Advertisement

Journal of Public Health

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 743–754 | Cite as

Burnout prevention team-process evaluation of an organizational health intervention

  • Gabriele BuruckEmail author
  • Anne Tomaschek
  • Sarah S. Lütke-Lanfer
Original Article
  • 234 Downloads

Abstract

Aim

The present study focuses on the implementation and evaluation of the organizational intervention “Burnout Prevention Team” (BPT). The BPT relies on a standardized procedure and is theoretically based on the Areas of Worklife—an emprical framework of well-established work-related factors that evidently induce job burnout.

Subjects and methods

To evaluate BPT, the process of intervention implementation was examined drawing on an evidence-based model of process evaluation with the focus on inititation, activities, and implementation strategies.

Results

BPT was conducted in nine health care institutions. Results emphasize the relevance of ensuring management support as well as developing a sound communication and information strategy within the initiation phase. Regarding intervention activities, providing employees with knowledge about the burnout concept and trigger factors turned out to be an essential prerequisite for developing successful intervention solutions. Overall, in each institution 7 to 12 solutions to institution-specific problems were developed. Approximately 1 year after the solutions were launched at least 70% were partially or completely implemented.

Conclusion

The general high implementation rate suggests that the BPT can be proposed as a successful example for an organizational-focused approach that should be highly exportable to other health care institutions.

Keywords

Burnout prevention Organizational health intervention Qualitative process evaluation Health care 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Heartfelt thanks to all participants in the study, whose enthusiasm continues to inspire us.

Compliance with ethical standards

The study was funded by the Gesundheitskasse für Sachsen und Thüringen (AOK Plus, Prof. Richter) and was partly supported by the Berufsgenossenschaft für Gesundheitsdienst und Wohlfahrtspflege (BGW Dresden). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

Gabriele Buruck declares that she has no conflict of interest. Anne Tomaschek declares that he has no conflict of interest. Sarah Lütke-Lanfer declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10389_2018_999_MOESM1_ESM.docx (43 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 43 kb)

References

  1. Adriaenssens J, De Gucht V, Maes S (2015) Determinants and prevalence of burnout in emergency nurses: a systematic review of 25 years of research. Int J Nurs Stud 52:649–661PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahola K, Toppinen-Tanner S, Seppänen J (2017) Interventions to alleviate burnout symptoms and to support return to work among employees with burnout: systematic review and meta-analysis. Burnout Res 4:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronsson G, Theorell T, Grape T, Hammarström A, Hogstedt C, Marteinsdottir I, Skoog I, Träskman-Bendz L, Hall C (2017) A systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and burnout symptoms. BMC Public Health 17:264PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aust B, Ducki A (2004) Comprehensive health promotion interventions at the workplace: experiences with health circles in Germany. Educational Publishing Foundation, USGoogle Scholar
  5. Aust B, Rugulies R, Finken A, Jensen C (2010) When workplace interventions lead to negative effects: learning from failures. Scand J Publ Health 38:106–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Awa WL, Plaumann M, Walter U (2010) Burnout prevention: a review of intervention programs. Patient Educ Couns 78:184–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Backe EM, Seidler A, Latza U, Rossnagel K, Schumann B (2012) The role of psychosocial stress at work for the development of cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 85:67–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bakker AB, Costa PL (2014) Chronic job burnout and daily functioning: a theoretical analysis. Burnout Res 1:112–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bakker AB, Demerouti E (2017) Job demands-resources theory: taking stock and looking forward. J Occup Health Psychol 22:273–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bourbonnais R, Brisson C, Vinet A, Vezina M, Abdous B, Gaudet M (2006a) Effectiveness of a participative intervention on psychosocial work factors to prevent mental health problems in a hospital setting. Occup Environ Med 63:335–342PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bourbonnais R, Brisson C, Vinet A, Vézina M, Lower A (2006b) Development and implementation of a participative intervention to improve the psychosocial work environment and mental health in an acute care hospital. Occup Environ Med 63:326–334PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brähler E, Muhlan H, Albani C, Schmidt S (2007) Teststatistische Prüfung und Normierung der deutschen Versionen des EUROHIS-QOL Lebensqualität-index und des WHO-5 Wohlbefindens-index. Hogrefe Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, GermanyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brom SS, Buruck G, Horváth I, Richter P, Leiter ML (2015) Areas of worklife as predictors of occupational health—a validation study in two German samples. Burnout Res 2:60–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buruck G, Brom SS, Kotte H, Richter P (2015) Evaluierung von Gesundheitspräventionen in der stationären Altenpflege. In: Badura B, Ducki A, Schröder H et al (eds) Fehlzeiten-report 2015: Neue Wege für mehr gesundheit- Qualitätsstandards für ein zielgruppenspezifisches Gesundheitsmanagement. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cox T, Karanika-Murray M, Griffiths A, Wong YYV, Hardy C (2009) Developing the management standards approach within the context of common health problems in the workplace: a Delphi study (RR687). HSE Books, SudburyGoogle Scholar
  16. Gascón S, Leiter MP, Andres E, Cunha MJ, Albesa A, Montero-Marín J, García-Campayo J, Martínez-Jarreta B (2013) The role of aggressions suffered by healthcare workers as predictors of burnout. J Clin Nurs 22:3120–3129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hall LH, Johnson J, Watt I, Tsipa A, O’Connor DB (2016) Healthcare staff wellbeing, burnout, and patient safety: a systematic review. PLoS One 11PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Havermans BM, Schlevis RM, Boot CR, Brouwers EP, Anema J, van der Beek AJ (2016) Process variables in organizational stress management intervention evaluation research: a systematic review. Scand J Work Environ HealthGoogle Scholar
  19. Jaworek M, Marek T, Karwowski W, Andrzejczak C, Genaidy AM (2010) Burnout syndrome as a mediator for the effect of work-related factors on musculoskeletal complaints among hospital nurses. Int J Ind Ergon 40:368–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson JV, Hall EM (1988) Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population. Am J Public Health 78:1336–1342PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karasek RA (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain—implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Q 24:285–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Khamisa N, Peltzer K, Ilic D, Oldenburg B (2016) Work related stress, burnout, job satisfaction and general health of nurses: a follow-up study. Int J Nurs Pract 22:538–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kirkpatrick DL (1998) Evaluating training programs. Berrett-Koehler, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  24. Kompier M, Aust B (2016) Organizational stress management interventions: is it the singer not the song? Scand J Work Environ Health 42:355–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lagerveld SE, Blonk RW, Brenninkmeijer V, Wijngaards-de ML, Schaufeli WB (2012) Work-focused treatment of common mental disorders and return to work: a comparative outcome study. J Occup Health Psychol 17:220–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lamontagne AD, Keegel T, Louie AM, Ostry A, Landsbergis PA (2007) A systematic review of the job-stress intervention evaluation literature, 1990-2005. Int J Occup Environ Health 13:268–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Le Blanc PM, Hox JJ, Schaufeli WB, Taris TW, Peeters MC (2007) Take care! The evaluation of a team-based burnout intervention program for oncology care providers. J Appl Psychol 92:213–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leiter MP, Maslach C (1999) Six areas of worklife: a model of the organizational context of burnout. J Health Hum Serv Adm 21:472–489PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Leiter MP, Maslach C (2004) Areas of worklife: a structured approach to organizational predictors of job burnout. Res Occup Stress Well Being 3:91–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leiter MP, Laschinger HKS, Day A, Oore DG (2011) The impact of civility interventions on employee social behavior, distress, and attitudes. J Appl Psychol 96:1258–1274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Maricutoiu LP, Sava FA, Butta O (2016) The effectiveness of controlled interventions on employees’ burnout: a meta-analysis. J Occup Organ Psychol 89:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP (2001) Job burnout. Annu Rev Psychol 52:397–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maslach C, Leiter MP, Jackson SE (2012) Making a significant difference with burnout interventions: researcher and practitioner collaboration. J Organ Behav 33:296–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McCambridge J, Witton J, Elbourne DR (2014) Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects. J Clin Epidemiol 67:267–277PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McHugh MD, Kutney-Lee A, Cimiotti JP, Sloane DM, Aiken LH (2011) Nurses’ widespread job dissatisfaction, burnout, and frustration with health benefits signal problems for patient care. Health Affairs (Project Hope) 30:202–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Montano D, Hoven H, Siegrist J (2014) Effects of organisational-level interventions at work on employees’ health: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 14:135PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nielsen K, Abildgaard JS (2013) Organizational interventions: a research-based framework for the evaluation of both process and effects. Work Stress 27:278–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nielsen K, Miraglia M (2017) What works for whom in which circumstances? On the need to move beyond the what works? question in organizational intervention research. Hum Relat 70:40–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nielsen K, Randall R (2013) Opening the black box: presenting a model for evaluating organizational-level interventions. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 22:601–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nielsen K, Randall R, Holten A-L, Gonzales ER (2010) Conducting organizational-level occupational health interventions: what works? Work Stress 24:234–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Salyers MP, Fukui S, Rollins AL, Firmin R, Gearhart T, Noll JP, Williams S, Davis CJ (2015) Burnout and self-reported quality of Care in Community Mental Health. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res 42:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schaufeli WB (1996) Burnout and performance in intensive care units: a cross-national European study. Int J Psychol 31:1424–1424Google Scholar
  43. Schaufeli WB, Buunk AB (2003) Burnout: An overview of 25 years of research and theorizing. In: Schabracq MJ, Winnubst JAM, Cooper CL (ed) The handbook of work and health psychology. Wiley, Chichester, p 383–425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seifert JW (1992) Visualisieren - Präsentieren - Moderieren [Visualisation - Presentation - Moderation]: GabalGoogle Scholar
  45. Sharma M, Rush SE (2014) Mindfulness-based stress reduction as a stress management intervention for healthy individuals: a systematic review. J Evid-Based Compl Altern Med 19:271–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Siegrist J, Starke D, Chandola T, Godin I, Marmot M, Niedhammer I, Peter R (2004) The measurement of effort-reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Soc Sci Med 58:1483–1499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tsutsumi A, Kawakami N (2004) A review of empirical studies on the model of effort–reward imbalance at work: reducing occupational stress by implementing a new theory. Soc Sci Med 59:2335–2359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Bogaert P, Peremans L, Van Heusden D, Verspuy M, Kureckova V, Van de Cruys Z, Franck E (2017) Predictors of burnout, work engagement and nurse reported job outcomes and quality of care: a mixed method study. BMC Nurs 16Google Scholar
  49. Walster E, Berscheid E, Walster GW (1973) New directions in equity research. J Pers Soc Psychol 25:151–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Westermann C, Kozak A, Harling M, Nienhaus A (2014) Burnout intervention studies for inpatient elderly care nursing staff: systematic literature review. Int J Nurs Stud 51:63–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriele Buruck
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anne Tomaschek
    • 2
  • Sarah S. Lütke-Lanfer
    • 3
  1. 1.Health and Healthcare SciencesWestsächsische Hochschule Zwickau, University of Applied SciencesZwickauGermany
  2. 2.School of Science, Faculty of PsychologyTU DresdenDresdenGermany
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of FreiburgBreisgauGermany

Personalised recommendations