A comprehensive description of sitting time in Brazilian adults: a population-based study
There is limited data from population-based studies addressing sedentary behavior in developing countries such as Brazil. This study provides a comprehensive description of sitting time in adults living in a mid-size city in Brazil.
Subjects and methods
Trained interviewers used the International Physical Activity Questionnaire to assess sitting time information. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between the independent variables with sitting time. The study had 1008 participants.
The median sitting time value for weekdays was 180 min (interquartile range: 120–300) and 240 minutes (interquartile range: 120–360) for weekend days. Individuals between 30 and 69 years of age and those of lower socioeconomic status are less likely to sit for more than 180 min during the weekdays compared to their younger and wealthier counterparts respectively. Individuals with higher educational levels and those with pain had higher levels of sitting time during the weekend. Disability was associated with greater sitting time during both week and weekend days.
Participants in our study reported a median sitting time of 3 and 4 h for week and weekend days respectively. We further observed an association between sitting time and age, socioeconomic status, educational attainment, and disability. Identifying groups at higher levels of sitting time is critical for devising initiatives aiming to reduce time spent in sedentary behavior, increase physical activity, and improve health.
KeywordsDisease prevention Health promotion Sedentary behavior Motor activity
The authors thank the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de São Paulo (FAPESP), the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), and the Secretaria Municipal de Saúde de Rio Claro-SP e o Conselho de Educação Física da 4° região (CREF04/SP). The authors would like to further thank Kate Epstein from Epstein Words for proof-reading the present manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bauman A, Ainsworth BE, Sallis JF, Hagstromer M, Craig CL, Bull FC, Pratt M, Venugopal K, Chau J, Sjostrom M (2011) The descriptive epidemiology of sitting: a 20-country comparison using the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ). Am J Prev Med 41:228–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P (2003) International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35:1381–1395. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dunstan DW, Barr ELM, Healy GN, Salmon J, Shaw JE, Balkau B, Magliano DJ, Cameron AJ, Zimmet PZ, Owen N (2010) Television viewing time and mortality: the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Circulation 121:384–391. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.894824 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee (2008) Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report. Washington DC United States. Available at https://health.gov/paguidelines/2008/report/
- Sisson SB, Camhi SM, Church TS, Martin CK, Tudor-Locke C, Bouchard C, Earnest CP, Smith SR, Newton RL, Rankinen T, Katzmarzyk PT (2009) Leisure time sedentary behavior, occupational/domestic physical activity, and metabolic syndrome in U.S. men and women. Metab Syndr Relat Disord 7:529–536. https://doi.org/10.1089/met.2009.0023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar