Novel swirl flow-focusing microfluidic device for the production of monodisperse microbubbles

  • Irene Arcos-Turmo
  • Miguel Ángel Herrada
  • José María López-Herrera
  • David Fernandez Rivas
  • Alfonso M. Gañán-Calvo
  • Elena Castro-HernándezEmail author
Research Paper


A novel swirl flow-focusing microfluidic axisymmetric device for the generation of monodisperse microbubbles at high production rates to be used as in-line contrast agents for medical applications is presented. The swirl effect is induced upstream of the discharge orifice by a circular array of microblades which form a given angle with the radial direction. The induced vortical component on the focusing liquid stabilizes the gas meniscus by the vorticity amplification due to vortex stretching as the liquid is forced through the discharge orifice. The stabilized meniscus tapers into a steady gas ligament that breaks into monodisperse microbubbles. A reduction up to \(57\%\) in the microbubble diameter is accomplished when compared to conventional axisymmetric flow-focusing microdevices. An exhaustive experimental study is performed for various blade angles and numerous gas to liquid flow rate ratios, validating previous VoF numerical simulations. The microbubbles issued from the stabilized menisci verify prior scaling law of flow-focusing.


Microbubble Flow-focusing Swirl 



The authors would like to acknowledge financial support from Spanish Government Ministry MEIC and Regional Government under the Contract DPI2013-46485 and P11-TEP-7465, respectively. They would also like to acknowledge the technical assistance of S. Schlautmann in the fabrication of the microfluidic devices and Manuel González and Jorge López for their technical assistance during the setup preparation.


  1. Anna SL, Bontoux N, Stone HA (2003) Formation of dispersions using flow focusing in microchannels. Appl Phys Lett 82(3):364–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Castro-Hernández E, van Hoeve W, Lohse D, Gordillo JM (2011) Microbubble generation in a co-flow device operated in a new regime. Lab Chip 11(12):2023–2029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dollet B, Van Hoeve W, Raven JP, Marmottant P, Versluis M (2008) Role of the channel geometry on the bubble pinch-off in flow-focusing devices. Phys Rev Lett 100(3):034504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ferrara K, Pollard R, Borden M (2007) Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 9:415–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gañán-Calvo AM (2004) Perfectly monodisperse microbubbling by capillary flow focusing: an alternate physical description and universal scaling. Phys Rev E 69(2):027301MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gañán-Calvo AM, Gordillo JM (2001) Perfectly monodisperse microbubbling by capillary flow focusing. Phys Rev Lett 87(27):274501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gañán-Calvo AM, Herrada MA, Garstecki P (2006) Bubbling in unbounded coflowing liquids. Phys Rev Lett 96(12):124504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Garstecki P, Gitlin I, Diluzio W, Kumacheva E, Stone HA, Whitesides GM (2004) Formation of monodisperse bubbles in a microfluidic flow-focusing device. Appl Phys Lett 85:2649–2651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garstecki P, Gañán-Calvo AM, Whitesides GM (2005) Formation of bubbles and droplets in microfluidic systems. Tech Sci 53(4)Google Scholar
  10. Garstecki P, Fuerstman MJ, Stone HA, Whitesides GM (2006) Formation of droplets and bubbles in a microfluidic t-junction—scaling and mechanism of break-up. Lab Chip 6(3):437–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Herrada MA, Gañán-Calvo AM (2009) Swirl flow focusing: a novel procedure for the massive production of monodisperse microbubbles. Phys Fluids 21(4):042003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herrada MA, Gañán-Calvo AM, López-Herrera JM (2011) Generation of small mono-disperse bubbles in axisymmetric t-junction: the role of swirl. Phys Fluids 23(7):072004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kennedy J, Wu F, Ter Haar G, Gleeson F, Phillips R, Middleton M, Cranston D (2004) High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of liver tumours. Ultrasonics 42(1–9):931–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marmottant P, Van Der Meer S, Emmer M, Versluis M, De Jong N, Hilgenfeldt S, Lohse D (2005) A model for large amplitude oscillations of coated bubbles accounting for buckling and rupture. J Acoust Soc Am 118(6):3499–3505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Takahashi M (2005) Potential of microbubbles in aqueous solutions: electrical properties of the gas–water interface. J Phys Chem B 109(46):21858–21864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wei K, Jayaweera A, Firoozan S, Linka A, Skyba D, Kaul S (1998) Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. Circulation 97(5):473–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Whitesides G (2006) The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 442(7101):368–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Área de Mecánica de Fluidos, Departamento de Ingeniería Aeroespacial y Mecánica de FluidosUniversidad de SevillaSevilleSpain
  2. 2.Mesoscale Chemical Systems and MESA+ Institute of NanotechnologyEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations