Effect of absolute pressure on flow through a textured hydrophobic microchannel

  • 661 Accesses

  • 13 Citations


The potential of textured hydrophobic surfaces to provide substantial drag reduction has been attributed to the presence of air bubbles trapped on the surface cavities. In this paper, we present results on water flow past a textured hydrophobic surface, while systematically varying the absolute pressure close to the surface. Trapped air bubbles on the surface are directly visualized, along with simultaneous pressure drop measurements across the surface in a microchannel configuration. We find that varying the absolute pressure within the channel greatly influences the trapped air bubble behavior, causing a consequent effect on the pressure drop (drag). When the absolute pressure within the channel is maintained below atmospheric pressure, we find that the air bubbles grow in size, merge and eventually detach from the surface. This growth and subsequent merging of the air bubbles leads to a substantial increase in the pressure drop. On the other hand, a pressure above the atmospheric pressure within the channel leads to gradual shrinkage and eventual disappearance of trapped air bubbles. We find that in this case, air bubbles do cause reduction in the pressure drop with the minimum pressure drop (or maximum drag reduction) occurring when the bubbles are flush with the surface. These results show that the trapped air bubble dynamics and the pressure drop across a textured hydrophobic microchannel are very significantly dependent on the absolute pressure within the channel. The results obtained hold important implications toward achieving sustained drag reduction in microfluidic applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18


  1. Al-Hayes RAM, Winterton RHS (1981) Bubble growth in flowing liquids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 24:213–221

  2. Bixler GD, Theiss A, Bhushan B, Lee SC (2014) Anti-fouling properties of microstructured surfaces bio-inspired by rice leaves and butterfly wings. J Colloid Interface Sci 419:114–133

  3. Bobji MS, Kumar SV, Asthana A, Govardhan RN (2009) Underwater sustainability of the “Cassie” state of wetting. Langmuir 25:12120–12126

  4. Bobji MS, Balan G, Govardhan RN (2011) Time dependant hydrophobicity of drag reducing surfaces. In: 3rd Micro and nano flows conference, Thessaloniki, Greece, 22–24 August 2011

  5. Bormashenko E (2015) Progress in understanding wetting transitions on rough surfaces. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 222:92–103

  6. Celia E, Darmanin T, Taffin de Givenchy E, Amigoni S, Guittard F (2013) Recent advances in designing superhydrophobic surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 402:1–18

  7. Checco A, Ocko BM, Rahman A, Black CT, Tasinkevych M, Giacomello A, Dietrich S (2014) Collapse and reversibility of the superhydrophobic state on nanotextured surfaces. Phys Rev Lett 112:216101

  8. Cheng Y-T, Rodak DE (2005) Is the lotus leaf superhydrophobic? Appl Phys Lett 86:144101

  9. Choi CH, Westin KJA, Breuer KS (2003) Apparent slip flows in hydrophilic and hydrophobic microchannels. Phys Fluids 15:2897–2902

  10. Choi CH, Ulmanella U, Kim J, Ho CM, Kim CJ (2006) Effective slip and friction reduction in nanograted superhydrophobic microchannels. Phys Fluids 18:087105

  11. Cong Q, Chen G, Fang Y, Ren L (2004) Super-hydrophobic characteristics of butterfly wing surface. J Bionics Eng 1:249–255

  12. Davis AMJ, Lauga E (2009) Geometric transition in friction for flow over a bubble mattress. Phys Fluids 21:011701

  13. Dilip D, Jha NK, Govardhan RN, Bobji MS (2014) Controlling air solubility to maintain “Cassie” state for sustained drag reduction. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 459:217–224

  14. Emami B, Hemeda AA, Amrei MM, Luzar A, Gad-el-Hak M, Tafreshi HV (2013) Predicting longevity of submerged superhydrophobic surfaces: surfaces with parallel grooves. Phys Fluids 25:062108

  15. Epsein PS, Plesset MS (1950) On the stability of gas bubbles in liquid-gas solutions. J Chem Phys 18:1505–1509

  16. Favelukis M, Tadmor Z, Talmon Y (1995) Bubble dissolution in viscous liquids in simple shear flow. AIChE J 41:2637–2641

  17. Flynn MR, Bush JWM (2008) Underwater breathing: the mechanics of plastron respiration. J Fluid Mech 608:275–296

  18. Gao X, Jiang L (2004) Water-repellent legs of water striders. Nature (London) 432:36

  19. Gogte S, Vorobieff P, Truesdell R, Mammoli A, van Swol F, Shah P, Brinker CJ (2005) Effective slip on textured superhydrophobic surfaces. Phys Fluids 17:051701

  20. Govardhan RN, Srinivas GS, Asthana A, Bobji MS (2009) Time dependence of effective slip on textured hydrophobic surfaces. Phys Fluids 21:052001

  21. Hemeda AA, Tafreshi HV (2014) General formulations for predicting longevity of submerged superhydrophobic surfaces composed of pores or posts. Langmuir 30:10317–10327

  22. Hemeda AA, Gad-el-Hak M, Tafreshi HV (2014) Effects of hierarchical features on longevity of submerged superhydrophobic surfaces with parallel grooves. Phys Fluids 26:082103

  23. Hensel R, Finn A, Helbig R, Killge S, Braun HG, Werner C (2014) In situ experiments to reveal the role of surface feature sidewalls in the Cassie − Wenzel transition. Langmuir 30:15162–15170

  24. Hu DL, Chan B, Bush JWM (2003) The hydrodynamics of water strider locomotion. Nature (London) 424:663

  25. Hyvaluoma J, Harting J (2008) Slip flow over structured surfaces with entrapped microbubbles. Phys Rev Lett 100:246001

  26. Klausner JF, Mei R, Bernhard DM, Zeng LZ (1993) Vapor bubble departure in forced convection boiling. Int J Hcat Mass Transf 36:651–662

  27. Koch K, Barthlott W (2009) Superhydrophobic and superhydrophilic plant surfaces: an inspiration for biomimetic materials. Phil Trans R Soc A 367:1487–1509

  28. Larmour IA, Bell SEJ, Saunders GC (2007) Remarkably simple fabrication of superhydrophobic surfaces using electroless galvanic deposition. Angew Chem Int Ed 46:1710–1712

  29. Lauga E, Stone H (2003) Effective slip in pressure-driven stokes flow. J Fluid Mech 489:55–77

  30. Lee C, Choi C-H, Kim CJ (2008) Structured surfaces for a giant liquid slip. Phys Rev Lett 101:064501

  31. Liebermann L (1957) Air bubbles in water. J Appl Phys 28:205–211

  32. Lv P, Xue Y, Shi Y, Lin H, Duan H (2014) Metastable states and wetting transition of submerged superhydrophobic structures. Phys Rev Lett 112:196101

  33. Lv P, Xue Y, Liu H, Shi Y, Xi P, Lin H, Duan H (2015) Symmetric and asymmetric meniscus collapse in wetting transition on submerged structured surfaces. Langmuir 31:1248–1254

  34. Mei R, Klausner JF (1992) Unsteady force on a spherical bubble at finite Reynolds number with small fluctuations in the free-stream velocity. Phys Fluids 4:63–70

  35. Ou J, Rothstein JP (2005) Direct measurements on flow past drag-reducing ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Phys Fluids 17:103606

  36. Ou J, Perot B, Rothstein JP (2004) Laminar drag reduction in microchannels using ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Phys Fluids 16:4635–4643

  37. Pan Q, Wang M, Wang H (2008) Separating small amount of water and hydrophobic solvents by novel superhydrophobic meshes. Appl Surf Sci 254:6002–6006

  38. Parker AR, Lawrence CR (2001) Water capture by a desert beetle. Nature (London) 414:33

  39. Piao L, Park H (2015) Two-dimensional analysis of air-water interface on superhydrophobic grooves under fluctuating water pressure. Langmuir 31:8022–8032

  40. Poetes R, Holtzmann K, Franze K, Steiner U (2010) Metastable Underwater Superhydrophobicity. Phys Rev Lett 105:166104

  41. Rothstein P (2010) Slip on Superhydrophobic surfaces. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 42:89–109

  42. Samaha MA, Tafreshi HV, Gad-el-Hak M (2012a) Effects of hydrostatic pressure on the drag reduction of submerged aerogel-particle coatings. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 399:62–70

  43. Samaha MA, Tafreshi HV, Gad-el-Hak M (2012b) Influence of Flow on longevity of superhydrophobic coatings. Langmuir 28:9759–9766

  44. Samaha MA, Tafreshi HV, Gad-el-Hak M (2012c) Superhydrophobic surfaces: from the lotus leaf to the submarine. C R Mec 340:18–34

  45. Samaha MA, Tafreshi HV, Gad-el-Hak M (2012d) Sustainability of Superhydrophobicity under pressure. Phys Fluids 24:112103

  46. Sheng X, Zhang J (2011) Air layer on superhydrophobic surfaces under water. Colloids Surf A Physiochem Eng Asp 377:374–378

  47. Shirtcliffe NJ, McHale G, Newton MI, Perry CC, Pyatt FB (2006) Plastron properties of a superhydrophobic surface. Appl Phys Lett 89:104106

  48. Shirtcliffe NJ, McHale G, Atherton S, Newton MI (2010) An introduction to superhydrophobicity. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 161:124–138

  49. Søgaard E, Andersen NK, Smistrup K, Larsen ST, Sun L, Taboryski R (2014) Study of transitions between wetting states on microcavity arrays by optical transmission microscopy. Langmuir 30:12960–12968

  50. Steinberger A, Cottin-Bizonne C, Kleimann P, Charlaix E (2007) High friction on a bubble mattress. Nat Mater 6:665–668

  51. Teo CJ, Khoo BC (2009) Analysis of Stokes flow in microchannels with superhydrophobic surfaces containing a periodic array of micro-grooves. Microfluid Nanofluid 7:353–382

  52. Tretheway C, Meinhart CD (2002) Apparent fluid slip at hydrophobic microchannel walls. Phys Fluids 14:L9–L12

  53. Truesdell R, Mammoli A, Vorobieff P, van Swol F, Jeffrey Brinker C (2006) Drag reduction on a patterned superhydrophobic surface. Phys Rev Lett 97:044504

  54. Verho T, Korhonen JT, Sainiemi L, Jokinen V, Bower C, Franze K, Franssila S, Andrew P, Ikkala O, Ras RH (2012) Reversible switching between superhydrophobic states on a hierarchically structured surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:10210–10213

  55. Wang LP, Teo CJ, Khoo BC (2014) Effect of Interface deformation on flow through microtubes containing superhydrophobic surfaces with longitudinal ribs and grooves. Microfluid Nanofluid 16:225–236

  56. Watanabe K, Udagawa Y, Udagawa H (1999) Drag reduction of Newtonian fluid in a circular pipe with a highly water-repellent wall. J Fluid Mech 381:225–238

  57. Woolford B, Maynes D, Webb B (2009) Liquid flow through microchannels with grooved walls under wetting and superhydrophobic conditions. Microfluid Nanofluid 7(1):121–135

  58. Xu M, Sun G, Kim CJ (2014) Infinite lifetime of underwater superhydrophobic states. Phys Rev Lett 113:136103

  59. Yamada T, Hong C, Gregory OJ, Faghri M (2011) Experimental investigations of liquid flow in rib-patterned microchannels with different surface wettability. Microfluid Nanofluid 11:45–55

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Raghuraman N. Govardhan.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 2107 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MP4 7193 kb)

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 2107 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MP4 7193 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dilip, D., Bobji, M.S. & Govardhan, R.N. Effect of absolute pressure on flow through a textured hydrophobic microchannel. Microfluid Nanofluid 19, 1409–1427 (2015) doi:10.1007/s10404-015-1655-4

Download citation


  • Textured hydrophobic surface
  • Trapped air bubbles
  • Pressure drop
  • Drag reduction