Advertisement

Microfluidics and Nanofluidics

, 23:106 | Cite as

Meridian whispering gallery modes sensing in a sessile microdroplet on micro/nanostructured superhydrophobic chip surfaces

  • Meng Zhang
  • Weifeng Cheng
  • Zheng Zheng
  • Jiangtao ChengEmail author
  • Jiansheng LiuEmail author
Research Paper
  • 145 Downloads

Abstract

A liquid microdroplet could be a naturally simple, miniaturized and effective optical cavity by itself due to the intriguing optofluidic properties associated with its surface tension-induced spherical shape. It had been shown that optical whispering gallery modes (WGMs) can be present along the circular rim in the equatorial plane of a sessile microdroplet, and this phenomenon had been leveraged for biosensing demonstrations. However, optical coupling to such equatorial modes for their excitation and monitoring is mostly based on either tapered fiber coupling or free-space beam coupling, each of which demandingly requires precise alignment of the tapered fiber or the free-space beam adjacent to the equatorial surface of the resonator. In this paper, we show that WGMs could also be stimulated along the meridian plane of a liquid microdroplet resting on a properly designed nanostructured chip surface. The geometrical morphology and optical characteristics of a microdroplet cavity are critical to achieve a high-quality Q factor and therefore to realize high-resolution in situ and in vivo monitoring of trace analytes. The unavoidable deformation along the meridian rim of the sessile microdroplet can be controlled and regulated by tailoring the nanopillar structures and their associated hydrophobicity. The nanostructured superhydrophobic chip surface and its impact on the microdroplet morphology are modeled by Surface Evolver, which is subsequently validated by the Cassie–Wenzel theory of wetting. The influence of the microdroplet morphology on the optical characteristics of WGMs is further numerically studied using the finite-difference time-domain method and it is found that meridian WGMs with intrinsic quality factor Q exceeding 104 can exist. Importantly, such meridian WGMs can be efficiently excited by a waveguiding structure embedded in the planar chip, which could significantly reduce the overall system complexity by eliminating conventional mechanical coupling parts. Our simulation results also demonstrate that this optofluidic resonator can achieve a sensitivity as high as 530 nm/RIU. This on-chip coupling scheme could pave the way for developing lab-on-a-chip resonators for high-resolution sensing of trace analytes in various applications ranging from chemical detections, biological reaction processes to environmental protection.

Keywords

Whispering gallery modes Superhydrophobic surface Deformed meridian plane Optofluidics Wetting 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NSFC 61775008, NSF ECCS 1550749 and NSF ECCS 1808931. The authors also acknowledge the Advanced Research Computing at Virginia Tech (http://www.arc.vt.edu) for providing computational resources and technical support that have contributed to the results reported in this paper.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary material

10404_2019_2272_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (950 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 951 kb)

References

  1. An L, Zheng Z, Li Z, Zhou T, Cheng J (2009) Ultra-wideband single-polarization single-mode, high nonlinearity photonic crystal fiber. Opt Commun 282:3266–3269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anand S et al (2016) Observation of whispering gallery modes in elastic light scattering from microdroplets optically trapped in a microfluidic channel. JOSA B 33:1349–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashkin A, Dziedzic J (1977) Observation of resonances in the radiation pressure on dielectric spheres. Phys Rev Lett 38:1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avino S et al (2014) Direct sensing in liquids using whispering-gallery-mode droplet resonators. Adv Opt Mater 2:1155–1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baaske M, Vollmer F (2012) Optical resonator biosensors: molecular diagnostic and nanoparticle detection on an integrated platform. ChemPhysChem 13:427–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banerjee S (2008) Simple derivation of Young, Wenzel and Cassie–Baxter equations and its interpretations. arXiv:0808.1460
  7. Bar-David D, Maayani S, Martin LL, Carmon T (2018) Cavity optofluidics: a μdroplet’s whispering-gallery mode makes a μvortex. Opt Express 26:19115–19122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bartolo D et al (2006) Bouncing or sticky droplets: impalement transitions on micropatterned surfaces. Europhys Lett 74(2):299–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brakke KA (1992) The surface evolver. Exp Math 1:141–165MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cassie A, Baxter S (1944) Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans Faraday Soc 40:546–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheng J-T, Chen C-L (2010a) Active thermal management of on-chip hot spots using EWOD-driven droplet microfluidics. Exp Fluids 49:1349–1357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheng J-T, Chen C-L (2010b) Adaptive chip cooling using electrowetting on coplanar control electrodes. Nanoscale Microscale Thermophys Eng 14:63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheng J-T, Vandadi A, Chen C-L (2012) Condensation heat transfer on two-tier superhydrophobic surfaces. Appl Phys Lett 101:131909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dahan R, Martin LL, Carmon T (2016) Droplet optomechanics. Optica 3:175–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Gennes P-G (1985) Wetting: statics and dynamics. Rev Mod Phys 57:827MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deng T et al (2009) Nonwetting of impinging droplets on textured surfaces. Appl Phys Lett 94:133109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Extrand CW (2002) Model for contact angles and hysteresis on rough and ultraphobic surfaces. Langmuir 18:7991–7999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fabbri P et al (2006) Surface properties of fluorinated hybrid coatings. J Appl Polym Sci 102:1483–1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Giorgini A, Avino S, Malara P, De Natale P, Gagliardi G (2017) Fundamental limits in high-Q droplet microresonators. Sci Rep 7:41997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gregor M et al (2010) An alignment-free fiber-coupled microsphere resonator for gas sensing applications. Appl Phys Lett 96:231102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grover R et al (2003) Laterally coupled InP-based single-mode microracetrack notch filter. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett 15:1082–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. He L, Özdemir ŞK, Zhu J, Kim W, Yang L (2011) Detecting single viruses and nanoparticles using whispering gallery microlasers. Nat Nanotechnol 6:428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ishimoto Y, Morishita Y (2014) Bubbly vertex dynamics: a dynamical and geometrical model for epithelial tissues with curved cell shapes. Phys Rev E 90:052711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jampani VSR, Humar M, Muševič I (2013) Resonant transport of light from planar polymer waveguide into liquid-crystal microcavity. Opt Express 21:20506–20516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jeong CY, Kim M, Kim S (2014) Metal nanodisk hybrid plasmonic resonator on dielectric substrate for relieved fabrication complexity. Opt Express 22:5772–5780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jonáš A, Karadag Y, Mestre M, Kiraz A (2012) Probing of ultrahigh optical Q-factors of individual liquid microdroplets on superhydrophobic surfaces using tapered optical fiber waveguides. JOSA B 29:3240–3247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jung YC, Bhushan B (2007) Wetting transition of water droplets on superhydrophobic patterned surfaces. Scripta Mater 57:1057–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jung YC, Bhushan B (2008) Dynamic effects of bouncing water droplets on superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 24:6262–6269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kashaninejad N, Chan WK, Nguyen N-T (2012) Eccentricity effect of micropatterned surface on contact angle. Langmuir 28:4793–4799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kashaninejad N, Nguyen N-T, Chan WK (2013) The three-phase contact line shape and eccentricity effect of anisotropic wetting on hydrophobic surfaces. Soft Matter 9:527–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kiraz A et al (2007a) Large spectral tuning of liquid microdroplets standing on a superhydrophobic surface using optical scattering force. Appl Phys Lett 91:231102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kiraz A et al (2007b) Single glycerol/water microdroplets standing on a superhydrophobic surface: optical microcavities promising original applications. J Nanophotonics 1:011655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kusumaatmaja H, Blow M, Dupuis A, Yeomans J (2008) The collapse transition on superhydrophobic surfaces. EPL 81:36003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lin H-B, Eversole JD, Campillo AJ (1992) Spectral properties of lasing microdroplets. JOSA B 9:43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ma M, Hill RM (2006) Superhydrophobic surfaces. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 11:193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Machavariani G, Davidson N, Ishaaya A, Friesem A, Hasman E (2002) Efficient formation of a high-quality beam from a pure high-order Hermite–Gaussian mode. Opt Lett 27:1501–1503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Newton M, Herbertson D, Elliott S, Shirtcliffe N, McHale G (2006) Electrowetting of liquid marbles. J Phys D Appl Phys 40:20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nishino T, Meguro M, Nakamae K, Matsushita M, Ueda Y (1999) The lowest surface free energy based on –CF3 alignment. Langmuir 15:4321–4323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reyssat M, Pépin A, Marty F, Chen Y, Quéré D (2006) Bouncing transitions on microtextured materials. EPL 74:306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reyssat M, Yeomans J, Quéré D (2007) Impalement of fakir drops. EPL 81:26006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Righini G et al (2011) Whispering gallery mode microresonators: fundamentals and applications. Rivista del nuovo cimento 34:435–488Google Scholar
  42. Scullion M, Di Falco A, Krauss T (2011) Slotted photonic crystal cavities with integrated microfluidics for biosensing applications. Biosens Bioelectron 27:101–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shin DH, Lee SH, Jung J-Y, Yoo JY (2009) Evaporating characteristics of sessile droplet on hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces. Microelectron Eng 86:1350–1353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Soria S et al (2011) Optical microspherical resonators for biomedical sensing. Sensors 11:785–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sun Y et al (2013) The un-symmetric hybridization of graphene surface plasmons incorporating graphene sheets and nano-ribbons. Appl Phys Lett 103:241116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sun Y, Zheng Z, Cheng J, Liu J (2014) Graphene surface plasmon waveguides incorporating high-index dielectric ridges for single mode transmission. Opt Commun 328:124–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tanyeri M, Kennedy IM (2008) Detecting single bacterial cells through optical resonances in microdroplets. Sens Lett 6:326–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tanyeri M, Perron R, Kennedy IM (2007) Lasing droplets in a microfabricated channel. Opt Lett 32:2529–2531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tian Y, Su B, Jiang L (2014) Interfacial material system exhibiting superwettability. Adv Mater 26:6872–6897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tzeng H-M, Wall KF, Long M, Chang R (1984) Laser emission from individual droplets at wavelengths corresponding to morphology-dependent resonances. Opt Lett 9:499–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vollmer F et al (2002) Protein detection by optical shift of a resonant microcavity. Appl Phys Lett 80:4057–4059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wan Y et al (2017) Resonant mode engineering of photonic crystal sensors clad with ultralow refractive index porous silicon dioxide. Adv Opt Mater 5:1700605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ward JM et al (2018) Nanoparticle sensing beyond evanescent field interaction with a quasi-droplet microcavity. Optica 5:674–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wenzel RN (1936) Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem 28:988–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhang M, Wu G (2017) High quality factor multi-layer symmetric hybrid plasmonic microresonator for sensing applications. Opt Commun 403:68–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhao L, Cheng J-T (2018) The mechanism and universal scaling law of the contact line friction for the Cassie-state droplets on nanostructured ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Nanoscale 10:6426–6436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zheng L, Zhi M, Chan Y, Khan SA (2018) Embedding liquid lasers within or around aqueous microfluidic droplets. Lab Chip 18:197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhi Y, Yu XC, Gong Q, Yang L, Xiao YF (2017) Single nanoparticle detection using optical microcavities. Adv Mater 29:1604920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhu H, White IM, Suter JD, Dale PS, Fan X (2007) Analysis of biomolecule detection with optofluidic ring resonator sensors. Opt Express 15:9139–9146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhu J et al (2010) On-chip single nanoparticle detection and sizing by mode splitting in an ultrahigh-Q microresonator. Nat Photonics 4:46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zullo R et al (2016) Laser-frequency locking to a whispering-gallery-mode cavity by spatial interference of scattered light. Opt Lett 41:650–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electronic and Information EngineeringBeihang UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA
  3. 3.Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Date-Based Precision MedicineBeihang UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations