A Low-Cost Stove Use Monitor to Enable Conditional Cash Transfers
Conditional cash transfers (CCTs)—cash payments provided to households or specific household members who meet defined conditions or fulfill certain behaviors—have been extensively used in India to encourage antenatal care, institutional delivery, and vaccination. This paper describes the social design and technical development of a low-cost, meal-counting stove use monitor (the Pink Key) that enables a CCT based on liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) usage and presents pilot data from its testing and the initial deployment. The system consists of a sensing harness attached to a two-burner LPG stove and an easily removable datalogger. For each cooking event with LPG, households receive 2 rupees—less than the cost of fuel, but enough to partially defray LPG refill costs. The system could enable innovative “self-monitoring” at a large scale—participants initiate the CCT by bringing their Pink Key to antenatal clinic visits, where care providers download data and initiate payments, and participants return the sensor to their stove at home. The system aligns with existing Indian programs to improve health among poor, pregnant women, and contributes a new method to encourage the use of clean cooking technologies.
KeywordsHousehold air pollution Biomass cooking Liquefied petroleum gas LPG India Solid fuel use Temperature sensors
The authors thank the participating households in and around Junnar for their generosity, time, and patience. We also thank the extended KEM field team for their dedicated and thorough work, especially Avinash Mhaske and Vrishali Meher, who managed CCT field operations. We acknowledge important contributions from and discussions with colleagues at University of California, Berkeley, and at the Implementation Science Network.
This project received funding through NIH/Fogarty’s Clean Cooking Implementation Science Network with support from the NIH Common Fund. The content within does not necessarily represent the view of the funders.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Alderman J (2017) Envirofit announces groundbreaking SmartGas™ program offering pay-as-you-cook LPG service for emerging markets [Internet]. Retrieved from: https://envirofit.org/envirofit-announces-groundbreaking-smartgas-program/
- Amegah AK, Quansah R, Jaakkola JJK (2014) Household air pollution from solid fuel use and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. PLoS ONE 9:e113920–e113923. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113920 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Commissioner OOTRGC (2011) India Population and Housing Census 2011. New Delhi, India: Office of the Registrar General & Census CommissionerGoogle Scholar
- Johnson MA, Chiang RA (2015) Quantitative guidance for stove usage and performance to achieve health and environmental targets. Environ Health Perspect Google Scholar
- Lagarde M, Haines A, Library NPTC (2009) The impact of conditional cash transfers on health outcomes and use of health services in low and middle income countries. Wiley Online LibraryGoogle Scholar
- Lindert K, Linder A, Hobbs J, la Brière De B (2007) The nuts and bolts of Brazil’s Bolsa Família Program: implementing conditional cash transfers in a decentralized contextGoogle Scholar
- Mittal N, Mukherjee A, Gelb A (2017) Fuel Subsidy Reform in Developing Countries: Direct Benefit Transfer of LPG Cooking Gas Subsidy in India. CGD Policy Paper. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development. https://www.cgdev.org/publication/fuel-subsidy-reform-developing-countries-india
- Mortimer K, Ndamala CB, Naunje AW, Malava J, Katundu C, Weston W, et al. (2017) A cleaner burning biomass-fuelled cookstove intervention to prevent pneumonia in children under 5 years old in rural Malawi (the Cooking and Pneumonia Study): a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet 389(10065):167–1675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ruiz-Mercado I, Lam NL, Canuz E, Davila G, Smith KR (2008) Low-cost temperature loggers as stove use monitors (SUMs). Boiling Point (55)Google Scholar
- Ruiz-Mercado I, Masera O (2015) Patterns of stove use in the context of fuel–device stacking: rationale and implications. Ecohealth 1–15Google Scholar
- Sambandam S, Balakrishnan K, Ghosh S, Sadasivam A, Madhav S, Ramasamy R, et al. (2014) Can currently available advanced combustion biomass cook-stoves provide health relevant exposure reductions? Results from initial assessment of select commercial models in India. Ecohealth 12(1):1–17Google Scholar
- Tripathi A, Sagar AD, Smith KR (2015) Promoting clean and affordable cooking. Economic Political Weekly 50(48):81–84Google Scholar