Burnout prevention team-process evaluation of an organizational health intervention
- 234 Downloads
The present study focuses on the implementation and evaluation of the organizational intervention “Burnout Prevention Team” (BPT). The BPT relies on a standardized procedure and is theoretically based on the Areas of Worklife—an emprical framework of well-established work-related factors that evidently induce job burnout.
Subjects and methods
To evaluate BPT, the process of intervention implementation was examined drawing on an evidence-based model of process evaluation with the focus on inititation, activities, and implementation strategies.
BPT was conducted in nine health care institutions. Results emphasize the relevance of ensuring management support as well as developing a sound communication and information strategy within the initiation phase. Regarding intervention activities, providing employees with knowledge about the burnout concept and trigger factors turned out to be an essential prerequisite for developing successful intervention solutions. Overall, in each institution 7 to 12 solutions to institution-specific problems were developed. Approximately 1 year after the solutions were launched at least 70% were partially or completely implemented.
The general high implementation rate suggests that the BPT can be proposed as a successful example for an organizational-focused approach that should be highly exportable to other health care institutions.
KeywordsBurnout prevention Organizational health intervention Qualitative process evaluation Health care
Heartfelt thanks to all participants in the study, whose enthusiasm continues to inspire us.
Compliance with ethical standards
The study was funded by the Gesundheitskasse für Sachsen und Thüringen (AOK Plus, Prof. Richter) and was partly supported by the Berufsgenossenschaft für Gesundheitsdienst und Wohlfahrtspflege (BGW Dresden). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of interest
Gabriele Buruck declares that she has no conflict of interest. Anne Tomaschek declares that he has no conflict of interest. Sarah Lütke-Lanfer declares that he has no conflict of interest.
- Aust B, Ducki A (2004) Comprehensive health promotion interventions at the workplace: experiences with health circles in Germany. Educational Publishing Foundation, USGoogle Scholar
- Buruck G, Brom SS, Kotte H, Richter P (2015) Evaluierung von Gesundheitspräventionen in der stationären Altenpflege. In: Badura B, Ducki A, Schröder H et al (eds) Fehlzeiten-report 2015: Neue Wege für mehr gesundheit- Qualitätsstandards für ein zielgruppenspezifisches Gesundheitsmanagement. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cox T, Karanika-Murray M, Griffiths A, Wong YYV, Hardy C (2009) Developing the management standards approach within the context of common health problems in the workplace: a Delphi study (RR687). HSE Books, SudburyGoogle Scholar
- Havermans BM, Schlevis RM, Boot CR, Brouwers EP, Anema J, van der Beek AJ (2016) Process variables in organizational stress management intervention evaluation research: a systematic review. Scand J Work Environ HealthGoogle Scholar
- Kirkpatrick DL (1998) Evaluating training programs. Berrett-Koehler, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- Schaufeli WB (1996) Burnout and performance in intensive care units: a cross-national European study. Int J Psychol 31:1424–1424Google Scholar
- Seifert JW (1992) Visualisieren - Präsentieren - Moderieren [Visualisation - Presentation - Moderation]: GabalGoogle Scholar
- Van Bogaert P, Peremans L, Van Heusden D, Verspuy M, Kureckova V, Van de Cruys Z, Franck E (2017) Predictors of burnout, work engagement and nurse reported job outcomes and quality of care: a mixed method study. BMC Nurs 16Google Scholar