Advertisement

Direct numerical simulation of a turbulent boundary layer over an anisotropic compliant wall

  • Qian-Jin Xia
  • Wei-Xi HuangEmail author
  • Chun-Xiao Xu
Research Paper
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Direct numerical simulation of a spatially developing turbulent boundary layer over a compliant wall with anisotropic wall material properties is performed. The Reynolds number varies from 300 to approximately 860 along the streamwise direction, based on the external flow velocity and the momentum thickness. Eight typical cases are selected for numerical investigation under the guidance of monoharmonic analysis. The instantaneous flow fields exhibit a traveling wavy motion of the compliant wall, and the frequency-wavenumber power spectrum of wall pressure fluctuation is computed to quantify the mutual influence of the wall compliance and the turbulent flow at different wave numbers. It is shown that the Reynolds shear stress and the pressure fluctuation are generally enhanced by the wall compliance with the parameters considered in the present study. A dynamical decomposition of the skin-friction coefficient is derived, and a new term (CW) appears due to the wall-induced Reynolds shear stress. The influence of the anisotropic compliant wall motion on the turbulent boundary layer through the wall-induced negative Reynolds shear stress is discussed. To elucidate the underlying mechanism, the budget analysis of the Reynolds stress transportation is further carried out. The impact of the wall compliance on the turbulent flow is disclosed by examining the variations of the diffusion and velocity–pressure correlation terms. It is shown that an increase of the Reynolds stress inside the flow domain is caused by enhancement of the velocity–pressure correlation term, possibly through the long-range influence of the wall compliance on the pressure field, rather than diffusion of the wall-induced Reynolds shear stress into the fluid flow.

Keywords

Turbulent boundary layer Anisotropic compliant wall Direct numerical simulation Skin-friction coefficient Reynolds shear stress 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 11772172 and 11490551). The authors would like to thank Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology for support in parallel computation.

References

  1. 1.
    Bushnell, D.M., Hefner, J.N., Ash, R.L.: Effect of compliant wall motion on turbulent boundary layers. Phys. Fluids Part II 20, S31–S48 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Riley, J.J., Gad-el-Hak, M., Metcalfe, R.W.: Compliant coatings. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20, 393–420 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gad-el-Hak, M.: Compliant coatings: a decade of progress. Appl. Mech. Rev. 49, S147–S157 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gad-el-Hak, M.: Compliant coatings for drag reduction. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 38, 77–99 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carpenter, P.W., Garrad, A.D.: The hydrodynamic stability of flow over Kramer-type compliant surfaces. Part 1. Tollmien–Schlichting instabilities. J. Fluid Mech. 155, 465–510 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carpenter, P.W., Garrad, A.D.: The hydrodynamic stability of flow over Kramer-type compliant surfaces. Part 2. Flow-induced surface instabilities. J. Fluid Mech. 170, 199–232 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carpenter, P.W., Morris, P.J.: The effect of anisotropic wall compliance on boundary-layer stability and transition. J. Fluid Mech. 218, 171–223 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yeo, K.S.: Hydrodynamic stability of boundary-layer flow over a class of anisotropic complaint walls. J. Fluid Mech. 220, 125–160 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yeo, K.S.: The three-dimensional stability of boundary-layer flow over compliant walls. J. Fluid Mech. 238, 537–577 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lucey, A.D., Carpenter, P.W.: Boundary layer instability over compliant walls: comparison between theory and experiment. Phys. Fluids 7, 2355–2363 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Luhar, M., Sharma, A.S., McKeon, B.J.: A framework for studying the effect of compliant surfaces on wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 768, 415–441 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kramer, M.O.: Boundary-layer stabilization by distributed damping. J. Aeronaut. Sci. 24, 459–460 (1957)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gad-el-Hak, M., Blackwelder, R.F., Riley, J.J.: On the interaction of compliant coatings with boundary-layer flows. J. Fluid Mech. 140, 257–280 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, T., Fisher, M., Schwarz, W.H.: Investigation of the stable interaction of a passive compliant surface with a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 257, 373–401 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Choi, K.S., Yang, X., Clayton, B.R., et al.: Turbulent drag reduction using compliant surfaces. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 453, 2229–2240 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Verma, M., Kumaran, V.: A multifold reduction in the transition Reynolds number, and ultra-fast mixing, in a micro-channel due to a dynamical instability induced by a soft wall. J. Fluid Mech. 727, 407–455 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Endo, T., Himeno, R.: Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a compliant surface. J. Turbul. 3, 1–10 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xu, S., Rempfer, D., Lumley, J.: Turbulence over a compliant surface: numerical simulation and analysis. J. Fluid Mech. 478, 11–34 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Luo, H., Bewley, T.R.: Design, modeling, and optimization of compliant tensegrity fabrics for the reduction of turbulent skin friction. In: International Society for Optics and Photonics, Smart Structures and Materials, pp. 460-470 (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Luo, H., Bewley, T.R.: Accurate simulation of near-wall turbulence over a compliant tensegrity fabric. In: International Society for Optics and Photonics, Smart Structures and Materials, pp. 184-197 (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fukagata, K., Kern, S., Chatelain, P., et al.: Evolutionary optimization of an anisotropic compliant surface for turbulent friction drag reduction. J. Turbul. 9, N35 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim, E., Choi, H.: Space-time characteristics of a compliant wall in a turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 756, 30–53 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xia, Q.J., Huang, W.X., Xu, C.X.: Direct numerical simulation of turbulent boundary layer over a compliant wall. J. Fluids Struct. 71, 126–142 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rosti, M., Brandt, L.: Numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow over a viscous hyper-elastic wall. J. Fluid Mech. 830, 708–735 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kramer, M.O.: Hydrodynamics of the dolphin. In: Chow, V.T. (ed.) Advances in Hydroscience, vol. 2, pp. 111–130. Academic Press, New York (1965)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Grosskreutz, R.: Wechselwirkungen zwischen turbulenten Grenzschichten und weichen Wänden. Selbstverlag Max-Planck-Institut für Strömungsforschung und der Aerodynamische Versuchsanstalt (1971) (in German)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Grosskreutz, R.: An attempt to control boundary-layer turbulence with nonisotropic compliant walls. Univ. Sci. J. Dar es Salaam 1, 65–73 (1975)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lund, T.S., Wu, X., Squires, K.D.: Generation of turbulent inflow data for spatially-developing boundary layer simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 140, 233–258 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kim, K., Baek, S.J., Sung, H.J.: An implicit velocity decoupling procedure for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 38, 125–138 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Huang, W.X., Sung, H.J.: Three-dimensional simulation of a flapping flag in a uniform flow. J. Fluid Mech. 653, 301–336 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Del Álamo, J.C., Jiménez, J.: Estimation of turbulent convection velocities and corrections to Taylor’s approximation. J. Fluid Mech. 640, 5–26 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fukagata, K., Iwamoto, K., Kasagi, N.: Contribution of Reynolds stress distribution to the skin friction in wall-bounded flows. Phys. Fluids 14, L73–L76 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Xia, Q.J., Huang, W.X., Xu, C.X., et al.: Direct numerical simulation of spatially developing turbulent boundary layers with opposition control. Fluid Dyn. Res. 47, 025503 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schlatter, P., Örlü, R.: Assessment of direct numerical simulation data of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 659, 116–126 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics; Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AML, Department of Engineering MechanicsTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations