On-chip acoustic mixer integration of electro-microfluidics towards in-situ and efficient mixing in droplets

  • Yao Lu
  • Menglun ZhangEmail author
  • Hongxiang Zhang
  • Jingze Huang
  • Zhan Wang
  • Zelin Yun
  • Yanyan Wang
  • Wei PangEmail author
  • Xuexin Duan
  • Hao Zhang
Research Paper


Rapid and reliable micromixing requires continuous improvement to renovate more powerful microfluidics chip for chemosynthesis, biological assay, and drug purification. In this work, we realized rapid in-situ mixing in droplets on a closed electro-microfluidic chip. Electrowetting and 2.5 GHz acoustic wave streaming were coupled into a monolithic chip for the manipulation and active mixing of microdroplets, respectively. Finite-element analysis simulation provided three-dimensional illustrations of turbulent flow pattern, fluid velocity, and vortices core locations. We carried out mixing experiments on different scales from nanoscale molecules to microscale particles, accelerating mixing efficiency by more than 50 times compared with pure diffusion. In the enzyme catalytic reaction experiment for biological assay demonstration, mixing efficiency of biological samples improves by about one order of magnitude compared with conventional 96-well-plate assay. Limited temperature rising of mixing in microdroplets validates biological safety, which guarantees potentials of the chip in various biochemical analyses and medical applications.


Electrowetting-on-dielectric In-situ mixing Active mixer Acoustofluidics Integrated biochip 



The authors acknowledge financial support from the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC no. 51375341), the 111 Project (B07014), Nanchang Institute for Microtechnology of Tianjin University, and the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program no. 2015AA042603).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals


Informed consent


Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (AVI 7377 KB)


  1. Ballard M, Owen D, Mills ZG et al (2016) Orbiting magnetic microbeads enable rapid microfluidic mixing. Microfluid Nanofluid 20:1–13. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beebe DJ, Mensing GA, Walker GM (2002) Physics and Applications of microfluidics in biology. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 4:261–286. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang CC, Yang RJ (2007) Electrokinetic mixing in microfluidic systems. Microfluid Nanofluid 3:501–525. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen D, Xu Y, Wang J et al (2010) The AlN based solidly mounted resonators consisted of the all-metal conductive acoustic Bragg reflectors. VAC 85:302–306. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen C-Y, Chen C-Y, Lin C-Y, Hu Y-T (2013) Magnetically actuated artificial cilia for optimum mixing performance in microfluidics. Lab Chip 13:2834. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cho SK, Moon H, Chang-Jin Kim (2003) Creating, transporting, cutting, and merging liquid droplets by electrowetting-based actuation for digital microfluidic circuits. J Microelectromech Syst 12:70–80. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chun H, Kim HC, Chung TD (2008) Ultrafast active mixer using polyelectrolytic ion extractor. Lab Chip 8:764. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cui W, Zhang H, Zhang H et al (2016) Localized ultrahigh frequency acoustic fields induced micro-vortices for submilliseconds microfluidic mixing. Appl Phys Lett. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Darwin R, Reyes D, Iossifidis, Pierre-Alain Auroux † and, Manz* A (2002) Micro total analysis systems. 1. Introduction, theory, and technology.
  10. Ding X, Li P, Lin S-CS et al (2013) Surface acoustic wave microfluidics. Lab Chip 13:3626. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. El Moctar AO, Aubry N, Batton J (2003) Electro-hydrodynamic micro-fluidic mixer electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: video of effect of electric field on channel flow mixing. See Lab Chip 3:273.
  12. Enlund J, Martin D, Yantchev V, Katardjiev I (2008) Solidly mounted thin film electro-acoustic resonator utilizing a conductive Bragg reflector. Sens Actuators A 141:598–602. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Friend J, Yeo LY (2011) Microscale acoustofluidics: Microfluidics driven via acoustics and ultrasonics. Rev Mod Phys 83:647–704. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frommelt T, Kostur M, Wenzel-Schäfer M et al (2008) Microfluidic mixing via acoustically driven chaotic advection. Phys Rev Lett 100:1–4. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fu YQ, Luo JK, Nguyen NT et al (2017) Advances in piezoelectric thin films for acoustic biosensors, acoustofluidics and lab-on-chip applications. Prog Mater Sci 89:31–91. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glasgow I, Aubry N (2003) Enhancement of microfluidic mixing using time pulsing. Lab Chip 3:114–120. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hessel V, Löwe H, Schönfeld F (2005) Micromixers—a review on passive and active mixing principles. Chem Eng Sci 60:2479–2501. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hiromitsu S, Jin K, Emiko S et al (2015) Novel method for immunofluorescence staining of mammalian eggs using non-contact alternating-current electric-field mixing of microdroplets. Sci Rep 5:1–10. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hong SO, Cooper-White JJ, Kim JM (2016) Inertio-elastic mixing in a straight microchannel with side wells. Appl Phys Lett. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jebrail MJ, Bartsch MS, Patel KD (2012) Digital microfluidics: a versatile tool for applications in chemistry, biology and medicine. Lab Chip 12:2452. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim H, Min K-I, Inoue K et al (2016) Submillisecond organic synthesis: Outpacing Fries rearrangement through microfluidic rapid mixing. Science 352:691–694. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Le The H, Le Thanh H, Dong T et al (2015) An effective passive micromixer with shifted trapezoidal blades using wide Reynolds number range. Chem Eng Res Des 93:1–11. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee MG, Choi S, Park JK (2009) Rapid laminating mixer using a contraction–expansion array microchannel. Appl Phys Lett 95:1–4. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee CY, Wang WT, Liu CC, Fu LM (2016) Passive mixers in microfluidic systems: a review. Chem Eng J 288:146–160. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li Y, Liu C, Feng X et al (2014) Ultrafast microfluidic mixer for tracking the early folding kinetics of human telomere G-quadruplex. Anal Chem 86:4333–4339. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lim TW, Son Y, Jeong YJ et al (2011) Three-dimensionally crossing manifold micro-mixer for fast mixing in a short channel length. Lab Chip 11:100–103. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu C, Hu G, Jiang X, Sun J (2015) Inertial focusing of spherical particles in rectangular microchannels over a wide range of Reynolds numbers. Lab Chip 15:1168–1177. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lynn NS, Martínez-López JI, Bocková M et al (2014) Biosensing enhancement using passive mixing structures for microarray-based sensors. Biosens Bioelectron 54:506–514. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Madison AC, Royal MW, Fair RB et al (2017) Piezo-driven acoustic streaming in an electrowetting-on-dielectric digital microfluidics device. Microfluid Nanofluid 21:1–9. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mugele F, Staicu A, Bakker R, van den Ende D (2011) Capillary Stokes drift: a new driving mechanism for mixing in AC-electrowetting. Lab Chip. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Neild A, Ng TW, Sheard GJ et al (2010) Swirl mixing at microfluidic junctions due to low frequency side channel fluidic perturbations. Sens Actuators B 150:811–818. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oberti S, Neild A, Wah Ng T (2009) Microfluidic mixing under low frequency vibration. Lab Chip 9:1435. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pang W, Zhao H, Kim ES et al (2012) Piezoelectric microelectromechanical resonant sensors for chemical and biological detection. Lab Chip 12:29–44. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Qu H, Yang Y, Chang Y et al (2017) On-chip integrated multiple microelectromechanical resonators to enable the local heating, mixing and viscosity sensing for chemical reactions in a droplet. Sens Actuators B Chem 248:280–287. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Samiei E, Tabrizian M, Hoorfar M (2016) A review of digital microfluidics as portable platforms for lab-on a-chip applications. Lab Chip 16:2376–2396. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stokes GG (1845) On the theories of the internal friction of fluids in motion, and of the equilibrium and motion of elastic solids. Math Phys Pap 18:75–129. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Suh YK, Kang S (2010) A review on mixing in microfluidics. Micromachines 1:82–111. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tsai JH, Lin L (2002) Active microfluidic mixer and gas bubble filter driven by thermal bubble micropump. Sens Actuators A 97–98:665–671. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Valencia PM, Basto PA, Zhang L et al (2018) Single-step assembly of homogenous lipid polymeric and lipid quantum dot nanoparticles enabled by microfluidic rapid mixing.
  40. Viefhues M, Eichhorn R, Fredrich E et al (2012) Continuous and reversible mixing or demixing of nanoparticles by dielectrophoresis. Lab Chip 12:485–494. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang J, Chen W, Sun J et al (2014) A microfluidic tubing method and its application for controlled synthesis of polymeric nanoparticles. Lab Chip 14:1673–1677. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang Z, Zhang H, Yang Y et al (2017) Wireless controlled local heating and mixing multiple droplets using micro-fabricated resonator array for micro-reactor applications. IEEE Access 5:25987–25992. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Whitesides GM (2011) What comes next? Lab Chip 11:191–193. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wiklund M (2012) Acoustofluidics 12: biocompatibility and cell viability in microfluidic acoustic resonators. Lab Chip 12:2018. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Xie Y, Ahmed D, Lapsley MI et al (2012) Single-shot characterization of enzymatic reaction constants K m and k cat by an acoustic-driven, bubble-based fast micromixer. Anal Chem 84:7495–7501. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yang Z, Matsumoto S, Goto H et al (2001) Ultrasonic micromixer for microfluidic systems. Sens Actuators A 93:266–272. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yeo LY, Friend JR (2014) Surface acoustic wave microfluidics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 46:379–406. MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang Z, Wang Y, Zhang H et al (2017) Hypersonic poration: a new versatile cell poration method to enhance cellular uptake using a piezoelectric nano-electromechanical device. Small 13:1–10. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laborary of Precision Measuring Technology and InstrumentsTianjin UniversityTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations