Evolution of wax-on-plastic microfluidics for sub-microliter flow dynamics and its application in distance-based assay
- 146 Downloads
Plastic substrates are known for their flexibility, optical clearance, toughness, heat resistance, and nonabsorbent properties. Here, we introduce new wax-on-plastic microfluidic platforms, which are responsive to liquid types and concentrations in sub-microliter volume regime based on their flow behavior. Fabrication of the wax-on-plastic microfluidic platforms do not require heating to create stable hydrophobic barriers and liquids can move with a capillary flow down to 0.25 μL volume in the microchannels having 10 μm height. The flow dynamics of the studied fluids in these channels followed the Darcy’s theoretical model, which can be correlated with their flow velocity and viscosity. The flow velocity of the liquid flow was used to estimate glucose in simulated urine within ~ 40 s run-time. The distance-based assay involving relying on flow velocities was used to establish a dynamic range of the glucose in simulated urine with limit of quantitation of 0.018%, which is almost 3× lower than the lower limit of glucose quantity normally present in diabetic patients, i.e., 0.05–0.1%. Moreover, these microchannels can also work distinctly with various biofluids, such as sweat, urine, and fat-free milk.
This work was funded by startup grant from the Southern Illinois University Carbondale.
Supplementary material 2 (MOV 42400 kb)
- Betancur V, Sun JB, Wu NQ, Liu YX (2017) Integrated lateral flow device for flow control with blood separation and biosensing. Micromachines 8(12):1–19Google Scholar
- Free AH, Adams EC, Kercher ML, Free HM, Cook MH (1957) Simple specific test for urine glucose. Clin Chem 3(3):163–168Google Scholar
- Kalish B, Luong J, Roper J, Beaudette C, Tsutsui H (2017) Distance-based Quantitative DNA Detection in a Paper-based Microfluidic Device. In: 2017 IEEE 12th International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems (Nems), pp 337–341Google Scholar
- Song SH, Lim CS, Shin S (2013) Migration distance-based platelet function analysis in a microfluidic system. Biomicrofluidics 7(6):1–10Google Scholar
- Tokel O, Yildiz UH, Inci F, Durmus NG, Ekiz OO, Turker B, Cetin C, Rao S, Sridhar K, Natarajan N, Shafiee H, Dana A, Demirci U (2015) Portable microfluidic integrated plasmonic platform for pathogen detection. Sci Rep UK 5:1–9Google Scholar
- Zhu Z, Guan ZC, Jia SS, Lei ZC, Lin SC, Zhang HM, Ma YL, Tian ZQ, Yang CJ (2014) Au@Pt Nanoparticle Encapsulated Target-Responsive Hydrogel with Volumetric Bar-Chart Chip Readout for Quantitative Point-of-Care Testing. Angew Chem Int Edit 53(46):12503–12507Google Scholar
- Zuk RF, Ginsberg VK, Houts T, Rabbie J, Merrick H, Ullman EF, Fischer MM, Sizto CC, Stiso SN, Litman DJ (1985) Enzyme immunochromatography—a quantitative immunoassay requiring no instrumentation. Clin Chem 31(7):1144–1150Google Scholar