Advertisement

EcoHealth

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 682–687 | Cite as

Conservation Values and Risk of Handling Bats: Implications for One Health Communication

  • C. N. Crockford
  • A. J. Dean
  • S. Reid
  • J. H. Dean
Short Communication

Abstract

Flying-foxes provide critical ecosystem services, but their role as hosts to zoonotic pathogens may undermine conservation support. We surveyed 214 residents of Cairns, Australia, regarding their perceptions about health risks associated with flying-foxes and support for flying-fox conservation. Greater likelihood of handling a flying-fox was associated with lower knowledge about risks, greater conservation support, and environmental organization membership. Respondents less likely to seek medical attention after a minor scratch tended to be younger, unemployed and perceive lower risk. Individuals who support flying-fox conservation should be one group targeted in One Health communication integrating health and conservation messages.

Keywords

Flying-foxes Zoonoses One Health Risk perception Benefit perception Conservation values 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the Cairns Regional Council for its support and assistance in participant recruitment to this survey.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10393_2018_1356_MOESM1_ESM.docx (146 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 145 kb)

References

  1. Communicable Disease Network Australia (2013) Rabies virus and other lyssavirus (including Australian Bat Lyssavirus). CDNA National Guidelines for Public Health Units. Available: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/cdna-song-abvl-rabies.htm [Accessed June 21. 2017]
  2. Communicable Diseases Network Australia (2017) Hendra Virus CDNA National Guidelines for Public Health Units. Available: www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/0E7D7BF4F17C1A96CA257BF0001CBF10/$File/Hendra-virus-SoNG.pdf [Accessed 8 November 2017]
  3. Decker DJ, Siemer WF, Evensen DT, Stedman RC, McComas KA , Wild MA, Castle KT, Leong KM (2012). Public perceptions of wildlife-associated disease: risk communication matters. HumanWildlife Interactions, 6(1), 112-122Google Scholar
  4. Degeling, C., & Kerridge, I. (2013). Hendra in the news: public policy meets public morality in times of zoonotic uncertainty. Social science & medicine (1982), 82, 156-163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.12.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edson, D., Field, H., McMichael, L., Jordan, D., Kung, N., Mayer, D., & Smith, C. (2015). Flying-fox roost disturbance and Hendra virus spillover risk. Plos One, 10(5), e0125881.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125881 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Francis, J. R., McCall, B. J., Hutchinson, P., Powell, J., Vaska, V. L., & Nourse, C. (2014). Australian bat lyssavirus: implications for public health. The Medical Journal of Australia, 201(11), 647-649.  https://doi.org/10.5694/mja16.01162 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hahn, R. A., & Truman, B. I. (2015). Education improves public health and promotes health equity. International Journal of Health Services Research, 45(4), 657-678.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0020731415585986 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hall, L., & Richards, G. (2000). Flying Foxes. Fruit and Blossom Bats of Australia. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hanisch-Kirkbride, S. L., Riley, S. J., & Gore, M. L. (2013). Wildlife disease and risk perception. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 49(4), 841-849.  https://doi.org/10.7589/2013-02-031 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Janz NK, Becker MH. 1984. The Health Belief Model: A Decade Later. Health Education Quarterly, 11:1-47.  https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818401100101 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kung, N., Field, H., McLaughlin, A., Edson, D., & Taylor, M. (2015). Flying-foxes in the Australian urban environment-community attitudes and opinions. One Health, 1, 24-30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2015.07.002 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Kunz, T. H., Braun de Torrez, E., Bauer, D., Lobova, T., & Fleming, T. H. (2011). Ecosystem services provided by bats. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1223, 1-38.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06004.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Levesque J-F, Harris MF, Russell G (2013) Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations. International Journal for Equity in Health, 12–18.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-12-18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nisbet, E. K., & Zelenski, J. M. (2013). The NR-6: a new brief measure of nature relatedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 11.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00813 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Olival, K.J., Hosseini, P. R., Zambrana-Torrelio, C., Ross, N., Bogich, T. L., & Daszak, P. (2017). Hosts and viral traits predict zoonotic spillover from mammals. Nature, 546, 646-650.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22975 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Paterson, B. J., Butler, M. T., Eastwood, K., Cashman, P. M., Jones, A., & Durrheim, D. N. (2014). Cross sectional survey of human-bat interaction in Australia: public health implications. BMC Public Health, 14, 58.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-58 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Quinn, E. K., Massey, P. D., Cox-Witton, K., Paterson, B. J., Eastwood, K., & Durrheim, D. N. (2014). Understanding human - bat interactions in NSW, Australia: improving risk communication for prevention of Australian bat lyssavirus. BMC Veterinary Research, 10, 144.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-10-144 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Rose DB (2011) Flying fox: Kin, Keystone, Kontaminant. Australian humanities review, 50. Available: http://www.australianhumanitiesreview.org/archive/Issue-May-2011/rose.html [Accessed 22 June 2017]
  19. Tait, J., Perotto-Baldivieso, H. L., McKeown, A., & Westcott, D. A. (2014). Are flying-foxes coming to town? Urbanisation of the spectacled flying-fox (Pteropus conspicillatus) in Australia. Plos One, 9(10), e109810.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109810 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Wood, J. L. N., Leach, M., Waldman, L., MacGregor, H., Fooks, A. R., Jones, K. E., Restif O., Dechmann, D., Hayman, D. T., Baker, K. S., Peel, A. J., Kamins, A. O., Fahr, J., Ntiamoa-Baidu, Y., Suu-Ire, R., Breiman, R. F., Epstein, J. H., Field, H. E., & Cunningham, A. A. (2012). A framework for the study of zoonotic disease emergence and its drivers: spillover of bat pathogens as a case study. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 367(1604), 2881-2892.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0228 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Woolhouse, M. E. and S. Gowtage-Sequeria (2005). Host range and emerging and reemerging pathogens. Emerging Infectious Disease, 11(12),1842-1847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Young, M. K., El Saadi, D., & McCall, B. J. (2014). Preventing Australian bat lyssavirus: community knowledge and risk perception of bats in South East Queensland. Vector borne and Zoonotic Diseases, 14(4), 284-290.  https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2013.1414 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EcoHealth Alliance 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. N. Crockford
    • 1
  • A. J. Dean
    • 2
    • 3
  • S. Reid
    • 1
  • J. H. Dean
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical SciencesThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.School of Communication and Arts, Faculty of Humanities and Social SciencesThe University of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia
  3. 3.ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, School of Biological SciencesThe University of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia

Personalised recommendations