Advertisement

Feasibility of automated fetal fractional shortening measurement with two-dimensional tracking and construction of a reference range for normal fetuses

  • Sumito Nagasaki
  • Masahiko NakataEmail author
  • Mayumi Takano
  • Kento Usui
  • Junya Sakuma
  • Eijiro Hayata
  • Mineto Morita
Original Article—Obstetrics & Gynecology
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the feasibility of an automated fractional shortening (Auto FS) measurement method using two-dimensional tracking and to construct a reference range for normal fetuses.

Methods

This study was conducted from May 2017 to March 2018. First, cardiac motion in the four-chamber view was recorded in the B-mode. Subsequently, the region of interest was set on the edge of the ventricular septum or ventricular muscle at a point one-third away from the atrioventricular valve toward the cardiac apex. Tracking was automatically performed. Values measured between the ventricular septum and right ventricle were defined as R-Auto FS, whereas those measured between the ventricular septum and left ventricle were defined as L-Auto FS. Those on each ventricular muscle were defined as Combined-Auto FS.

Results

Data were obtained from 131 singleton fetuses. R-Auto FS significantly decreased with an increase in the number of gestational weeks, and L-Auto FS and Combined-Auto FS showed the same tendency (Spearman’s correlation analysis: p = − .528, p = − .351, and p = − .636, respectively).

Conclusion

We succeeded in defining a reference Auto FS value for normal singleton pregnancies. Auto FS was negatively correlated with gestational age. This novel technique can assess fetal heart contractility.

Keywords

Auto FS Fractional shortening Two-dimensional tracking method Fetal cardiac function 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant No.: JP16K11114).

Author contributions

Sumito Nagasaki designed the study and wrote the initial manuscript draft. Masahiko Nakata contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data and assisted in the preparation of the manuscript. All other authors contributed to data collection and interpretation, and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All declare that they there is conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This manuscript has not been published or presented elsewhere in part or in entirety and is not under consideration by another journal. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. All study participants provided informed consent, and the study design was approved by the appropriate ethics review board.

References

  1. 1.
    Wladimiroff JW, McGhie JS. M-mode ultrasonic assessment of fetal cardiovascular dynamics. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981;88:1241–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    DeVore GR, Siassi B, Platt LD. Fetal echocardiography. IV. M-mode assessment of ventricular size and contractility during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy in the normal fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;150:981–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hsieh YY, Chang FC, Tsai HD, et al. Longitudinal survey of fetal ventricular ejection and shortening fraction throughout pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16:46–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gardiner HM, Pasquini L, Wolfenden J, et al. Myocardial tissue Doppler and long axis function in the fetal heart. Int J Cardiol. 2006;113:39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huhta JC. Guidelines for the evaluation of heart failure in the fetus with or without hydrops. Pediatr Cardiol. 2004;25:274–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    DeVore GR. Assessing fetal cardiac ventricular function. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;10:515–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Michelfelder E, Allen C, Urbinelli L. Evaluation and management of fetal cardiac function and heart failure. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2016;18:55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Simpson JM, Cook A. Repeatability of echocardiographic measurements in the human fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;20:332–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Royston P, Wright EM. How to construct ‘normal ranges’ for fetal variables. Ultrasound Obst Gyn. 1998;11:30–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    DeVore GR. Computing the Z score and centiles for cross-sectional analysis: a practical approach. J Ultrasound Med. 2017;36:459–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Takano M, Nakata M, Nagasaki S, et al. Assessment of diastolic function of normal fetal heart using dual-gate Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52:238–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jones CJ, Raposo L, Gibson DG. Functional importance of the long axis dynamics of the human left ventricle. Br Heart J. 1990;63:215–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maciver DH. The relative impact of circumferential and longitudinal shortening on left ventricular ejection fraction and stroke volume. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2012;17:5–11.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wandt B. Long-axis contraction of the ventricles: a modern approach, but described already by Leonardo da Vinci. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000;13:699–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Luewan S, Yanase Y, Tongprasert F, et al. Fetal cardiac dimensions at 14-40 weeks’ gestation obtained using cardio-STIC-M. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:416–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Johnson P, Maxwell DJ, Tynan MJ, et al. Intracardiac pressures in the human fetus. Heart. 2000;84:59–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reed KL, Meijboom EJ, Sahn DJ, et al. Cardiac Doppler flow velocities in human fetuses. Circulation. 1986;73:41–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Molina FS, Faro C, Sotiriadis A, et al. Heart stroke volume and cardiac output by four-dimensional ultrasound in normal fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32:181–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kenny JF, Plappert T, Doubilet P, et al. Changes in intracardiac blood flow velocities and right and left ventricular stroke volumes with gestational age in the normal human fetus: a prospective Doppler echocardiographic study. Circulation. 1986;74:1208–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    De Smedt MC, Visser GH, Meijboom EJ. Fetal cardiac output estimated by Doppler echocardiography during mid- and late gestation. Am J Cardiol. 1987;60:338–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sumito Nagasaki
    • 1
    • 2
  • Masahiko Nakata
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Mayumi Takano
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kento Usui
    • 2
  • Junya Sakuma
    • 1
    • 2
  • Eijiro Hayata
    • 2
  • Mineto Morita
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyToho University Graduate School of MedicineOta CityJapan
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyToho University Omori Medical CenterTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations