Advertisement

Journal of Public Health

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 11–19 | Cite as

Patients’ perspectives on generic substitution among statin users in Japan

  • Eriko KobayashiEmail author
  • Chiemi Abe
  • Nobunori Satoh
Original Article
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

Aim

The study was undertaken to reveal the differences in statin users’ characteristics, the views on generic drugs between brand-name statin users and generic statin users, and the factors associated with being generic statin users.

Subjects and methods

A questionnaire survey was conducted on patients visiting community pharmacies in order to have their prescriptions including statins dispensed. Respondents answered their views on the questionnaire items using a 5-point Likert-type scale, then answers were dichotomized. Odds ratios were calculated to analyze respondent’s views and respondents’ characteristics associated with being generic users.

Results

In total, 122 patients agreed to participate in the survey; with regard to respondent’s views associated with being generic statin users, those agreeing “I have a concern in switching any currently taken drugs to generic drugs” were less likely to be generic statin users [OR (95% CI): 0.13, (0.05–0.35)]. Respondents agreeing “generic drugs are less expensive than brand-name drugs” were more likely to be generic users [4.55, (1.77–11.67)]. No respondent’s characteristics were associated with being generic statin users. The majority of respondents agreed “I don’t mind taking the generic drugs that my physician prescribe”. With regard to how much cost savings would encourage them to substitute, 1000–1999 Japanese Yen per pharmacy visit was most often indicated by the respondents.

Conclusion

A certain level of cost saving is necessary for patients to substitute. Physician-initiated substitution reduce patients’ concerns in switching. The introduction of a kind of policy to widen the price difference between brand-name drugs and generic drugs should be considered as one of the policy options.

Keywords

Generic substitution Pharmaceutical policy Patient medication knowledge Questionnaire survey 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all of the patients who participated in the survey. The authors also thank the two pharmacies collaborating with our research.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Eriko Kobayashi has no conflict of interest. Chiemi Abe has no conflict of interest. Nobunori Satoh has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Patients’ consent to participate was indicated by returning the completed questionnaire.

References

  1. Al Ameri MN, Whittaker C, Tucker A, Yaqoob M, Johnston A (2011) A survey to determine the views of renal transplant patients on generic substitution in the UK. Transpl Int 24(8):770–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Gedadi NA, Hassali MA, Shafie AA (2008) A pilot survey on perceptions and knowledge of generic medicines among consumers in Penang, Malaysia. Pharm Pract (Granada) 6(2):93–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alrasheedy AA, Hassali MA, Stewart K, Kong DCM, Aljadhey H, Ibrahim MIM, Al-Tamimi SK (2014) Patient knowledge, perceptions, and acceptance of generic medicines: a comprehensive review of the current literature. Patient Intelligence 6:1–29Google Scholar
  4. Brekke KR, Grasdalb AL, Holmåsc TH (2009) Regulation and pricing of pharmaceuticals: reference pricing or price cap regulation? Eur Econ Rev 53(2):170–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Degli Esposti L, Sangiorgi D, Buda S, Degli Esposti E, Scaglione F (2016) Therapy discontinuation or substitution in patients with cardiovascular disease, switching among different products of the same off-patent active substance: a ‘real-world’ retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 6(11):e012003.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Drozdowska A, Hermanowski T (2016) Predictors of generic substitution: the role of psychological, sociodemographic, and contextual factors. Res Social Adm Pharm 12(1):119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunne SS, Dunne CP (2015) What do people really think of generic medicines? A systematic review and critical appraisal of literature on stakeholder perceptions of generic drugs. BMC Med 13:173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dylst P, Vulto A, Simoens S (2013) Demand-side policies to encourage the use of generic medicines: an overview. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 13(1):59–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. The Federal Reserve (2018) Foreign Exchange Rates - G.5A. January 11, 2018. https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g5a/current/ Accessed 29 Jul 2018
  10. Gagne JJ, Choudhry NK, Kesselheim AS, Polinski JM, Hutchins D, Matlin OS, Brennan TA, Avorn J, Shrank WH (2014) Comparative effectiveness of generic and brand-name statins on patient outcomes: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 161(6):400–407.  https://doi.org/10.7326/M13-2942 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giuliani G, Selke G, Garattini L (1998) The German experience in reference pricing. Health Policy 44(1):73–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heikkilä R, Mäntyselkä P, Hartikainen-Herranen K, Ahonen R (2007) Customers’ and physicians’ opinions of and experiences with generic substitution during the first year in Finland. Health Policy 82(3):366–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoshi S, Kimura H (2008) Questionnaire on the awareness of generic drugs among outpatients and medical staff. Drug Discov Ther 2(3):194–199Google Scholar
  14. Ibrahim R, McKinnon RA, Ngo SN (2012) Knowledge and perceptions of community patients about generic medicines. J Pharm Pract Res 42:283–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Inoue Y, Kmiya K, Odaka A, Noritake K, Kanamoto I, Higashi K, Moribe K, Yamamoto K (2008) Current status of diabetic and hypertensive patients prescribed by nonproprietary name in a small local hospital. Prog Med 28:2013–2019 [in Japanese]Google Scholar
  16. Kobayashi E, Karigome H, Sakurada T, Satoh N, Ueda S (2011) Patients’ attitudes towards generic drug substitution in Japan. Health Policy 99(1):60–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keenum AJ, Devoe JE, Chisolm DJ, Wallace LS (2012) Generic medications for you, but brand-name medications for me. Res Social Adm Pharm 8(6):574–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lebanova H, Manolow D, Getov I (2012) Patients’ attitudes about generics — Bulgarian perspective. Marmara Pharm J 16:36–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li P, Schwartz JS, Doshi JA (2016) Impact of cost sharing on therapeutic substitution: the story of statins in 2006. J Am Heart Assoc 5(11)Google Scholar
  20. Mano Y, Fukushima S, Kuroda H, Ohshima H, Kato Y, Ohuchi K, Maezawa K, Momose Y, Ikeda S, Asahi M (2015) Adherence to changing from brand-name to generic atorvastatin in newly treated patients: a retrospective cohort study using health insurance claims. J Pharm Health Care Sci 1:12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Japan (MHLW) (2011) The survey of cases of advanced initiatives for promoting the use of generic medicines. 2011. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/iryou/kouhatu-iyaku/dl/03_01.pdf Accessed 10 Jul 2017
  22. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Japan (MHLW) (2013) Roadmap for further promotion of the use of generic drugs. 2013 April. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/houdou/2r9852000002z7fr.html Accessed 10 Jul 2017
  23. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Japan (MHLW) (2014a) Estimates of National Medical Care Expenditure, FY 2014. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/database/db-hss/dl/digest2014.pdf Accessed 10 Jul 2017
  24. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Japan (MHLW) (2014b) The result of Patient Survey 2014. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/kanja/14/index.html Accessed 10 Jul 2017
  25. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Japan (MHLW) (2016) The Notice of Hohatsu 0210–01, on February 10th, 2016 of the director of Health Insurance Bureau, Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. “the reference of drug pricing”Google Scholar
  26. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Japan (MHLW) (2017a) Market share of generic medicines. 2017. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/06-Seisakujouhou-10800000-Iseikyoku/0000114903.pdf Accessed 10 Jul 2017
  27. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Japan (MHLW) (2017b) Promotion of the use of generic drugs. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/kenkou_iryou/iryou/kouhatu-iyaku/ Accessed 10 Jul 2017
  28. O’Brien EC, McCoy LA, Thomas L, Peterson ED, Wang TY (2015) Patient adherence to generic versus brand statin therapy after acute myocardial infarction: insights from the can rapid stratification of unstable angina patients suppress adverse outcomes with early implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines registry. Am Heart J 170(1):55–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. O’Leary A, Usher C, Lynch M, Hall M, Hemeryk L, Spillane S, Gallagher P, Barry M (2015) Generic medicines and generic substitution: contrasting perspectives of stakeholders in Ireland. BMC Res Notes 8:790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2015) Share of generic market, in Health at a Glance 2015: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing, Paris.  https://doi.org/10.1787/health_glance-2015-69-enAccessed 10 Jul 2017
  31. Quintal C, Mendes P (2012) Underuse of generic medicines in Portugal: an empirical study on the perceptions and attitudes of patients and pharmacists. Health Policy 104(1):61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramkumar S, Raghunath A, Raghunath S (2016) Statin therapy. Review of safety and potential side effects. Acta Cardiol Sin 32(6):631–639Google Scholar
  33. Rathe J, Andersen M, Jarbøl DE, dePont Christensen R, Hallas J, Søndergaard J (2015) Generic switching and non-persistence among medicine users: a combined population-based questionnaire and register study. PLoS One 10(3):e0119688.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119688. eCollection 2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rathe J, Larsen P, Andersen M, Paulsen M, Jarbøl D, Thomsen J, Soendergaard J (2013) Associations between generic substitution and patients’ attitudes, beliefs and experiences. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 69(10):1827–1736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Salami JA, Warraich H, Valero-Elizondo J, Spatz ES, Desai NR, Rana JS, Virani SS, Blankstein R, Khera A, Blaha MJ, Blumenthal RS, Lloyd-Jones D, Nasir K (2017) National trends in statin use and expenditures in the US adult population from 2002 to 2013: insights from the medical expenditure panel survey. JAMA Cardiol 2(1):56–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sarpong EM, Zuvekas SH (2014) Trends in statin therapy among adults (age ≥ 18), United States, 2000 to 2011. Statistical brief #458. November 2014. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville MDGoogle Scholar
  37. Sewell K, Andreae S, Luke E, Safford MM (2012) Perceptions of and barriers to use of generic medications in a rural African American population, Alabama, 2011. Prev Chronic Dis 9:E142.  https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd9.120010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shrank WH, Cox ER, Fischer MA, Mehta J, Choudhry NK (2009) Patients’ perceptions of generic medications. Health Aff 28(2):546–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Slazak EM, Kozakiewicz JT, Winters NS, Smith JR, Monte SV (2016) Statin adherence rates in patients utilizing a patient-centered medical home-based pharmacy. J Pharm Pract 30(5):516–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Takizawa O, Urushihara H, Tanaka S, Kawakami K (2015) Price difference as a predictor of the selection between brand-name and generic statins in Japan. Health Policy 119(5):612–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wong ZY, Hassali MA, Alrasheedy AA, Saleem F, Yahaya AH, Aljadhey H (2014) Patients’ beliefs about generic medicines in Malaysia. Pharm Pract (Granada) 12(4):474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ude M, Schuessel K, Quinzler R, Leuner K, Müller WE, Schulz M (2011) Generic switch after ramipril patent expiry is not associated with decreased pharmacy refill compliance: a retrospective study using the DAPI database. J Hypertens 29(9):1837–1845.  https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834942be CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social Pharmacy, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical SciencesChiba UniversityChiba-ShiJapan
  2. 2.Department of PharmacyTokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical CenterFuchu-shiJapan

Personalised recommendations