Advertisement

Innovative tool for health promotion for at-risk Thai people with hypertension

  • Nipawan Thatthong
  • Kitti SranacharoenpongEmail author
  • Panrawee Praditsorn
  • Piyanit Churak
  • Punnee Ponprachanuvut
  • Nuttarat Srisangwan
  • Arisa Keeratichamroen
Original Article
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

Aim

To examine the innovative nutrition educational tool that improves knowledge, blood pressure level, and urine sodium excretion in at-risk Thai people with hypertension.

Subjects and methods

Sixty-seven at-risk hypertensive subjects in semi-urban areas were randomized and divided into control and intervention groups. Anthropometry, blood pressure level, knowledge score, urine sodium excretion, and 24-h recall from the same day as 24-h urine collection were measured in both groups. The control group (n = 35) participated in a general healthcare counseling program. The intervention group (n = 32) participated in a sodium reduction counseling program using an innovative nutrition educational tool (LINE). During 8 weeks of the intervention program, interactive sodium reduction key messages were sent to the intervention group. All measurements were collected and compared after the end of the program.

Results

The baseline characteristics were not different between the two groups. The knowledge score increased significantly in both groups (intervention: p = 0.000; control: p = 0.001). The intervention group had a significant decrease of the systolic blood pressure (p = 0.041) and the diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the blood pressure level, knowledge score, and urine sodium excretion between the two groups.

Conclusion

Although the knowledge score increased in both groups, the innovative nutritional education tool was more effective than the general healthcare counseling program regarding the blood pressure level reduction. Therefore, the innovative nutrition educational tool should be beneficial as a supportive approach for health promotion.

Keywords

Hypertension Innovative tool Nutrition education Smartphone Thailand Urine sodium excretion 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ms. Julia Verhaeghe for editing the grammatical English language.

Funding

This research was supported by the Thai Health Promotion Foundation.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Ethical approval

Ethical consideration of this study was sent for approval by the Research Ethics Committee at the Ministry of Public Health, Thailand and Mahidol University. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before the study began.

References

  1. [No authors listed] (1999) 1999 World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of hypertension. Guidelines Subcommittee. J Hypertens 17(2):151–183Google Scholar
  2. Aekplakorn W, Bunnag P, Woodward M et al (2006) A risk score for predicting incident diabetes in the Thai population. Diabetes Care 29(8):1872–1877Google Scholar
  3. Aekplakorn W, Abbott-Klafter J, Premgamone A et al (2007) Prevalence and management of diabetes and associated risk factors by regions of Thailand: Third National Health Examination Survey 2004. Diabetes Care 30(8):2007–2012Google Scholar
  4. Aekplakorn W, Chariyalertsak S, Kessomboon P et al (2011) Prevalence and management of diabetes and metabolic risk factors in Thai adults: the Thai National Health Examination Survey IV, 2009. Diabetes Care 34(9):1980–1985Google Scholar
  5. Brown IJ, Dyer AR, Chan Q et al (2013) Estimating 24-hour urinary sodium excretion from casual urinary sodium concentrations in Western populations: the INTERSALT study. Am J Epidemiol 177(11):1180–1192Google Scholar
  6. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR et al (2003) Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 42:1206–1252Google Scholar
  7. de Wardener HE, He FJ, MacGregor GA (2004) Plasma sodium and hypertension. Kidney Int 66:2454–2466Google Scholar
  8. Gibson RS (2005) Principles of nutritional assessment, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Hanchaiphiboolkul S, Poungvarin N, Nidhinandana S et al (2011) Prevalence of stroke and stroke risk factors in Thailand: Thai Epidemiologic Stroke (TES) Study. J Med Assoc Thai 94(4):427–436Google Scholar
  10. He FJ, Marciniak M, Visagie E et al (2009) Effect of modest salt reduction on blood pressure, urinary albumin, and pulse wave velocity in white, black, and Asian mild hypertensives. Hypertension 54:482–488Google Scholar
  11. He FJ, Li J, MacGregor GA (2013) Effect of longer term modest salt reduction on blood pressure: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ 346:f1325Google Scholar
  12. Holmes L, Hossain J, Ward D, Opara F (2013) Racial/ethnic variability in hypertension prevalence and risk factors in National Health Interview Survey. ISRN Hypertens 2013:257842, 8 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. Kumanyika SK, Cook NR, Cutler JA et al (2005) Sodium reduction for hypertension prevention in overweight adults: further results from the Trials of Hypertension Prevention Phase II. J Hum Hypertens 19:33–45Google Scholar
  14. Land MA, Webster J, Christoforou A et al (2014) The association of knowledge, attitudes and behaviours related to salt with 24-hour urinary sodium excretion. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 11:47Google Scholar
  15. Matyas E, Jeitler K, Horvath K et al (2011) Benefit assessment of salt reduction in patients with hypertension: systematic overview. J Hypertens 29(5):821–828Google Scholar
  16. National Centre for Social Research (2011) Assessment of Dietary Sodium Levels Among Adults (aged 19-64) in England, 2011, based on analysis of dietary sodium in 24 hour urine samples [Internet]. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/213420/Sodium-Survey-England-2011_Text_to-DH_FINAL1.pdf. Accessed 29 Jan 2019
  17. Park MJ, Kim HS (2012) Evaluation of mobile phone and Internet intervention on waist circumference and blood pressure in post-menopausal women with abdominal obesity. Int J Med Inform 81:388–394Google Scholar
  18. Park MJ, Kim HS, Kim KS (2009) Cellular phone and internet-based individual intervention on blood pressure and obesity in obese patients with hypertension. Int J Med Inform 78:704–710Google Scholar
  19. Rhodes DG, Murayi T, Clemens JC et al (2013) The USDA Automated Multiple-Pass Method accurately assesses population sodium intakes. Am J Clin Nutr 97:958–964Google Scholar
  20. Satheannoppakao W, Kasemsup R, Inthawong R et al (2013) Sodium intake and socio-demographic determinants of the non-compliance with daily sodium intake recommendations: Thai NHES IV. J Med Assoc Thai 96(Suppl 5):S161–S170Google Scholar
  21. Subramanian H, Soudarssanane MB, Jayalakshmy R et al (2011) Non-pharmacological interventions in hypertension: a community-based cross-over randomized controlled trial. Indian J Community Med 36(3):191–196Google Scholar
  22. Suckling RJ, He FJ, Markandu ND, MacGregor GA (2012) Dietary salt influences postprandial plasma sodium concentration and systolic blood pressure. Kidney Int 81:407–411Google Scholar
  23. Taylor RS, Ashton KE, Moxham T, Hooper L, Ebrahim S (2011) Reduced dietary salt for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (Cochrane review). Am J Hypertens 24(8):843–853Google Scholar
  24. World Health Organization (WHO) (2002) Globalization, diets and noncommunicable diseases. WHO, Geneva. Available online at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/9241590416.pdf. Accessed Apr 2018

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Nutrition, Institute of NutritionMahidol UniversityNakhon PathomThailand

Personalised recommendations