Advertisement

3D hydrodynamic focusing in microscale channels formed with two photoresist layers

  • Erik S. HamiltonEmail author
  • Vahid Ganjalizadeh
  • Joel G. Wright
  • William G. Pitt
  • Holger Schmidt
  • Aaron R. Hawkins
Research Paper
  • 99 Downloads

Abstract

3D hydrodynamic focusing was implemented with channel cross-section dimensions smaller than 10 μm. Microchannels were formed using sacrificial etching of two photoresist layers on a silicon wafer. The photoresist forms a plus-shaped prismatic focusing fluid junction which was coated with plasma-enhanced chemical-vapor-deposited oxide. Buffer fluid carried to the focusing junction envelopes an intersecting sample fluid, resulting in 3D focusing of the sample stream. The design requires four fluid ports and operates across a wide range of fluid velocities through pressure-driven flow. The focusing design was integrated with optical waveguides to interrogate fluorescing particles and confirm 3D focusing. Particle diffusion away from a focused stream was characterized.

Keywords

3D hydrodynamic focusing Optofluidic Microscale channel Liquid-core waveguide 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health under Grant 1R01AI116989, and the National Science Foundation under Grant CBET-1703058.

Author contributions

The study conception and design were performed by ESH, JGW, and ARH. Modeling and fabrication were performed by ESH. Data collection and analysis were performed by VG, WGP, and HS. The first draft of the manuscript was written by ESH and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

ARH and HS have a financial interest in Fluxus Inc. which commercializes optofluidic technology.

References

  1. Amini H, Sollier E, Masaeli M, Xie Y, Ganapathysubramanian B, Stone HA et al (2013) Engineering fluid flow using sequenced microstructures. Nat Commun 4:1826.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2841 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Black JA, Hamilton E, Hueros RAR, Parks JW, Hawkins AR, Schmidt H (2019) Enhanced detection of single viruses on-chip via hydrodynamic focusing. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron.  https://doi.org/10.1109/jstqe.2018.2854574 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carslaw HS, Jaeger JC (1959) Conduction of heat in solids. Clarendon Press, OxfordzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiu YJ, Cho SH, Mei Z, Lien V, Wu TF, Lo YH (2013) Universally applicable three-dimensional hydrodynamic microfluidic flow focusing. Lab Chip 13(9):1803–1809.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3lc41202d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daniele MA, Boyd DA, Mott DR, Ligler FS (2015) 3D hydrodynamic focusing microfluidics for emerging sensing technologies. Biosens Bioelectron 67:25–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2014.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eyal S, Quake SR (2002) Velocity-independent microfluidic flow cytometry. Electrophoresis 23(16):2653–2657.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2683(200208)23:16%3c2653:AID-ELPS2653%3e3.0.CO;2-H CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fu LM, Leong JC, Lin CF, Tai CH, Tsai CH (2007) High performance microfluidic capillary electrophoresis devices. Biomed Microdevices 9(3):405–412.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-007-9049-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamilton ES, Wright JG, Stott MA, Hawkins AR, Black JA, Schmidt H (2018) 3D hydrodynamic focusing for optofluidics using a stacked channel design. In: Conference on lasers and electro-optics IEEE, 13–18 May 2018, paper JTh2A.101. San Jose, CA, USA.  https://doi.org/10.1364/cleo_at.2018.jth2a.101
  9. Hammon SJ (2017) Preserving optical confinement in PECVD SiO2 waveguides by control of thin-film stress, Brigham Young University, Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology; Electrical and Computer Engineering, MS. http://hdl.lib.byu.edu/1877/etd9148
  10. Hsieh SS, Lin HC, Lin CY (2006) Electroosmotic flow velocity measurements in a square microchannel. Colloid Polym Sci 284(11):1275–1286.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-006-1508-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kapusta P (2010) Absolute diffusion coefficients: compilation of reference data for FCS calibration. Rev 1. picoquant.com: PicoQuant GmbH. https://www.picoquant.com/images/uploads/page/files/7353/appnote_diffusioncoefficients.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2019
  12. Lee MG, Choi S, Park JK (2009) Three-dimensional hydrodynamic focusing with a single sheath flow in a single-layer microfluidic device. Lab Chip 9(21):3155–3160.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b910712f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lunt EJ, Wu B, Keeley JM, Measor P, Schmidt H, Hawkins AR (2010) Hollow ARROW waveguides on self-aligned pedestals for improved geometry and transmission. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett 22(15):1147–1149.  https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2010.2051145 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mao X, Waldeisen JR, Huang TJ (2007) “Microfluidic drifting”—implementing three-dimensional hydrodynamic focusing with a single-layer planar microfluidic device. Lab Chip 7(10):1260–1262.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b711155j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. MicroChem (2002) Nano SU-8 negative tone photoresist formulations 2-25. Rev 2/02. MicroChem, Newton, Massachusetts. http://www.microchem.com/pdf/SU8_2-25.pdf. Accessed 4 Oct 2019
  16. Ozcelik D, Parks JW, Wall TA, Stott MA, Cai H, Hawkins AR et al (2015) Optofluidic wavelength division multiplexing for single-virus detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(42):12933–12937.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1511921112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Parks J, Wall T, Cai H, Hawkins A, Schmidt H (2016) Enhancement of ARROW photonic device performance via thermal annealing of PECVD-based SiO2 waveguides. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 22(6):249–254.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2016.2549801 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Piyasena ME, Graves SW (2014) The intersection of flow cytometry with microfluidics and microfabrication. Lab Chip 14(6):1044–1059.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3lc51152a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Probstein RF (1994) Physicochemical hydrodynamics: an introduction. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sajeesh P, Sen AK (2014) Particle separation and sorting in microfluidic devices: a review. Microfluid Nanofluid 17(1):1–52.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-013-1291-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Simonnet C, Groisman A (2005) Two-dimensional hydrodynamic focusing in a simple microfluidic device (research-article). Appl Phys Lett.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2046729 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stellwagen E, Lu Y, Stellwagen NC (2003) Unified description of electrophoresis and diffusion for DNA and other polyions. Biochemistry 42(40):11745–11750.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bi035203p CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Testa G, Bernini R (2012) Integrated tunable liquid optical fiber. Lab Chip 12(19):3670–3672.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2lc40431a CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Electrical and Computer EngineeringBrigham Young UniversityProvoUSA
  2. 2.Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of California, Santa CruzSanta CruzUSA
  3. 3.Chemical EngineeringBrigham Young UniversityProvoUSA

Personalised recommendations