Advertisement

Slip flow through microchannels with lubricant-infused bi-dimensional textured surfaces

  • Himani Sharma
  • Anvesh Gaddam
  • Amit AgrawalEmail author
  • Suhas S. Joshi
Research Paper
  • 103 Downloads

Abstract

Lubricant-infused textured surfaces, where a secondary liquid impregnates textures, have been employed as an alternative to gas-cushioned textured surfaces. However, the drag reduction capabilities of this new class of textured surfaces in the laminar regime have not been explored. In this work, a pressure-driven flow through microchannels containing lubricant-infused bi-dimensional textures was numerically investigated to assess their slippage properties. A large parameter ranges, Reynolds numbers 1–1000; viscosity ratio 0–1; constriction ratio 0.1–10; lubricant fraction 0–1, were employed in the simulations. Upon balancing the velocity continuity and shear stress at the liquid–lubricant interface, we could capture the viscous effects of lubricant on the amount of slippage. The effective slip length was computed as a function of relevant non-dimensional flow and geometrical parameters for texture configurations such as posts and holes. A significant amount of dissipation in the lubricant phase was observed for a viscosity ratio greater than 0.1 for both the texture configurations investigated. However, an increased viscosity ratio between the lubricant and liquid bettered the performance of the posts compared to holes at low-lubricant fractions. The inertial effects on the effective slip length were alleviated with an increase in viscosity of the underlying lubricant, for a surface covered with holes compared to posts. Furthermore, it was shown that the validity of scaling laws for the effective slip length from the gas-cushioned textured surfaces to liquid-infused textured surfaces could be extended upon incorporating the effects of inertia and viscosity ratio. The results presented here will help in designing efficient lubricant-infused textured surfaces for drag reduction both in internal and external flow settings.

Keywords

Drag reduction Effective slip length Flow friction Lubricant-infused textured surfaces Microchannel And pressure-driven flow 

Notes

References

  1. Asmolov ES, Nizkaya TV, Vinogradova OI (2018) Enhanced slip properties of lubricant-infused grooves. Phys Rev E 98:033103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bjelobrk N, Girard HL, Subramanyam SB, Kwon HM, Quéré D, Varanasi KK (2016) Thermocapillary motion on lubricant-impregnated surfaces. Phys Rev Fluids 1(6):063902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carlborg CF, van der Wijngaart W (2010) Sustained superhydrophobic friction reduction at high liquid pressures and large flows. Langmuir 27(1):487–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen T, Cong Q, Qi Y, Jin J, Choy KL (2018) Hydrophobic durability characteristics of butterfly wing surface after freezing cycles towards the design of nature inspired anti-icing surfaces. PloS One 13(1):.e0188775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng YP, Teo CJ, Khoo BC (2009) Microchannel flows with superhydrophobic surfaces: effects of Reynolds number and pattern width to channel height ratio. Phys Fluids 21(12):122004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Choi CH, Ulmanella U, Kim J, Ho CM, Kim CJ (2006) Effective slip and friction reduction in nanograted superhydrophobic microchannels. Phys Fluids 18(8):087105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davies J, Maynes D, Webb BW, Woolford B (2006) Laminar flow in a microchannel with superhydrophobic walls exhibiting transverse ribs. Phys Fluids 18(8):087110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dilip D, Jha NK, Govardhan RN, Bobji MS (2014) Controlling air solubility to maintain “Cassie” state for sustained drag reduction. Colloids Surf A 459:217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forsberg P, Nikolajeff F, Karlsson M (2011) Cassie–Wenzel and Wenzel–Cassie transitions on immersed superhydrophobic surfaces under hydrostatic pressure. Soft Matter 7(1):104–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gaddam A, Agrawal A, Joshi SS, Thompson MC (2015a) Utilization of cavity vortex to delay the wetting transition in one-dimensional structured microchannels. Langmuir 31(49):13373–13384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gaddam A, Garg M, Agrawal A, Joshi SS (2015b) Modeling of liquid–gas meniscus for textured surfaces: effects of curvature and local slip length. J Micromech Microeng 25(12):125002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gaddam A, Agrawal A, Joshi SS, Thompson MC (2018) Slippage on a particle-laden liquid-gas interface in textured microchannels. Phys Fluids 30(3):032101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Howell C, Grinthal A, Sunny S, Aizenberg M, Aizenberg J (2018) Designing liquid-infused surfaces for medical applications: a review. Adv Mater 30:1802724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jacobi I, Wexler JS, Stone HA (2015) Overflow cascades in liquid-infused substrates. Phys Fluids 27(8):082101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Khalil KS, Mahmoudi SR, Abu-Dheir N, Varanasi KK (2014) Active surfaces: ferrofluid-impregnated surfaces for active manipulation of droplets. Appl Phys Lett 105(4):041604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim JH, Rothstein JP (2016) Delayed lubricant depletion on liquid-infused randomly rough surfaces. Exp Fluids 57(5):81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lauga E, Stone HA (2003) Effective slip in pressure-driven Stokes flow. J Fluid Mech 489:55–77MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee C, Kim CJ (2011a) Underwater restoration and retention of gases on superhydrophobic surfaces for drag reduction. Phys Rev Lett 106(1):014502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee C, Kim CJC (2011b) Influence of surface hierarchy of superhydrophobic surfaces on liquid slip. Langmuir 27(7):4243–4248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maynes D, Jeffs K, Woolford B, Webb BW (2007) Laminar flow in a microchannel with hydrophobic surface patterned microribs oriented parallel to the flow direction. Phys Fluids 19(9):093603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ng CO, Chu HC, Wang CY (2010) On the effects of liquid-gas interfacial shear on slip flow through a parallel-plate channel with superhydrophobic grooved walls. Phys Fluids 22(10):102002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ou J, Perot B, Rothstein JP (2004) Laminar drag reduction in microchannels using ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Phys Fluids 16(12):4635–4643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peaudecerf FJ, Landel JR, Goldstein RE, Luzzatto-Fegiz P (2017) Traces of surfactants can severely limit the drag reduction of superhydrophobic surfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114(28):7254–7259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Smith JD, Dhiman R, Anand S, Reza-Garduno E, Cohen RE, McKinley GH, Varanasi KK (2013) Droplet mobility on lubricant-impregnated surfaces. Soft Matter 9(6):177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Solomon BR, Khalil KS, Varanasi KK (2014) Drag reduction using lubricant-impregnated surfaces in viscous laminar flow. Langmuir 30(36):10970–10976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Teo CJ, Khoo BC (2009) Analysis of Stokes flow in microchannels with superhydrophobic surfaces containing a periodic array of micro-grooves. Microfluid Nanofluid 7(3):353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Teo CJ, Khoo BC (2010) Flow past superhydrophobic surfaces containing longitudinal grooves: effects of interface curvature. Microfluid Nanofluid 9(2–3):499–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Van Buren T, Smits AJ (2017) Substantial drag reduction in turbulent flow using liquid-infused surfaces. J Fluid Mech 827:448–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang P, Zhang D, Sun S, Li T, Sun Y (2016) Fabrication of slippery lubricant-infused porous surface with high underwater transparency for the control of marine biofouling. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(1):972–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wexler JS, Jacobi I, Stone HA (2015) Shear-driven failure of liquid-infused surfaces. Phys Rev Lett 114(16):168301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wong TS, Kang SH, Tang SK, Smythe EJ, Hatton BD, Grinthal A, Aizenberg J (2011) Bioinspired self-repairing slippery surfaces with pressure-stable omniphobicity. Nature 477(7365):443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Woolford B, Maynes D, Webb BW (2009) Liquid flow through microchannels with grooved walls under wetting and superhydrophobic conditions. Microfluid Nanofluid 7(1):121–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xiang Y, Xue Y, Lv P, Li D, Duan H (2016) Influence of fluid flow on the stability and wetting transition of submerged superhydrophobic surfaces. Soft Matter 12(18):4241–4246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ybert C, Barentin C, Cottin-Bizonne C, Joseph P, Bocquet L (2007) Achieving large slip with superhydrophobic surfaces: scaling laws for generic geometries. Phys Fluids 19(12):123601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang S, Huang J, Cheng Y, Yang H, Chen Z, Lai Y (2017) Bioinspired surfaces with superwettability for anti-icing and ice-phobic application: concept, mechanism, and design. Small 13(48):1701867CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Himani Sharma
    • 1
  • Anvesh Gaddam
    • 1
  • Amit Agrawal
    • 1
    Email author
  • Suhas S. Joshi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology BombayMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations