A method for controlling absolute pressures at the entrance and exit of a nanochannel/nanotube

  • Wenjing Zhou
  • Jinjia WeiEmail author
  • Wenquan Tao
Research Paper


A method is proposed to apply specified pressures at the entrance and exit of a nanochannel/nanotube. The pressure at the entrance is controlled by imposing an external force on fluid atoms within the pump region, while the pressure at the exit is adjusted by applying another external force on the piston which is an extension of the back reservoir. The method is validated by simulating argon flowing through a nanochannel/nanotube with different pressures at the ends, and the simulation results show that the pressures can be well controlled by this method. To further test the method in an unsteady case, the external force in the pump region is linearly increased while that on the piston keeps unchanged. The results show that the pressure in the back reservoir keeps constant while the pressure in the front reservoir increases as expected. The end effect on pressure drop for argon flowing through a nanotube is also investigated. Finally, the method has been proven to work effectively for water transport through carbon nanotubes with different diameters and different wall models. The advantage of the method is that it controls the absolute pressures in both the front and back reservoirs continuously and it is more applicable to long nanochannels/nanotubes compared to previous methods.


Pressure control Molecular dynamics simulation Nanochannel Carbon nanotube End effects 



This work is supported by the project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 51636006, 51611130060). W. J. Zhou acknowledges fruitful discussions with Jason Reese, Matthew Borg and Laurent Joly. Prof. Reese is greatly missed. The authors also thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and helpful suggestions to improve the quality of this paper.


  1. Abascal JLF, Vega C (2005) A general purpose model for the condensed phases of water: TIP4P/2005. J Chem Phys 123:234505. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arya G, Chang HC, Maginn EJ (2001) A critical comparison of equilibrium, non-equilibrium and boundary-driven molecular dynamics techniques for studying transport in microporous materials. J Chem Phys 115:8112–8124. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrat JL, Bocquet L (1999) Large slip effect at a nonwetting fluid-solid interface. Phys Rev Lett 82:4671–4674. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, Gunsteren WFV, DiNola A, Haak JR (1984) Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 81:3684–3690. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bitrián V, Principe J (2018) Driving mechanisms and streamwise homogeneity in molecular dynamics simulations of nanochannel flows. Phys Rev Fluids 3:014202. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borg MK, Lockerby DA, Reese JM (2013) A multiscale method for micro/nano flows of high aspect ratio. J Comput Phys 233:400–413. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borg MK, Lockerby DA, Reese JM (2015) A hybrid molecular–continuum method for unsteady compressible multiscale flows. J Fluid Mech 768:388–414. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brenner DW, Shenderova OA, Harrison JA, Stuart SJ, Ni B, Sinnott SB (2002) A second-generation reactive empirical bond order (REBO) potential energy expression for hydrocarbons. J Phys Condens Matter 14:783–802. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deserno M, Holm C (1998) How to mesh up Ewald sums. I. A theoretical and numerical comparison of various particle mesh routines. J Chem Phys 109:7678–7693. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ge S, Gu YW, Chen M (2015) A molecular dynamics simulation on the convective heat transfer in nanochannels. Mol Phys 113:703–710. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heffelfinger GS, van Swol F (1994) Diffusion in Lennard-Jones fluids using dual control volume grand canonical molecular dynamics simulation (DCV-GCMD). J Chem Phys 100:7548–7552. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoover WG (1985) Canonical dynamics-equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys Rev A 31:1695–1697. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang C, Nandakumar K, Choi PYK, Kostiuk LW (2006) Molecular dynamics simulation of a pressure-driven liquid transport process in a cylindrical nanopore using two self-adjusting plates. J Chem Phys 124:234701. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang C, Choi PY, Nandakumar K, Kostiuk LW (2008) Investigation of entrance and exit effects on liquid transport through a cylindrical nanopore. Phys Chem Chem Phys 10:186–192. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang C, Choi PY, Kostiuk LW (2011) A method for creating a non-equilibrium NT (P1–P2) ensemble in molecular dynamics simulation. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:20750–20759. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Irving J, Kirkwood JG (1950) The statistical mechanical theory of transport processes. IV. The equations of hydrodynamics. J Chem Phys 18:817–829. MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu L, Patey GN (2014) Simulations of water transport through carbon nanotubes: how different water models influence the conduction rate. J Chem Phys 141:18C518. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nagayama G, Cheng P (2004) Effects of interface wettability on microscale flow by molecular dynamics simulation. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 47:501–513. CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (2005) Thermophysical properties of fluid systems.
  20. Nose S (1984) A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular-dynamics methods. J Chem Phys 81:511–519. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117:1–19. CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Priezjev NV (2007) Rate-dependent slip boundary conditions for simple fluids. Phys Rev E 75:051605. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Richard R, Anthony S, Aziz G (2016) Pressure-driven molecular dynamics simulations of water transport through a hydrophilic nanochannel. Mol Phys 114:2655–2663. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ryckaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC (1977) Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comput Phys 23:327–341. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sisan TB, Lichter S (2011) The end of nanochannels. Microfluid Nanofluid 11:787–791. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sisavath S, Jing XD, Pain CC, Zimmerman RW (2002) Creeping flow through an axisymmetric sudden contraction or expansion. J Fluids Eng 124:273–278. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Suk ME, Aluru NR (2010) Water transport through ultrathin graphene. J Phys Chem Lett 1:1590–1594. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sun J, He YL, Tao WQ (2010) Scale effect on flow and thermal boundaries in micro-/nano-channel flow using molecular dynamics-continuum hybrid simulation method. Int J Numer Meth Eng 81:207–228. MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Sun J, He YL, Tao WQ, Rose JW, Wang HS (2012) Multi-scale study of liquid flow in micro/nanochannels: effects of surface wettability and topology. Microfluid Nanofluid 12:991–1008. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thomas JA, McGaughey AJH (2008) Reassessing fast water transport through carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett 8:2788–2793. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thomas JA, McGaughey AJH (2009) Water flow in carbon nanotubes: transition to subcontinuum transport. Phys Rev Lett 102:184502. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thomas JA, Iutzi RM, McGaughey AJH (2010) Thermal conductivity and phonon transport in empty and water-filled carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B 81:045413. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thompson PA, Troian SM (1997) A general boundary condition for liquid flow at solid surfaces. Nature 389:360–362. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Walther JH, Ritos K, Cruz-Chu ER, Megaridis CM, Koumoutsakos P (2013) Barriers to superfast water transport in carbon nanotube membranes. Nano Lett 13:1910–1914. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang L, Dumont RS, Dickson JM (2012) Nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulation of water transport through carbon nanotube membranes at low pressure. J Chem Phys 137:044102. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang L, Dumont RS, Dickson JM (2013) Nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulation of pressure-driven water transport through modified CNT membranes. J Chem Phys 138:124701. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weissberg HL (1962) End correction for slow viscous flow through long tubes. Phys Fluids 5:1033–1036. MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. Yong X, Zhang LT (2013) Thermostats and thermostat strategies for molecular dynamics simulations of nanofluidics. J Chem Phys 138:084503. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zheng J, Lennon EM, Tsao H-K, Sheng Y-J, Jiang S (2005) Transport of a liquid water and methanol mixture through carbon nanotubes under a chemical potential gradient. J Chem Phys 122:214702. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhou WJ, Luan HB, He YL, Sun J, Tao WQ (2014) A study on boundary force model used in multiscale simulations with non-periodic boundary condition. Microfluid Nanofluid 16:587–595. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemical Engineering and TechnologyXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power EngineeringXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina
  3. 3.Key Laboratory of Thermo-Fluid Science and Engineering of MOE, School of Energy and Power EngineeringXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations