Advertisement

Rapid prototyping of shrinkable BOPS-based microfluidic devices

  • Yiqiang Fan
  • Hongliang Wang
  • Shicheng Liu
  • Jingji Liu
  • Kexin Gao
  • Yajun Zhang
Short Communication
  • 95 Downloads

Abstract

Biaxially oriented polystyrene (BOPS) is a commercialized packaging material, which has the advantages of biocompatibility, non-toxic, transparency, light-weight and cost-effective. Due to the stress accumulated from both directions in plane during the fabrication process, when BOPS was reheated above the glass transition temperature, an isotropic shrinkage will occur. This study proposed a low-cost and rapid prototyping method for the fabrication of BOPS-based microfluidics device. Both laser ablation and micro-milling were used for the fabrication of microchannels on the surface of the BOPS sheet, after thermal induced shrinkage, microchannels with finer microstructure could be achieved. For the sealing of fabricated microchannels on BOPS, two approaches were made using a layer of BOPS or a layer of polyester adhesive film. The thermal induced shrinkage and bonding strength were carefully studied in this study. Several microfluidic devices, including a droplet generator and a diffusion mixer were also fabricated for demonstration. The proposed fabrication method for BOPS-based microfluidics is simple, rapid, cost-effective and without the requirement of cleanroom facility, with help of thermal induced shrinkage, finer structure with high resolution could be achieved with conventional lab tools.

Keywords

Microfluidics Biaxially oriented polystyrene Laser ablation Micro-milling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51804014).

References

  1. Aghvami SA et al (2017) Rapid prototyping of cyclic olefin copolymer (COC) microfluidic devices. Sens Actuators B 247:940–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhattacharjee N et al (2016) The upcoming 3D-printing revolution in microfluidics. Lab Chip 16(10):1720–1742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boussommier-Calleja A et al (2018) The effects of monocytes on tumor cell extravasation in a 3D vascularized microfluidic model. Biomaterials.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cao Y, Bontrager-Singer J, Zhu L (2015) A 3D microfluidic device fabrication method using thermopress bonding with multiple layers of polystyrene film. J Micromech Microeng 25(6):065005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang C-W et al (2014) A polydimethylsiloxane–polycarbonate hybrid microfluidic device capable of generating perpendicular chemical and oxygen gradients for cell culture studies. Lab Chip 14(19):3762–3772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng Z et al (2017) Enclosed casting of epoxy resin for rapid fabrication of rigid microfluidic chips. Sens Actuators B 252:785–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Danielson C et al (2017) Fabrication and characterization of self-folding thermoplastic sheets using unbalanced thermal shrinkage. Soft Matter 13(23):4224–4230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fan Y et al (2012) Printed wax masks for 254 nm deep-UV pattering of PMMA-based microfluidics. J Micromech Microeng 22(2):027001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fan Y et al (2018) Rapid prototyping of flexible multilayer microfluidic devices using polyester sealing film. Microsyst Technol 24(6):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grimes A et al (2008) Shrinky-Dink microfluidics: rapid generation of deep and rounded patterns. Lab Chip 8(1):170–172MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lin S et al (2014) Thermally-induced miniaturization for micro- and nanofabrication: progress and updates. Lab Chip 14(18):3475–3488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lin T-Y et al (2017) 3D printed metal molds for hot embossing plastic microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 17(2):241–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu Y et al (2012) Self-folding of polymer sheets using local light absorption. Soft Matter 8(6):1764–1769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu EY et al (2018) High-throughput double emulsion-based microfluidic production of hydrogel microspheres with tunable chemical functionalities toward biomolecular conjugation. Lab Chip 18(2):323–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mandon CA et al (2010) Polyshrink based microfluidic chips and protein microarrays. Biosens Bioelectron 26(4):1218–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Miao S et al (2017) Improving the resolution of 3D-Printed molds for microfluidics by iterative casting-shrinkage cycles. Anal Chem 89(4):2227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moon H-S et al (2018) Inertial-ordering-assisted droplet microfluidics for high-throughput single-cell RNA-sequencing. Lab Chip 18(5):775–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rajan SAP et al (2018) Microfluidics in cell and tissue studies. In: Tumor organoids. Humana Press, Cham, pp 149–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ren X, Foster BM, Ghassemi P, Strobl JS, Kerr BA, Agah M (2018) Entrapment of prostate cancer circulating tumor cells with a sequential size-based microfluidic chip. Anal Chem 90(12):7526–7534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Roggo C et al (2018) Quantitative chemical biosensing by bacterial chemotaxis in microfluidic chips. Environ Microbiol 20(1):241–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shimin W, Feiya S, Danfeng H (2016) Effects of packaging materials and types on the postharvest nutritional quality of mini Pakchoi Brassica chinensis. Int J Agric Biol Eng 9(6):207–213Google Scholar
  22. Sollier K et al (2009) “Print-n-Shrink” technology for the rapid production of microfluidic chips protein microarrays. Lab Chip 9(24):3489–3494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Toossi A et al (2015) Bonding PMMA microfluidics using commercial microwave ovens. J Micromech Microeng 25(8):085008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tran R et al (2014) Simplified prototyping of perfusable polystyrene microfluidics. Biomicrofluidics 8(4):046501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wu J et al (2015) Inkjet-printed microelectrodes on PDMS as biosensors for functionalized microfluidic systems. Lab Chip 15(3):690–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Young EW et al (2011) Rapid prototyping of arrayed microfluidic systems in polystyrene for cell-based assays. Anal Chem 83(4):1408–1417CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical and Electrical EngineeringBeijing University of Chemical TechnologyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations