Advertisement

Does health and medical research consider geographic factors affecting study participants: a retrospective snapshot analysis of 11 leading journals

  • Stuart WarkEmail author
  • Natasha Hardikar
  • Martin Wensing
  • Bonnie Lau
  • Joanne Anugerah
  • Gary Wallace
  • Destiny Powell
  • Henry Thai
  • Jessica Zhou
  • Alycia Senthinathan
  • Ann Le
Original Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Research has identified that rurally located persons face health inequities when compared to their urban peers. While health policies and practice frameworks to address the needs of rural people are largely developed on the principles of evidence-based medicine, it is not clear whether this evidence base appropriately considers geographic factors that may impact participant outcomes. The purpose of this project was to examine whether research within leading health and medical journals identified the geographic classification (location) of their participants, thus enabling the original authors and subsequent readers to appropriately consider this factor in the making of policy and practice recommendations.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of study participants’ geographic identifiers within articles from medical and health journals was carried out in this project. Eleven journals were chosen for evaluation, with 300 consecutive eligible papers from each journal retrospectively reviewed. All 3300 papers were analyzed to determine whether the research participants’ geographic location was identified. This classification was then stratified into varying categories of rural or urban, as appropriate.

Results

It was not possible to identify participants’ geographic location in 2193 (66%) of the 3300 reviewed articles. A total of 121 papers (4%) had sole focus on rural residents, with another 95 articles (3%) comparing outcomes between rural and urban locations. Slightly more than a quarter (27%) of the articles either just featured urban participants or made no distinction between rural and urban locations.

Conclusions

These findings indicate that insufficient attention is given to the geographic location of participants. This failure means that the outcomes and recommendations of the research base may be invalid for a large section of the world’s population and result in inequities in healthcare services. There is an emerging concern about using this evidence base for developing health guidelines and policy frameworks, as the needs of a substantial proportion of the population may not have been appropriately captured.

Keywords

Rural Urban Geographic inequity Evidence-based medicine Health guidelines Health practice 

Notes

Author contributions

Conceptualization, S.W.; methodology, S.W.; data collection, S.W., N.H., M.W., B.L., J.A., G.W., D.P., H.T., J.Z., A.S., A.L.; validation, S.W., N.H., M.W., B.L., J.A., G.W., D.P., H.T., J.Z., A.S., A.L.; formal analysis, S.W., N.H., M.W., B.L., J.A., G.W., D.P., H.T., J.Z., A.S., A.L.; investigation, S.W., N.H., M.W., B.L., J.A., G.W., D.P., H.T., J.Z., A.S., A.L.; writing – original draft preparation, S.W..; writing – review and editing, S.W., N.H., M.W., B.L., J.A., G.W., D.P., H.T., J.Z., A.S., A.L.; project administration, S.W.

Funding

There was no funding to declare.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study did not require ethical approval as it was a retrospective analysis of journal articles published in 11 leading medical and health journals.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Alston M, Kent J (2004) Social impacts of drought. A report to NSW Agriculture. Centre for Rural Social Research, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2017) Regional population growth, Australia, 2013–14. http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/3218.02013-14?OpenDocument. Accessed 12 Sep 2017
  3. Australian Government Department of Health (2013) Evidence-based medicine and POCT. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/publications/publishing.nsf/Content/qupp-review~qupp-evidence-based-medicine-poct. Accessed 10 Jul 2017
  4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2003) Rural, regional and remote health: a study on mortality. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  5. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2017) Rural health life expectancy. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/rural-health/rural-remotehealth/contents/deaths-remoteness. Accessed 7 Jul 2019
  6. Baxter J, Hayes A, Gray M (2011) Families in regional, rural and remote Australia. Australian Government, Australian Institute of Family Studies, Southbank, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  7. Brooke F (2017) Championing the National Strategic Framework for Rural and Remote Health. Aust J Rural Health 25(2):134.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12357 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cochrane Collaboration (2011) Strategies for addressing heterogeneity. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/chapter_9/9_5_3_strategies_for_addressing_heterogeneity.htm. Accessed 21 Jun 2019
  9. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, Gov.UK (2016a) Rural population and migration statistics. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/rural-population-and-migration/rural-population-201415. Accessed 13 Jul 2017
  10. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, Gov.UK (2016b) Rural urban classification. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/rural-urban-classification. Accessed 12 Sep 2016
  11. Francis K (2005) Health and health practice in rural Australia: where are we, where to from here? Online J Rural Nurs Health Care 5(1):28–36.  https://doi.org/10.14574/ojrnhc.v5i1.188 Google Scholar
  12. Fredriksson M, Blomqvist P, Winblad U (2014) Recentralizing healthcare through evidence-based guidelines—striving for national equity in Sweden. BMC Health Serv Res 14(1):509.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0509-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greenhalgh T, Howick J, Maskrey N; Evidence Based Medicine Renaissance Group (2014) Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? BMJ 348:g3725.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3725 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guyatt G, Cairns J, Churchill D et al; Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1992) Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 268(17):2420–2425.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03490170092032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Henley SJ, Anderson RN, Thomas CC, Massetti GM, Peaker B, Richardson LC (2017) Invasive cancer incidence, 2004–2013, and deaths, 2006–2015, in nonmetropolitan and metropolitan counties—United States. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), Surveillance Summaries 66(14):1–13.  https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6614a1
  16. Mackinney AC, Mueller KJ, McBride TD (2011) The march to accountable care organizations—how will rural fare? J Rural Health 27(1):131–137.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-0361.2010.00350.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mehta LS, Beckie TM, DeVon HA et al; American Heart Association Cardiovascular Disease in Women and Special Populations Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research (2016) Acute myocardial infarction in women: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 133(9):916–947.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Montori VM, Guyatt GH (2008) Progress in evidence-based medicine. JAMA 300(15):1814–1816.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31592-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. NHS Scotland (2007) Delivering for remote and rural healthcare: the final report of the remote and rural workstream. NHS Scotland, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  20. Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations (2014) World’s population increasingly urban with more than half living in urban areas. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/news/population/world-urbanization-prospects-2014.html. Accessed 9 Sep 2017
  21. Professor the Lord Darzi of Denham (2008) Evidence-based medicine and the NHS: a commentary. J R Soc Med 101(7):342–344.  https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2008.nh8004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Singh GK, Siahpush M (2014) Widening rural–urban disparities in life expectancy, U.S., 1969–2009. Am J Prev Med 46(2):e19–e29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith KB, Humphreys JS, Wilson MG (2008) Addressing the health disadvantage of rural populations: how does epidemiological evidence inform rural health policies and research? Aust J Rural Health 16(2):56–66.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1584.2008.00953.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Statistics Canada (2015) Rural area (RA). https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/ref/dict/geo042-eng.cfm. Accessed 12 Sep. 2016
  25. Stutz F (2015) Tackling rural disadvantage. Indep Educ 45(1):18–19Google Scholar
  26. The Complete University Guide (2017) University profiles. http://www.thecompleteuniversityguide.co.uk/universities. Accessed 24 Oct 2017
  27. United Nations Statistics Division (2017) Population density and urbanization. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/Demographic/sconcerns/densurb/densurbmethods.htm. Accessed 9 Sep 2017
  28. United States Census Bureau (2015) Urban and rural classification. https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/urban-rural.html. Accessed 16 Jul 2017
  29. United States Census Bureau (2016) New census data show differences between urban and rural populations. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2016/cb16-210.html. Accessed 13 Jul 2017
  30. Universities Australia (2017) University profiles. https://www.universitiesaustralia.edu.au/australias-universities/university-profiles#.WA1UYHqRag4. Accessed 24 Oct 2017
  31. U.S. Department of Education (2017) Database of accredited postsecondary institutions and programs. https://ope.ed.gov/accreditation/GetDownLoadFile.aspx. Accessed 24 Oct 2017
  32. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (2017) Clinical guidelines and recommendations. https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/clinicians-providers/guidelines-recommendations/index.html. Accessed 6 Jul 2017
  33. Wark S (2017) A missing factor in the reporting of medical research outcomes: Geographic classification of participants. European Science Editing 43 (4):76–80. Google Scholar
  34. Wark S (2018) Does intellectual disability research consider the potential impact of geographic location? J Intellect Dev Dis 43 (3):362–369.  https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2017.1310826
  35. Wagstaff A, Lindelow M, Wang S, Zhang S (2009) Reforming China’s rural health system. World Bank Publications, Washington, DC, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Winterton R, Warburton J (2011) Does place matter? Reviewing the experience of disadvantage for older people in rural Australia. Rural Soc 20(2):187–197.  https://doi.org/10.5172/rsj.20.2.187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. World Health Organization (2010) Rural poverty and health systems in the WHO European Region. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stuart Wark
    • 1
    Email author
  • Natasha Hardikar
    • 1
  • Martin Wensing
    • 1
  • Bonnie Lau
    • 1
  • Joanne Anugerah
    • 1
  • Gary Wallace
    • 1
  • Destiny Powell
    • 1
  • Henry Thai
    • 1
  • Jessica Zhou
    • 1
  • Alycia Senthinathan
    • 1
  • Ann Le
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Rural MedicineUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia

Personalised recommendations