Desktop micromilled microfluidics

  • Ali Lashkaripour
  • Ryan Silva
  • Douglas DensmoreEmail author
Research Paper


Micromilling is a proven method for prototyping microfluidic devices; however, high overhead costs, large machine footprints, an esoteric software stack, and nonstandard device bonding protocols may be hampering the widespread adoption of micromilling in the greater microfluidics community. This research exploits a free design-to-device software chain and uses it to explore the applicability of a new class of inexpensive, desktop micromills for fabricating microfluidic devices out of polycarbonate. We present an analysis framework for stratifying micromill’s spatial accuracy and surface quality. Utilizing this we concluded milling geometries directly on the substrate is advantageous to making molds out of the substrate, in terms of accuracy and minimum feature size. Moreover, we proposed a general procedure to calculate feedrate and spindle-speed for any sub-millimeter endmill based on a recommended load percentage. We also established stepover is the major parameter in determining the surface quality rather than spindle-speed and feedrate, showing low-cost mills are able to deliver high-quality surface finishes. Ultimately, we clarified the suitability of low-cost micromills and a cost-efficient assembly method in the field of microfluidics by demonstrating rate- and size-controlled microfluidic droplet generation.


Microfluidics Micromilling Low cost Microfabrication Droplet microfluidics 



We like to thank Mohammadreza Rasouli from Biomat’X research laboratories at McGill University who provided a detailed pricing information on photolithography. We also like to thank Christopher Rodriguez and Sarah Nemsick for the image processing of the microfluidic droplet generation and graphic design, respectively. This work was supported by the NSF Living Computing Project Award \(\#1522074\) and NSF CAREER Award \(\#1253856\).

Supplementary material

10404_2018_2048_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (7.2 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 7378 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (mp4 3623 KB)

10404_2018_2048_MOESM3_ESM.scad (2 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (scad 1 KB)
10404_2018_2048_MOESM4_ESM.stl (28 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (stl 27 KB)
10404_2018_2048_MOESM5_ESM.scad (2 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (scad 1 KB)
10404_2018_2048_MOESM6_ESM.stl (113 kb)
Supplementary material 6 (stl 112 KB)
10404_2018_2048_MOESM7_ESM.scad (1 kb)
Supplementary material 7 (scad 1 KB)
10404_2018_2048_MOESM8_ESM.stl (166 kb)
Supplementary material 8 (stl 166 KB)
10404_2018_2048_MOESM9_ESM.scad (1 kb)
Supplementary material 9 (scad 0 KB)
10404_2018_2048_MOESM10_ESM.stl (31 kb)
Supplementary material 10 (stl 30 KB)


  1. Aubin J, Prat L, Xuereb C, Gourdon C (2009) Effect of microchannel aspect ratio on residence time distributions and the axial dispersion coefficient. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 48(1):554–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayoib A, Hashim U, Arshad MM, Thivina V (2016) Soft lithography of microfluidics channels using su-8 mould on glass substrate for low cost fabrication. In: 2016 IEEE EMBS conference on biomedical engineering and sciences (IECBES). IEEE, pp 226–229Google Scholar
  3. Bahrami M, Yovanovich M, Culham J (2006) Pressure drop of fully-developed, laminar flow in microchannels of arbitrary cross-section. J Fluids Eng 128(5):1036–1044CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbier V, Tatoulian M, Li H, Arefi-Khonsari F, Ajdari A, Tabeling P (2006) Stable modification of pdms surface properties by plasma polymerization: application to the formation of double emulsions in microfluidic systems. Langmuir 22(12):5230–5232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beebe DJ, Mensing GA, Walker GM (2002) Physics and applications of microfluidics in biology. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 4(1):261–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brower K, White AK, Fordyce PM (2017) Multi-step variable height photolithography for valved multilayer microfluidic devices. J Vis Exp (119):e55276–e55276Google Scholar
  7. Chen PC, Pan CW, Lee WC, Li KM (2014) Optimization of micromilling microchannels on a polycarbonate substrate. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 15(1):149–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dittrich PS, Schwille P (2003) An integrated microfluidic system for reaction, high-sensitivity detection, and sorting of fluorescent cells and particles. Anal Chem 75(21):5767–5774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eddings MA, Johnson MA, Gale BK (2008) Determining the optimal pdms-pdms bonding technique for microfluidic devices. J Micromech Microeng 18(6):067001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guckenberger DJ, de Groot TE, Wan AM, Beebe DJ, Young EW (2015) Micromilling: a method for ultra-rapid prototyping of plastic microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 15(11):2364–2378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harper CA (2000) Modern plastics handbook: handbook. McGraw-Hill Professional, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang H, Densmore D (2014) Fluigi: microfluidic device synthesis for synthetic biology. ACM J Emerg Technol Comput Syst (JETC) 11(3):26Google Scholar
  13. Jankowski P, Ogonczyk D, Kosinski A, Lisowski W, Garstecki P (2011) Hydrophobic modification of polycarbonate for reproducible and stable formation of biocompatible microparticles. Lab Chip 11(4):748–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kang JH, Kim YC, Park JK (2008) Analysis of pressure-driven air bubble elimination in a microfluidic device. Lab Chip 8(1):176–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kintses B, Hein C, Mohamed MF, Fischlechner M, Courtois F, Lainé C, Hollfelder F (2012) Picoliter cell lysate assays in microfluidic droplet compartments for directed enzyme evolution. Chem Biol 19(8):1001–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lashkaripour A, Abouei Mehrizi A, Rasouli M, Goharimanesh M (2015) Numerical study of droplet generation process in a microfluidic flow focusing. J Comput Appl Mech 46(2):167–175Google Scholar
  17. Lashkaripour A, Abouei Mehrizi A, Rasouli M, Goharimanesh M, Razavi Bazaz S (2018) Size-controlled droplet generation in a microfluidic device for rare dna amplification by optimizing its effective parameters. J Mech Med Biol 18(1):1850002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee K, Dornfeld DA (2004) A study of surface roughness in the micro-end-milling processGoogle Scholar
  19. Luo Y, Yu F, Zare RN (2008) Microfluidic device for immunoassays based on surface plasmon resonance imaging. Lab Chip 8(5):694–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mian A, Driver N, Mativenga P (2011) Estimation of minimum chip thickness in micro-milling using acoustic emission. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 225(9):1535–1551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mogi K, Sugii Y, Yamamoto T, Fujii T (2014) Rapid fabrication technique of nano/microfluidic device with high mechanical stability utilizing two-step soft lithography. Sens Actuators B Chem 201:407–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mukhopadhyay R (2007) When PDMS isn't the best. Anal Chem 79(9):3248–3253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ogonczyk D, Wegrzyn J, Jankowski P, Dabrowski B, Garstecki P (2010) Bonding of microfluidic devices fabricated in polycarbonate. Lab Chip 10(10):1324–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pansare VB, Sharma SB (2013) Chip load sensitive performance in micro-face milling of engineering materials. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 35(3):285–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Prentner S, Allen DM, Larcombe L, Marson S, Jenkins K, Saumer M (2010) Effects of channel surface finish on blood flow in microfluidic devices. Microsyst Technol 16(7):1091–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rasouli M, Abouei Mehrizi A, Lashkaripour A (2015) Numerical study on low reynolds mixing oft-shaped micro-mixers with obstacles. Transp Phenom Nano Micro Scales 3(2):68–76Google Scholar
  27. Sackmann EK, Fulton AL, Beebe DJ (2014) The present and future role of microfluidics in biomedical research. Nature 507(7491):181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Silva R, Bhatia S, Densmore D (2016) A reconfigurable continuous-flow fluidic routing fabric using a modular, scalable primitive. Lab Chip 16(14):2730–2741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Silva R, Dow P, Dubay R, Lissandrello C, Holder J, Densmore D, Fiering J (2017) Rapid prototyping and parametric optimization of plastic acoustofluidic devices for blood-bacteria separation. Biomed Microdevices 19(3):70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Solutions H (2016) Helical machining guidebook. Helical Solutions, LLC, GorhamGoogle Scholar
  31. Squires TM, Quake SR (2005) Microfluidics: fluid physics at the nanoliter scale. Rev Mod Phys 77(3):977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stone HA, Stroock AD, Ajdari A (2004) Engineering flows in small devices: microfluidics toward a lab-on-a-chip. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 36:381–411CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Tang J, Guo H, Zhao M, Yang J, Tsoukalas D, Zhang B, Liu J, Xue C, Zhang W (2015) Highly stretchable electrodes on wrinkled polydimethylsiloxane substrates. Sci Rep 5(16):527Google Scholar
  34. Thorsen T, Roberts RW, Arnold FH, Quake SR (2001) Dynamic pattern formation in a vesicle-generating microfluidic device. Phys Rev Lett 86(18):4163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tirandazi P, Hidrovo CH (2017) Liquid-in-gas droplet microfluidics; experimental characterization of droplet morphology, generation frequency, and monodispersity in a flow-focusing microfluidic device. J Micromech Microeng 27(7):075020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tsao CW, DeVoe DL (2009) Bonding of thermoplastic polymer microfluidics. Microfluid Nanofluid 6(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ward T, Faivre M, Abkarian M, Stone HA (2005) Microfluidic flow focusing: drop size and scaling in pressure versus flow-rate-driven pumping. Electrophoresis 26(19):3716–3724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Whitesides GM (2006) The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 442(7101):368–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wu N, Zhu Y, Brown S, Oakeshott J, Peat T, Surjadi R, Easton C, Leech P, Sexton B (2009) A pmma microfluidic droplet platform for in vitro protein expression using crude e. coli s30 extract. Lab Chip 9(23):3391–3398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yen DP, Ando Y, Shen K (2016) A cost-effective micromilling platform for rapid prototyping of microdevices. Technology 4(04):234–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biomedical Engineering DepartmentBoston UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringBoston UniversityBostonUSA
  3. 3.Biological Design CenterBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations