Litwin H, Stoeckel KJ (2016) Social network, activity participation, and cognition. Res Aging 38(1):76–97.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027515581422 Google Scholar
  23. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Ann Rev Sociol 27(1):415–444Google Scholar
  24. Peabody D (1985) National characteristics. Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’HommeGoogle Scholar
  25. Plagnol AC, Huppert FA (2010) Happy to help? Exploring the factors associated with variations in rates of volunteering across Europe. Soc Indic Res 97(2):157–176Google Scholar
  26. Riley MW, Kahn RL, Foner A, Mack KA (1994) Age and structural lag: society’s failure to provide meaningful opportunities in work, family, and leisure. Wiley, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Schafer M (2011) Health and network centrality in a continuing care retirement community. J Gerontol 66(6):795–803.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr112 Google Scholar
  28. Schafer MH, Upenieks L (2016) The age-graded nature of advice: distributional patterns and implications for life meaning. Soc Psychol Q 79(1):22–43Google Scholar
  29. Suanet B, van Tilburg TG, Broese van Groenou MI (2013) Nonkin in older adults’ personal networks: more important among later cohorts? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 68(4):633–643Google Scholar
  30. Uhlenberg P, Gierveld JDJ (2004) Age-segregation in later life: an examination of personal networks. Ageing Soc 24(1):5–28.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X0300151X Google Scholar
  31. Uhlenberg P et al (2000) Essays on age integration. Gerontologist 40(3):261–308Google Scholar
  32. United Nations (2018) UN Data, United Nations Statistics and Population Divisions. http://data.un.org/en/index.html. Accessed 12 Dec 2018
  33. Van Oorschot W, Arts W, Gelissen J (2006) Social capital in Europe: measurement and social and regional distribution of a multifaceted phenomenon. Acta Sociol 49(2):149–167Google Scholar
  34. Vozikaki M, Linardakis M, Micheli K, Philalithis A (2017) Activity participation and well-being among European adults aged 65 years and older. Soc Indic Res 131(2):769–795.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1256-y Google Scholar
  35. Wollebaek D, Selle P (2002) Does participation in voluntary associations contribute to social capital? The impact of intensity, scope, and type. The impact of intensity, scope and type. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 31(1):32–61Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations