Advertisement

Journal of Medical Ultrasonics

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 35–43 | Cite as

Ultrasonic measurement of sound velocity fluctuations in biological tissue due to ultrasonic heating and estimation of thermo-physical properties

  • Yukako Tsujimoto
  • Mai Morimoto
  • Naotaka Nitta
  • Iwaki AkiyamaEmail author
Original Article
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Tissue characterization in terms of the differences in thermo-physical properties of biological tissues was investigated in this study. The objective was to measure the ratio of variation in sound velocity due to ultrasonic heating and to derive the relational expression between the ratio and thermo-physical properties.

Methods

The ratio of sound velocity variation before and after the temperature rise of tissue samples exposed to ultrasound was measured by ultrasonic pulse echo method. The thermo-physical properties were estimated for a tissue-mimicking material and porcine muscle and fat tissues due to theoretical expression. The transducer for heating had a resonance frequency of 3.2 MHz, and the transducer for measurement of sound velocity variation had a resonance frequency of 5.2 MHz.

Results

In the phantom study, the measured values of the temperature rise agreed with the values calculated by a finite element method (FEM). The estimated values of the temperature rise from the sound velocity variations of muscle and fat tissues were 0.36 °C and 1.1 °C, respectively. Also, the estimated values of thermo-physical properties agreed with the reference values within an error of 10%.

Conclusions

The thermo-physical properties of the porcine tissues were measured by sound velocity variation due to ultrasonic heating within the safety regulations.

Keywords

Tissue characterization Thermo-physical properties Sound velocity variation Temperature rise 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by MEXT-Supported Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities, 2013-2017.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Yukako Tsujimoto, Mai Morimoto, Naotaka Nitta, and Iwaki Akiyama declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Waag RC. A review of tissue characterization from ultrasonic scattering. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1984;31:884–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nicholas D, Nassiri DK, Garbutt P, et al. Tissue characterization from ultrasound B-scan data. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1986;12:135–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph JM, et al. Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003;29:1705–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bamber JC, Hill CR, King JA. Acoustic properties of normal and cancerous human liver lI dependence on tissue structure. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1981;7:135–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Braticevici CF, Sporea I, Panaitescu E, et al. Value of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging elastography for non-invasive evaluation of patients with nonalcohoric fatty liver disease. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39:1942–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Orlacchio A, Bolacchi F, Antonicolo M, et al. Liver elasticity in nash patients evaluated with real-time elastography (RTE). Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012;38:537–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kang BK, Lee SS, Cheong H, et al. Shear wave elastography for assessment of steatohepatitis and hepatic fibrosis in rat models of non-alcohoric fatty liver disease. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41:3205–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bamber JC, Hill CR. Ultrasonic attenuation and propagation speed in mammalian tissues as a function of temperature. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1979;5:149–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Techavipoo U, Varghese T, Chen Q, et al. Temperature dependence of ultrasonic propagation speed and attenuation in excised canine liver tissue measured using transmitted and reflected pulses. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004;115:2859–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ichizuka K, Matsuoka R, Aoki H, et al. Basic study of less invasive high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in fetal therapy for twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) sequence. J Med Ultrasonics. 2016;43:487–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Simon C, VanBaren P, Ebbini ES. Two-dimensional temperature estimation using diagnostic ultrasound. IEEE Trans UFFC. 1998;45:1088–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maass-Moreno R, Damianou CA. Noninvasive temperature estimation in tissue via ultrasound echo-shifts. Part 1. Analytical model. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996;100:2514–21.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Amini AN, Ebbini ES, Georgiou TT. Noninvasive estimation of tissue temperature via high-resolution spectral analysis techniques. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2005;52:221–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu D, Ebbini ES. Real-time 2-D temperature imaging using ultrasound. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010;57:12–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mano K, Tanigawa S, Hori M, et al. Basic investigation on acoustic velocity change imaging method for quantitative assessment of fat content in human liver. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2016;55:07KF20.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harris GR, Church CC, Dalecki D, et al. Comparison of thermal safety practice guidelines for diagnostic ultrasound exposures. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016;42:345–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nyborg WL, Carson PL, Miller MW, et al. Exposure criteria for medical diagnostic ultrasound: I. Criteira based on thermal mechanisms. Natl Council Radiat Protect Meas. 1992;113:52–60.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ebbini ES. Noninvasive two dimential temperature imaging for guidance of thermal therapy. In: IEEE international symposium on biomedical imaging: nano to macro. 2006. pp. 884–7.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zahiri-Azar R, Salcudean SE. Motion estimation in ultrasound images using time domain cross correlation with prior estimates. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006;53:1990–2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gammell PM, Le Croissette DH, Heyser RC. Temperature and frequency dependence of ultrasonic attenuation in selected tissues. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1979;5:269–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Guntur SR, Lee KI, Paeng DG, et al. Temperature-dependent thermal properties of ex vivo liver undergoing thermal ablation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39:1771–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Medical electrical equipment-Part 2—37: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of ultrasonic medical diagnostic and monitoring equipment. IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission) IEC 60601-2-37 Ed 2.0; 2007.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nitta N, Ishiguro Y, Sasanuma H, et al. Experimental system for in situ measurement of temperature rise in animal tissue under exposure to acoustic radiation force impulse. J Med Ultrasonics. 2015;42:39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goss SA, Johnston RL, Dunn F. Comprehensive compilation of empirical ultrasonic properties of mammalian tissues. J Acoust Soc Am. 1978;64:423–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yukako Tsujimoto
    • 1
  • Mai Morimoto
    • 1
  • Naotaka Nitta
    • 2
  • Iwaki Akiyama
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Medical Ultrasound Research CenterDoshisha UniversityKyotanabeJapan
  2. 2.National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and TechnologyTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations