Advertisement

Exploring knowledge translation practices in a global health program: case study on the establishment of the Pakistan National Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health Program

  • Jawad ChishtieEmail author
  • Farrukh Chishtie
  • Susan Jaglal
Original Article
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

Aim

To describe the major knowledge translation processes, decisions, and organizations involved in the landmark decision to institute a national, federal program in one of the most populous countries of the world. The Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (MNCH) program was a vertical program that was established in 2006 in Pakistan.

Subject and method

Using the case study methodology, we conducted a peer and grey literature review, with key informant in-depth interviews for meeting the study objectives. We used Wilson et al’s Knowledge to Action (K2A) Framework to explore the knowledge translation processes, the major decisions, and the national and international organizations involved during the 7-year period preceding the decision. The time period was selected based on the change in government in late 1998, which continued till the establishment of the national program.

Results

Using the framework, we categorized knowledge translation practices and major decisions into phases of research, translation, and institutionalization. We were able to identify 20 organizations that had played a part in the institution of the program, of which six national and international were considered significant towards effecting decisions. While organizations such as the World Bank and Pakistan Ministry of Health played important roles, we highlight the pivotal role of the Health Secretary’s office, as an unusual ‘knowledge broker’ situated within the Government.

Conclusion

While effective program planning in low middle-income countries can greatly benefit from knowledge translation practices, explaining processes from evidence generation to the final step of key decisions is valuable in understanding the complexities involved in such settings. The study begins to fill a critical gap in literature in illustrating real-world program planning in resource-constrained countries, lagging in maternal and child health indicators.

Keywords

Evidence based medicine Knowledge translation Global health Maternal and child health Pakistan 

Abbreviations

ADB

Asian Development Bank

AusAid

Australian Department for International Aid

CMW

Community Midwife

DFID

Department for International Development, UK

ESP

Economic Survey of Pakistan

JICA

Japanese International Cooperation Agency

K2A

Knowledge to Action

KT

knowledge translation

MCH

Maternal and Child Health

MICS

Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey

MMR

Maternal Mortality Ratio

MNCH

Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health

MOH

Ministry of Health

NCMNH

National Commission for Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health NGO

NGO

Non-government organization

NNS

National Nutrition Survey

NSF

National MNCH Strategic Framework

P&D

Ministry of Planning and Development

PC-1

Planning Commission Document/Proforma-One

PDHS

Pakistan Demographic Health Survey

PIHS

Pakistan Integrated Household Survey

PLSMS

Pakistan Living Standard Measurement Survey

SBA

Skilled Birth Attendant/Attendance

TAMA

Technical Agency for Management Assistance

UNFPA

United Nations Population Fund

USAID

United States Aid for International Development

WB

The World Bank

WHO

World Health Organization

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge support and assistance of Mr. Arsalan Bashir and Mr. Muhammad Imran, both Research Associates at the Subh-e-Nau: and Environment and Public Health Concern Pakistan, in the literature review, ethical review, setting up the interviews and their transcription. We also thank Janna MacLachlan, MSc OT, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, for reviewing the transcript and providing critical feedback. Finally, we especially thank the study participants for their valuable time, input and cooperation throughout the course of the study. This study would not have been possible without the support and able guidance of Dr Boika Rechel and Dr Sue Lawrence, both research supervisors at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London UK. 

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical statement

The study was not funded, and the authors received no compensation for any related activity. The study was undertaken as part of the requirement of the first author’s MSc Public Health degree at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

The study protocol was approved by both international and national ethical review boards that included the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine’s Ethical Review Board (LSHTM MSc Ethics Ref: 7462) and the National Bioethics Committee, Pakistan Medical Research Council. There were no risks or benefits to the participants. We took special care to maintain anonymity and confidentiality. Transcripts were anonymized by assigning an alias, while we do not refer to individual respondents or their organizations in presenting our findings.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Adam T et al (2005) Cost effectiveness analysis of strategies for maternal and neonatal health in developing countries. BMJ 331:1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed SM et al (2016) Cross-country analysis of strategies for achieving progress towards global goals for women’s and children’s health. Bull World Health Organ 94:351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson LM, Brownson RC, Fullilove MT, Teutsch SM, Novick LF, Fielding J, Land GH (2005) Evidence-based public health policy and practice: promises and limits. Am J Prev Med 28:226–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ADB (2008) Validation report, Pakistan: women’s health project. Asian Development Bank, Manila, PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  5. ADB (2010) Validation report, Pakistan: reproductive health project. Asian Development Bank, Manila, PhilipplinesGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhutta ZA (2000) Why has so little changed in maternal and child health in South Asia? Br Med J 321:809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhutta ZA (2004) Maternal and child health in Pakistan: challenges and opportunities. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Buse K, Mays N, Walt G (2012) Making health policy. McGraw-Hill Education (UK), LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Creswell JW (2013) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  10. Dobbins M et al (2009) A description of a knowledge broker role implemented as part of a randomized controlled trial evaluating three knowledge translation strategies. Implement Sci 4:23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Estabrooks CA, Thompson DS, Lovely JJ, Hofmeyer A (2006) A guide to knowledge translation theory. J Contin Educ Heal Prof 26:25–36.  https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.48 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Federal Bureau of Statistics GoP (2002) Pakistan integrated household survey round 4: 2001–02. Federal Bureau of Statistics, Government of Pakistan, IslamabadGoogle Scholar
  13. Fikree F (2002) Safe motherhood in Pakistan: past failures, future challenges. JPMA J Pak Med Assoc 52:538Google Scholar
  14. Finance PMo (2003) Economic survey of Pakistan 2002–03. Ministry of Finance, IslamabadGoogle Scholar
  15. Government of the Punjab PDD, Bureau of Statistics (2009) Multiple Indicator cluster survey Punjab 2007–08 volume 1 provincial report. Federal Bureau of Statistics, Government of Pakistan, IslamabadGoogle Scholar
  16. Green J, Browne J (2005) Principles of social research. McGraw-Hill International, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15:1277–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ian D, Graham JMT (2009) Getting evidence into policy and practice: perspective of a health research funder. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 18:47Google Scholar
  19. International NIoPSaM (2008) Pakistan demographic and health survey 2006–07. National Institute of Population Studies, IslamabadGoogle Scholar
  20. Iram Yasir BTS (2011) Use of evidence for decision making: a qualitative exploratory study on MNCH program, Pakistan. Pak J Public Health 1:5Google Scholar
  21. Islam A, Malik F (2001) Role of traditional birth attendants in improving reproductive health: lessons from the family health project, Sindh. JPMA J Pak Med Assoc 51:218–221Google Scholar
  22. Jafarey S (2002) Maternal mortality in Pakistan—compilation of available data. JPMA J Pak Med Assoc 52:539–544Google Scholar
  23. Kelly MP, Speller V, Meyrick J (2004) Getting evidence into practice in public health. NHS Health Development Agency, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Khan A et al (2012) Newborn survival in Pakistan: a decade of change and future implications. Health Policy Plan 27:iii72–iii87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lavis JN, Lomas J, Hamid M, Sewankambo NK (2006) Assessing country-level efforts to link research to action. Bull World Health Organ 84:620–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J, Team LNSS (2005) 4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why? Lancet 365:891–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lawn JE et al (2006) 1 year after the Lancet Neonatal Survival Series—was the call for action heard? Lancet 367:1541–1547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marsh DR, Fikree FF (1994) Verbal autopsy: an alternate technique for assigning cause of death. J Pak Med Assoc 44:178–179Google Scholar
  29. Martines J et al (2005) Neonatal survival: a call for action. Lancet 365:1189–1197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mays N, Pope C (2000) Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ 320:50–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Merriam SB (2009) Qualitative case study research. In: Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco CA, pp 39–54Google Scholar
  32. Ministry of Health GoP (2001) National Health Policy 2001: the way forward, agenda for health sector reform. Ministry of Health Pakistan, IslamabadGoogle Scholar
  33. Ministry of Health GoP (2005) Pakistan: maternal and child health policy and strategic framework (2005–2015). Ministry of Health Pakistan, IslamabadGoogle Scholar
  34. Ministry of Health GoP (2006) National Maternal Newborn and Child Health (MNCH) Program. Ministry of Health Pakistan, IslamabadGoogle Scholar
  35. Natow RS (2019) The use of triangulation in qualitative studies employing elite interviews. Qualitative Research 2019:1468794119830077Google Scholar
  36. Nishtar S, Mehboob AB (2011) Pakistan prepares to abolish ministry of health. Lancet 378:648–649.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60606-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Norton TC, Howell C, Reynolds C (2016) Exploratory study of the role of knowledge brokers in translating knowledge to action following global maternal and newborn health technical meetings. Public Health 140:235–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. WHO (2000) Maternal mortality in 2000: estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF and UNFPA. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  39. WHO (2019) Maternal mortality ratio (per 100 000 live births). World Health Organisation, Geneva. https://www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/indmaternalmortality/en/. Accessed: 2019-03-20. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/771HxAsxD)
  40. Orton L, Lloyd-Williams F, Taylor-Robinson D, O'Flaherty M, Capewell S (2011) The use of research evidence in public health decision making processes: systematic review. PLoS One 6:e21704.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021704 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pakistan PCo (1955) First Five-Year Plan 1955–60. Planning Commission of Pakistan, KarachiGoogle Scholar
  42. Pakistan PCo (1960) Second Five-Year Plan 1960–65. Planning Commission of Pakistan, KarachGoogle Scholar
  43. Pakistan PCo (1965) Third Five-Year Plan 1965–70. Planning Commission of Pakistan, KarachiGoogle Scholar
  44. Pakistan PCo (1970) Fourth Five-Year Plan 1970–75. Planning Commission of Pakistan, IslamabadGoogle Scholar
  45. Pakistan PCo (1978) Fifth Five-Year Plan 1978–83. Planning Commission of Pakistan, IslamabadGoogle Scholar
  46. Pakistan PCo (1983) Sixth Five-Year Plan 1983–88. Planning Commission of Pakistan, IslamabadGoogle Scholar
  47. Pakistan PCo (1988) Seventh Five-Year Plan 1988–93. Planning Commission of Pakistan, IslamabadGoogle Scholar
  48. Pakistan PCo (1993) Eighth Five-Year Plan 1993–98. Planning Commission of Pakistan, IslamabadGoogle Scholar
  49. Srivastava P, Hopwood N (2009) A practical iterative framework for qualitative data analysis. Int J Qual Methods 8:76–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Straus S, Tetroe J, Graham I (2009a) Science and practice of knowledge translation: moving from evidence to practice. Wiley–Blackwell BMJ Books, West SussexGoogle Scholar
  51. Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham I (2009b) Defining knowledge translation. CMAJ 181:165–168.  https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.081229 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Studies NIoP (2007) Status of women, reporoductive health and family planning survey: main report. National Institute of Population Studies, IslamabadGoogle Scholar
  53. Thompson GN, Estabrooks CA, Degner LF (2006) Clarifying the concepts in knowledge transfer: a literature review. J Adv Nurs 53(6):691–701Google Scholar
  54. Tinker A, Parker R, Lord D, Grear K (2010) Advancing newborn health: the saving newborn lives initiative. Glob Public Health 5:28–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 19:349–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ward V, House A, Hamer S (2009) Knowledge brokering: the missing link in the evidence to action chain? Evid Policy 5:267–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilson KM, Brady TJ, Lesesne C, Translation NWGo (2011) An organizing framework for translation in public health: the knowledge to. Action Framework Prev Chronic Dis 8:A46Google Scholar
  58. Yin RK (2011) Qualitative research from start to finish, 1st edn. The Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rehabilitation Sciences InstituteUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Science and Data Lead, SERVIR-MekongAsian Disaster Preparedness CenterBangkokThailand
  3. 3.Department of Physical TherapyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations